Real-World Insurance Claims Analysis of Venous Thromboembolism in Japanese Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which encompasses both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). AIM: To investigate the incidence of, and risk factors for, VTE in patients with IBD in Japan. METHODS: This was a retrospective, non-interventional study in patients with IBD from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database. Incidence rates (IRs; unique patients with events per 100 patient-years) were calculated for VTE, DVT, and PE among the IBD, UC, and CD cohorts. Odds ratios of potential risk factors were calculated by univariate and multivariate analyses in a nested case-control design. RESULTS: Overall, 16 273 patients with IBD were included: 13 585 with UC and 3443 with CD. VTE events occurred in 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.9% of patients with IBD, UC, and CD, respectively. In patients with IBD, UC, and CD, IRs of VTE were 0.45, 0.40, and 0.64, respectively, IRs of DVT were 0.42, 0.38, and 0.61, respectively, and IRs of PE were 0.07, 0.07, and 0.11, respectively. In patients with IBD, treatment history (immunomodulators), cardiovascular risk (hypertension, high-density lipoprotein or diabetes mellitus, and history of coronary artery disease or heart failure), malignancy, and undergoing major surgery were identified as potential risk factors for VTE in the multivariate analysis, with similar risk factors reported for patients with UC and CD. CONCLUSIONS: This large study provides insight into the incidence and risk factors for VTE in patients with IBD from Japan.

Use of diagnostic likelihood ratio of outcome to evaluate misclassification bias in the planning of database studies.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) and its utility are well-known in the field of medical diagnostic testing. However, its use has been limited in the context of an outcome validation study. We considered that wider recognition of the utility of DLR would enhance the practices surrounding database studies. This is particularly timely and important since the use of healthcare-related databases for pharmacoepidemiology research has greatly expanded in recent years. In this paper, we aimed to advance the use of DLR, focusing on the planning of a new database study. METHODS: Theoretical frameworks were developed for an outcome validation study and a comparative cohort database study; these two were combined to form the overall relationship. Graphical presentations based on these relationships were used to examine the implications of validation study results on the planning of a database study. Additionally, novel uses of graphical presentations were explored using some examples. RESULTS: Positive DLR was identified as a pivotal parameter that connects the expected positive-predictive value (PPV) with the disease prevalence in the planned database study, where the positive DLR is equal to sensitivity/(1-specificity). Moreover, positive DLR emerged as a pivotal parameter that links the expected risk ratio with the disease risk of the control group in the planned database study. In one example, graphical presentations based on these relationships provided a transparent and informative summary of multiple validation study results. In another example, the potential use of a graphical presentation was demonstrated in selecting a range of positive DLR values that best represented the relevant validation studies. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of the DLR in the results section of a validation study would benefit potential users of the study results. Furthermore, investigators planning a database study can utilize the DLR to their benefit. Wider recognition of the full utility of the DLR in the context of a validation study would contribute meaningfully to the promotion of good practice in planning, conducting, analyzing, and interpreting database studies.

Efficacy and safety of fesoterodine treatment for overactive bladder symptoms in elderly women with and without hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To assess fesoterodine treatment in elderly women with overactive bladder with and without hypertension. METHODS: Data for 2527 elderly women with overactive bladder symptoms, including urgency urinary incontinence, were pooled from 10 double-blind, placebo-controlled fesoterodine studies. RESULTS: A total of 1523 elderly women (60.3%) had a history of hypertension, and 1004 women (39.7%) had no hypertension history. Overactive bladder symptoms, mean bodyweight and mean body mass index at baseline were significantly higher in women with overactive bladder and hypertension versus those without hypertension (P < 0.05). Statistically significant improvements in overactive bladder symptoms at week 12 were observed for fesoterodine treatment versus placebo in women with hypertension and those without (P < 0.05). The diary-dry rate (no urgency urinary incontinence episodes), the proportion with less than eight micturitions/24 h, overactive bladder symptom bother and health-related quality of life were also statistically significantly improved by fesoterodine treatment in both populations. Incidence of treatment-related adverse events with fesoterodine was similar in women with hypertension (39.3%) and without hypertension (44.6%). Dry mouth and constipation were the most common treatment-related adverse events with fesoterodine in women with hypertension (26.2% and 5.2%, respectively) and without hypertension (30.5% and 8.0%). CONCLUSIONS: A relationship among the severity of overactive bladder symptoms, hypertension and obesity in elderly women is suggested. Fesoterodine provides significantly greater improvements in overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life versus placebo in women with or without hypertension. Hypertension does not appear to affect the efficacy and safety of fesoterodine in elderly women with overactive bladder symptoms, including urgency urinary incontinence.

Randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the safety of apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome in Japanese patients (APPRAISE-J).

BACKGROUND: Concomitant anticoagulant therapy may further reduce the risk of thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) when given in addition to current standard antiplatelet therapies. This Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japanese patients with ACS assessed the bleeding risk of apixaban compared with placebo when given in combination with standard antiplatelet therapy, and followed a similar design to APPRAISE-1, the larger global Phase II study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with recently diagnosed ACS were randomized to receive apixaban 2.5mg twice daily (BID; n=49), apixaban 5mg BID (n=50), or placebo (n=52) in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy for 24 weeks. The composite primary endpoint of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 2 patients (4.1%) in each apixaban treatment group and 1 patient (2.0%) in the placebo group, and a dose-dependent increase was seen in all bleeding events. No hemorrhagic strokes occurred in either apixaban treatment group. This study was terminated before completion because the APPRAISE-2 global Phase III trial was stopped based on the recommendation of the Data Monitoring Committee, following an increase in bleeding events without a counterbalancing reduction in ischemic events. CONCLUSIONS: The bleeding profile of apixaban in Japanese patients with ACS was similar to that found in the global APPRAISE-1 study, supporting the safety of apixaban in Japanese patients.

Long-term safety and efficacy of daily recombinant human growth hormone treatment in Japanese short children born small for gestational age: final report from an open and multi-center study.

Our study aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of GH treatment up to near adult height (NAH) for short children born small for gestational age (SGA). This was a multi-center, open-label, long-term extension study after a one-year, randomized, open-label, dose-response study. The primary objective was to assess safety, determined by adverse events and laboratory test parameters. Height parameters were evaluated as a secondary objective. The final data after all patients completed the study were reported. Overall, 61 patients were enrolled in the study. GH treatment was well tolerated. No notable changes in HbA1c levels, oral glucose tolerance tests and glucose metabolism were observed. No new safety concerns related to long-term treatment up to NAH were identified. Twenty patients (11 boys and 9 girls) reached NAH with a mean height of 159.1 cm and 146.9 cm, respectively. The mean change in height SDS from baseline to NAH was +1.9 in boys and +1.8 in girls. Long-term GH treatment for SGA short stature was confirmed to be safe and effective for the normalization of adult height.

Onset of puberty and near adult height in short children born small for gestational age and treated with GH: Interim analysis of up to 10 years of treatment in Japan.

The safety and effectiveness of long-term (10-yr) GH treatment in short Japanese children born small for gestational age (SGA) were evaluated based on interim data analysis from a clinical study, including the findings concerning the influence on the onset of puberty and subjects who achieved near adult height (NAH). Sixty-one subjects were analyzed at baseline in this study. Eleven subjects (6 boys and 5 girls) achieved NAH (mean 157.4 cm and 145.5 cm, respectively), and the Δ height SDS from the start of GH treatment was +1.6 in boys and +1.8 in girls. The median age (yr) at onset of puberty was 11.4 in boys and 9.9 in girls, comparable to healthy children. However, the mean height (cm) at onset of puberty (137.0 in boys; 125.5 in girls) was shorter than that of healthy children. Treatment-related adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity; however, adenoidal hypertrophy was observed in two subjects as a serious adverse event. One subject had jaw malformation related to GH treatment at a dose of 0.067 mg/kg/d. No notable changes in HbA1c levels were observed, and the levels remained within the reference range. We have confirmed the safety and effectiveness of long-term GH treatment through this ongoing clinical study.

