Frailty, health literacy and self-care in patients admitted with acute heart failure. / Skrøpelighet, helsekompetanse og egenomsorg hos pasienter som innlegges med akutt hjertesvikt.

BACKGROUND: There is limited knowledge from Norway on clinical characteristics, self-care and health literacy in patients admitted to hospital with acute heart failure. Our aim was to identify these factors in this group. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We included patients admitted with acute heart failure over a period of six months (2022/2023) at Drammen Hospital and Vestfold Hospital Trust. Cardiac nurses collected information from the patients, including self-assessed knowledge on an ordinal scale from 0 (little knowledge) to 10 (good knowledge). Clinical frailty scores were calculated and data from the hospital records were recorded. RESULTS: Of 136 patients with acute heart failure, 81 were included. Median age was 79 (range 35-95) years, 35 (43 %) were women. A total of 35 (43 %) had been admitted with heart failure exacerbation in the past year. The patients had a median of 5 (1-10) diagnoses, and the median score on the clinical frailty scale was 4 (1-7), corresponding to 'vulnerable'. A total of 63 (78 %) had been diagnosed with heart failure before admission to hospital. Of these, 13 (21 %) were unaware of the diagnosis, and their self-assessed knowledge was median 3 (25th and 75th percentile, 0-5) for management of heart failure, 2 (25th and 75th percentile, 0-5) for lifestyle interventions and 0 (25th and 75th percentile, 0-2) for heart medications. Altogether 42 out of 63 (67 %) weighed themselves weekly, 13 (21 %) measured their blood pressure, while 3 (5 %) had a self-care plan. Of 50 patients with left ventricle ejection fraction ≤ 40 %, 32 (64 %) were discharged with betablockers and angiotensin II receptor blockers or a combination drug with a neprilysin inhibitor, whereas 11 (22 %) were also prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. INTERPRETATION: The included patients were multimorbid and had a low level of self-care and health literacy. There is potential to optimise well-documented medicinal treatment.

Monitoring Simvastatin Adherence in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study Based on Pharmacokinetic Measurements in Blood Plasma.

BACKGROUND: Poor statin adherence remains a public health concern associated with adverse outcomes. We evaluated the use of pharmacokinetic measurements to monitor adherence to simvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Eighteen patients with CHD taking an evening dose of simvastatin 20 mg (n = 7), 40 mg (n = 5), or 80 mg (n = 6) were examined at steady-state pharmacokinetics. Ten patients were instructed to interrupt simvastatin dosing and return for blood sampling for the subsequent 3 days. Dose-normalized plasma concentrations of simvastatin lactone and simvastatin acid and the sum of the 2 were evaluated to discriminate between adherent dosing and dose omission. Bioanalytical quantification was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A simvastatin acid cutoff of 1.0 × 10 -2 nmol -1 ·L -1 ·mg -1 identified 100% of those omitting 2 doses and 60% of those omitting a single dose. Simvastatin acid showed superior ability to discriminate dose omission, as well as the best agreement between samples handled at ambient and cool temperatures (median deviation 3.5%; interquartile range -2.5% to 13%). The cutoff for a morning dose schedule, with a similar ability to discriminate, was estimated at 2.0 × 10 -3 nmol -1 ·L -1 ·mg -1 . CONCLUSIONS: The present method discriminated between adherence and reduced adherence to simvastatin therapy in patients with CHD. Sample handling is feasible for routine practice, and the assessment of adherence can be performed by direct measurement of simvastatin acid in a blood sample, according to defined cutoff values. Further studies validating the cutoff value and utility for clinical application are encouraged.

Clinical and psychological factors in coronary heart disease patients with statin associated muscle side-effects.

BACKGROUND: To compare clinical and psychological factors among patients with self-perceived statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS), confirmed SAMS, and refuted SAMS in coronary heart disease patients (CHD). METHODS: Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study of 1100 CHD outpatients and a study of 71 CHD outpatients attending a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study to test effects of atorvastatin 40 mg/day on muscle symptom intensity. Clinical and psychosocial factors were compared between patients with and without SAMS in the cross-sectional study, and between patients with confirmed SAMS and refuted SAMS in the randomized study. RESULTS: Bilateral, symmetric muscle symptoms in the lower extremities during statin treatment were more prevalent in patients with confirmed SAMS compared to patients with refuted SAMS (75% vs. 41%, p = 0.01) in the randomized study. No significant differences in psychological factors (anxiety, depression, worry, insomnia, type D personality characteristics) were detected between patients with and without self-perceived SAMS in the cross-sectional study, or between patients with confirmed SAMS and refuted SAMS, in the randomized study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with confirmed SAMS more often present with bilateral lower muscle symptoms compared to those with refuted SAMS. Psychological factors were not associated with self-perceived SAMS or confirmed SAMS. A careful pain history and a search for alternative causes of muscle symptoms are likely to promote communication in patients with SAMS, and may reduce the risk for statin discontinuation.

