Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 29(1): 82-8, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25440641

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Review the findings and use of rescue echocardiography performed by the Division of Perioperative Echocardiography and its impact on patient management. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single institution, tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred sixty-four consecutive rescue echocardiograms in the perioperative setting. INTERVENTIONS: Rescue transesophageal or rescue transthoracic echocardiography. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of a total of 1,675 perioperative echocardiograms performed in a 28-month period, 364 (21.8%) were rescue studies. Of these, 95.9% were transesophageal and 4.1% were transthoracic. Location at time of rescue echocardiography was intraoperative (55.5%), postoperative (44.2%), and preoperative (0.3%). No single diagnosis predominated the intraoperative or postoperative environment, and the frequency of common etiologies did not allow for assumption. There was a change in management for 214 patients (59%) as the result of findings. The methods used in performing rescue echocardiography at the authors' institution are reported. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of diagnoses and the frequency with which rescue echocardiography changed management further supports the growing body of evidence that the hemodynamically unstable perioperative patient benefits from its use.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia/métodos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Médicos , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesiologia/normas , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/normas , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Médicos/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Anesth Analg ; 112(5): 1132-8, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21346165

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nonphysician advanced life support (ALS) providers often perform tracheal intubation (TI) for cardiac arrest or other life-threatening indications in the prehospital setting, where airway assessment and airway management tools are limited. However, the frequency of difficult TI in obese patients in this setting is unclear. In this study we determined factors associated with TI success, and determined TI difficulty as a function of body mass index (BMI) in a system of ALS providers experienced in TI, to guide future prehospital education efforts. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients ≥15 years of age who underwent prehospital TI by paramedics in the Seattle Medic One system over a 4-year period, and were transported to the regional level 1 trauma center (Harborview Medical Center). Data were abstracted from a prospectively collected prehospital airway management database and from the hospital medical records, including demographic information, number of TI attempts, TI success or failure, and body weight/height (BMI). Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression were calculated, with the primary end point being difficult TI (defined as ≥4 TI attempts or the need to use an alternative airway management technique). RESULTS: Of 80,501 patient contacts in whom 4114 TIs were attempted during the 4-year study period, 823 met study entry criteria (including a calculable BMI). The overall TI success rate in the study population was 98.5% (811 out of 823), with 6.8% (56 out of 823) meeting the predetermined definition for difficult TI. There was no significant association between difficult TI and patient age, gender, use of succinylcholine, or medical diagnosis (trauma vs. nontrauma). In comparison with the lean patient subgroup (BMI <30 kg/m(2)), patients with class III obesity (BMI >40 kg/m(2)) had a significant association with difficult TI (odds ratio 3.68; confidence interval [CI] 1.27-10.59), whereas those with class I/II obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2) and <40 kg/m(2)) did not (odds ratio 0.98; CI 0.46 -2.07). CONCLUSIONS: Among prehospital ALS providers with previously documented and published successful TI performance, increased difficulty with TI was observed in patients with extreme obesity, but not in patients with lesser degrees of obesity. Because extreme obesity is an easily identifiable patient characteristic, didactic and clinical (e.g., operating room) airway management education for such providers should emphasize airway management challenges and strategies associated with obesity, including specific equipment, patient positioning, and practice recommendations that may facilitate both TI and alternative airway management techniques in this population.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Intubação Intratraqueal/efeitos adversos , Obesidade/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice de Massa Corporal , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Competência Clínica , Auxiliares de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Washington , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA