A critical care pandemic staffing framework in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Pandemics and the large-scale outbreak of infectious disease can significantly impact morbidity and mortality worldwide. The impact on intensive care resources can be significant and often require modification of service delivery, a key element which includes rapid expansion of the critical care workforce. Pandemics are also unpredictable, which necessitates rapid decision-making and action which, in the lack of experience and guidance, may be extremely challenging. Recognising the potential strain on intensive care units (ICUs), particularly on staffing, a working group was formed for the purpose of developing recommendations to support decision-making during rapid service expansion. METHODS: The Critical Care Pandemic Staffing Working Party (n = 21), representing nursing, allied health, and medical disciplines, has used a modified consensus approach to provide recommendations to inform multidisciplinary workforce capacity expansion planning in critical care. RESULTS: A total of 60 recommendations have been proposed which reflect general recommendations as well as those specific to maintaining the critical care workforce, expanding the critical care workforce, rostering and allocation of the critical care workforce, nurse-specific recommendations for staffing the ICU, education support and training during ICU surge situations, workforce support, models of care, and de-escalation. CONCLUSION: These recommendations are provided with the intent that they be used to guide interdisciplinary decision-making, and we suggest that careful consideration is given to the local context to determine which recommendations are most appropriate to implement and how they are prioritised. Ongoing evaluation of recommendation implementation and impact will be necessary, particularly in rapidly changing clinical contexts.

A Quality Control Study of the Adherence to Recommended Physiological Targets for the Management of Brain-Dead Organ Donors in South Australian Intensive Care Units.

BACKGROUND: The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society and the Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association provide recommendations on the physiological management of brain-dead donors. PROBLEM STATEMENT: How often physiological targets are prescribed for brain-dead donors in Australian intensive care units (ICUs), and how well these compare to recommended targets is unknown. It is also unknown how often recommended targets are achieved, irrespective of prescribed targets. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational quality control study in 81 adult (>18 years) brain-dead donors to describe how often physiological targets were prescribed, comparing these to current guidelines. We determined the proportion of observations within the recommended target range, irrespective of any prescribed target. We aimed to identify poor adherence to recommended targets to guide future quality improvement initiatives. OUTCOMES: Seventy-four (91%) donors had at least 1 prescribed physiological target written on the ICU chart, with a median of 2 (range 2-5), and a maximum of 13 targets. Prescribed targets appeared to adhere well with recommended targets. Most recommended physiological targets were met irrespective of any prescribed target. However, one-quarter of serum sodium observations and one-third of blood glucose levels were above the recommended target. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Quality improvement initiatives are required to improve the prescription of physiological targets in brain-dead donors in South Australia. Serum sodium and serum glucose targets were not met. However, this most likely reflects the need for current guidelines to be updated in line with current evidence.