Diagnostic values of MRI indexes for polycystic ovary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful non-invasive modality for observation of ovarian morphologic characteristics. Few studies have focused on the value of MRI-derived indexes in reproductive-aged women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic value of MRI in women with PCOS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective case-control study included 85 women with PCOS and 50 controls who underwent pelvic MRI during 2017-2019. Ovarian volume (OV), follicle count (FC; counts of follicles sizing 2-3, 4-6, 7-9, 2-9 mm, respectively), follicular peripheral distribution, absence of a dominant follicle and stromal to total area ratio (S:A) were determined with MRI. The diagnostic value (sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) of OV, FC2-9, and follicular peripheral distribution for PCOS were assessed. RESULTS: The AUCs were 0.94 for OV, 0.96 for FC2-9, and 0.78 for follicular peripheral distribution. The optimal threshold to detect PCOS was 8.5 mL for OV (sensitivity 78%; specificity 96%) and 26 for FC2-9 (sensitivity 85%; specificity 98%). Sensitivity and specificity were 73% and 82% for follicular peripheral distribution, respectively. Reproducibility was perfect for OV (ICC = 0.96) and absence of a dominant follicle (k = 0.85), substantial for FC2-9 (ICC = 0.79) and S:A (ICC = 0.69), and moderate for follicular peripheral distribution (k = 0.56). CONCLUSION: Detected by MRI, OV >8.5 mL or FC2-9 >26 are accurate for diagnosing PCOS.

Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy) and magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography (MR-HSG) in the diagnosis of fallopian tubal patency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for records up to November 30, 2019. Studies involved in the diagnostic detection of HyCoSy or MR-HSG for fallopian tubal patency using conventional HSG or laparoscopy as the reference test were included. Data was analyzed by meta-analysis. We compared sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) plots of both HyCoSy and MR-HSG. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS: The analysis included 24 articles involving 1340 patients. HyCoSy was studied in 17 studies, and MR-HSG was studied in seven studies. For HyCoSy in diagnosis of fallopian tubal patency, pooled sensitivity was 89 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 87 %-91 %), and specificity was 93 % (95 % CI, 91 %-94 %). For MR-HSG in diagnosis of fallopian tubal patency, pooled sensitivity was 100 % (95 % CI, 98 %-100 %), and specificity was 82 % (95 % CI, 74 %-89 %). The sROC showed similar diagnostic accuracy for MR-HSG and HyCoSy. 3D/4D HyCoSy with ultrasound microbubbles had equal sensitivity (95 % vs. 100 %, P = 0.186) and significantly higher specificity (94 % vs. 82 %, P = 0.005) compared with MR-HSG. CONCLUSIONS: HyCoSy and MR-HSG showed similar overall diagnostic performance for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency. 3D/4D HyCoSy with ultrasound microbubbles could significantly improve the diagnostic specificity of HyCoSy.