High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity: Aspirin versus Clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic regimen in patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging. At least, one antiplatelet agent in combination with OAC is recommended after PCI for 6-12 months. Clopidogrel is used most frequently in this setting. However, data comparing P2Y12 inhibition with clopidogrel versus cyclooxygenase inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is missing. It is well known that the antiplatelet effects of ASA and clopidogrel are frequently impaired (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). In this pilot investigation, we compared the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel versus ASA. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center database analysis, we investigated platelet reactivity by light transmission aggregometry in patients under different antiplatelet regimes. Results were presented as maximum of aggregation (MoA). HTPR to ASA and to clopidogrel were assessed. RESULTS: 755 patients were enrolled. 677 were on ASA, 521 were on clopidogrel, and 198 had OAC. Overall mean age was 73 ± 13.4 years, and 458 (60.7%) were male. HTPR to ASA occurred in 94/677 patients (13.9%), and mean arachidonic acid-induced MoA was 14.15 ± 19.04%. HTPR to clopidogrel occurred in 241/521 patients (46.3%), and mean adenosine diphosphate-induced MoA was 50.06 ± 20.42%. HTPR to clopidogrel was significantly more frequent than HTPR to ASA; single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT)-mono ASA: 27/199 (13.6%) versus mono clopidogrel: 6/18 (33.3%); p = 0.037; SAPT with OAC-OAC with ASA: 8/35 (22.9%) versus OAC with clopidogrel: 27/60 (45%); p = 0.046. Same difference in HTPR contingency could be shown in subgroups of dual antiplatelet therapy and ASA + clopidogrel + OAC therapy. CONCLUSION: Impaired pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel was more frequent as HTPR to ASA. Hence, ASA should be tested in combination with OAC post-PCI.

Rivaroxaban Reduces Arterial Thrombosis by Inhibition of FXa-Driven Platelet Activation via Protease Activated Receptor-1.

RATIONALE: A reduced rate of myocardial infarction has been reported in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with FXa (factor Xa) inhibitors including rivaroxaban compared with vitamin K antagonists. At the same time, low-dose rivaroxaban has been shown to reduce mortality and atherothrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease. Yet, the mechanisms underlying this reduction remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we hypothesized that rivaroxaban's antithrombotic potential is linked to a hitherto unknown rivaroxaban effect that impacts on platelet reactivity and arterial thrombosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we identified FXa as potent, direct agonist of the PAR-1 (protease-activated receptor 1), leading to platelet activation and thrombus formation, which can be inhibited by rivaroxaban. We found that rivaroxaban reduced arterial thrombus stability in a mouse model of arterial thrombosis using intravital microscopy. For in vitro studies, atrial fibrillation patients on permanent rivaroxaban treatment for stroke prevention, respective controls, and patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation before and after first intake of rivaroxaban (time series analysis) were recruited. Platelet aggregation responses, as well as thrombus formation under arterial flow conditions on collagen and atherosclerotic plaque material, were attenuated by rivaroxaban. We show that rivaroxaban's antiplatelet effect is plasma dependent but independent of thrombin and rivaroxaban's anticoagulatory capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we identified FXa as potent platelet agonist that acts through PAR-1. Therefore, rivaroxaban exerts an antiplatelet effect that together with its well-known potent anticoagulatory capacity might lead to reduced frequency of atherothrombotic events and improved outcome in patients.

A novel mechanism of ACE inhibition-associated enhanced platelet reactivity: disproof of the ARB-MI paradox?

