In vitro activity of taurolidine against clinical Candida auris isolates: relevance to catheter-related bloodstream infections.

Candida auris is an evolving and concerning global threat. Of particular concern are bloodstream infections related to central venous catheters. We evaluated the activity of taurolidine, a broad-spectrum antimicrobial in catheter lock solutions, against 106 C. auris isolates. Taurolidine was highly active with a MIC50/MIC90 of 512/512 mg/L, over 20-fold lower than lock solution concentrations of ≥13,500 mg/L. Our data demonstrate a theoretical basis for taurolidine-based lock solutions for prevention of C. auris catheter-associated infections.

Taurolidine/Heparin Lock Solution and Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Hemodialysis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Control, Phase 3 Study.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are one of the most prevalent, fatal, and costly complications of hemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC). The LOCK IT-100 trial compared the efficacy and safety of a taurolidine/heparin catheter lock solution that combines taurolidine 13.5 mg/ml and heparin (1000 units/ml) versus heparin in preventing CRBSIs in participants receiving hemodialysis via CVC. METHODS: LOCK IT-100 was a randomized, double-blind, active-control, multicenter, phase 3 study that enrolled adults with kidney failure undergoing maintenance hemodialysis via CVC from 70 US sites. Participants were randomized 1:1 to taurolidine/heparin catheter lock solution or heparin control catheter lock solution (1000 units/ml). The primary end point was time to CRBSI as assessed by a blinded Clinical Adjudication Committee. Secondary end points were catheter removal for any reason and loss of catheter patency. On the basis of a prespecified interim analysis, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board recommended terminating the trial early for efficacy with no safety concerns. RESULTS: In the full analysis population ( N =795), nine participants in the taurolidine/heparin arm ( n =397; 2%) and 32 participants in the heparin arm ( n =398; 8%) had a CRBSI. Event rates per 1000 catheter days were 0.13 and 0.46, respectively, with the difference in time to CRBSI being statistically significant, favoring taurolidine/heparin ( P < 0.001). The hazard ratio was 0.29 (95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.62), corresponding to a 71% reduction in risk of CRBSIs with taurolidine/heparin versus heparin. There were no significant differences between study arms in time to catheter removal for any reason or loss of catheter patency. The safety of taurolidine/heparin was comparable with that of heparin, and most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Taurolidine/heparin reduced the risk of developing a CRBSI in study participants receiving hemodialysis via CVC compared with heparin with a comparable safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Study Assessing Safety & Effectiveness of a Catheter Lock Solution in Dialysis Patients to Prevent Bloodstream Infection, NCT02651428 .