Household heating fuels impact on Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI) symptoms among children in Punjab, Pakistan.

Exposure to household air pollution (HAP) accounted for the loss of 86 million healthy lives in 2019, with almost half of all deaths due to lower respiratory infection among children under 5 years of age. Similarly, the situation in Punjab - Pakistan's largest province - is also not promising. This study was conducted to examine household energy consumption and respiratory symptoms among children under the age of five in rural and urban areas of Punjab. Using data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) 2017-18, logistic regression models were applied to the data of a sample of 35,000 children under the age of five living in households with polluting heating fuels. A hypothesis was formulated to investigate the relationship between polluting heating activities and respiratory infections among children under five. Those Children who live in households having traditional space heaters without chimneys are 50% more likely to have symptoms of Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI) compared to those whose households have chimneys with traditional space heaters. When households utilize polluting heating fuel, the likelihood of children experiencing rapid, shortness of breath increases by 49%, and the likelihood of children displaying ARI symptoms characterized by coughing rises by approximately 30%. This study proposed a complete banning of polluting heating activities and replacing it with cleaner ones using financial incentives. It is pertinent to raise awareness campaigns majorly focusing on the guidelines to adopt better heat output with less harmful emissions.

Framing the front door: co-creating a home health care assessment of service need for children with disabilities.

This paper details the co-creation of a home health assessment tool for children with disabilities in the context of state-level systems change from traditional Medicaid to Medicaid managed care. A community based, sequential, mixed methods design was used to co-develop the assessment. A process evaluation highlighted community members' experiences with Medicaid managed care. Community members identified issues related to appropriateness of items and loss of services and recommended a dual assessment process to address concerns. Results indicated that 72% of items functioned well. Community members felt that organizational policies and the accuracy of clinical information obtained during assessment processes led directly to loss of services. Co-creating the assessment with caregivers of children with disabilities led to a comprehensive, person-centered, and holistic tool. The process buttressed several concrete systems and policy actions to improve home health care for children with disabilities in Medicaid managed care.

Impact of a decision-making aid for suspected urinary tract infections on antibiotic overuse in nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are highly utilized in nursing homes. The aim of the study was to test the effectiveness of a decision-making aid for urinary tract infection management on reducing antibiotic prescriptions for suspected bacteriuria in the urine without symptoms, known as asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) in twelve nursing homes in Texas. METHOD: A pre- and post-test with comparison group design was used. The data was collected through retrospective chart review. The study sample included 669 antibiotic prescriptions for suspected urinary tract infections ordered for 547 nursing home residents. The main measurement for the outcome variable was whether an antibiotic was prescribed for suspected urinary tract infections with no symptoms present. RESULTS: Most of the prescriptions for antibiotics UTIs were written without documented symptoms - thus for asymptomatic bacteuria (ASB) (71 % during the pre-intervention period). Exposure to the decision-making aid decreased the number of prescriptions written for ASB (from 78 % to 65 % in the low-intensity homes and from 65 % to 57 % in the high-intensity homes), and decreased odds of a prescription being written for ASB (OR = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.25 - 1.60 for low-intensity homes; OR = 0.79, 95 % CI = 0.33 - 1.88 for high-intensity homes). The odds of a prescription being written for ASB decreased significantly in homes that succeeded in implementing the decision-making aid (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI = 0.16-0.76), compared to homes with no fidelity. CONCLUSIONS: The decision-making aid improved antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes.

Barriers and mediators for routine dental care visits from the experiences of immigrant parents of autistic children living in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Immigrants are reluctant to attend routine dental care visits. Moreover, children with autism have a higher chance of developing periodontal disease. In this study, we describe the experiences of immigrant parents with autistic children and the barriers and mediators to routine dental care visits for their children in the United States. METHOD: We conducted semistructured interviews with 19 immigrants who have children with autism. RESULTS: We found that lack of transportation, support system, and insurance; prioritization of basic needs; and a mistrust of healthcare providers are the main barriers to attending routine dental care visits for autistic children of immigrant parents. Moreover, staff who consider the needs of children with autism, spend ample time with children with autism, and help with navigating the health system can improve access to routine dental care visits for autistic children with immigrant parents. This study found that despite their immigration status, all parents want to see improvements in the oral health of their children with special needs. CONCLUSION: This study aimed to unpack the structural barriers and mediators to routine dental care visits for autistic children of immigrant parents. We found that removing structural barriers to care and utilizing mediators will enhance the outcome of routine dental care, resulting in healthier oral hygiene.