Efficacy of fesoterodine on nocturia and quality of sleep in Asian patients with overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of fesoterodine vs placebo on nocturia, sleep disturbance, and sleep-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with overactive bladder and nocturia. METHODS: This posthoc analysis used data from a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg per day in Asian adults reporting ≥8 micturitions and ≥1 urgency urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours at baseline. Patients who reported ≥1 nocturnal micturition/24 h were included in this analysis. Efficacy variables included change from baseline to week 12/end of treatment in nocturnal micturitions/24 h, nocturnal voided volume/micturition, and hours of undisturbed sleep. Sleep-related QoL was assessed using King's Health Questionnaire Sleep/Energy domain. Treatment comparisons were made using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Among 555 patients, reductions in nocturnal micturitions with fesoterodine 4 mg (-0.63) and 8 mg (-0.77) were numerically greater vs placebo (-0.56), but differences were not significant (P >.05). When patients with a nocturnal polyuria index >33% were excluded, the decrease in nocturnal micturitions was significantly greater with fesoterodine 8 mg vs placebo (-0.24; P = .031). Increases in nocturnal voided volume/micturition were significantly greater with fesoterodine 4 (38.07 mL; P = .013) and 8 mg (42.05 mL; P <.001) vs placebo (14.89 mL). Hours of undisturbed sleep was significantly longer with fesoterodine 4 mg vs placebo (80 vs 54 minutes; P = .032); improvement in King's Health Questionnaire Sleep/Energy scores was significantly greater with fesoterodine 4 (P = .034) and 8 mg (P = .019) vs placebo. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that fesoterodine may reduce nocturnal micturitions and improve sleep quality and QoL in overactive bladder patients with nocturia.

A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Drug Safety Among East Asian Populations.

Global clinical studies conducted in various countries and regions are increasing. Race and extrinsic ethnic factors are key covariates that may affect the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of the drug. Genetic similarity among East Asian populations has been confirmed; thus, PK, efficacy, and safety in these populations are expected to be similar, but this has not been confirmed. This study presents a comparison of PK and safety among East Asians from clinical studies sponsored by Pfizer. Four compounds with different characteristics, including mechanism of actions and PK profiles, were selected, and retrospective PK and safety comparisons in East Asians were conducted. No distinct differences were observed in PK and safety across the 4 compounds. These results are consistent with previous reports on PK comparisons and meet the expectations based on genetic similarity among East Asians. Extrapolation of these findings to other compounds should be done with caution, but these results should support the consideration of mutual use of clinical data among East Asian countries.

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Fesoterodine in Asian Patients with Overactive Bladder.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg once daily (QD) compared with placebo in Asian subjects with overactive bladder (OAB) after 12 weeks of treatment. METHODS: This phase II, dose-finding study consisted of a 2-week placebo run-in period followed by a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, treatment period. Eligible subjects were aged ≥20 years with ≥8 micturitions per 24 h and ≥1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes per 24 h reported in a 3-day diary. The subjects were randomized to receive placebo, fesoterodine 4 mg, or fesoterodine 8 mg QD for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of 1232 subjects who entered the placebo run-in period, 951 received double-blind treatment. The mean number of UUI episodes per 24 h at baseline was 2.2 among the three treatment groups. The two fesoterodine groups showed statistically significant decreases from baseline in the mean number of UUI episodes per 24 h at week 12 (primary endpoint) compared with placebo. Most all-causality adverse events (e.g. dry mouth and constipation) were mild or moderate. The percentage of subjects with severe adverse events was low and similar among the treatment groups (placebo, 1.3%; fesoterodine 4 mg, 1.9%; fesoterodine 8 mg, 1.0%). CONCLUSION: Fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg QD were significantly better than placebo in improving OAB symptoms. Overall, the two fesoterodine dosing regimens were well tolerated. These results suggest that fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg QD are effective and well-tolerated treatments for OAB in Asian subjects.