RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Hearing loss is a growing public health issue that significantly impacts both health-related quality of life and working life. This study investigates how hearing rehabilitation with bone conduction hearing implants impacts health-related quality of life and working life in adults of working age with hearing impairment. DESIGN: This longitudinal study used data from Cochlear's Implant Recipient Observational Study to assess hearing disabilities and job satisfaction in 18-65-year-old recipients of bone conduction hearing implants. Baseline data were collected pre-implantation and patients were followed-up at 12-months post-implantation. STUDY SAMPLE: Patient demographics, Health Utilities Index Mark 3, the Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale, and self-reported employment data are presented for a sample ranging from 30 to 43 patients, pre-implantation and at 12-months follow-up following implantation with a bone conduction hearing implant. RESULTS: Significant improvements in hearing and speech attribute, and overall health-related quality of life were observed between pre-and post-implantation. Overall hearing disability decreased post-implantation and job satisfaction improved. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing rehabilitation using bone conduction hearing implants are shown to improve health-related quality of life, reduce hearing disability, and improve work performance and satisfaction. Results are representative of healthy and actively working users of bone conduction hearing implants.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of maximum power output of bone conduction hearing devices on speech recognition in quiet and in noise in experienced users of bone conduction hearing devices. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised cross-over investigation comparing speech recognition performance, subjective sound quality, and device preference between two bone conduction hearing devices with different maximum power outputs. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixteen adult subjects with conductive or mixed hearing loss. RESULTS: Both speech recognition in quiet and speech recognition in noise improved significantly when using the device with high vs. lower maximum power output. Mean improvement in word recognition score in quiet was 10.5% and the mean speech reception threshold in noise improved by 0.9 dB SNR. Compared to the device with lower maximum power output, the sound quality was rated significantly higher with the device with high maximum power output, which was also the device of preference for 81% of the subjects. CONCLUSION: Bone conduction hearing devices with higher maximum power output have the potential to improve speech recognition in both quiet and noisy listening environments.
Assuntos
Auxiliares de Audição , Percepção da Fala , Adulto , Condução Óssea , Estudos Cross-Over , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , FalaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to explore the conceptions of working life among employees with mild-moderate aided hearing impairment (HI). DESIGN: This study has a descriptive design, in which data was collected by means of semi-structured interviews. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The text was analysed in accordance with the phenomenographic approach. STUDY SAMPLE: Fifteen participants with mild-moderate aided HI were recruited to the current study. RESULTS: The analysis of the interviews resulted in four main categories describing the participants' conceptions of working life: (1) diffiiculties in daily work, (2) communication strategies, (3) facilitating factors in work environment, and (4) impact on daily life. The four identified descriptive categories show that the effects of HI on the lives of working adults generate far-reaching psychosocial consequences for the individual. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that difficulties and impact of having a HI interact with strategies used by the individual and contextual facilitators made in the work environment. We argue that there is a need for extensive services in aural rehabilitation for this population. This includes identifying the need of assistive listening devices, teaching the individual with HI about communication strategies and informing stakeholders about the consequence of having a HI.
Assuntos
Perda Auditiva/psicologia , Trabalho/psicologia , Adulto , Comunicação , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Aprendizagem , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
The aim of the following study was to examine the relationship between working memory capacity (WMC), executive functions (EFs) and perceived effort (PE) after completing a work-related task in quiet and in noise in employees with aided hearing impairment (HI) and normal hearing. The study sample consisted of 20 hearing-impaired and 20 normally hearing participants. Measures of hearing ability, WMC and EFs were tested prior to performing a work-related task in quiet and in simulated traffic noise. PE of the work-related task was also measured. Analysis of variance was used to analyze within- and between-group differences in cognitive skills, performance on the work-related task and PE. The presence of noise yielded a significantly higher PE for both groups. However, no significant group differences were observed in WMC, EFs, PE and performance in the work-related task. Interestingly, significant negative correlations were only found between PE in the noise condition and the ability to update information for both groups. In summary, noise generates a significantly higher PE and brings explicit processing capacity into play, irrespective of hearing. This suggest that increased PE involves other factors such as type of task that is to be performed, performance in the cognitive skill required solving the task at hand and whether noise is present. We therefore suggest that special consideration in hearing care should be made to the individual's prerequisites on these factors in the labor market.