'You never know when you will need an antibiotic': A qualitative study of structural barriers and cultural assumptions in antibiotic misuse among immigrants in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: The use of nonprescribed antibiotics increases the risk of antibiotic resistance, which is a primary public health concern of the 21st century. This study explores structural and cultural determinants of antibiotic misuse among immigrants living in the United States who arrived from home countries with easier access to antibiotics. METHODS: Adopting a qualitative approach, we interviewed 34 immigrants living in the United States and who had traveled back to their home countries within 1 year of the interview. We followed the steps of constructive grounded theory to analyze the data. RESULTS: We found two primary influences of immigrants' use of nonprescribed antibiotics. The first was structural barriers to health care access in the host country, including insurance coverage, cost of an emergency department visit, cost of missing a paid day of work, complexity of the healthcare system, and communication issues with health care providers. The second was participants' cultural assumptions, including their experiences of antibiotics use, beliefs about antibiotics, a habit of self-medication, and uncertainty about future medical needs. CONCLUSIONS: This study informs policymakers concerned with combating antibiotic resistance. Promoting antibiotic stewardship among immigrants from countries with lax antibiotic-prescribing practices and improving access to appropriate channels for preventative and same-day care may reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics.

Disparities and inequalities in pain treatment among people with limited English proficiency.

•The role of patient language in pain management and treatment is understudied.•There are disparities in access to pain relievers among people with Limited English Proficiency (LEP).•We need to address the need of people with LEP to reach the objectives of Healthy People 2030.

Mental health-related hospitalizations among adolescents and emerging adults with autism in the United States: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of national hospital discharge data.

LAY ABSTRACT: Autistic young people are more likely to have mental health conditions, like depression and bipolar disorder, than people without autism. These mental health issues sometimes lead to hospitalizations, which can be expensive and traumatic. Because of this, we wanted to understand mental health-related hospitalizations among autistic young people aged 10-20. We found that the main mental health reasons for the hospitalization of autistic young people were neurodevelopmental, disruptive, depressive, and bipolar disorders. These hospitalizations cost an average of US$7401.23 per stay, for a total of US$106 million in service delivery costs in 2016. Mental health-related hospitalizations were compared between young people with autism, young people with complex and chronic conditions, and young people with no chronic conditions. Autistic young people were almost 11 times more likely to be hospitalized for mental health reasons than young people with complex and chronic conditions, and two times more likely than young people with no complex and chronic conditions. We believe the United States needs better community-based mental health care for young people with autism.

Quasi experimental study of same-sex marriage laws & sexually transmitted infections.

Objectives: On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriages in the United States. This change has had some positive implications for the health of Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals and public health in general. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common among LGBT individuals and legalization of same sex marriage effected the rate of emergency department (ED) visits for STIs. We examined the effect of same-sex marriage legalization on emergency department visits related to STIs among LGBT individuals. Study design: Quasi-experimental difference-in-difference negative binomial design is used with state and time fixed-effects. We used data for 16 states from State Emergency Department Database and State Inpatient Database from January 2007-December 2015. People over 18 years of age visited the ED for STIs were included. Results: At 5% significance level, number of STIs cases decreased by 6.1% (95% CI, 0.906-0.973; P = 0.001) after same-sex marriage legalization. When adjusting for sex, these cases decreased by 7.6% (95% CI, 0.885-0.966; P < 0.001) for females, and 4.7% (95% CI, 0.914-0.995; P = 0.027) for males. By age cohorts, 18-24 aged had 8.5% (95% CI, 0.875-0.957; P < 0.001) decrease, while older age cohorts was statistically insignificant. Conclusions: Our results show that there is an association between legalization and decreased STIs cases in ED visits. Policy makers need to focus on encouraging a positive attitude towards LGBT community, as it leads to better quality of health for sexual minority groups and leads to positive externalities for general community.

Factors associated with antibiotic prescriptions for the viral origin diseases in office-based practices, 2006-2012.

OBJECTIVE: To test the potential association between time spent with a doctor and antibiotic overprescriptions in case of the common cold, runny nose, bronchitis, chest colds, flu, sore throats, and fluid in the middle ear. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Office-based physicians in the US. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 261,623 patient visits recorded to office-based physicians in the US. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The interest outcome was unnecessary antibiotic prescription. RESULTS: The analysis revealed five significant predictors of antibiotic prescriptions for suspected viral infections: length of doctor-patient encounter time, patient gender, spending time with a family medicine doctor, type of insurance, and the rate of antibiotic prescriptions per physician. For every additional minute a patient spent with a physician during a visit, the mean predicted probability of receiving unnecessary antibiotics decreased by 2.4%. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided evidence that physicians continue to prescribe antibiotics in avoidable cases. Policies that would monitor antibiotic prescription in office-based settings should be considered in order to control spreading of antibiotic resistance and eventually improve population health.