A novel direct method to determine adherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease.

AIMS: Objective methods to monitor statin adherence are needed. We have established a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for quantification of atorvastatin and its metabolites in blood. This study aimed to develop an objective drug exposure variable with cut-off values to discriminate among adherence, partial adherence and nonadherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease. METHODS: Twenty-five patients treated with atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 5), 20 mg (n = 6), 40 mg (n = 7) and 80 mg (n = 7) participated in a directly observed atorvastatin therapy study to confirm baseline adherence. After the directly observed therapy, half of the patients (test group) were instructed to stop taking atorvastatin and return for blood sample collection the subsequent 3 days. Levels of atorvastatin and metabolites were compared between the test group and the adherent control group. RESULTS: The sum of parent drug and all measured primary metabolites correlated well with the atorvastatin dose administered (Spearman's rho = 0.71, 95% CI 0.44-0.87). The dose-normalized atorvastatin plus metabolites concentrations completely separated the partially adherent test group from the controls at 0.18 nM/mg after 3 days without atorvastatin. To reduce the risk of misinterpreting adherent patients as partially adherent, a corresponding cut-off at 0.10 nM/mg is proposed. A metabolite level of 2-OH atorvastatin acid <0.014 nmol/L provided the optimal cut-off for nonadherence. CONCLUSION: A direct method to discriminate among adherence, partial adherence and nonadherence to atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease has been developed. This tool may be important for novel studies on adherence and potentially useful in clinical practice.

A Method for Direct Monitoring of Atorvastatin Adherence in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Quantification of the Total Exposure to Parent Drug and Major Metabolites Using 2-Channel Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Low adherence to statin therapy remains a public health concern associated with poor prognosis in cardiovascular disease patients. A feasible method for statin adherence monitoring in clinical practice has yet to be developed. In this article, we describe a novel method designed for the direct monitoring of atorvastatin adherence based on the sum of parent drug and major metabolites in blood samples. METHODS: Acid and lactone forms of atorvastatin, 2-OH-atorvastatin, and 4-OH-atorvastatin were assayed. Plasma proteins were precipitated with an acidified mixture of methanol, acetonitrile, and aqueous zinc sulfate, and the supernatant was analyzed with 2-channel reversed-phase chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Assay validation was performed according to the guidelines provided by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration. RESULTS: The effective run time was 1 minute and 45 seconds per sample. Mean accuracy ranged from 92% to 110%, and coefficients of variation were ≤8.1% over the measurement ranges for individual compounds. The sum of acids and corresponding lactones was stable in clinical plasma samples kept at ambient temperature for up to 6 days after blood sampling (mean sum within 96.6%-101% of baseline). CONCLUSIONS: A fast and reliable assay for the quantification of atorvastatin and its 5 major metabolites in clinical blood samples is reported. Limitations of preanalytical stability were solved using the sum of the acid and lactone forms. The assay is feasible for implementation in clinical practice, and the sum of parent drug and metabolites may be used for direct monitoring of atorvastatin adherence.

Statin-associated muscle symptoms in coronary patients: design of a randomized study.

Objectives. Estimate the effect of atorvastatin on muscular symptom intensity in coronary patients with subjective statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) and to determine the association with blood levels of atorvastatin and its metabolites, to obtain an objective marker for true SAMS. Design. A randomized, double-blinded, cross-over study will include 80 coronary patients with subjectively reported SAMS during ongoing atorvastatin therapy or previous muscle symptoms that led to discontinuation of atorvastatin. Patients will be randomized to 7-weeks treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg/day in the first period and matched placebo in the second 7-weeks period, or placebo in the first period and atorvastatin in the second period. Each period is preceded by 1-week wash-out. A control group (n = 40) without muscle symptoms will have 7 weeks open treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg/day. Blood samples will be collected at baseline and at the end of each treatment period, and muscular symptoms will be rated by the patients weekly using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The primary outcome is the difference in aggregated mean VAS scores between the last three weeks of atorvastatin treatment and of placebo treatment. The main purpose is to develop an objective marker for true SAMS, by comparing SAMS associated with blinded atorvastatin treatment with blood concentrations of atorvastatin and its metabolites. Diagnostic and discrimination performance will be determined. Conclusions. The study provides new knowledge on SAMS in coronary patients and may contribute to more personalized statin treatment and monitoring, fewer side-effects and consequently improved adherence and lipid management in future practice.

