E-mental health in child psychiatry during COVID-19: an initial attitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 propelled e-mental health within the Australian health system. It is important to learn from this to inform mental healthcare during future crises. METHOD: A lexical analysis was conducted of clinician reflections during COVID-19 as they delivered psychiatry services to children and families in New South Wales (n = 6) and transitioned to e-mental health. RESULTS: E-mental health can extend the reach of, and access to psychiatry services, particularly for individuals disadvantaged by inequity. Yet e-mental health can be problematic. It is partly contingent on technological prowess, equipment, internet access as well as space and privacy. Relatedly, e-mental health can hinder clinician capacity to conduct examinations, monitor child development as well as assess risk and the need for child protection. CONCLUSIONS: Given the benefits and limitations of e-mental health, a model that supports face-to-face mental healthcare and e-mental health may be of value. This model would require practical, yet flexible policies and protocols that protect the privacy of children and families, safeguard them from harm, and respect the needs and preferences of children, families and clinicians.

Naturalistic outcomes of continuation right unilateral ultrabrief ECT in major depression: a retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVE: Continuation treatment of major depression following an acute course of electroconvulsive treatment (ECT) may be often required to prevent relapse. Data on continuation phase of right unilateral ultrabrief ECT are sparse and there are doubts if it is inherently capable of relapse prevention. METHODS: All consecutive adult patients with major depression who received the first 'run' of continuation phase of right unilateral ultrabrief ECT over a 10-year period were routinely followed up. ECT frequency varied from weekly to up to once every 4 weeks for a maximum period of 6 months. The data were extracted from a retrospective chart review. RESULTS: 20 out of 22 patients persisted with ultrabrief pulses (0.3 ms) with two needing 0.5 ms pulse widths. The median duration of continuation treatment was 51 days (range: 14-460). At the end of 1 month (n = 17), treatment gap in days mean (SD): 10.18 (7.08), widening to mean (SD): 20.11 (16.85) at 4 months (n = 9). Stimulus dose increased throughout the continuation phase: p = 0.026. In 16 out of 22 patients, more than 70% of the visits were charted as being 'in remission'. CONCLUSION: As most patients receiving ultrabrief ECT remained well, this study suggests that ultrabrief ECT can be used effectively in continuation therapy.

Concomitant Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With Ultrabrief Electroconvulsive Therapy: A 2-Week Double-Blind Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The feasibility and effectiveness of concomitant use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has not been investigated. The study principally aimed at determining whether tDCS when combined with ECT improved the speed of antidepressant response. Secondarily, the ease of generation of seizures during electroconvulsive therapy and cognitive outcomes were investigated. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for ECT to treat major depression were randomized to tDCS with dorsolateral prefrontal electrode placements (n = 8) or sham (n = 8) used daily and just before thrice weekly, 6 times threshold, right unilateral ultrabrief (0.3 ms) pulse width ECT. Change of depression severity was determined using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale along with cognitive assessments using Montreal Cognitive Assessment and visual memory testing at weeks 1 and 2, which were compared with baseline. RESULTS: Change of depression severity from baseline was similar in tDCS and ECT compared with sham tDCS and ECT at week1 (mean [standard deviation {SD}] = 16.00 [6.78]; 13.75 [7.83]; P = 0.89) and at week 2 (mean [SD] = 23.00 [4.96]; 19.75 [9.85], P = 0.08). No between-group differences were obtained in the cognitive tests at weeks 1 and 2. Combining tDCS with ECT resulted in higher restimulation: 62.5% requiring 3 stimulations to achieve threshold in contrast to 12.5% with sham tDCS and ECT (P = 0.04). The mean suprathreshold dose was higher in the tDCS and ECT group compared with sham tDCS and ECT: mean [SD] = 144.0 [43.54] and mean [SD] = 122.4 [20.36], P = 0.04, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of tDCS with ultrabrief right unilateral ECT is feasible and safe albeit with higher rates of restimulation when tDCS was combined with ECT. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the speed of antidepressant response or cognitive outcomes at weeks 1 and 2 after the commencement of treatments.