Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Vasc Med ; 26(4): 426-433, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33818200

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may predispose patients to venous thromboembolism (VTE). Limited data are available on the utilization of the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) in the setting of the COVID-19 global pandemic. We performed a single-center study to evaluate treatment, mortality, and bleeding outcomes in patients who received PERT consultations in March and April 2020, compared to historical controls from the same period in 2019. Clinical data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. The primary study endpoints were inpatient mortality and GUSTO moderate-to-severe bleeding. The frequency of PERT utilization was nearly threefold higher during March and April 2020 (n = 74) compared to the same period in 2019 (n = 26). During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was significantly less PERT-guided invasive treatment (5.5% vs 23.1%, p = 0.02) with a numerical but not statistically significant trend toward an increase in the use of systemic fibrinolytic therapy (13.5% vs 3.9%, p = 0.3). There were nonsignificant trends toward higher in-hospital mortality or moderate-to-severe bleeding in patients receiving PERT consultations during the COVID-19 period compared to historical controls (mortality 14.9% vs 3.9%, p = 0.18 and moderate-to-severe bleeding 35.1% vs 19.2%, p = 0.13). In conclusion, PERT utilization was nearly threefold higher during the COVID-19 pandemic than during the historical control period. Among patients evaluated by PERT, in-hospital mortality or moderate-to-severe bleeding were not significantly different, despite being numerically higher, while invasive therapy was utilized less frequently during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Recursos em Saúde/tendências , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Terapia Trombolítica/tendências , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidade , Feminino , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidade
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 93(2): E98-E100, 2019 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30196541

RESUMO

Coronary artery perforation (CAP) during percutaneous coronary intervention is a rare but serious complication. Treatment options of CAP include prolonged balloon inflation, covered stent, and coil embolization. Although most cases of CAP can be treated with prolonged balloon inflation, some cases, especially Ellis grade III CAP require covered stents or coiling. Covered stents may require a large bore guide catheter and have a high rate of restenosis, which can be a limiting factor in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease. Coil embolization is generally used in distal CAP because coiling in the proximal vessels results in a large territory of infarction. We present a case of an Ellis grade III CAP during rotational atherectomy successfully treated with a novel coiling technique whereby the thrombogenic coil extends through the perforation outside of the vessel, and the intraarterial portion of the coil is excluded from the lumen by drug-eluting stent placement over the proximal portion of the coil.


Assuntos
Aterectomia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Vasos Coronários/lesões , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Traumatismos Cardíacos/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Calcificação Vascular/terapia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Stents Farmacológicos , Embolização Terapêutica/instrumentação , Traumatismos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Cardíacos/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Resultado do Tratamento , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/etiologia
3.
Curr Heart Fail Rep ; 15(3): 181-190, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29700697

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure is associated with an enormous burden on both patients and health care systems in the USA. Several national policy initiatives have focused on improving the quality of heart failure care, including reducing readmissions following hospitalization, which are common, costly, and, at least in part, preventable. The transition from inpatient to ambulatory care setting and the immediate post-hospitalization period present an opportunity to further optimize guideline concordant medical therapy, identify reversible issues related to worsening heart failure, and evaluate prognosis. It can also provide opportunities for medication reconciliation and optimization, consideration of device-based therapies, appropriate management of comorbidities, identification of individual barriers to care, and a discussion of goals of care based on prognosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies suggest that attention to detail regarding patient comorbidities, barriers to care, optimization of both diuretic and neurohormonal therapies, and assessment of prognosis improve patient outcomes. Despite the fact that the transition period appears to be an optimal time to address these issues in a comprehensive manner, most patients are not referred to programs specializing in this approach post hospital discharge. The objective of this review is to provide an outline for early post discharge care that allows clinicians and other health care providers to care for these heart failure patients in a manner that is both firmly rooted in the guidelines and patient-centered. Data regarding which intervention is most likely to confer benefit to which subset of patients with this disease is lacking and warrants further study.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Alta do Paciente , Humanos , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências
5.
Clin Res Cardiol ; 112(5): 626-632, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36583764