PURPOSE: ACE inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) are important drugs in cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about which of these drug class is to be preferred. First analyses show that the blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) influences platelet reactivity. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of ACEI and ARB on platelet reactivity and thrombin generation. METHODS: We conducted a time series analysis in 34 patients. We performed light transmission aggregometry (LTA) to evaluate platelet reactivity. Results are given as maximum of aggregation (MoA). Thrombin generation was measured as endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) via calibrated automated thrombogram. Flow cytometry was used to analyze protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 expression. RESULTS: ACEI treatment significantly increased platelet reactivity already 4 h after initiation of treatment (prior vs. 4 h post ACEI: MoA 41.9 ± 16.2% vs. 55.2 ± 16.7%; p = 0.003). After switching from ACEI to ARB treatment, platelet reactivity decreased significantly (3 months after switching: MoA 34.7 ± 20.9%; p = 0.03). ACEI reduced endogenous thrombin potential significantly from before to 3 months after ACEI (ETP 1527 ± 437 nM × min vs. 1088 ± 631 nM × min; p = 0.025). Platelet thrombin receptor (PAR1) expression increased from 37.38 ± 10.97% before to 49.53 ± 6.04% after ACEI treatment (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: ACEI enhanced platelet reactivity. This can be reversed by changing to ARB. The mechanism behind RAAS influencing platelet function seems to be associated with PAR-1 expression.

Platelet reactivity in patients with chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis.

End stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis (HD) is frequent and coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common comorbidity. It is associated with bleeding and ischemic events. Platelet reactivity is a well-known determinant of both. However, the impact of HD due to end stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) on platelet reactivity is unknown. Therefore in this study, we evaluated platelet reactivity during hemodialysis in patients with CKD and coronary artery disease. 22 patients with CKD, HD and CAD were included in this study. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and flow cytometry were used for evaluating platelet function immediately before and 2 h after initiation of HD. Arachidonic acid-induced maximum of aggregation (MoApre HD: 27.36% ± 25.23% vs. MoAduring HD: 28.05% ± 23.50%, p value = 0.822), adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation (MoApre HD: 65.36% ± 12.88% vs. MoAduring HD: 61.55% ± 17.17%, p-value = 0.09) and collagen-induced platelet aggregation (MoApre HD: 62.18% ± 18.14% vs. MoAduring HD: 64.82% ± 18.31%, p-value = 0.375) were not affected by HD. P-selectin expression was significantly lower after 2 h of HD (pre HD: 31.56% ± 18.99%, during HD: 23.97% ± 15.28%, p = 0.026). In this pilot study, HD did not enhance platelet aggregation. Baseline platelet reactivity was decreased during HD.

Enhanced Platelet Reactivity under Aspirin Medication and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Aspirin is indispensable in secondary prevention of ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, insufficient platelet inhibition despite aspirin medication is frequent. This is referred to as high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). Nevertheless, if this is associated with clinical outcome instead of only laboratory phenomenon remains unclear so far. In this study, we test whether patients with ischemic events have higher platelet reactivity despite aspirin medication than patients without ischemic events. In this prospective study of 72 CAD patients, we determined pharmacodynamic response to aspirin by arachidonic acid induced aggregation via light-transmission aggregometry and expressed as maximum of aggregation (MoA). During a mean follow-up duration of 3.2 years, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), mortality, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and stroke were assessed as endpoints via yearly telephone interviews with the treating physician of the patients. Patients who suffered from MACCE, death, and NSTEMI had a significantly higher MoA than those without (MACCE: 5.4 vs. 16.4%, p < 0.05; death: 5.6 vs. 16.8%, p < 0.05; NSTEMI: 1.8 vs. 21%, p < 0.001). MoA did not differ with regard to the occurrence of stroke (10.1 vs. 14.9%, p = 0.59). Patients with MACCE, death, and NSTEMI show enhanced platelet reactivity despite aspirin medication as compared to patients without ischemic events. Hence, insufficient response to aspirin medication should be regarded as risk factor for ischemic events in CAD patients. Further trials are needed to assess options to overcome HTPR to aspirin.

Platelet Reactivity in Patients on Aspirin and Clopidogrel Therapy Measured by a New Bedside Whole-Blood Assay.

