Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is the recommended treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of sorafenib to that of selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: SARAH was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, investigator-initiated, phase 3 trial done at 25 centres specialising in liver diseases in France. Patients were eligible if they were aged at least 18 years with a life expectancy greater than 3 months, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, Child-Pugh liver function class A or B score of 7 or lower, and locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] stage C), or new hepatocellular carcinoma not eligible for surgical resection, liver transplantation, or thermal ablation after a previously cured hepatocellular carcinoma (cured by surgery or thermoablative therapy), or hepatocellular carcinoma with two unsuccessful rounds of transarterial chemoembolisation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a permutated block method with block sizes two and four to receive continuous oral sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) or SIRT with 90Y-loaded resin microspheres 2-5 weeks after randomisation. Patients were stratified according to randomising centre, ECOG performance status, previous transarterial chemoembolisation, and presence of macroscopic vascular invasion. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population; safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of sorafenib or underwent at least one of the SIRT work-up exams. This study has been completed and the final results are reported here. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01482442. FINDINGS: Between Dec 5, 2011, and March 12, 2015, 467 patients were randomly assigned; after eight patients withdrew consent, 237 were assigned to SIRT and 222 to sorafenib. In the SIRT group, 53 (22%) of 237 patients did not receive SIRT; 26 (49%) of these 53 patients were treated with sorafenib. Median follow-up was 27·9 months (IQR 21·9-33·6) in the SIRT group and 28·1 months (20·0-35·3) in the sorafenib group. Median overall survival was 8·0 months (95% CI 6·7-9·9) in the SIRT group versus 9·9 months (8·7-11·4) in the sorafenib group (hazard ratio 1·15 [95% CI 0·94-1·41] for SIRT vs sorafenib; p=0·18). In the safety population, at least one serious adverse event was reported in 174 (77%) of 226 patients in the SIRT group and in 176 (82%) of 216 in the sorafenib group. The most frequent grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (20 [9%] vs 41 [19%]), liver dysfunction (25 [11%] vs 27 [13%]), increased laboratory liver values (20 [9%] vs 16 [7%]), haematological abnormalities (23 [10%] vs 30 [14%]), diarrhoea (three [1%] vs 30 [14%]), abdominal pain (six [3%] vs 14 [6%]), increased creatinine (four [2%] vs 12 [6%]), and hand-foot skin reaction (one [<1%] vs 12 [6%]). 19 deaths in the SIRT group and 12 in the sorafenib group were deemed to be treatment related. INTERPRETATION: In patients with locally advanced or intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma after unsuccessful transarterial chemoembolisation, overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups. Quality of life and tolerance might help when choosing between the two treatments. FUNDING: Sirtex Medical Inc.

Identification of 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters Associated with Weight Loss in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

18F-FDG PET-CT is routinely performed as part of the initial staging of numerous cancers. Other than having descriptive, predictive and prognostic values for tumors, 18F-FDG PET-CT provides full-body data, which could inform on concurrent pathophysiological processes such as malnutrition. To test this hypothesis, we measured the 18F-FDG uptake in several organs and evaluated their association with weight loss in patients at diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Forty-eight patients were included in this retrospective monocentric study. 18F-FDG uptake quantification was performed in the brain, the liver, the spleen, bone marrow, muscle and the esophageal tumor itself and was compared between patients with different amounts of weight loss. We found that Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) and peak Standardized Uptake Values (SUVpeak) measured in the brain correlated with the amount of weight loss: TLG was, on average, higher in patients who had lost more than 5% of their usual weight, whereas brain SUVpeak were, on average, lower in patients who had lost more than 10% of their weight. Higher TLG and lower brain SUVpeak were associated with worse OS in the univariate analysis. This study reports a new and significant association between 18F-FDG uptake in the brain and initial weight loss in patients with esophageal cancer.

Retrospective Voxel-Based Dosimetry for Assessing the Ability of the Body-Surface-Area Model to Predict Delivered Dose and Radioembolization Outcome.

The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the ability of the body-surface-area (BSA) model to predict tumor-absorbed dose and treatment outcome through retrospective voxel-based dosimetry. Methods: Data from 35 hepatocellular carcinoma patients with a total of 42 90Y-resin microsphere radioembolization treatments were included. Injected activity was planned with the BSA model. Voxel dosimetry based on 99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin SPECT and 90Y-microsphere PET was retrospectively performed using a dedicated treatment planning system. Average dose and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the anatomically defined tumors were analyzed. The selected dose metrics extracted from DVHs were minimum dose to 50% and 70% of the tumor volume and percentage of the volume receiving at least 120 Gy. Treatment response was evaluated 6 mo after therapy according to the criteria of the European Association for the Study of the Liver. Results: Six-month response was evaluated in 26 treatments: 14 were considered to produce an objective response and 12 a nonresponse. Retrospective evaluation of 90Y-microsphere PET-based dosimetry showed a large interpatient variability with a median average absorbed dose of 60 Gy to the tumor. In 62% (26/42) of the cases, tumor, nontumoral liver, and lung doses would have complied with the recommended thresholds if the injected activity calculated by the BSA method had been increased. Average doses, minimum dose to 50% and 70% of the tumor volume, and percentage of the volume receiving at least 120 Gy were significantly higher in cases of objective response than in nonresponse. Conclusion: In our population, average tumor-absorbed dose and DVH metrics were associated with tumor response. However, the activity calculated by the BSA method could have been increased to reach the recommended tumor dose threshold. Tumor uptake, target and nontarget volumes, and dose distribution heterogeneity should be considered for activity planning.