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Traditional management for right-sided infective endocarditis and other adherent masses centers around balancing the risks and benefits of open surgical removal against medical therapy. METHODS: Single-center study analysis of 19 patients who underwent vacuum-assisted debulking and/or en bloc removal of right-sided infective endocarditis and other adherent masses between September 2017 and November 2021. Clinical outcomes during the perioperative period, postoperative period, hospital course, and post-discharge were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 12 male and 7 female patients with an average age 47.4 ± 16.8. Relevant risk factors included 47.4% of patients with active intravenous drug use (IVDU), 21.1% of patients with a history of permanent pacemaker (PPM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and 5.3% of prior malignancy with mediastinal radiation. 31.6% of patients had documented right-sided masses from a non-infectious etiology, while 68.4% of patients were noted to have right-sided infective endocarditis (RSIE). All patients were found to have large, mobile masses or vegetations at high risk for embolization to the pulmonary vasculature. Average in-hospital length of stay was 17.8 ± 12.2 days, blood cultures cleared postoperatively in 8.9 ± 7.3 days, periprocedural mortality was 0%, subsequent open surgical valvular repair during the same admission was 5.3%, and in-hospital mortality was 5.3%. Within 6 weeks of follow-up, 15.8% of patients were readmitted for recurrence of bacteremia, 10.5% of patients were found to have new pulmonary embolism, and 15.8% of patients underwent open surgical valvular repair. Total death after 1-year and 2-years was 15.8% and 5.3%, respectively. Recurrence of bacteremia was 21.1% within 1-year. CONCLUSION: AngioVac is a viable therapeutic strategy for select patients with intravascular and intracardiac right-sided masses including thrombi, emboli, or infective masses such as endocarditis.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Trombose , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência ao Convalescente , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Alta do Paciente , Trombose/terapia , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Endocardite/cirurgia , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocardite Bacteriana/cirurgia
6.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 46: 44-51, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35961855

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Increased bleeding risks have been documented in patients exposed to P2Y12 inhibitors within 5 days of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). This study aimed to determine the relative CABG bleeding risks of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor exposure and the proper time course of ticagrelor discontinuation prior to surgery. METHODS: Clinical outcomes were assessed in 2075 isolated CABG patients, including 375 who had received P2Y12 inhibitors within 5 days of surgery (155 clopidogrel, 213 ticagrelor, 7 prasugrel). BARC-4 CABG bleeding complications and perioperative blood product usage were assessed in propensity-matched P2Y12-inhibited and non-P2Y12-inhibited cohorts. RESULTS: P2Y12-inhibited patients (n = 375) in comparison to matched non-P2Y12-inhibited patients (n = 1138) had higher rates of re-operation for bleeding (3.8 % vs 1.3 %, p = 0.003), postoperative red blood cell transfusion ≥5 units (5.7 % vs 2.7 %, p = 0.007), and intraoperative and postoperative blood product utilization (42.3 % vs 27.1 %, p < 0.001; 41.8 % vs 32.2 %, p < 0.001, respectively). Univariate predictors of BARC-4 bleeding included clopidogrel (OR: 2.145, 95 % CI: 1.131-4.067, p = 0.019) and ticagrelor discontinued within 3 days of surgery (OR: 2.153, 95 % CI: 1.003-4.169, p = 0.049). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that only clopidogrel exposure was an independent BARC-4 bleeding predictor (OR: 1.850, 95 % CI: 1.007-3.398, p = 0.048). Unadjusted ticagrelor patients with drug discontinuation 4-5 days prior to CABG only demonstrated higher rates of perioperative platelet transfusion, without additional signs of excessive bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel exposure within 5 days of CABG is an independent predictor of BARC-4 bleeding, whereas major ticagrelor bleeding effects are confined to drug exposure within 3 days of surgery.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Humanos , Ticagrelor/efeitos adversos , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/induzido quimicamente , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/efeitos adversos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 50(2)2023 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36913275

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have documented a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergent percutaneous treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but few have examined recovery of healthcare systems in restoring prepandemic STEMI care. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of data from 789 patients with STEMI from a large tertiary medical center treated with percutaneous coronary intervention between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021. RESULTS: For patients with STEMI presenting to the emergency department, median time from door to balloon was 37 minutes in 2019, 53 minutes in 2020, and 48 minutes in 2021 (P < .001), whereas median time from first medical contact to device changed from 70 to 82 to 75 minutes, respectively (P = .002). Treatment time changes in 2020 and 2021 correlated with median emergency department evaluation time (30 to 41 to 22 minutes, respectively; P = .001) but not median catheterization laboratory revascularization time. For transfer patients, median time from first medical contact to device changed from 110 to 133 to 118 minutes, respectively (P = .005). In 2020 and 2021, patients with STEMI had greater late presentation (P = .028) and late mechanical complications (P = .021), with nonsignificant increases in yearly in-hospital mortality (3.6% to 5.2% to 6.4%; P = .352). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 was associated with worsening STEMI treatment times and outcomes in 2020. Despite improving treatment times in 2021, in-hospital mortality had not decreased in the setting of a persistent increase in late patient presentation and associated STEMI complications.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Fatores de Tempo , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Tempo para o Tratamento
8.
Cureus ; 14(7): e26479, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35919216

