HbA1c variability as an independent predictor of diabetes retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To evaluate the association of both mean HbA1c and HbA1c variability with DR development in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes who received dilated funduscopic examination annually and who underwent at least 2-year follow-up were included in this longitudinal study. Subjects were excluded if they took less than five HbA1c measurements during the follow-up period. HbA1C variability was expressed as A1c-SD, and the mean of HbA1c (A1c-Mean) was calculated. In addition, medical history and clinical data of all subjects were collected and analyzed. According to A1c-Mean above or below the value 7% and A1c-SD above or below the population mean value 0.76%, subjects were divided into four quartiles: Q1(A1c-Mean < 7%, A1c-SD < 0.76%); Q2(A1c-Mean < 7%, A1c-SD ≥ 0.76%); Q3(A1c-Mean ≥ 7%, A1c-SD < 0.76%); Q4(A1c-Mean ≥ 7%, A1c-SD ≥ 0.76%). RESULTS: 3152 participants were included in the study analysis with a median follow-up period of 3.95 years (2-5 years), 17.6% (n = 556) were found to have DR, and these patients also had higher HbA1c levels (P < 0.001). Linear mixed-effect models were performed after adjusting for the characteristics of participants and the results showed that HbA1c variability is an independent risk factor for DR. Cox regression revealed that patients in Q4 group had the highest DR prevalence (HR = 1.624, P < 0.001) while Q1 group had the lowest. In addition, patients in Q2 group (HR = 1.429, P = 0.006) had a higher risk of DR than those in Q3 group (HR = 1.334, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c variability is an independent predictor of DR in patients with type 2 diabetes in Asia. It may play a greater role in DR development than mean HbA1c does when the mean value of HbA1c variability index is above 0.75%, indicating that aggressive A1c lowering strategies may, in fact, contribute excessively to risk of DR in patients with type 2 diabetes; steady decline of A1c should be taken into consideration.

Two-year-supervised resistance training prevented diabetes incidence in people with prediabetes: A randomised control trial.

AIM: The purpose of this study is to explore the long-term effects of aerobic training (AT), resistance training (RT), and combined training (AT + RT) on the prevention of T2D incidence in patients with prediabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, people with prediabetes (fasting glucose ≥5.6 and <7.0 mmol/L and/or 2-h glucose ≥7.8 and <11.1 mmol/L on the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test and/or haemoglobin A1c ≥5.7% and <6.4%) were randomly assigned to the control group, AT group, RT group, or AT + RT group. Supervised exercise programmes, including AT, RT, and AT + RT, were completed for 60 minutes per day, three non-consecutive days per week for 24 months. The primary outcome was the incidence of T2D; secondary outcomes were blood glucose and lipid levels, including total cholesterol (TC) and standard 2-hour oral glucose tolerance (2hPG). RESULTS: A total of 137 (80%) subjects with a mean age of 59 years (45 men, 92 women) entered the final analysis. After 24 months of intervention, the incidences of T2D adjusted by sex and age were significantly decreased by 74% (95% CI, 38-89), 65% (95% CI, 21-85), and 72% (95% CI, 36-87) in the AT + RT, RT, and AT groups compared with the control group (HR: AT + RT 0.26 [95% CI, 0.11-0.62], RT 0.35 [95% CI, 0.15-0.79], and AT 0.28 [95% CI, 0.13-0.64]). The cumulative T2D incidences were significantly lower in the AT + RT, RT, and AT groups than in the control group (21%, 26%, and 22% vs 69%). The blood glucose and lipid profiles improved more in the AT, RT, and AT + RT groups than in the control group. CONCLUSION: RT and RT plus AT were as effective as isolated AT in preventing progression to T2D.

Effects of aerobic training and resistance training in reducing cardiovascular disease risk for patients with prediabetes: A multi-center randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: Aerobic training (AT) and resistance training (RT) can reduce blood glucose and type 2 diabetes risk, and increase muscle mass for prediabetes patients. However, the impact of long-term AT and RT on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of AT and RT on CVD risk reduction in prediabetes patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 248 prediabetes patients were enrolled in this multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: RT (n = 82), aerobic training (AT (n = 83)), and control group (n = 83). Participants in RT and AT groups had moderate RT or AT 3 times a week (150 min/week) under supervision in 3 research centers for 24 months. Primary outcome was CVD risk measured by Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and The Chinese 10-year ischemic cardiovascular disease (ICVD) risk assessment tool. Secondary outcomes included in HOMA2-IR, HbA1c, blood pressure and serum lipid profile. RESULTS: Both RT and AT groups experienced a significant reduction in HOMA2-IR, HbA1c, LDL-C, TC, SBP, and DBP at the end of 12 and 24 months. Compared to the control group, Both RT and AT groups had significant reduction of the Chinese 10-year ICVD risk (P < 0.05), but FRS CVD risk declined significantly only in the AT group (all P < 0.05). Although FRS CVD risk decreased more in the RT group than in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. After adjusting for age, gender, statin use, BMI, and WHR, in COX's proportional hazard model, RT (HR = 0.419, P = 0.037) and AT (HR = 0.310, P = 0.026) were protective factors for CVD risk in prediabetes patients. 24-month RT and AT decreased respectively 58.1% and 69.0% of CVD risk (10-year ICVD risk assessment) in prediabetes patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that 24-month moderate AT reduces the Chinese 10-year ICVD risk and FRS CVD risk in prediabetes patients. RT groups had significant reduction of CVD risk (10-year ICVD risk assessment) in prediabetes patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration number: NCT02561377. DATE OF REGISTRATION: 24/09/2015.

Comparing the effects of 6 months aerobic exercise and resistance training on metabolic control and ß-cell function in Chinese patients with prediabetes: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: It is clear that aerobic training (AT) can delay pancreatic exhaustion and slow the progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes (T2D), but there is little information regarding the effects of resistance training (RT) in people with prediabetes. This study compared the effectiveness of RT and AT in improving metabolic control and protecting ß-cell function in people with prediabetes. METHODS: Chinese subjects (n = 248) with prediabetes were randomized to three groups: AT (n = 83), RT (n = 82) and control (n = 83). Subjects in the RT group performed 13 different resistance exercises per session using an elastic string. Those in the AT group performed aerobic exercises at 60%-70% of maximum heart rate. In both cases, exercises were performed three times per week for a period of 6 months. The primary outcome was improvement in metabolic control. Longitudinal changes between groups were tested using repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Of the initial 248 participants, 217 finished the study, but all participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics among the RT, AT, and control groups (P > 0.05). Changes in HbA1c were not significantly greater in RT than AT cohort (P = 0.059), but the decrease in HbA1c in both exercise groups was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with prediabetes, RT appears to improve metabolic control and preserve ß-cell function comparable to AT.

Effect of 12-Month Resistance Training on Changes in Abdominal Adipose Tissue and Metabolic Variables in Patients with Prediabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of resistance training relative to aerobic training on abdominal adipose tissue and metabolic variables in adults with prediabetes. METHODS: 105 participants with prediabetes were randomized into the resistance training group (RT, n = 35), aerobic training group (AT, n = 35), and control group (CG, n = 35). The participants completed supervised 12-month exercise; the control group followed the primary lifestyle without exercise intervention. The primary outcomes were visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) measured by computed tomography (CT). Secondary outcomes were body composition, lipid profile, and metabolic variables. RESULTS: A total of 93 participants completed the study. There were nonsignificant differences between groups before intervention. After training, VAT decreased significantly in AT and RT compared with CG (P = 0.001 and P = 0.014, respectively). Although no significant difference in SAT was found across groups, SAT decreased significantly over time within each exercise group (all P = 0.001). Increase in muscle mass was greater in RT than that in AT and CG (P = 0.031 and P = 0.045, respectively). Compared with CG, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) decreased significantly in RT and AT (P = 0.003 and P = 0.014, respectively). There was a significant difference in the number of prediabetes who converted to diabetes among AT and RT, as compared with the control group (P = 0.031 and P = 0.011, respectively). No significant differences were observed in lipid, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), body mass index (BMI), fasting insulin (FI), 2-hour postprandial glucose (2hPG), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), HOMA-IR, and HOMA-ß across groups. CONCLUSION: Both aerobic training and resistance training are effective in reducing abdominal adipose tissue and fasting plasma glucose in adults with prediabetes. Importantly, resistance training but not aerobic training is effective in augmenting muscle mass. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with NCT02561377 (date of registration: 24/09/2015).

Visceral adipose tissue is more strongly associated with insulin resistance than subcutaneous adipose tissue in Chinese subjects with pre-diabetes.

AIMS: To investigate the value of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in a cohort of a community's residents who were diagnosed as pre-diabetes, and to evaluate the association of VAT and SAT with insulin resistance. METHODS: This study was based on cross-sectional analysis of data from 107 adults. VAT and SAT were assessed by computed tomography. Insulin resistance was defined by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance >2.69. The relationship of VAT and SAT with insulin resistance were examined by linear regression. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association of VAT and SAT with insulin resistance. RESULTS: A total of 87 subjects had VAT ≥100 cm2. Thirty-six out of 107 (33.6%) subjects were detected to have insulin resistance, 71 were normal (66.4%), and all had insulin resistance with VAT ≥100 cm2. VAT (r = 0.378, p < .001) and SAT (r = 0.357, p < .001) were significantly and positively correlated with insulin resistance. In multiple regression analysis when VAT and SAT were simultaneously included after adjustment for age, gender, BMI, and WC, the association between VAT and insulin resistance was still maintained (p = .003), but that of SAT was lost. CONCLUSION: Pre-diabetic subjects with insulin resistance had elevated levels of VAT. VAT was more strongly associated with insulin resistance than SAT in Chinese subjects with pre-diabetes.

Impact of "Conversation Maps" on diabetes distress and self-efficacy of Chinese adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study.

The objective was to compare Diabetes Conversation Maps-based education and traditional education in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 53 outpatients were randomized to the intervention group (Diabetes Conversation Maps-based education) and control group (traditional education). In the intervention group, six 1-hour sessions covering diabetes overview, living with diabetes, risk factors and complications of diabetes, starting insulin treatment, foot care, and healthy eating and exercise were provided during 4 weeks. The participants had to attend at least four sessions, followed by a monthly follow-up telephone call in the subsequent 3 months. In the control group, six 1-hour diabetes classes covering similar topics as those in the intervention group were provided over 4 weeks. Each participant needed to attend at least four sessions. A1C was assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after the last educational session/class. Psychosocial metrics and self-care activities were evaluated at baseline and 6 months after the last educational session/class. Forty-six participants finished the study. After 6 months, the total score of diabetes distress scale was significantly lower and total score of diabetes empowerment scale-short form was significantly higher in the intervention group than the control group. The 3 months A1C was significantly lower in the intervention group than the control group. However, the 6 months A1C did not reach a statistically significant difference between groups. Compared to traditional education, Diabetes Conversation Maps were more effective in improving psychosocial metrics and 3-month A1C.

Knowledge of A1c Predicts Diabetes Self-Management and A1c Level among Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

This study was to identify current A1c understanding status among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, assess if knowledge of A1c affects their diabetes self-management and their glycemic control and recognize the factors influencing knowledge of A1c among patients with type 2 diabetes. A multi-center, cross-sectional survey was conducted between April and July 2010 in 50 medical centers in the Mainland China. Participants were recruited from inpatients and outpatients who were admitted to or visited those medical centers. The survey included core questions about their demographic characteristics, diabetes self-management behavior, and A1c knowledge. Overall, of 5957 patients, the percentage of patients with good understanding was 25.3%. In the multivariable logistic regression model, the variables related to the knowledge of A1c status are presented. We discovered that patients with longer diabetes duration (OR = 1.05; 95%CI = 1.04-1.06) and having received diabetes education (OR = 1.80; 95%CI = 1.49-2.17) were overrepresented in the good understanding of A1c group. In addition, compared to no education level, higher education level was statistically associated with good understanding of A1c (P<0.001). The percentage of patients with good understanding varied from region to region (P<0.001), with Eastern being highest (OR = 1.54; 95%CI = 1.32-1.80), followed by Central (OR = 1.25; 95%CI = 1.02-1.53), when referring to Western. Only a minority of patients with type 2 diabetes in China understood their A1c value. The patients who had a good understanding of their A1c demonstrated significantly better diabetes self-management behavior and had lower A1c levels than those who did not.

Does patient empowerment predict self-care behavior and glycosylated hemoglobin in chinese patients with type 2 diabetes?

BACKGROUND: Patient empowerment is playing an increasingly important role in diabetes and related disorders. This study evaluated the correlations among patient empowerment, self-care behavior, and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in mainland China. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study. Eight hundred eighty-five patients who sought care at hospitals in Nanjing, Changsha, Yunnan, and Chongqing, China, were enrolled. Structured questionnaires and medical records provided the data. The instruments included a demographic and clinical questionnaire, the Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form, and the Chinese version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Scale. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was used as a measure of glycemic control. The data analyses are presented as proportions, means (±SD), ß, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multilinear regressions were used to examine the correlations among the scores of patient empowerment, self-care behavior, and HbA1c values. RESULTS: Linear regression revealed that patient empowerment was a statistically significant predictor of patients' self-care behavior even after controlling for age, gender, marital status, educational level, and diabetes duration. Diet (ß=0.449; 95% CI, 0.370, 0.528), exercise (ß=0.222; 95% CI, 0.164, 0.279), blood glucose testing (ß=0.152; 95% CI, 0.106, 0.199), medication taking (ß=0.062; 95% CI, 0.030, 0.095), and foot care (ß=0.279; 95% CI, 0.217, 0.342). Additionally, patient empowerment was a statistically significant predictor of HbA1c (ß=-0.094; 95% CI, -0.123, -0.065). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that perceived diabetes empowerment is a predictor of self-care behavior and HbA1c in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, interventions to enhance and promote patient empowerment should be essential components of diabetes education programs to improve self-care behavior and glycemic control.