Assuntos
Atenção/fisiologia , Cognição/fisiologia , Função Executiva/fisiologia , Perda Auditiva/terapia , Memória de Curto Prazo/fisiologia , Ruído dos Transportes , Trabalho/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Emprego , Feminino , Auxiliares de Audição , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Percepção , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aims were to compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and hearing handicap between two groups of employees with normal hearing and aided hearing impairment (HI). HRQOL was also compared to a normative population. The second aim was to compare perceived effort (PE) and disturbance after completing a task in office noise between the two study groups. DESIGN: A Swedish version of the short form-36 (SF-36) and the hearing handicap inventory for adults (HHIA) was used to determine HRQOL and hearing handicap. The Borg-CR 10 scale was used to measure PE and disturbance. STUDY SAMPLE: Hearing impaired (n = 20) and normally hearing (n = 20) participants. The normative sample comprised of 597 matched respondents. RESULTS: Hearing-impaired employees report relatively good HRQOL in relation to the normative population, but significantly lower physical functioning and higher PE than their normally-hearing peers in noise. Results from the HHIA showed mild self-perceived hearing handicap. CONCLUSIONS: The current results demonstrate that physical health status can be negatively affected even at a mild-moderate severity of HI, and that a higher PE is reported from this group when performing a task in noise, despite the regular use of hearing aids.
Assuntos
Percepção Auditiva , Transtornos da Audição/psicologia , Ruído/efeitos adversos , Saúde Ocupacional , Mascaramento Perceptivo , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Estimulação Acústica , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/instrumentação , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Auxiliares de Audição , Transtornos da Audição/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Audição/terapia , Testes Auditivos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Autoimagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adults with cochlear implants (CIs) are usually implanted unilaterally. To preserve binaural advantages, a noninvasive method involves maintaining the hearing aid (HA) on the contralateral ear; the choice of HA for this purpose is therefore crucial. In recent years, the use of frequency transposition has gained a renewed interest in clinical practice. This type of processing records information from the high-frequency region and conveys it to a low-frequency region where there is still some residual hearing. PURPOSE: To conduct an investigation and examine whether adults with unilateral CI derive benefits from a HA utilizing linear frequency transposition (LFT) on the contralateral ear. RESEARCH DESIGN: A two-period, single-blind, repeated-measures crossover design was conducted to examine the combination of LFT in conjunction with a CI. Speech recognition tests were performed in quiet and in noise with LFT either activated or deactivated. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire (SSQ) was used to measure subjective benefit. STUDY SAMPLE: The participants were nine frequent bimodal users, five males and four females, with a moderate to profound high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss in the nonimplanted ear. INTERVENTION: The current study was conducted using the Widex Mind440 power (m4-19) behind-the-ear HA. The participants acted as their own control in a total of seven conditions: (1) bimodal with own HA, (2) CI only, (3) own HA alone, (4) bimodal new HA LFT-off, (5) new HA LFT-off, (6) bimodal new HA LFT-on, and (7) new HA LFT-on. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Monosyllabic words in quiet and the Swedish version of Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) were used as speech test materials. Stimuli were presented in sound field at a speech level of 65 dB sound pressure level (SPL) via a loudspeaker at a distance of 1 m from the participant in a sound-treated room. The SSQ was administered in each session evaluating the three bimodal conditions. SPSS software was used for statistical analyses. General linear model (GLM) analysis of variance for repeated measures was performed and followed with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: Participants performed better with CI only than with HA alone, and the bimodal conditions were superior to the CI alone. No significant differences (p > .05) were observed when comparing the LFT-on with LFT-off regardless of whether the use of CI was included in the different listening conditions in objective and subjective measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest an advantage for CI patients with a HA in the opposite ear, and that the LFT neither degraded nor enhanced speech performance in conjunction with a CI in quiet or in noise in comparison to when it was deactivated.
