Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 16: 211, 2016 07 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27378468

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is an important goal to vaccinate a high proportion of health care providers (HCPs) against influenza, to prevent transmission to patients. Different aspects of how a HCP vaccination campaign is conducted may be linked to different vaccination rates. We sought to characterize organizational factors and practices that were associated with vaccination campaign success among six sites within the Veterans Health Administration, where receipt of flu-vaccination is voluntary. METHOD: We conducted a total of 31 telephone interviews with key informants who were involved with HCP flu vaccination campaigns at three sites with high-vaccination rates and three sites with low-vaccination rates. We compared the organization and management of the six sites' campaigns using constant comparison methods, characterzing themes and analyzing data iteratively. RESULTS: Three factors distinguished sites with high flu vaccination rates from those with low vaccination rates. 1) High levels of executive leadership involvement: demonstrating visible support, fostering new ideas, facilitating resources, and empowering flu team members; 2) Positive flu team characteristics: high levels of collaboration, sense of campaign ownership, sense of empowerment to meet challenges, and adequate time and staffing dedicated to the campaign; and 3) Several concrete strong practices emerged: advance planning, easy access to the vaccine, ability to track employee vaccination status, use of innovative methods to educate staff, and use of audit and feedback to promote targeted efforts to reach unvaccinated employees. CONCLUSION: Successful HCP flu campaigns shared several recognizable characteristics, many of which are amenable to adoption or emulation by programs hoping to improve their vaccination rates.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais de Veteranos , Programas de Imunização , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Profissional para o Paciente/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Hospitais de Veteranos/organização & administração , Humanos , Influenza Humana/transmissão , Entrevistas como Assunto , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 33(9): 924-31, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22869267

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of our study were to explore reasons for seasonal influenza vaccine acceptance and declination in employees of a large integrated healthcare system and to identify underlying constructs that influence acceptance versus declination. Secondary objectives were to determine whether vaccine acceptance varied by hospital location and to identify facility-level measures that explained variability. DESIGN: A national health promotion survey of employees was conducted that included items on vaccination in the 2009-2010 influenza season. The survey was administered with two other institutional surveys in a stratified fashion: approximately 40% of participating employees were randomly assigned to complete the health promotion survey. SETTING: National single-payer healthcare system with 152 hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Employees of the healthcare system in 2010 who responded to the survey. METHODS: Factor analysis was used to identify underlying constructs that influenced vaccine acceptance versus declination. Mean factor scores were examined in relation to demographic characteristics and occupation. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to determine whether vaccine acceptance varied by location and to identify facility-level measures that explained variability. RESULTS: Four factors were identified related to vaccine declination and were labeled as (1) "don't care," (2) "don't want," (3) "don't believe," and (4) "don't know." Significant differences in mean factor scores existed by demographic characteristics and occupation. Vaccine acceptance varied by location, and vaccination rates in the previous year were an important facility-level predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Results should guide interventions that tailor messages on the basis of particular reasons for declination. Occupation-specific and culturally appropriate messaging should be considered. Continued efforts will be taken to better understand how workplace context influences vaccine acceptance.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Vacinação/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/psicologia , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA