The Effect of Verapamil, a P-gp Inhibitor, on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Omadacycline in Healthy Adults: A Phase I, Open-Label, Single-Sequence Study.

BACKGROUND: Omadacycline is a semisynthetic aminomethylcycline antibacterial derived from the tetracycline class. It is approved in the USA to treat adults with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. OBJECTIVES: This phase I, open-label study evaluated the effect of a potential drug-drug interaction of verapamil-a known P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor-with omadacycline on the pharmacokinetic profile of omadacycline in healthy adults. The safety and tolerability of omadacycline taken alone and in combination with verapamil were also evaluated. METHODS: A single oral dose of 240 mg verapamil extended release (ER) was given 2 h prior to a single oral dose of 300 mg omadacycline. RESULTS: Ten (83.3%) of the 12 participants enrolled in the study completed the study, and all enrolled participants were included in the safety and pharmacokinetic populations. An increase of 14-25% in systemic exposure to omadacycline was seen when administered following a single oral dose of 240 mg verapamil ER compared with omadacycline alone, as measured by the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 24 h after dosing (AUC0-24), from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf), and by maximum (peak) observed plasma concentration (Cmax). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by one participant (nausea and headache). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, if given with a known P-gp inhibitor, dose adjustment of oral omadacycline is not warranted based on small increases in absorption and systemic exposure. No safety signals were identified.

Results of two Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Studies (Ascending Single-dose and Multiple-dose Studies) to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered LX9211 in Healthy Participants.

PURPOSE: For neuropathic pain, current therapies do not provide relief for most patients; less than half achieve a 50% pain reduction. Current analgesics have adverse effects. We present 2 Phase I studies of LX9211, a new small-molecule AP2-associated kinase 1 inhibitor with preclinical effectiveness in pain relief. METHODS: Both randomized, placebo-controlled studies' primary objectives evaluated the tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of oral LX9211. In the single-ascending dose (SAD) study, single, oral, liquid doses of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 80, 120, 160, 200, and 300 mg of LX9211 or placebo were administered in the fasted state and 40 mg in a fed group. In the multiple-ascending dose (MAD) study, a loading dose was administered on day 1 and maintenance doses were administered daily on days 2 to 14. The treatment groups were designated as: 25/2.5, 50/5.0, 100/10, 150/15, and 200/20 mg. The secondary objectives included ECG evaluation. FINDINGS: The SAD study enrolled 96 participants 19 to 61 years of age (86.5% male) in 12 cohorts (2:6 placebo:LX9211), and the MAD study enrolled 50 participants 20 to 63 years of age (78% male) in 5 cohorts (2:8 placebo:LX9211). Both studies had a good LX9211 safety profile. No deaths or serious adverse events occurred. All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild, except for moderate nausea and vomiting reported in 1 participant in the SAD 300-mg cohort. All TEAEs were considered recovered or resolved, except for blurred vision (n = 1 in the SAD 300-mg group), which was ongoing at the last visit. One participant in the MAD study (50/5 mg group) discontinued participation in the study early because of TEAEs (angioedema, dermatitis allergic, and urticaria). Headache, dizziness, constipation, and nausea were the most common TEAEs. In the SAD study, 4 participants in the 200-mg cohort developed headache approximately 24 hours after dosing, lasting 24 to 48 hours. Only 1 required treatment (acetaminophen). No notable ECG changes from baseline were found in either study. After both single- and multiple-dose administration, plasma exposure of LX9211 was approximately dose proportional. Steady-state LX9211 plasma concentrations were rapidly attained and maintained by a dosing regimen of a loading dose, followed by daily maintenance doses (1/10 the loading dose). No accumulation was as seen after multiple dosing. IMPLICATIONS: These studies found that LX9211 was safe and well tolerated in healthy participants. These findings suggest it is appropriate to take LX9211 forward into Phase II studies of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and postherpetic neuralgia. LX9211 has received fast track designation by the US Food and Drug Administration.

A mechanistic study to assess whether isoproterenol can reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod.

The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod (FTY720) elicits a negative chronotropic effect at treatment initiation that attenuates thereafter. The authors determined whether isoproterenol can counteract this effect. In this randomized, crossover study, 14 healthy subjects received 5 infusions of isoproterenol (titrated to increase heart rate to 100-120 bpm) or intravenous placebo. The first infusion was 2 hours before and the other 4 infusions were between 3 and 6 hours after a 5-mg oral dose of fingolimod. Telemetry and pharmacokinetic data were collected for 24 hours. During isoproterenol infusion 1 (before fingolimod administration), heart rate was increased 80% from preinfusion 68 +/- 9 bpm to a maximum 122 +/- 15 bpm. Administration of fingolimod decreased heart rate from 73 +/- 11 bpm predose to a nadir of 57 +/- 8 bpm. The subsequent isoproterenol infusion 2 in the presence of fingolimod increased mean heart rate by 85% to a maximum 105 +/- 21 bpm. A 41% higher total isoproterenol dose was needed to increase heart rate to the target range with fingolimod (97 +/- 6 mcg) compared with isoproterenol alone (69 +/- 27 mcg). Isoproterenol infusions 3 to 5 had similar effects on heart rate as infusion 2. Fingolimod had no significant influence on blood pressure responses to isoproterenol. Isoproterenol did not alter the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod. The pure beta-agonist isoproterenol can reverse the heart rate reduction that occurs transiently after initiating fingolimod treatment.

The ability of atropine to prevent and reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod in healthy subjects.

AIMS: The authors determined whether intravenous atropine can prevent or counteract the negative chronotropic effect of the immunomodulator fingolimod. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover study, 12 healthy subjects received 5 mg fingolimod orally concurrently with intravenous atropine (titrated to a heart rate of 110-120 beats min(-1)) or intravenous placebo. A second group of 12 subjects received atropine/placebo 4 h after the fingolimod dose. Continuous telemetry measurements were made for 24 h after each fingolimod dose. RESULTS: Fingolimod administration alone yielded a heart rate nadir of 51 +/- 5 beats min(-1) at a median 4 h postdose with heart rate remaining depressed at 51-64 beats min(-1) over the rest of the day. Concurrent administration of fingolimod and atropine yielded a nadir of 66 +/- 6 beats min(-1) resulting in an atropine: placebo ratio (90% confidence interval) of 1.30 (1.22, 1.36). When atropine was administered at the time of the nadir, it was able to reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod from a heart rate of 56 +/- 9 beats min(-1) (placebo) to 64 +/- 8 beats min(-1) (atropine) resulting in an atropine: placebo ratio of 1.15 (1.04, 1.26). Atropine had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod. CONCLUSIONS: Atropine administered concurrently with fingolimod prevented the heart rate nadir that typically occurs 4 h postdose. Atropine administered at the time of the heart rate nadir was able to reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod.

Evaluation of Eluxadoline Effect on Cardiac Repolarization.

This study evaluated the effects of eluxadoline, a mixed µ-opioid receptor (OR) and κ-OR agonist and δ-OR antagonist, on cardiac repolarization. This evaluator-blinded, placebo- and positive-controlled, 4-period crossover study randomized healthy men and women to single oral doses of eluxadoline (therapeutic dose 100 mg or supratherapeutic dose 1000 mg), moxifloxacin 400 mg, or placebo. QT data were corrected using individual custom correction (QTcI). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in QTcI intervals (ΔQTcI) between eluxadoline and placebo (ΔΔQTcI). An upper bound of the 95% confidence interval around ΔΔQTcI of 10 milliseconds was considered clinically significant. Concentration-QTc data were analyzed using a repeated-measures, mixed-effects linear model. Sixty-four volunteers were treated, and 58 completed the study. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated with moxifloxacin (noted by ΔΔQTcI of 11.94 milliseconds). The maximum ΔΔQTcI for eluxadoline 1000 mg was 4.10 milliseconds 1 hour postdose (1-sided 95% upper confidence bound, 5.81 milliseconds), and for eluxadoline 100 mg was 1.20 milliseconds at 0.5 hours postdose (1-sided 95% upper confidence bound, 2.91 milliseconds). Primary ΔΔQTcI results were confirmed using Fridericia's formula for QTc. Categorical, morphological, and concentration-QTc analyses were consistent with the primary and secondary findings. There were no significant gender effects on ΔΔQTcI values. The most common adverse events were contact dermatitis and nausea (12.5% each) and dizziness (10.9%); adverse events were more frequent in the eluxadoline 1000 mg group. In conclusion, eluxadoline, at therapeutic or supratherapeutic doses, did not significantly prolong QT intervals, and was safe and generally well tolerated in this study population.

The effect of etoricoxib on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin.

The effects of etoricoxib on pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters of warfarin were determined in healthy men and women. Subjects titrated with warfarin to an international normalized ratio for prothrombin time of 1.4 to 1.7 during a 28-day prestudy period were randomly assigned in crossover fashion to be coadministered etoricoxib (120 mg) or matching placebo over two 21-day continuous periods. On day 21, a 24-hour pharmacokinetic profile of both S(-) and R(+) warfarin, as well as international normalized ratio values, were determined. Etoricoxib increased the international normalized ratio by 13% (90% confidence interval: 8%, 19%; P

FTY720: placebo-controlled study of the effect on cardiac rate and rhythm in healthy subjects.

The purpose of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to measure the effects of FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, on heart rate and rhythm in healthy volunteers. Subjects (n = 66) were randomized to FTY720 1.25 mg or 5 mg or placebo administered once daily for 7 days. Continuous telemetry revealed an acute, dose-dependent decrease in mean heart rate (10-bpm decrease vs placebo) following the first dose of FTY720, with a nadir generally 4 hours postdose. Although a persistent FTY720-related decrease in heart rate was measured from day 2 to day 7, additional doses of FTY720 after day 2 resulted in no further incremental decreases. Mean PR interval increased by approximately 8 to 10 msec in FTY720-treated subjects on day 1. FTY720 did not increase the QRS or QT interval. These results confirm that the first dose of FTY720 has a mild to moderate negative chronotropic effect.

Evaluation of safety and pharmacokinetics of consecutive multiple-day dosing of palonosetron in healthy subjects.

This study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of consecutive multiple-day dosing of palonosetron. Sixteen healthy subjects received an intravenous bolus dose of palonosetron 0.25 mg (n = 12) or placebo (n = 4) daily for 3 consecutive days. Safety was evaluated throughout the study. Serial plasma samples were collected on days 1 and 3 for pharmacokinetic determinations. Three days of dosing with palonosetron 0.25 mg was safe and well tolerated. There were no clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory values, vital signs, physical examinations, or electrocardiogram intervals. Plasma palonosetron concentrations declined in a biphasic manner, measurable up to 168 hours after dosing on day 3. Mean terminal phase elimination half-life after day 3 dosing was 42.8 hours. The 2.1-fold accumulation of palonosetron in plasma following 3 daily doses was predictable based on elimination half-life of approximately 40 hours, and the maximum plasma concentration remained below the maximum plasma concentration previously observed after a single, well-tolerated 0.75 mg intravenous bolus dose of palonosetron.

Pharmacokinetics of palonosetron in combination with aprepitant in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Palonosetron is a second-generation 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist with a prolonged duration of action and higher receptor binding affinity than first-generation agents (ondansetron, granisetron, and dolasetron). Aprepitant is a selective antagonist of substance P/neurokinin 1 that augments the benefit of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, two-way, crossover trial was designed to evaluate the effect of oral aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single intravenous (IV) dose of palonosetron in 12 healthy subjects. Treatment A consisted of a single IV bolus dose of palonosetron 0.25mg on day 1. Treatment B added oral aprepitant 125 mg on day 1 (30 minutes prior to palonosetron) and 80 mg on days 2 and 3. Blood for pharmacokinetic evaluations was collected through 168 hours after palonosetron administration on days 1 and 15; safety was monitored through day 22. RESULTS: Mean plasma concentration-time plots for palonosetron were virtually identical for palonosetron administered alone or with concomitant aprepitant. The ratio of geometric least-square mean values (with:without aprepitant) for C(max) was 98.6% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 61.8-157%), and for AUC(0-infinity) the ratio was 101% (90% CI: 85.6-119%). With and without aprepitant coadministration, respectively, mean plasma elimination half-life was 40 hours and 43 hours (difference: -3.0 hours; p = 0.348), mean total body clearance was 130 mL/min and 136 mL/min (difference: -5.6 mL/min; p = 0.735), and mean volume of distribution at steady-state was 410.9 L and 442.3 L (difference: -31.4 L; p = 0.463). Palonosetron alone and the palonosetron/aprepitant regimen were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: These results indicate no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters for palonosetron between the two treatments, and suggest that palonosetron can be safely coadministered with aprepitant with no alterations in the expected safety profile and no dosage adjustment necessary.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of AFN-1252 administered as immediate release tablets in healthy subjects.

AIMS: AFN-1252 is a novel inhibitor of FabI, an essential enzyme in Staphylococcus spp. This study was undertaken to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of AFN-1252, following oral administration in an ascending dose trial. MATERIALS & METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-part study. In Part I, single doses (QD) of 100, 200, 300, or 400 mg AFN-1252 were administered. In Part II, subjects received 200, 400, 600, or 800 mg (total daily dose) where 100, 200 and 400-mg doses were given twice in one day. RESULTS: AFN-1252 was well-absorbed with Cmax at 3-4 h when given once per day and 2.5-9 h when dosed twice in a single dosing day. T½ ranged from 8 to 11 h. Total and peak exposures of AFN-1252 increased nonlinearly. Adverse events were primarily mild and resolved promptly. CONCLUSIONS: Oral doses of AFN-1252 were safe and well tolerated. AFN-1252 has the potential for once or twice-a-day dosing for treatment of staphylococcal infections.

Effects of three fluoroquinolones on QT interval in healthy adults after single doses.

OBJECTIVE: A clinical trial was conducted in healthy adult volunteers to assess the effect of levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and ciprofloxacin on the QT and QTc interval. METHODS: Electrocardiograms were recorded 24 hours before and after subjects took placebo, 1000 mg levofloxacin, 800 mg moxifloxacin, and 1500 mg ciprofloxacin in a double-blind, randomized, 4-period, 4-treatment, 4-sequence crossover trial. Changes in QT and QTc interval from baseline were assessed by several different methods. RESULTS: Increases in QT and QTc interval compared with placebo were consistently greater after moxifloxacin compared with either levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. The mean postdose change from baseline QTc (Bazett) intervals for the 24-hour period after treatment with moxifloxacin ranged from 16.34 to 17.83 ms (P < .001, compared with placebo). For levofloxacin, this change ranged from 3.53 to 4.88 ms (P < .05, compared with placebo), and for ciprofloxacin, this change ranged from 2.27 to 4.93 ms (P < .05, compared with placebo, with the use of 3 of 5 baseline methods). CONCLUSIONS: A change in QTc (Bazett) interval from baseline can be demonstrated safely in healthy volunteers after single high doses of fluoroquinolones that achieve approximately 1.5 times the maximum plasma drug concentration that occurs after recommended doses. There is substantial daily variation in both QT and QTc interval, and the magnitude and frequency of changes in QTc interval can depend on the methods used. These factors need to be considered because clinical trials measuring the effects of drugs on QT intervals are used to estimate the risk of using these drugs. Greater changes in QT and QTc intervals after treatment with moxifloxacin compared with levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin are consistent with in vitro observations related to the effect of these drugs on rapid potassium (IK(r)) channels. The clinical relevance of these differences is not known.

Absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of treprostinil sodium administered by acute subcutaneous infusion.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the absolute bioavailability and acute pharmacokinetics of treprostinil sodium administered by continuous, short-term subcutaneous infusion in normal subjects. Fifteen healthy volunteers received treprostinil via an intravenous infusion at 15 ng/kg/min over 150 minutes, followed by a 5- to 7-day washout and a subcutaneous infusion at the same rate administered over 150 minutes. Serial plasma samples were collected predosing, during dosing, and postdosing, and plasma treprostinil concentration levels were measured by a validated liquid chromatography atmospheric pressure ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 25 pg/mL. Acute administration of treprostinil administered by subcutaneous infusion at a rate of 15 ng/kg/min for 150 minutes achieved a mean Cmax of 1.47 ng/mL. Mean AUC infinity values for intravenous and subcutaneous dosing were 3.52 and 3.97 ng.h/mL, respectively, resulting in a mean apparent absolute bioavailability of 113% for subcutaneous administration. It was possible that the area under of the curve for the intravenous administration was underestimated because most of the terminal elimination phase could not be documented due to the LLOQ of the assay. The mean apparent elimination half-life of treprostinil following subcutaneous administration was 1.38 hours, compared to 0.87 hours following intravenous administration. It was concluded that treprostinil administered by subcutaneous administration is completely absorbed, with a slightly longer half-life compared to intravenously administered treprostinil.

Pharmacokinetics of treprostinil sodium administered by 28-day chronic continuous subcutaneous infusion.

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of treprostinil sodium administered as a 28-day continuous subcutaneous infusion at escalating infusion rates of 2.5 to 15 ng/kg/min in normal subjects. Fourteen healthy adult volunteers received a 28-day continuous sub-cutaneous infusion of treprostinil at escalating infusion rates of 2.5, 5, 10, and 15 ng/kg/min. Doses were escalated every 7 days with no washouts between escalations. Serial plasma samples were collected predosing, during dosing, and postdosing. Samples were also collected every 3 hours on Day 7 of each dosing period to evaluate diurnal variation over a 24-hour steady-state interval. Plasma treprostinil concentration was measured by a validated liquid chromatography atmospheric pressure ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 25 pg/mL. Distinct steady states were achieved for each of the four treprostinil doses. Linear regression analysis of mean steady-state treprostinil concentration versus targeted dose yielded a fitted line with an r(2) of 0.92. Variation in apparent plasma clearance for the four doses was small (i.e., 9.77-10.4 mL/kg/min). Consistent diurnal cycles of two peak and two trough treprostinil concentrations were observed over a 24-hour steady-state interval for each dose with peak levels 20% to 30% higher than trough levels. The terminal half-life of treprostinil was 2.93 hours. Intersubject variability for mean pharmacokinetic parameters was small (coefficients of variation ranging from 13.6%-25.5%). At clinically relevant doses, the pharmacokinetics of treprostinil were linear and dose independent with modest, consistent diurnal cycles consisting of two daily peaks and two daily troughs observed for all four doses. In addition, the elimination half-life was about 3 hours.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, in man.

