Proven infection-related sepsis induces a differential stress response early after ICU admission.

INTRODUCTION: Neuropeptides arginine-vasopressin (AVP), apelin (APL), and stromal-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) are involved in the dysfunction of the corticotropic axis observed in septic ICU patients. Study aims were: (i) to portray a distinctive stress-related neuro-corticotropic systemic profile of early sepsis, (ii) to propose a combination data score, for aiding ICU physicians in diagnosing sepsis on admission. METHODS: This prospective one-center observational study was carried out in a medical intensive care unit (MICU), tertiary teaching hospital. Seventy-four out of 112 critically ill patients exhibiting systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were divided into two groups: proven sepsis and non sepsis, based on post hoc analysis of microbiological criteria and final diagnosis, and compared to healthy volunteers (n = 14). A single blood sampling was performed on admission for measurements of AVP, copeptin, APL, SDF-1α, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol baseline and post-stimulation, and procalcitonin (PCT). RESULTS: Blood baseline ACTH/cortisol ratio was lower and copeptin higher in septic vs. nonseptic patients. SDF-1α was further increased in septic patients vs. normal patients. Cortisol baseline, ACTH, PCT, APACHE II and sepsis scores, and shock on admission, were independent predictors of sepsis diagnosis upon admission. Using the three first aforementioned categorical bio-parameters, a probability score for predicting sepsis yielded an area under the Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) curves better than sepsis score or PCT alone (0.903 vs 0.727 and 0.726: P = 0.005 and P < 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The stress response of early admitted ICU patients is different in septic vs. non-septic conditions. A proposed combination of variable score analyses will tentatively help in refining bedside diagnostic tools to efficiently diagnose sepsis after further validation.

Resuscitation fluids and endotoxin-induced myocardial dysfunction: is selection a load-independent differential issue?

Along with redistributive shock, myocardial dysfunction is now recognized as highly prevalent in early severe sepsis. Indeed, aside from their distinct loading potency, resuscitation fluids have been poorly investigated as to their specific molecular impact on myocardial dysfunction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the load-independent biological impact of different resuscitation fluids on endotoxin-induced myocardial dysfunction. Adult rats implanted with a central venous catheter were given an intraperitoneal injection of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharides [LPSs], Escherichia coli, 10 mg/kg) or normal saline (sham) and subsequently infused or not with similar "fluid potency" loading resuscitation fluid (normal saline, albumin [Alb], or hypertonic saline solution) for 6 to 24 h, followed by echocardiographic and hemodynamic monitoring together with biochemical and histopathologic evaluation. Intervention was to assess the selective influence of load-independent fluid infusion on the aforementioned parameters in groups of animals challenged or not with LPS. At comparative plasma volumes, Alb improved myocardial homeostasis after LPS challenge by (i) reducing left ventricular relative wall diastolic thickness, interstitial space enlargement, and endogenous Alb content; (ii) limiting cardiac apoptosis and sustaining extracellular signal-regulated mitogen-activated protein kinase activation; and (iii) enhancing the expression pattern of heme-oxygenase 1/inducible nitric oxide synthase. Hypertonic saline solution was also cardioprotective by early prevention of myocardial dysfunction and by reducing cardiac apoptosis. Fluid infusions have distinct load-independent structural/biological impacts on endotoxin-induced myocardial dysfunction. Albumin and hypertonic saline solution are the most pleiotropic fluids in protecting the heart after a "sepsis" hit.