Assuntos
Implante Coclear/métodos , Auxiliares de Audição , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/terapia , Percepção da Fala , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Limiar Auditivo , Terapia Combinada , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ruído , Método Simples-Cego , Localização de Som , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Hearing loss is a growing public health concern associated with decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and a negative impact on work life. Knowledge about the long-term benefits for patients receiving cochlear implants may provide knowledge imperative for policymakers to promote better HRQoL and working life outcomes for individuals with hearing loss. The purpose of this study was to explore how HRQoL, hearing disabilities, and work satisfaction outcomes changed in working-aged adults with severe to profound hearing loss from pre- to post-receiving a cochlear implant (CI) between the baseline, year one, and year two. This longitudinal study used Cochlear's Implant Recipient Observational Study (IROS) registry data to assess HRQoL, hearing disabilities, and work satisfaction in 18-65-year-old CI recipients. Data were collected pre- and post-implantation at baseline, year one, and year two follow-up. One hundred and twenty-seven CI recipients participated in the study. Significant improvements were observed for HRQoL outcomes for hearing, speech, emotion, and health utility post-implant. Overall hearing disability decreased post-CI, and work satisfaction improved. With the increasing prevalence of hearing disabilities, this is pertinent knowledge that supports the use of CIs for hearing rehabilitation which may promote better HRQoL and work satisfaction.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of tympanoplasty in treating chronic otitis media-related hearing loss, published literature was systematically reviewed to determine the clinical success rate of tympanoplasty at restoring hearing in chronic otitis media patients at a minimum follow-up period of 12-months. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. METHODS: Two independent reviewers performed literature searches. Publications reporting long-term (≥12-month) hearing outcomes and complications data on adult and pediatric patients with chronic otitis media were included and assessed for risk of bias and strength of evidence. To assess how tympanoplasty influences long-term hearing outcomes, data on pure tone audiometry (air-bone gap) and complications were extracted and synthesized. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Data from 3162 patients indicated that 14.0% of patients encountered postoperative complications. In adult patients, mean weighted air-bone gap data show closure from 26.5 dB hearing level (HL) (preoperatively) to 16.1 dB HL (postoperatively). In studies that presented combined adult and pediatric data, the mean preoperative air-bone gap of 26.7 dB HL was closed to 15.4 dB HL. In 1370 patients with synthesizable data, 70.7% of patients had a postoperative air-bone gap Ë 20 dB HL at long-term follow-up. Finally, subgroup analysis identified that mean improvement in ABG closure for patients with and without cholesteatoma was 10.0 dB HL and 12.4 dB HL, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic otitis media, tympanoplasty successfully closed the air-bone gap to within 20 dB HL in 7/10 cases and had an overall complication rate of 14.0%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: A new active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant system that uses piezoelectric technology has been developed: an active osseointegrated steady-state implant system (OSI). This was the first clinical investigation undertaken to demonstrate clinical performance, safety, and benefit of the new implant system. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A multicenter prospective within-subject clinical investigation was conducted. PATIENTS: Fifty-one adult subjects with mixed and conductive hearing loss (MHL/CHL, nâ=â37) and single-sided sensorineural deafness (SSD, nâ=â14) were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Audiological evaluations included audiometric thresholds, speech recognition in noise, and quiet. Hearing and health-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs; health utilities index [HUI], abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit [APHAB], and speech, spatial of qualities of hearing scale [SSQ]), daily use, surgical and safety parameters were collected. RESULTS: Intra- and postoperative complications were few. One implant was removed before activation due to post-surgical infection. Compared with the preoperative softband tests, a significant improvement in speech recognition-in-noise was observed in the MHL/CHL group (-7.3âdB, pâ≤â0.0001) and the SSD group (-8.1âdB, pâ=â0.0008). In quiet, word recognition improved in the MHL/CHL group, most markedly at lower intensity input of 50âdB SPL (26.7%, pâ≤â0.0001). The results of all PROs showed a significant improvement with the new device compared with preoperative softband in the MHL/CHL group. In the SSD group significant improvements were observed in the APHAB and SSQ questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The results confirmed the clinical safety, performance, and benefit of this new treatment modality for subjects with CHL, MHL, and SSD.