The single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, were examined in two clinical studies. Single-dose pharmacokinetics--including dose proportionality, absolute bioavailability of the highest dose-strength (120-mg) tablet, and the effect of a high-fat meal on the bioavailability of that tablet--were investigated in a two-part, open, balanced crossover study in two panels of healthy subjects (12 per panel). Steady-state pharmacokinetics were investigated in an open-label study in which 24 healthy subjects were administered 120-mg single and multiple (once daily for 10 days) oral doses of etoricoxib tablets. The pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib were found to be consistent with linearity through doses at least twofold greater than the highest anticipated clinical dose of 120 mg. Etoricoxib administered as a tablet was rapidly and completely absorbed and available; the absolute bioavailability was estimated to be 100%. A high-fat meal decreased the rate of absorption without affecting the extent of absorption of etoricoxib; therefore, etoricoxib can be dosed irrespective of food. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib, achieved following 7 days of once-daily dosing, were found to be reasonably predicted from single doses. The accumulation ratio averaged 2.1, and the corresponding accumulation t1/2 averaged 22 hours, supporting once-daily dosing. Etoricoxib was generally well tolerated.

Integration of modeling and simulation to support changes to ondansetron dosing following a randomized, double-blind, placebo-, and active-controlled thorough QT study.

Prolongation of the QT interval has been observed with ondansetron and other members of the 5-HT3 antagonist class. This is the first thorough QTc study of ondansetron conducted in accordance with ICH E14 guidelines, designed to investigate the effect of single intravenous (IV) doses of ondansetron on cardiac conduction compared to placebo and a positive control, moxifloxacin, in healthy subjects. Statistical analysis of dose-response showed the maximum mean difference in QTcF, compared to placebo and corrected for baseline (ddQTcF), was less than 10 milliseconds (ms) after an 8 mg IV dose and approximately 20 ms after the 32 mg dose, each infused over 15 minutes. The concentration-response (Cp-ddQTcF) model resulted in similar predictions for the 8 and 32 mg and was used to predict the maximum mean ddQTcF (upper 90% CI bound) of 9.2 (11.2) ms for 16 mg IV. As a result, single IV doses of ondansetron greater than 16 mg should no longer be used. Adult cancer patients, under 75 years, may receive up to a maximum initial 15-minute IV dose of 16 mg, prior to chemotherapy, followed by 2 additional IV or IM doses of 8 mg for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

Effect of the thrombin receptor antagonist (PAR-1) vorapaxar on QT/QTc interval in healthy volunteers: A randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled, parallel group trial.

In a randomized, double-blind (vorapaxar and placebo), placebo- and positive-controlled (moxifloxacin 400 mg) parallel group study, the effect of single-dose vorapaxar 120 mg on QT/QTc interval was assessed in 120 adults 18-50 years. Twelve-lead digital ECGs were obtained in triplicate using Mortara H12+ Holter monitors at 9 timepoints over 24 hours. If the largest upper bound of the 95% one-sided CI for the mean difference in QTcF between vorapaxar and placebo was <10 milliseconds, vorapaxar was considered to have no potential for QT/QTc prolongation of regulatory concern. Vorapaxar was well-tolerated. The lower bound of the 95% CI for the difference in QTcF between moxifloxacin and placebo was >5 milliseconds, confirming study sensitivity. Vorapaxar had no significant effect on QTcF. At all timepoints the upper 95% CI for the mean difference between placebo and vorapaxar was ≤3.8 milliseconds (mean difference ≤1.0 milliseconds). Vorapaxar does not prolong the QT/QTc interval in healthy subjects.

Effect of pitavastatin vs. rosuvastatin on international normalized ratio in healthy volunteers on steady-state warfarin.

