Construction of hub transcription factor-microRNAs-messenger RNA regulatory network in recurrent implantation failure.

PURPOSE: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) affects up to 10% of in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients worldwide. However, the pathogenesis of RIF remains unclear. This study was aimed at identifying hub transcription factors (TFs) of RIF in bioinformatics approaches. METHODS: The GSE111974 (mRNA), GSE71332 (miRNA), and GSE103465 (mRNA) datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database from human endometrial tissue using R version 4.2.1 and used to identify differentially expressed TFs (DETFs), differentially expressed miRNAs, and differentially expressed genes for RIF, respectively. DETFs were subjected to functional enrichment analysis and the protein-protein interaction network analysis using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (version 11.5) database. Hub TFs were identified using the cytoHubb plug-in, after which a hub TF-miRNA-mRNA network was constructed using Cytoscape v3.8.2. RESULTS: Fifty-seven DETFs were identified, in which Gene Ontology analysis revealed to be mainly involved in the regulation of transcription. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis suggested that DETFs were enriched in transcriptional misregulation in cancer, aldosterone synthesis and secretion, AMPK signaling pathway, and cGMP-PKG signaling pathway. EOMES, NKX2-1, and POU5F1 were identified as hub TFs, and a hub TF-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network was constructed using these three hub TFs, four miRNAs, and four genes. CONCLUSION: Collectively, we identified three promising molecular biomarkers for the diagnosis of RIF, which may further be potential therapeutic targets. This study provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying RIF. However, further experiments are required to verify these results.

Effects of bacterial-feeding nematodes on soil microbial activity and the microbial community in oil-contaminated soil.

Rapid economic development has caused an increase in serious pollution problems due to the ever-increasing use of oil and its products, thus making oil pollution control an urgent task. Studies have shown that large amounts of bacterial-feeding nematodes are present in oil-contaminated soil; their function is as yet unclear. In this experiment, different densities of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) were inoculated into artificially simulated oil-contaminated soil to examine their effects on microbial activity and the microbial community in oil-contaminated soil. Six treatments were investigated: sterilized oil-contaminated soil as control 1 (FSP), nematode-free soil as control 2 (S), oil-contaminated soil (SP), oil-contaminated soil + 5, 10 or 20 individual C. elegans per gram of dry soil (i.e., SPN5, SPN10, SPN20). Results showed that oil pollution significantly increased the soil basal respiration. However, C. elegans weakened the soil basal respiration to different degrees and soil microbial respiration entropy essentially changed in line with the soil basal respiration. Oil pollution and C. elegans boosted catalase activity in contaminated soil by approximately 64.2-145.1%. Soil urease activity of SPN5, SPN10 and SPN20 was 88.5%, 126.7% and 109.0% stronger, respectively, than that of SP. The inoculation of C. elegans changed the microbial phospholipid fatty acid content in the oil-contaminated soil, including soil bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, Gram-positive bacteria (G+) and Gram-negative bacteria (G-). Therefore, this research demonstrates that C. elegans can stimulate microbial reproduction in oil-contaminated soil, enhance related soil enzyme activities and regulate soil microbial community structure and diversity, thereby improving the contaminated soil environment and promoting oil degradation.

Bibliometric and visual analysis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (2004-2023).

Background: Patients undergoing chemotherapy often encounter troubling and common side effects, notably Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This side effect not only impairs the patient's quality of life but could also result in the interruption or discontinuation of the chemotherapy treatment. Consequently, research into CINV has consistently remained a focal point in the realm of clinical medicine. In this research domain, bibliometric analysis has not been conducted. The purpose of this study is to deliver a thorough summary of the knowledge framework and key areas of interest in the field of Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, using bibliometric methods. This approach aims to furnish novel concepts and pathways for investigators working in this area. Methods: Publications focusing on Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, spanning from 2004 to 2023, were identified using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Tools such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package "bibliometrix" were employed for this bibliometric analysis. Results: This research covers 734 publications from 61 countries, with the United States and China being the primary contributors. There has been a significant rise in the volume of papers published in the most recent decade compared to the one before it, spanning over the past twenty years. However, the annual publication rate in the last ten years has not shown a significant upward trend. The University of Toronto, Merck & Co., Sun Yat-sen University, and Helsinn Healthcare SA emerged as the principal research institutions in this field. Supportive Care in Cancer stands out as the most frequently published and cited journal in this domain. These works are contributed by 3,917 authors, with Rudolph M Navari, Matti Aapro, Shimokawa Mototsugu, and Lee Schwartzberg being among those who have published the most. Paul J. Hesketh is notably the most co-cited author. The primary focus of this research field lies in exploring the mechanisms of CINV and the therapeutic strategies for managing it. Key emerging research hotspots are represented by terms such as "Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting," "nausea," "vomiting," "chemotherapy," and "antiemetics." Conclusion: This represents the inaugural bibliometric study to thoroughly outline the research trends and advancements in the field of CINV. It highlights the latest research frontiers and trending directions, offering valuable insights for scholars engaged in studying CINV.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Dienogest Compared With Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist After Conservative Surgery for Endometriosis in China.

PURPOSE: Although the clinical effect of dienogest for endometriosis after conservative surgery has been proven, the cost-effectiveness of this new pharmacotherapy remains to be determined. We aimed to assess the health economic implications of dienogest versus a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a; goserelin in the Chinese setting. METHODS: A decision tree model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dienogest compared with a GnRH-a (goserelin) after conservative surgery for endometriosis during a 2-year time horizon from the perspective of a health care system in China. The cost of drugs, use of outpatient care facilities, administration of medications, routine laboratory work and imaging studies, and treatment of drug-related adverse events were considered. We obtained clinical efficacy data from the peer-reviewed literature. Base case findings were further tested with 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. FINDINGS: The model projects that treatment with dienogest would result in a modest incremental 0.02 quality-adjusted life-year gains compared with a GnRH-a (goserelin) (1.48 vs 1.46) at a cost saving of ¥7274 (¥22,809 vs ¥30,164). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that dienogest has a 100% probability of % being considered cost-effective compared with a GnRH-a (goserelin) at the willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 times the gross domestic product per capita (¥64,644 × 3) of China in 2018 (¥1 = US$0.1454 and €0.1248). IMPLICATIONS: Dienogest is more effective and cost-saving compared with a GnRH-a (goserelin) in the treatment of patients with endometriosis after conservative surgery in China.

Effects of bacterial-feeding nematodes and organic matter on microbial activity and oil degradation in contaminated soil.

Increasing rates of oil exploitation and utilization are associated with increasing rates of oil pollution in soil. Nematodes are abundant in soils with or without oil contamination, among which bacterial-feeding nematodes are the dominant group. However, their function in oil-contaminated soil is unclear. This study explores the effects of bacterial-feeding nematode and organic matter addition on microbial activity and oil degradation in contaminated soil. Experiments were conducted using six treatments of oil-contaminated soil: sterilized (Control), nematode-free (OC), nematode addition (OCN), nematode + wheat straw addition (OCNW), nematode + rapeseed cake addition (OCNR), and nematode + biochar addition (OCNB). At the end of a 168-day incubation experiment, the oil concentration of OCN soil was 26.77% lower than that of OC soil, and those of OCNW, OCNR, and OCNB were 12.83%, 27.81%, and 4.77% lower, respectively, than that of OCN soil. Over the experiment, soil microbial biomass carbon, fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis activity, and dehydrogenase activity increased by 4.35-382.30%, 1.75-302.22%, and - 2.73-224.55%, respectively, in oil-contaminated soils, with or without nematode and organic matter addition. These results suggest that the addition of organic matter and bacterial-feeding nematodes to oil-contaminated soil can promote the growth and activity of microorganisms that break down oil.