Various tests are available for measuring on-treatment platelet reactivity. The pharmacologically most specific assays are time-consuming and elaborate. A highly specific and convenient assay would be desirable for clinical routine. In this pilot study, we aimed to examine the ability of a novel bedside whole-blood assay-ROTEM platelet-to evaluate platelet inhibition compared with established assays. Platelet reactivity was investigated in 93 patients. Forty-Seven patients were on permanent aspirin therapy and 46 on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel. We used ROTEM platelet impedance aggregometry (ROTEM-PTL), light transmission aggregometry (LTA), Multiplate electrode aggregometry (MEA) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein flow cytometry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed ROTEM-PTL differentiates well between patients on medication and healthy individuals: aspirin: ROCAUC 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.01); P < 0.0001; DAPT treatment: ROCAUC 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.91); P < 0.001. Pearson regression analyses showed moderate correlations between assays. Aspirin: MEA versus ROTEM-PTL r = 0.435, P ≤ 0.001; LTA versus ROTEM-PTL r = 0.048, P = 0.180. DAPT: MEA versus ROTEM-PTL r = 0.398, P = 0.001; LTA versus ROTEM-PTL r = 0.409, P = 0.001; vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein versus ROTEM-PTL r = 0.164, P = 0.055. ROTEM platelet distinguished well between treated and healthy individuals but correlated moderately with other assays. Clinical trials are needed to investigate the ability of this new assay to identify patients at risk of adverse events.

Dose reduction, oral application, and order of intake to preserve aspirin antiplatelet effects in dipyrone co-medicated chronic artery disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Dipyrone comedication in aspirin-treated patients is associated with impaired pharmacodynamic response to aspirin (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). Additionally, in small observational studies, an association with impaired outcome has been described. In this uncontrolled, hypothesis-generating study, we aimed to investigate strategies to prevent this drug-drug interaction in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: We analyzed pharmacodynamic response to aspirin in 80 dipyrone co-medicated CAD patients. Aspirin antiplatelet effects were measured using arachidonic acid (AA)-induced light-transmission aggregometry (LTA). Platelet reactivity was associated with daily dose, administration form, and frequency. Additionally, we conducted a time-series analysis in patients with HTPR to aspirin with re-evaluation of pharmacodynamic response to aspirin after 5 days. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 75.5 ± 9.8 years. Forty-three (54%) were male, 22 (27.5%) obese, and 38 (47.5%) diabetics. Baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, comedication, or laboratory parameters did not differ between patients with or without HTPR. HTPR to aspirin occurred in 34 out of 80 patients (42.5%). The incidence of HTPR was associated with dipyrone daily dose (< 1 g/day: HTPR 20% vs. > 3 g/day: HTPR 50%, p > 0.0001) and form of administration (i.v. 87.5% vs. oral 37.5%; p < 0.0001). A strict order of intake (aspirin 30 min prior to dipyrone) restored aspirin antiplatelet effects in all patients (HTPR before 100% vs. HTPR after 0%, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: This study shows that dipyrone should be used with caution in aspirin-treated patients. If dipyrone seems indispensable, the lowest effective dose and a strict order of intake seem favorable.

Malondialdehyde Assay in the Evaluation of Aspirin Antiplatelet Effects.

Aspirin is essential in secondary prevention of patients after myocardial infarction and with coronary artery disease. However, impaired pharmacodynamic response to aspirin is frequent (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). This leads to an enhanced prevalence of cardiovascular events and to an impaired clinical outcome. The current specific assays to evaluate aspirin antiplatelet effects are complex, time-consuming and demand for a high laboratory expertise. Therefore, we developed a potentially bedside assay based on the determination of malondialdehyde (MDA). MDA is a by-product of the thromboxane (TX) formation, which is synthesized in equimolar concentrations. In this study, we compared this MDA assay to the conventional assays in determination of pharmacodynamic aspirin response. For this, aspirin antiplatelet effects were measured in 22 healthy individuals and 63 aspirin treated patients using TX B2 formation enzyme-linked antibody assay, arachidonic acid induced light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and the new fluorometric MDA assay. In patients, MDA levels correlated well with TX formation (R = 0.81; 95% CI 0.69-0.88; p < 0.001) and LTA (R = 0.84; CI 0.74-0.91; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that the MDA assay does detect HTPR to aspirin sufficiently (area under the curve: 0.965; p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off was > 128 nmol/L (sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 91%). The new MDA assay is reliable in detecting HTPR. It is highly specific in the evaluation of antiplatelet effects by aspirin. This promising and potential bedside assay needs to be evaluated in clinical practice.

