Deciphering the Morphology of Tumor-Stromal Features in Invasive Breast Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence.

Tumor-associated stroma in breast cancer (BC) is complex and exhibits a high degree of heterogeneity. To date, no standardized assessment method has been established. Artificial intelligence (AI) could provide an objective morphologic assessment of tumors and stroma, with the potential to identify new features not discernible by visual microscopy. In this study, we used AI to assess the clinical significance of (1) stroma-to-tumor ratio (S:TR) and (2) the spatial arrangement of stromal cells, tumor cell density, and tumor burden in BC. Whole-slide images of a large cohort (n = 1968) of well-characterized luminal BC cases were examined. Region and cell-level annotation was performed, and supervised deep learning models were applied for automated quantification of tumor and stromal features. S:TR was calculated in terms of surface area and cell count ratio, and the S:TR heterogeneity and spatial distribution were also assessed. Tumor cell density and tumor size were used to estimate tumor burden. Cases were divided into discovery (n = 1027) and test (n = 941) sets for validation of the findings. In the whole cohort, the stroma-to-tumor mean surface area ratio was 0.74, and stromal cell density heterogeneity score was high (0.7/1). BC with high S:TR showed features characteristic of good prognosis and longer patient survival in both the discovery and test sets. Heterogeneous spatial distribution of S:TR areas was predictive of worse outcome. Higher tumor burden was associated with aggressive tumor behavior and shorter survival and was an independent predictor of worse outcome (BC-specific survival; hazard ratio: 1.7, P = .03, 95% CI, 1.04-2.83 and distant metastasis-free survival; hazard ratio: 1.64, P = .04, 95% CI, 1.01-2.62) superior to absolute tumor size. The study concludes that AI provides a tool to assess major and subtle morphologic stromal features in BC with prognostic implications. Tumor burden is more prognostically informative than tumor size.

AI-based intra-tumor heterogeneity score of Ki67 expression as a prognostic marker for early-stage ER+/HER2- breast cancer.

Early-stage estrogen receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor negative (ER+/HER2-) luminal breast cancer (BC) is quite heterogeneous and accounts for about 70% of all BCs. Ki67 is a proliferation marker that has a significant prognostic value in luminal BC despite the challenges in its assessment. There is increasing evidence that spatial colocalization, which measures the evenness of different types of cells, is clinically important in several types of cancer. However, reproducible quantification of intra-tumor spatial heterogeneity remains largely unexplored. We propose an automated pipeline for prognostication of luminal BC based on the analysis of spatial distribution of Ki67 expression in tumor cells using a large well-characterized cohort (n = 2,081). The proposed Ki67 colocalization (Ki67CL) score can stratify ER+/HER2- BC patients with high significance in terms of BC-specific survival (p < 0.00001) and distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.0048). Ki67CL score is shown to be highly significant compared with the standard Ki67 index. In addition, we show that the proposed Ki67CL score can help identify luminal BC patients who can potentially benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

AI-enabled routine H&E image based prognostic marker for early-stage luminal breast cancer.

Breast cancer (BC) grade is a well-established subjective prognostic indicator of tumour aggressiveness. Tumour heterogeneity and subjective assessment result in high degree of variability among observers in BC grading. Here we propose an objective Haematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) image-based prognostic marker for early-stage luminal/Her2-negative BReAst CancEr that we term as the BRACE marker. The proposed BRACE marker is derived from AI based assessment of heterogeneity in BC at a detailed level using the power of deep learning. The prognostic ability of the marker is validated in two well-annotated cohorts (Cohort-A/Nottingham: n = 2122 and Cohort-B/Coventry: n = 311) on early-stage luminal/HER2-negative BC patients treated with endocrine therapy and with long-term follow-up. The BRACE marker is able to stratify patients for both distant metastasis free survival (p = 0.001, C-index: 0.73) and BC specific survival (p < 0.0001, C-index: 0.84) showing comparable prediction accuracy to Nottingham Prognostic Index and Magee scores, which are both derived from manual histopathological assessment, to identify luminal BC patients that may be likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Semantic annotation for computational pathology: multidisciplinary experience and best practice recommendations.

Recent advances in whole-slide imaging (WSI) technology have led to the development of a myriad of computer vision and artificial intelligence-based diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive algorithms. Computational Pathology (CPath) offers an integrated solution to utilise information embedded in pathology WSIs beyond what can be obtained through visual assessment. For automated analysis of WSIs and validation of machine learning (ML) models, annotations at the slide, tissue, and cellular levels are required. The annotation of important visual constructs in pathology images is an important component of CPath projects. Improper annotations can result in algorithms that are hard to interpret and can potentially produce inaccurate and inconsistent results. Despite the crucial role of annotations in CPath projects, there are no well-defined guidelines or best practices on how annotations should be carried out. In this paper, we address this shortcoming by presenting the experience and best practices acquired during the execution of a large-scale annotation exercise involving a multidisciplinary team of pathologists, ML experts, and researchers as part of the Pathology image data Lake for Analytics, Knowledge and Education (PathLAKE) consortium. We present a real-world case study along with examples of different types of annotations, diagnostic algorithm, annotation data dictionary, and annotation constructs. The analyses reported in this work highlight best practice recommendations that can be used as annotation guidelines over the lifecycle of a CPath project.