Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Triple-Negative Apocrine Carcinoma: Comparing Apocrine Morphology, Androgen Receptor, and Immune Phenotypes.

CONTEXT.­: Apocrine differentiation and androgen receptor (AR) positivity represent a specific subset of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and are often considered potential prognostic or predictive factors. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate the response of TNBC to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to assess the impact of apocrine morphology, AR status, Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67LI), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). DESIGN.­: A total of 232 TNBC patients who underwent NAC followed by surgical resection in a single institute were analyzed. The study evaluated apocrine morphology and AR and Ki-67LI expression via immunohistochemistry from pre-NAC biopsy samples. Additionally, pre-NAC intratumoral TILs and stromal TILs (sTILs) were quantified from biopsies using a deep learning model. The response to NAC after surgery was assessed based on residual cancer burden. RESULTS.­: Both apocrine morphology and high AR expression correlated with lower Ki-67LI (P < .001 for both). Apocrine morphology was associated with lower postoperative pathologic complete response (pCR) rates after NAC (P = .02), but the difference in TILs between TNBC cases with and without apocrine morphology was not statistically significant (P = .09 for sTILs). In contrast, AR expression did not significantly affect pCR (P = .13). Pre-NAC TILs strongly correlated with postoperative pCR in TNBCs without apocrine morphology (P < .001 for sTILs), whereas TNBC with apocrine morphology demonstrated an indeterminate trend (P = .82 for sTILs). CONCLUSIONS.­: Although TIL counts did not vary significantly based on apocrine morphology, apocrine morphology itself was a more reliable predictor of NAC response than AR expression. Consequently, although apocrine morphology is a rare subtype of TNBC, its identification is clinically important.

Scalp Cooling in Preventing Persistent Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Current studies of the efficacy of scalp cooling are limited by short-term duration. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of scalp cooling in reducing persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (PCIA) 6 months after chemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial comparing scalp cooling versus control in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer stages I-III scheduled to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with curative intent between December 2020 and August 2021. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to scalp cooling or usual clinical practice. The primary outcome was PCIA 6 months after chemotherapy. Hair thickness and density were measured using Folliscope 5.0. CIA-related distress was assessed using the CIA distress scale (CADS), with a higher score reflecting higher stress. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with PCIA at 6 months was 13.5% (12/89) in the scalp-cooling group and 52.0% (26/50) in the control group. The average difference in the change in hair thickness from baseline between the scalp-cooling and control groups was 9.0 µm in favor of the intervention group. The average difference in the change in hair density between intervention and control at the end of the study was -3.3 hairs/cm2. At 6 months after chemotherapy, the average difference in the change in CADS score between the intervention and control groups was -3.2 points, reflecting reduced CIA-related stress in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: Scalp cooling reduced the incidence of PCIA, primarily by increasing hair thickness compared with control. Scalp cooling is helpful in promoting qualitative hair regrowth. Yet, further research is necessary to observe longer-term benefits of scalp cooling.

Phase II DORA Study of Olaparib with or without Durvalumab as a Chemotherapy-Free Maintenance Strategy in Platinum-Pretreated Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: We explored the efficacy of PARP inhibition with or without programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) blockade as chemotherapy-free maintenance therapy for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC) sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the phase II non-comparative DORA trial (NCT03167619), patients with ongoing stable disease (SD) or complete/partial response (CR/PR) to first- or second-line platinum-based chemotherapy for TNBC (≤10% estrogen/progesterone receptor expression) were randomized 1:1 to receive olaparib 300 mg twice daily with or without durvalumab 1,500 mg on day 1 every 4 weeks. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) versus a historical control of continued platinum-based therapy. RESULTS: 45 patients were randomized (23 to olaparib alone, 22 to the combination; 3 with estrogen/progesterone receptor expression 1%-10%). At 9.8 months' median follow-up, median PFS from randomization was 4.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.6-6.1] months with olaparib and 6.1 (95% CI, 3.7-10.1) months with the combination, both significantly longer than the historical control (P = 0.0023 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Clinical benefit rates (SD ≥24 weeks or CR/PR) were 44% (95% CI, 23%-66%) and 36% (95% CI, 17%-59%) in the monotherapy and combination arms, respectively. Sustained clinical benefit was seen irrespective of germline BRCA mutation or PD-L1 status, but tended to be associated with CR/PR to prior platinum, particularly in the olaparib-alone arm. No new safety signals were reported. CONCLUSIONS: PFS was longer than expected with both regimens. A patient subset with wild-type BRCA platinum-sensitive aTNBC had durable disease control with chemotherapy-free maintenance.