Thromboxane Formation Assay to Identify High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity to Aspirin.

Platelet inhibition by aspirin is indispensable in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, impaired aspirin antiplatelet effects (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]) are frequent. This is associated with an enhanced risk of cardiovascular events. The current gold standard to evaluate platelet hyper-reactivity despite aspirin intake is the light-transmittance aggregometry (LTA). However, pharmacologically, the most specific test is the measurement of arachidonic acid (AA)-induced thromboxane (TX) B2 formation. Currently, the optimal cut-off to define HTPR to aspirin by inhibition of TX formation is not known. Therefore, in this pilot study, we aimed to calculate a TX formation cut-off value to detect HTPR defined by the current gold standard LTA. We measured platelet function in 2,507 samples. AA-induced TX formation by ELISA and AA-induced LTA were used to measure aspirin antiplatelet effects. TX formation correlated nonlinearly with the maximum of aggregation in the AA-induced LTA (Spearman's rho R = 0.7396; 95% CI 0.7208-0.7573, p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis and Youden's J statistics revealed 209.8 ng/mL as the optimal cut-off value to detect HTPR to aspirin with the TX ELISA (area under the curve: 0.92, p < 0.0001, sensitivity of 82.7%, specificity of 90.3%). In summary, TX formation ELISA is reliable in detecting HTPR to aspirin. The calculated cut-off level needs to be tested in trials with clinical end points.

Dipyrone (metamizole) markedly interferes with platelet inhibition by aspirin in patients with acute and chronic pain: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Nonopioid analgesic drugs may interfere with platelet inhibition by aspirin. Recent in vitro and clinical studies in patients with cardiovascular disease have suggested that this pharmacodynamic interaction may also occur with dipyrone, a nonopioid analgesic popular in Europe, Asia and South America. OBJECTIVE: Dipyrone is used extensively in acute and chronic pain. This study was undertaken to provide clinical data, so far missing, on its interactions in this group of patients. DESIGN: A case-control study. SETTING: Primary care in one European university hospital centre. PATIENTS: In total, 27 patients with stable cardiovascular, cerebrovascular or peripheral arterial disease and acute or chronic pain were identified and given dipyrone for at least 5 days in combination with low-dose aspirin. In total, 10 comparable patients on low-dose aspirin alone served as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Platelet-rich plasma was prepared to determine arachidonic acid-induced aggregation (aggregometry) and thromboxane formation (immunoassay). Platelet sensitivity to aspirin was examined in vitro. The presence of dipyrone (metabolites) in plasma was confirmed by HPLC. Additional in vitro measurements examined the aspirin/dipyrone interaction in healthy donors. RESULTS: Inhibition of aggregation was observed in only six of 27 patients receiving aspirin with dipyrone, with absence of complete inhibition by antiplatelet therapy showing in 78% of patients. In contrast, aggregation was completely inhibited in nine of 10 control patients (P < 0.001). Platelet thromboxane synthesis was higher in patients receiving dipyrone + aspirin compared with controls (387 ±â€Š89 vs. 7 ±â€Š1 ng ml, P < 0.001). Aspirin added in vitro failed to inhibit aggregation and thromboxane synthesis in platelet-rich plasma from dipyrone-treated patients. In vitro measurements with blood from healthy individuals confirmed that dipyrone dramatically reduces inhibition of platelet thromboxane synthesis by aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Dipyrone given for 5 days or longer blunts platelet inhibition by low-dose aspirin in the majority of recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS ID DRKS00000204. Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1113-3946.