OBJECTIVE: Statins have been shown to impact international normalized ratio (INR) when coadministered with warfarin. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of pitavastatin compared with rosuvastatin on steady-state pharmacodynamics (PD) of warfarin by measuring INR in healthy adult subjects. METHODS: Subjects received oral doses of warfarin 5 mg once daily on days 1 through 3. The dose was titrated on days 4 through 9 to reach a steady-state INR of 1.5 to 2.2. Warfarin was continued on days 10 through 21 and pitavastatin 4 mg or rosuvastatin 40 mg was administered once daily on days 14 through 22. After a 14-day washout period, the process was repeated with the alternate statin. STUDY NUMBER: NK-104-4.03US. RESULTS: For pitavastatin, mean INR changed from 1.73 ± 0.18 (n = 42) on day 14 before starting statin dosing, to 1.78 ± 0.29 (n = 42) on day 22 at treatment end; the difference in INR was not significant (p = 0.219). For rosuvastatin, mean INR increased significantly from 1.74 ± 0.20 (n = 43) at baseline to 1.90 ± 0.30 (n = 43) at treatment end (p < 0.001). Rosuvastatin caused a significantly greater increase in INR than pitavastatin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Steady-state INR during warfarin treatment did not change significantly when pitavastatin 4 mg was added to the regimen, while a significant increase was observed when rosuvastatin 40 mg was added. The effect of rosuvastatin on INR was significantly larger than the effect of pitavastatin. This study is limited because it was done in healthy volunteers. Further studies in patient populations are needed to better understand the clinical significance of the results.

Effect of continuous subcutaneous treprostinil therapy on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin.

Treprostinil sodium was recently approved in the United States for continuous subcutaneous infusion in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Anticoagulation with warfarin is recommended in PAH therapy. Given the likelihood for treprostinil and warfarin coadministration, a single-blind, controlled, crossover study was conducted to evaluate the effect of treprostinil infusion on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of warfarin. Area under the effect-time curve (AUEC(0-1)) and maximum effect over the entire sampling phase (E(max)) for warfarin INR were 219.58 and 2.071 with treprostinil and 218.93 and 2.041 with vehicle, respectively. Mean time to attain the peak concentration of R-enantiomer of warfarin (T(max)), half-life, and elimination rate constant (k(el)) were 1.9 hours, 51.688 hours, and 0.0137 per hour, respectively, in the presence of treprostinil and 1.5 hours, 52.579 hours, and 0.0137 per hour, respectively, in the presence of vehicle (control). Results were similar for the S-enantiomer. The 90% confidence intervals for warfarin INR and warfarin R- and S-enantiomer pharmacokinetic parameter (C(max) and AUC( infinity )) ratios were within 0.80-1.25, which was established as the no-effect criterion for treprostinil coadministration. No serious or severe adverse events, anticoagulation-related events, or clinically significant physical or laboratory findings were reported. These findings suggest that a clinically important interaction between treprostinil and warfarin during therapy is unlikely.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in healthy men.

Caspofungin, a glucan synthesis inhibitor, is being developed as a parenteral antifungal agent. The pharmacokinetics of caspofungin following 1-h intravenous infusions in healthy men was investigated in four phase I studies. In an alternating two-panel (six men each), rising-single-dose study, plasma drug concentrations increased proportionally with the dose following infusions of 5 to 100 mg. The beta-phase half-life was 9 to 10 h. The plasma drug clearance rate averaged 10 to 12 ml/min. Renal clearance of unchanged drug was a minor pathway of elimination (approximately 2% of the dose). Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics were investigated in a 2-week, serial-panel (5 or 6 men per panel) study of doses of 15, 35, and 70 mg administered daily; a 3-week, single-panel (10 men) study of a dose of 70 mg administered daily; and a parallel panel study (8 men) of a dose of 50 mg administered daily with or without a 70-mg loading dose on day 1. Moderate accumulation was observed with daily dosing. The degree of drug accumulation and the time to steady state were somewhat dose dependent. Accumulation averaged 24% at 15 mg daily and approximately 50% at 50 and 70 mg daily. Mean plasma drug concentrations were maintained above 1.0 microg/ml, a target selected to exceed the MIC at which 90% of the isolates of the most clinically relevant species of Candida were inhibited, throughout therapy with daily treatments of 70 or 50 mg plus the loading dose, while they fell below the target for the first 2 days of a daily treatment of 50 mg without the loading dose. Caspofungin infused intravenously as a single dose or as multiple doses was generally well tolerated. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics of caspofungin supports the clinical evaluation of once-daily dosing regimens for efficacy against fungal infections.