Cytokine responses, microbial aetiology and short-term outcome in community-acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: The inflammatory response to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is orchestrated through activation of cytokine networks and the complement system. We examined the association of multiple cytokines and the terminal complement complex (TCC) with microbial aetiology, disease severity and short-term outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma levels of 27 cytokines and TCC were analysed in blood samples obtained at hospital admission, clinical stabilization and 6-week follow-up from 247 hospitalized adults with CAP. Fourteen mediators were included in final analyses. Adverse short-term outcome was defined as intensive care unit (ICU) admission and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Cytokine and TCC levels were dynamic in the clinical course of CAP, with highest levels seen at admission for most mediators. Admission levels of cytokines and TCC did not differ between groups of microbial aetiology. High admission levels of IL-6 (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.84, P = .001), IL-8 (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.26-2.55, P = .001) and MIP-1ß (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.36-3.81, P = .002) were associated with a CURB-65 severity score of ≥3, while IL-6 (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07-1.74, P = .011) and MIP-1ß (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.03-3.36, P = .040) were associated with a high risk of an adverse short-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this CAP cohort, admission levels of IL-6, IL-8 and MIP-1ß were associated with disease severity and/or adverse short-term outcome. Still, for most mediators, only nonsignificant variations in inflammatory responses were observed for groups of microbial aetiology, disease severity and short-term outcome.

Managing patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes after coronary events: individual tailoring needed - a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the determinants associated with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in coronary patients may help to individualize treatment and modelling interventions. We sought to identify sociodemographic, medical and psychosocial factors associated with normal blood glucose (HbA1c < 5.7%), prediabetes (HbA1c 5.7-6.4%), and type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A cross-sectional explorative study applied regression analyses to investigate the factors associated with glycaemic status and control (HbA1c level) in 1083 patients with myocardial infarction and/or a coronary revascularization procedure. Data were collected from hospital records at the index event and from a self-report questionnaire and clinical examination with blood samples at 2-36 months follow-up. RESULTS: In all, 23% had type 2 diabetes, 44% had prediabetes, and 33% had normal blood glucose at follow-up. In adjusted analyses, type 2 diabetes was associated with larger waist circumference (Odds Ratio 1.03 per 1.0 cm, p = 0.001), hypertension (Odds Ratio 2.7, p < 0.001), lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Odds Ratio 0.3 per1.0 mmol/L, p = 0.002) and insomnia (Odds Ratio 2.0, p = 0.002). In adjusted analyses, prediabetes was associated with smoking (Odds Ratio 3.3, p = 0.001), hypertension (Odds Ratio 1.5, p = 0.03), and non-participation in cardiac rehabilitation (Odds Ratio 1.7, p = 0.003). In patients with type 2 diabetes, a higher HbA1c level was associated with ethnic minority background (standardized beta [ß] 0.19, p = 0.005) and low drug adherence (ß 0.17, p = 0.01). In patients with prediabetes or normal blood glucose, a higher HbA1c was associated with larger waist circumference (ß 0.13, p < 0.001), smoking (ß 0.18, p < 0.001), hypertension (ß 0.08, p = 0.04), older age (ß 0.16, p < 0.001), and non-participation in cardiac rehabilitation (ß 0.11, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Along with obesity and hypertension, insomnia and low drug adherence were the major modifiable factors associated with type 2 diabetes, whereas smoking and non-participation in cardiac rehabilitation were the factors associated with prediabetes. Further research on the effect of individual tailoring, addressing the reported significant predictors of failure, is needed to improve glycaemic control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02309255 , December 5th 2014.

Admissions to the medical department - who admits and why. / Innleggelser i medisinsk avdeling ­ hvem legger inn og hvorfor.

BAKGRUNN: Hensikten med denne studien var å kartlegge grunnlaget for innleggelser ved en stor medisinsk avdeling i Norge. Vi har vurdert mulige alternativer til innleggelse og hvorvidt triagering kan bidra til å identifisere aktuelle pasienter. MATERIALE OG METODE: Alle innleggelser ved Medisinsk avdeling ved Drammen sykehus i en full uke høsten 2014 ble registrert med pasientens alder, kjønn, liggetid, innleggende lege/instans, hvor vedkommende ble innlagt fra og diagnose ved innleggelse og utskrivning. Alternativer til innleggelse vurdert ut fra tilstanden ved avreise fra primærhelsetjenesten ble systematisk evaluert av to fastleger og en erfaren lege ved medisinsk avdeling ved gjennomgang av innleggelsesskrivene. Pasientene ble triagert i akuttmottaket umiddelbart etter ankomst, og tilstandens alvorlighetsgrad ble sammenholdt med mulige alternativer til innleggelse. RESULTATER: Studien omfattet 255 innleggelser (52 % kvinner, gjennomsnittsalder 62 år). Innleggende lege var i 57 % av tilfellene fra primærhelsetjenesten (fastlege 26 %, legevakt 31 %) og i 24 %fra spesialisthelsetjenesten. Innleggelsen var uten direkte legehenvisning i 18 % av tilfellene. De hyppigste innleggelsesdiagnosene var hjertesykdommer (38 %), lungesykdommer (11 %) og infeksjoner (9 %). Hos 7 % av de pasientene som var innlagt av primærlege (fastlege/legevaktlege), fant vi mulige alternativer til innleggelse, oftest innleggelse i kommunal akutt døgnplass (KAD). Det var ingen sammenheng mellom triagering og alternativ til innleggelse. FORTOLKNING: Andelen innleggelser fra fastlege var høyere enn i tilsvarende studier. Én av 15 innleggelser (7 %) ble vurdert som aktuell for alternativ. Triagering skiller ikke ut pasientforløp som er egnet for alternativ til innleggelse.

Unfavourable risk factor control after coronary events in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Risk factor control after a coronary event in a recent European multi-centre study was inadequate. Patient selection from academic centres and low participation rate, however, may underscore failing risk factor control in routine clinical practice. Improved understanding of the patient factors that influence risk factor control is needed to improve secondary preventive strategies. The objective of the present paper was to determine control of the major risk factors in a coronary population from routine clinical practice, and how risk factor control was influenced by the study factors age, gender, number of coronary events, and time since the index event. METHODS: A cross-sectional study determined risk factor control and its association with study factors in 1127 patients (83% participated) aged 18-80 years with acute myocardial infarction and/or revascularization identified from medical records. Study data were collected from a self-report questionnaire, clinical examination, and blood samples after 2-36 months (median 16) follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent were current smokers at follow-up. Of those smoking at the index event 56% continued smoking. Obesity was found in 34%, and 60% were physically inactive. Although 93% were taking blood-pressure lowering agents and statins, 46% were still hypertensive and 57% had LDL cholesterol >1.8 mmol/L at follow-up. Suboptimal control of diabetes was found in 59%. The patients failed on average to control three of the six major risk factors, and patients with >1 coronary events (p < 0.001) showed the poorest overall control. A linear increase in smoking (p < 0.01) and obesity (p < 0.05) with increasing time since the event was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of coronary patients in a representative Norwegian population did not achieve risk factor control, and the poorest overall control was found in patients with several coronary events. New strategies for secondary prevention are clearly needed to improve risk factor control. Even modest advances will provide major health benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT02309255 ).

Medical and sociodemographic factors predict persistent smoking after coronary events.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the determinants of persistent smoking after a coronary event constitutes the basis of modelling interventions of smoking cessation in secondary prevention programs. We aim to identify the potentially modifiable medical, sociodemographic and psychosocial factors, comprising the study factors, associated with unfavourable risk factor control after CHD events. METHODS: A cross-sectional explorative study used logistic regression analysis to investigate the association between study factors and smoking status in 1083 patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction and/or coronary revascularization. Hospital record data, a self-report questionnaire, clinical examination and blood samples were applied. RESULTS: At the index hospitalization, 390 patients were smoking and at follow-up after 2-36 months 167 (43%) of these had quit, while 230 reported persistent smoking. In adjusted analyses, unemployed or disability benefits (Odds ratio (OR) 4.1), low education (OR 3.5), longer smoking duration (OR 2.3) and not having ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as index event (OR 2.3) were significantly associated with persistent smoking. Psychosocial factors at follow-up were not associated with persistent smoking. Smokers reported high motivation for cessation, with 68% wanting help to quit. Only 42% had been offered nicotine replacement therapy or other cessation aids. Smokers rated use of tobacco as the most important cause of their coronary disease (6.8 on a 1-10 Likert scale). CONCLUSIONS: Low socioeconomic status, prior duration of smoking, and not having STEMI as index event were associated with persisting smoking. Persistent smokers in this study seem to have an acceptable risk perception and were motivated to cease smoking, but needed assistance through cessation programs including prescription of pharmacological aids. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02309255 , registered retrospectively.

Patient characteristics and risk factors of participants and non-participants in the NOR-COR study.

OBJECTIVES: We aim to compare patient characteristics and coronary risk factors among participants and non-participants in a survey of CHD patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study explored characteristics and risk factors in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction and/or revascularization. Study data collected from hospital medical records were compared between participants (n = 1127, 83%) and non-participants (n = 229, 16%), who did not consent to participation in the clinical study. RESULTS: Non-participants showed statistically higher prevalence of women (28% versus 21%), ethnic minorities (6% versus 3%), patients living alone (26% versus 19%), depression (19% versus 6%), anxiety (9% versus 3%), hypertension (54% versus 43%) and diabetes (24% versus 17%). Significantly higher multi-adjusted odds ratios were found for Charlson comorbidity index 3.4 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8, 4.3) and depression 14.5 (4.4, 121.5) in non-participants. CONCLUSIONS: Non-participants do have higher prevalence of important coronary risk factors compared to participants, and risk factor control may thus be overestimated in available prevention studies. Patients with somatic comorbidity and depression appear to be at particular risk of non-participation in the present study. New strategies accounting for the causes of nonadherence are important to improve secondary prevention in CHD.

The role of medical and psychosocial factors for unfavourable coronary risk factor control.

OBJECTIVES: This project aims to identify socio-demographic, medical and psychosocial factors (study factors) associated with coronary risk control and prognosis, and to test their impact in a representative sample of coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. DESIGN: The first phase includes a cross-sectional study designed to explore the association between the study factors and coronary risk factor control in CHD patients. Data from hospital records, a questionnaire, clinical examination and blood samples were collected. The independent effects of study factors on subsequent coronary events will be explored prospectively by controlling for baseline coronary risk factors. In the second phase, we will test the effect of tailored interventions to modify the study factors associated with unfavourable risk profile in phase I. RESULTS: In all 1366 patients (21% women), aged 18-80 years with a coronary event on average 17 (2-38) months prior to study participation were identified (83% participation rate). Of the 239 patients who refused participation, 229 patients consented to analysis of hospital record data (non- participants). CONCLUSIONS: If the study variables contribute to CHD risk factors and prognosis, the present project may be important for the development of prevention programs by tailoring these to the patients perceived needs and behaviour profiles.

Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia and diagnostic yields of microbiological methods: a 3-year prospective study in Norway.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in microbiological techniques, the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is still not well described. We applied polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and conventional methods to describe etiology of CAP in hospitalized adults and evaluated their respective diagnostic yields. METHODS: 267 CAP patients were enrolled consecutively over our 3-year prospective study. Conventional methods (i.e., bacterial cultures, urinary antigen assays, serology) were combined with nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swab samples analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for Streptococcus pneumoniae, and by real-time PCR for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Bordetella pertussis and 12 types of respiratory viruses. RESULTS: Etiology was established in 167 (63%) patients with 69 (26%) patients having ≥1 copathogen. There were 75 (28%) pure bacterial and 41 (15%) pure viral infections, and 51 (19%) viral-bacterial coinfections, resulting in 126 (47%) patients with bacterial and 92 (34%) patients with viral etiology. S. pneumoniae (30%), influenza (15%) and rhinovirus (12%) were most commonly identified, typically with ≥1 copathogen. During winter and spring, viruses were detected more frequently (45%, P=.01) and usually in combination with bacteria (39%). PCR improved diagnostic yield by 8% in 64 cases with complete sampling (and by 15% in all patients); 5% for detection of bacteria; 19% for viruses (P=.04); and 16% for detection of ≥1 copathogen. Etiology was established in 79% of 43 antibiotic-naive patients with complete sampling. S. pneumoniae qPCR positive rate was significantly higher for OP swab compared to NP swab (P<.001). Positive rates for serology were significantly higher than for real-time PCR in detecting B. pertussis (P=.001) and influenza viruses (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Etiology could be established in 4 out of 5 CAP patients with the aid of PCR, particularly in diagnosing viral infections. S. pneumoniae and viruses were most frequently identified, usually with copathogens. Viral-bacterial coinfections were more common than pure infections during winter and spring; a finding we consider important in the proper management of CAP. When swabbing for qPCR detection of S. pneumoniae in adult CAP, OP appeared superior to NP, but this finding needs further confirmation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01563315 .

A multi-component intervention increased access to smoking cessation treatment after hospitalization for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a randomized trial.

Aims: To evaluate the effects of a multi-component intervention for smokers hospitalized for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) on the participation rate in community-based cessation programmes and the use of cessation drugs. Additionally, to explore the impact on the cessation rates at 6 months. Methods and results: A randomized parallel-group study was conducted at a Norwegian secondary care hospital in 2021. The intervention group was: (i) counselled using motivational interviewing techniques during hospitalization; (ii) given an information leaflet, detailing the cessation programme; and (iii) referred to the community-based smoking cessation treatment including a post-discharge pro-active telephone invitation. The control group received usual care and the same information leaflet containing clear contact details for initiating participation. Data were collected at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Among 99 smokers hospitalized with ASCVD, 40 were excluded. Of 59 randomized patients, 4 were lost to follow-up and 55 completed the study. The mean age was 65.1 (standard deviation 9.3) years, 35% were female, and 88% had smoked >20 years. Co-morbidity was prevalent (mean Charlson score 4.8). The intervention group was more likely to participate in the smoking cessation treatment {48 vs. 7%, difference: 41% [95% confidence interval (CI): 14%, 63%]} and used cessation drugs more frequently [59 vs. 21%, difference: 38% (95% CI: 17%, 59%)]. At the 6 months point prevalence, we observed notable between-group differences in self-reported cessation rate (48 vs. 25%). Conclusion: The intervention significantly increased the participation rate at community-based smoking cessation programmes and the use of cessation drugs among multi-morbid smokers hospitalized for ASCVD.

Mevalonate in blood and muscle: Response to atorvastatin treatment and the relationship to statin intolerance in patients with coronary heart disease.

Statin-associated muscle symptoms are frequently reported and often lead to discontinuation of statin therapy with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. In vitro studies suggest that statin-mediated inhibition of the mevalonate pathway leads to muscle cell toxicity. We aimed to determine the relationship between mevalonate, LDL-cholesterol, and atorvastatin metabolites in patients with coronary heart disease and self-perceived muscle side effects. Furthermore, we assessed the correlation between mevalonate in blood and muscle and the relationship to statin intolerance due to muscle symptoms. We used blood plasma from a randomized crossover trial (n = 70) and muscle biopsies and plasma from a subgroup in a subsequent open intervention study (n = 26). Both studies tested atorvastatin 40 mg/day. Seven patients did not tolerate ≥3 statins throughout the follow-up and were classified as statin-intolerant. Mevalonate in blood plasma decreased during atorvastatin treatment (median difference -38%, range -77% to 43%, p < 0.001), whereas mevalonate in muscle tissue was not lowered (0.05%, range -47% to 145%). Mevalonate correlated poorly with LDL-cholesterol and atorvastatin metabolites (Spearman's rho -0.28 to 0.10). The statin-intolerant patients had a smaller reduction in circulating mevalonate compared with the tolerant patients; median difference -8.1 (-22 to 3.5) nmol/L versus -25 (-93 to 12) nmol/L, p = 0.028. A similar observation was made for LDL-cholesterol. Cutoffs based on these biomarkers classified >50% correctly as tolerant. Inhibition of the mevalonate pathway does not appear to be the mechanism underlying statin intolerance in the present study. Further studies of mevalonate as a biomarker for statin tolerance are needed to clarify the potential.

Treatment patterns and adherence to lipid-lowering drugs during eight-year follow-up after a coronary heart disease event.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Proper prescription and high adherence to intensive lipid lowering drugs (LLD) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are crucial and strongly recommended. The aim of this study is to investigate long-term treatment patterns and adherence to LLD following hospitalization for a CHD event. METHODS: Patients admitted to two Norwegian hospitals with a CHD event from 2011 to 2014 (N = 1094) attended clinical examination and completed a questionnaire, median 16 months later. Clinical data were linked to pharmacy dispensing data from 2010 to 2020. The proportions using high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin 40/80 mg or rosuvastatin 20/40 mg) and non-statin LLD after the CHD event were assessed. Adherence was evaluated by proportion of days covered (PDC) and gaps in treatment. RESULTS: Median age at hospitalization was 63 (IQR 12) years, 21 % were female. Altogether, 1054 patients (96 %) were discharged with a statin prescription, while treatment was dispensed in 85 % within the following 90 days. During median 8 (SD 2.5) years follow-up, the proportion using high-intensity statin therapy ranged 62-68 %, whereas the use of ezetimibe increased from 4 to 26 %. PDC <0.8 was found in 22 % of statin users and 26 % of ezetimibe users. The proportions with a treatment gap exceeding 180 days were 22 % for statins and 28 % for ezetimibe. Smoking at hospitalization and negative affectivity were significantly associated with reduced statin adherence, regardless of adherence measure. CONCLUSIONS: In this long-term follow-up of patients with CHD, less than 70 % used high-intensity statin therapy with only small changes over time, and only 25 % used additional treatment with ezetimibe. We identified factors associated with reduced statin adherence that may be target for interventions.

Validation of a novel direct method to determine reduced adherence to atorvastatin therapy.

AIMS: Objective methods to determine statin adherence are requested to improve lipid management. We have recently established a method to detect reduced adherence to atorvastatin therapy with cut-off values based on the sum of atorvastatin and its major metabolites in the blood. We aimed to validate this method in patients with and without cardiovascular disease, and optimize previous cut-off values. METHODS AND RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic study included 60 participants treated with atorvastatin 20 mg (N = 20), 40 mg (N = 20), and 80 mg (N = 20). Atorvastatin was then stopped and blood samples collected from day zero to day four. Quantification of the parent drug and its metabolites in blood plasma was performed with a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. The cut-off values for reduced adherence were validated and optimized by calculating diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Our candidate cut-off value of dose-normalized six-component sum of atorvastatin plus metabolites <0.10 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 93% for detecting ≥2 omitted doses. An optimized cut-off <0.062 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100%. An alternative simplified two-component metabolite sum with a cut-off value <0.05 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 76%. An optimized cut-off <0.02 nM/mg provided a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 98%. CONCLUSION: This validation study confirms that our direct method discriminates reduced adherence from adherence to atorvastatin therapy with high diagnostic accuracy. The method may improve lipid management in clinical practice and serve as a useful tool in future studies.

The atorvastatin metabolite pattern in muscle tissue and blood plasma is associated with statin muscle side effects in patients with coronary heart disease; An exploratory case-control study.

Background and aims: Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) is a prevalent cause of statin discontinuation. It is challenging and time-consuming for clinicians to assess whether symptoms are caused by the statin or not, and diagnostic biomarkers are requested. Atorvastatin metabolites have been associated with SAMS. We aimed to compare atorvastatin pharmacokinetics between coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with and without clinically statin intolerance and statin-dependent histopathological alterations in muscle tissue. Secondarily we aimed to assess genetic variants relevant for the observed pharmacokinetic variables. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with CHD and subjective SAMS were included in the exploratory MUSE biomarker study in 2020. Participants received atorvastatin 40 mg/day for seven weeks followed by no statins for eight weeks. Muscle biopsies and blood were collected at the end of each period. Four patients were categorized as clinically intolerant to ≥3 statins prior to study start whereas four patients had signs of muscle cell damage during treatment. Results: We found significantly lower levels of atorvastatin acids, and higher lactone/acid ratios in the statin intolerant, both in muscle and plasma. With optimal cut-off, the combination of 2-OH-atorvastatin acid and the 2-OH-atorvastatin lactone/acid ratio provided sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of 100 %. Patients with variants in UGT1A1 and UGT1A3 had higher lactone metabolite levels than those with wild type, both in muscle and plasma. Conclusion: Atorvastatin metabolites appear promising as biomarkers for the identification of clinical statin intolerance in patients with self-perceived SAMS, but the findings have to be confirmed in larger studies.