Sustained hypertension despite endothelial-specific eNOS rescue in eNOS-deficient mice.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the possible contribution of non-endothelial eNOS to the regulation of blood pressure (BP). To accomplish this, a double transgenic strain expressing eNOS exclusively in the vascular endothelium (eNOS-Tg/KO) has been generated by endothelial-specific targeting of bovine eNOS in eNOS-deficient mice (eNOS-KO). Expression of eNOS was evaluated in aorta, myocardium, kidney, brain stem and skeletal muscle. Organ bath studies revealed a complete normalization of aortic reactivity to acetylcholine, phenylephrine and the NO-donors in eNOS-Tg/KO. Function of eNOS in resistance arteries was demonstrated by acute i.v. infusion of acetylcholine and the NOS-inhibitor L-NAME. Acetylcholine decreased mean arterial pressure in all strains but eNOS-KO responded significantly less sensitive as compared eNOS-Tg/KO and C57BL/6. Likewise, acute i.v. L-NAME application elevated mean arterial pressure in C57BL/6 and eNOS-Tg/KO, but not in eNOS-KO. In striking contrast to these findings, mean, systolic and diastolic BP in eNOS-Tg/KO remained significantly elevated and was similar to values of eNOS-KO. Chronic oral treatment with L-NAME increased BP to the level of eNOS-KO only in C57BL/6, but had no effect on hypertension in eNOS-KO and eNOS-Tg/KO. Taken together, functional reconstitution of eNOS in the vasculature of eNOS-KO not even partially lowered BP. These data suggest that the activity of eNOS expressed in non-vascular tissue might play a role in physiologic BP regulation.

Determination of thromboxane formation, soluble CD40L release and thrombopoietin clearance in apheresis platelet concentrates.

All deleterious changes in platelet morphology, structure and function that occur in platelet concentrates (PC) during storage are titled as the 'platelet storage lesion'. No single in vitro test currently available is sufficient in assessing these changes of platelet quality. The release of soluble CD40 Ligand (sCD40L), the formation of thromboxane (TXB2) and the thrombopoietin (TPO) clearance reflect different aspects of platelet metabolism and activitiy, and were used to examine platelet quality in apheresis platelet products. At days 1, 3 and 5, in single-donor apheresis platelet products (n = 10) under routine storage conditions, sCD40L (measured by ELISA) and TXB2 (measured by RIA) were determined after platelet stimulation (recalcification and clot formation). TPO (measured by ELISA) was determined after an incubation time of 5 h at 37°C with platelet-rich plasma (adjusted initial TPO concentration of about 500 pg/mL). Results were related to a therapeutic unit (TU = 2 × 10(11) platelets). Immediately after platelet preparation, sCD40L release was 41 ± 7.6 ng/TU, TXB2 formation 1688 ± 374 ng/TU and TPO clearance 1.22 ± 0.32 ng/h/TU. At days 1, 3 and 5, sCD40L was reduced to 89 ± 7%, 71 ± 12% and 57 ± 9%, TXB2 release to 91 ± 6%, 74 ± 12% and 58 ± 9% and TPO clearance to 90 ± 15%, 84 ± 5% and 79 ± 10% of the respective control values. In conclusion, in single-donor apheresis PC, sCD40L release and TXB2 formation as well as TPO clearance by the platelets were dependent on storage duration and reduced to about 60% to 80% of the respective control values after a storage period for 5 days. These findings are in line with literature data, indicating that a loss of platelet functionality of about 30% will occur after 5 days of storage.

Soluble CD40L release as test for functional platelet loss.

BACKGROUND: During platelet storage, alterations of the platelet function, 'platelet storage lesion', can be observed resulting in a reduced platelet viability. The release of soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) by platelets reflects different aspects of platelet metabolism and activity. Therefore, we used the sCD40L release to test for functional platelet loss in platelet products during storage in comparison to the formation of thromboxane (TXB2). METHODS: On day 1, 3, and 5 in single donor apheresis platelet products (n = 8) under routine storage conditions, sCD40L (measured by ELISA) and TXB2 (measured by RIA) were determined after platelet stimulation (recalcification and clot formation). Results were related to a therapeutic unit (TU = 2 x 10*11 platelets). RESULTS: In platelet-rich plasma of the donors, sCD40L release was 42.5 +/- 7.1 ng/TU and TXB2 formation 2,183 +/- 576 ng/TU. On day 1, 3, and 5 sCD40L release was reduced to 95%, 64%, and 57% and TXB2 formation to 92%, 80%, and 65% of the respective control values. CONCLUSIONS: In single donor apheresis PCs, sCD40L release and TXB2 formation showed a comparable course over storage time and were reduced to about 60% of the respective control values after a storage period of 5 days. These findings are in line with literature data indicating that a functional platelet loss of about 30% will occur after 5 days of storage. Overall, sCD40L release could be easily induced by recalcification and clot formation and can be used as a marker for functional platelet loss.