Prognostic value of structural variants in early breast cancer patients.

Genomic analysis of structural variants(SVs) in breast cancer (BC) patients has been conducted, but the relationship between genomic alterations and BC prognosis remains unclear. We performed RNA sequencing of 297 early BC fresh-frozen tissues. We identified SVs using three tools (STAR.Arriba, STAR.fusion, and STAR.SEQR) with the COSMIC and Mitelman databases as guide references. We found a median of five to eight fusions per sample. In BC intrinsic subtypes, normal subtype had the fewest fusions (median: 1, interquartile range [IQR]: 0, 3) followed by luminal A (median: 5.5, IQR: 2.75, 10.25), luminal B (median: 9, IQR: 6, 16.5), HER2-enriched (median: 9, IQR: 6, 16.5) and basal (median 10, IQR: 6, 15.5) subtypes (p < 0.05). Intrachromosomal fusion was more frequent observed rather than interchromosomal fusion. In location, chromosome 17 had the most fusions followed by chromosome 1 and 11. When samples were divided into high and low fusion groups based on a cut-off value of 11 fusions, five-year event-free survival (5Y-EFS) was 68.1% in the high fusion group (n = 72) and 80.1% in the low fusion group (n = 125) (p = 0.024) while 75.6% among all patients (95% confidence interval: 0.699, 0.819). Among BC subtype, TNBCs with more fusions had shorter EFS compared to those with fewer fusions (5Y-EFS rate: 65.1% vs. 85.7%; p = 0.013) but no EFS differences were observed in other BC subtypes. ESTIMATE ImmuneScore was also associated with the number of fusions in TNBC (p < 0.005) and TNBCs with high ImmuneScore had better 5Y-EFS compared to those with low ImmuneScore (p = 0.041). In conclusion, diverse fusions were observed by BC subtype, and the number of fusions was associated with BC survival outcome and immune status in TNBC.

The Survival and Financial Benefit of Investigator-Initiated Trials Conducted by Korean Cancer Study Group.

Purpose: The Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) is a nationwide cancer clinical trial group dedicated to advancing investigator-initiated trials (IITs) by conducting and supporting clinical trials. This study aims to review IITs conducted by KCSG and quantitatively evaluate the survival and financial benefits of IITs for patients. Materials and Methods: We reviewed IITs conducted by KCSG from 1998 to 2023, analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) gains for participants. PFS and OS benefits were calculated as the difference in median survival times between the intervention and control groups, multiplied by the number of patients in the intervention group. Financial benefits were assessed based on the cost of investigational products provided. Results: From 1998 to 2023, KCSG conducted 310 IITs, with 133 completed and published. Of these, 21 were included in the survival analysis. The analysis revealed that 1,951 patients in the intervention groups gained a total of 2,558.4 months (213.2 years) of PFS and 2,501.6 months (208.5 years) of OS, with median gains of 1.31 months in PFS and 1.58 months in OS per patient. When analyzing only statistically significant results, PFS and OS gain per patients was 1.69 months and 3.02 months, respectively. Investigational drug cost analysis from 6 available IITs indicated that investigational products provided to 252 patients were valued at 10,400,077,294 won (approximately 8,046,481 US dollars), averaging about 41,270,148 won (approximately 31,930 US dollars) per patient. Conclusion: Our findings, based on analysis of published research, suggest that IITs conducted by KCSG led to survival benefits for participants and, in some studies, may have provided financial benefits by providing investment drugs.