Assuntos
Auxiliares de Audição , Perda Auditiva Condutiva-Neurossensorial Mista , Percepção da Fala , Adulto , Condução Óssea , Perda Auditiva Condutiva-Neurossensorial Mista/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Purpose: To examine the relation between speech recognition and cognitive skills in bimodal cochlear implant (CI) and hearing aid users. Method: Seventeen bimodal CI users (28-74 years) were recruited to the study. Speech recognition tests were carried out in quiet and in noise. The cognitive tests employed included the Reading Span Test and the Trail Making Test (Daneman & Carpenter, 1980; Reitan, 1958, 1992), measuring working memory capacity and processing speed and executive functioning, respectively. Data were analyzed using paired-sample t tests, Pearson correlations, and partial correlations controlling for age. Results: The results indicate that performance on some cognitive tests predicts speech recognition and that bimodal listening generates a significant improvement in speech in quiet compared to unilateral CI listening. However, the current results also suggest that bimodal listening requires different cognitive skills than does unimodal CI listening. This is likely to relate to the relative difficulty of having to integrate 2 different signals and then map the integrated signal to representations stored in the long-term memory. Conclusions: Even though participants obtained speech recognition benefit from bimodal listening, the results suggest that processing bimodal stimuli involves different cognitive skills than does unimodal conditions in quiet. Thus, clinically, it is important to consider this when assessing treatment outcomes.
Assuntos
Implantes Cocleares , Cognição , Perda Auditiva/psicologia , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação , Reconhecimento Psicológico , Percepção da Fala , Adulto , Idoso , Limiar Auditivo , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reconhecimento Fisiológico de Modelo , Testes PsicológicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Health care professionals frequently meet employees with hearing impairment (HI) who experience difficulties at work. There are indications that the majority of these difficulties might be related to the presence of background noise. Moreover, research has also shown that high-level noise has a more detrimental effect on cognitive performance and self-rated disturbance in individuals with HI than low-level noise. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of different types of background noise on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance (PD) in employees with aided HI and normal hearing. RESEARCH DESIGN: A mixed factorial design was conducted to examine the effect of noise in four experimental conditions. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 40 participants (21 men and 19 women) were recruited to take part in the study. The study sample consisted of employees with HI (n = 20) and normal hearing (n = 20). The group with HI had a mild-moderate sensorineural HI, and they were all frequent hearing-aid users. INTERVENTION: The current study was conducted by using four general work-related tasks (mental arithmetic, orthographic decoding, phonological decoding, and serial recall) in four different background conditions: (1) quiet, (2) office noise at 56 dBA, (3) daycare noise at 73.5 dBA, and (4) traffic noise at 72.5 dBA. Reaction time and the proportion of correct answers in the working tasks were used as outcome measures of cognitive performance. The Borg CR-10 scale was used to assess PD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data collection occurred on two separate sessions, completed within 4 wk of each other. All tasks and experimental conditions were used in a counterbalanced order. Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was performed to analyze the results. To examine interaction effects, pairwise t-tests were used. Pearson correlation coefficients between reaction time and proportion of correct answers, and cognitive performance and PD were also calculated to examine the possible correlation between the different variables. RESULTS: No significant between-group or within-group differences in cognitive performance were observed across the four background conditions. Ratings of PD showed that both groups rated PD according to noise level, where higher noise level generated a higher PD. The present findings also demonstrated that the group with HI was more disturbed by higher than lower levels of noise (i.e., traffic and daycare setting compared with office setting). This pattern was observed consistently throughout four working tasks where the group with HI reported a significantly greater PD in the daycare and traffic settings compared with office noise. CONCLUSIONS: The present results demonstrate that background noise does not impair cognitive performance in nonauditory tasks in employees with HI and normal hearing, but that PD is affected to a greater extent in employees with HI during higher levels of background noise exposure. In addition, this study also supports previous studies regarding the detrimental effects that high-level noise has on employees with HI. Therefore, we emphasize the need of both self-rated and cognitive measurements in hearing care and occupational health services for both employees with normal hearing and HI.