Left ventricular-aortic angle is associated with platelet reactivity in patients with aortic stenosis.

The impact of aortic stenosis on platelet reactivity is unclear. Previous studies reported contradicting results. The reason for this is unknown. It is known that flow alterations enhance platelet reactivity. A steep left ventricular-aortic angle (LV-AO-angle) is associated with turbulent flow in the aorta ascendens. Therefore, in this study, we hypothesized that LV-AO-angle is associated with platelet reactivity in patients with severe aortic stenosis. We included 289 patients with severe aortic stenosis and performed cardiac computertomography to assess the LV-AO-angle. Platelet function was evaluated by light transmission aggregometry. Platelet reactivity was higher in patients with a steep LV-AO-angle (ADP: <160°: 66.99% ±â€Š20.72% vs. ≥160°: 60.66% ±â€Š19.85%, P  = 0.009; collagen: <160°: 78.67% ±â€Š13.19% vs. ≥160°: 73.85% ±â€Š14.44%, P  = 0.003). Using Spearman correlation, ADP and collagen-induced aggregation was associated with LV-AO-angle (ADP: r  = -0.19, P  = 0.0009, R2  = 0.022; collagen: r  = -0.21, P  = 0.0004, R2  = 0.027). Apart from platelet reactivity, body weight, history of myocardial infarction and other factors were associated with steep LV-AO-angle. However, multivariate cox-regression (including body weight, comorbidities, history of MI and cardiac surgery, kidney function and laboratory parameters) revealed that LV-AO angle was a robust predictor of ADP and collagen-induced platelet aggregation. Steep LV-AO-angle is associated with enhanced platelet reactivity in patients with aortic stenosis. This could be the reason of contradicting results regarding platelet function in patients with aortic stenosis in previous studies. In addition, enhanced platelet reactivity in steep LV-AO-angle aortic stenosis patients might be a promising target in pathogenesis of aortic stenosis.

Staphylococcus aureus increases platelet reactivity in patients with infective endocarditis.

Thromboembolism is frequent in infective endocarditis (IE). However, the optimal antithrombotic regimen in IE is unknown. Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is the leading cause of IE. First studies emphasize increased platelet reactivity by SA. In this pilot study, we hypothesized that platelet reactivity is increased in patients with SA- IE, which could be abrogated by antiplatelet medication. We conducted a prospective, observatory, single-center cohort study in 114 patients with IE, with four cohorts: (1) SA coagulase positive IE without aspirin (ASA) medication, (2) coagulase negative IE without ASA, (3) SA coagulase positive IE with ASA, (4) coagulase negative IE with ASA. Platelet function was measured by Multiplate electrode aggregometry, blood clotting by ROTEM thromboelastometry. Bleeding events were assessed according to TIMI classification. In ASA-naïve patients, aggregation with ADP was increased with coag. pos. IE (coagulase negative: 39.47 ± 4.13 AUC vs. coagulase positive: 59.46 ± 8.19 AUC, p = 0.0219). This was abrogated with ASA medication (coagulase negative: 42.4 ± 4.67 AUC vs. coagulase positive: 45.11 ± 6.063 AUC p = 0.7824). Aspirin did not increase bleeding in SA positive patients. However, in SA negative patients with aspirin, red blood cell transfusions were enhanced. SA coagulase positive IE is associated with increased platelet reactivity. This could be abrogated by aspirin without increased bleeding risk. The results of this pilot study suggest that ASA might be beneficial in SA coagulase positive IE. This needs to be confirmed in clinical trials.

ß-Adrenergic signaling and response to pressure overload in transgenic mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of inducible NO synthase.

UNLABELLED: The role of iNOS induction in the context of cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure is still not fully understood. We have used transgenic mice with cardiac specific overexpression of iNOS (tg-iNOS) to investigate the consequences of high level NO formation on cardiac function in vivo and the response to chronic pressure overload. Conductance manometry was used to analyze cardiac function of wild type (WT) and tg-iNOS mice under basal conditions and ß-adrenergic stimulation. To investigate the influence of iNOS on cardiac function in hypertrophied hearts, transversal aortic constriction was performed. Despite a high level of cardiac NO formation tg-iNOS mice showed almost normal LV function under basal conditions. The cardiac response to ß-adrenergic stimulation, however, was completely abolished. Acute NOS inhibition led to an instantaneous recovery of the inotropic response to catecholamines in tg-iNOS mice. Chronic pressure overload induced a similar extent of cardiac hypertrophy in WT and tg-iNOS hearts. LV function, however, was more compromised in tg-iNOS hearts as revealed by a decreased contractility and cardiac output. IN CONCLUSION: a high level of cardiac NO formation does not induce heart failure per se but severely enhances the functional depression in response to pressure overload. This effect could be due to the tonic impairment of the cardiac ß-adrenergic response.

Clomipramine-induced serum prolactin as a marker for serotonin and dopamine turnover: results of an open label study.

Central nervous system (CNS) monoamine deficits have been linked to a number of pathological conditions such as major depressive disorder. Individual biological variations in 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), homovanillic acid (HVA) and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) might account for the variation in responses of neurotransmitter systems observed after the administration of clomipramine. The prolactin response to clomipramine has been widely used to assess CNS functioning. This open label study investigates the prolactin response induced by clomipramine in the plasma of healthy volunteers and whether it is related to changes in monoamine metabolites. The effects of clomipramine challenge on prolactin, 5-HIAA, HVA and MHPG were measured in 12 healthy volunteers. Samples were drawn directly before and 50 min after clomipramine infusion. A statistically significant increase in serum prolactin concentrations was measured in women 50 min after CMI infusion, but not in men. We found no significant increases in the serum monoamine metabolite concentrations 50 min after CMI infusion. Changes in HVA and 5-HIAA correlated statistically significantly and positively with the amount of prolactin release in the whole sample. Furthermore, positive correlations were found between ∆(50-0 min) 5-HIAA and ∆(50-0 min) HVA, although we did not find a correlation between ∆(50-0 min) prolactin and ∆(50-0 min) MHPG after clomipramine challenge. The pronounced prolactin release in healthy adult women might indicate a higher physiological sensitivity. Correlations between intra-individual changes in HVA, 5-HIAA and serum prolactin might indicate a central nervous effect of clomipramine on monoamine turnover. We conclude that monoamine changes in relation to prolactin response after clomipramine challenge may be suitable for characterizing the relationship between central serotonergic and dopaminergic function.

Noncanonical Effects of Oral Thrombin and Factor Xa Inhibitors in Platelet Activation and Arterial Thrombosis.

Nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or direct oral anticoagulants comprise inhibitors of factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) or factor IIa (dabigatran). Both classes efficiently interfere with the final or penultimate step of the coagulation cascade and showed superior net clinical benefit compared with vitamin K antagonists for prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with AF and for prevention and therapy of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. None the less, accumulating data suggested, that there may be differences regarding the frequency of atherothrombotic cardiovascular events between NOACs. Thus, the optimal individualized NOAC for each patient remains a matter of debate. Against this background, some basic and translational analyses emphasized NOAC effects that impact on platelet activity and arterial thrombus formation beyond inhibition of plasmatic coagulation. In this review, we will provide an overview of the available clinical and translational evidence for so-called noncanonical NOAC effects on platelet activation and arterial thrombosis.