RESUMO

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an underdiagnosed cause of acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) emerged that is incompletely understood. While the involvement of numerous organ systems has been described, the potential cardiovascular manifestations, such as myocarditis, arterial thrombosis, or SCAD, are particularly worrisome. Here, we present a case of MIS that was preceded by an unremarkable case of COVID-19 and followed by the development of SCAD. This case highlights the importance of furthering our understanding of the potential sequelae of COVID-19 and of the potential relationship between SCAD and MIS.

9.
Interv Cardiol Clin ; 9(2): 125-137, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32147115

RESUMO

Plaque modification (PM) for atherosclerotic peripheral vascular lesions includes a variety of device types to alter the vessel structure with the aim of enhancing procedural success. PM device utilization has expanded significantly in the United States in recent years despite limited high-quality clinical trials. This article reviews societal guidelines for PM, evaluates currently available trial evidence, examines various pathologic subsets in which PM may be used, and discusses future areas for research.


Assuntos
Aterectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Calcificação Vascular/cirurgia , Dispositivos de Oclusão Vascular , Desenho de Equipamento , Artéria Femoral , Humanos , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico
10.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 53(4): 325-336, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30885060

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The optimal antithrombotic regimen in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is not known, leading to significant variations in antithrombotic treatment protocols in randomized trials and clinical practice. In device trials, antithrombotic regimens in patients receiving peripheral vascular interventions have not been clearly reported on. This review summarizes and discusses the most recent evidence on this topic to provide a potential guide to clinical practice. METHODS: A search of the literature was done for publications that reported outcomes of major PAD device trials. Reported outcomes and various antithrombotic regimens were studied. RESULTS: Use of antithrombotic therapy varied significantly between various device trials. Reporting of antithrombotic regimens at the time of follow-up is lacking. CONCLUSION: Outcome data on optimal antithrombotic regimens are presently lacking largely due to the significant heterogeneity and underreporting of antithrombotic regimens at follow-up among prior clinical trials. Standardization and reporting of precise antithrombotic regimens at various points of follow-up in device trials of patients with PAD should be attempted so as to minimize differences in treatment patterns when evaluating new devices.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Coagulação Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Doença Arterial Periférica/sangue , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos
11.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ; 22: 1-5, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30480083

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure is associated with recurrent hospitalizations and high mortality. Guideline directed medical treatment (GDMT), including beta blockers (BBs), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and aldosterone antagonists (AAs) has shown to improve outcomes. Current guidelines recommend the use of these medication classes at maximally tolerated dosages. Despite the evidence, < 25% of patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) are on the appropriate medical regimen titrated to the target doses. As such, we sought to assess the utility of a focused GDMT clinic to reduce this gap. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review through existing patient data in a single center teaching hospital of patients referred to a focused GDMT clinic primarily staffed with heart failure trained nurse specialists, physician assistants and cardiologists. Management guidelines were developed with protocols for the initiation and uptitration of all therapeutic agents considered as GDMT.Our primary objective was to determine whether enrollment into a dedicated nursing led guideline directed medical therapy clinic would increase the proportion of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on appropriate medications as well as medication dosages in patients, the percentage of patients on the following medications and percentage at target doses: Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockers, Evidence Based Beta Blockers, and Aldosterone Antagonists. Our secondary objective was to determine if there was any clinical benefit on objective measures including renal function, hospital admissions, mortality and implantable defibrillator shocks. RESULTS: Between October 2015 and March 2017, 63 patients were identified by requisition forms, in which 61 were able to be identified based on legibility of identifying information. Mean duration of follow up was 264.44 ±â€¯162.68 days over 7 ±â€¯3.94 days. Mean ejection fraction was 21.8 ±â€¯7.3%. New onset cardiomyopathies (diagnosed within 30 days) compiled 21% of the patient population while those with demonstrated cardiomyopathies (> 90 days) compiled 48% of the patient population. Patients with NYHA class III heart failure compiled 65% of the patient population.There was a statistically significant increase in the mean number of GDMT at any dose (2.31 ±â€¯0.76 to 2.74 ±â€¯0.66; p < 0.001) and mean number of GDMT at target doses (0.54 ±â€¯0.79 to 1.52 ±â€¯1.1; p < 0.001). Percentage of the population that were on no target doses at initial visit was 62% which was reduced to 18% after intervention.Clinical improvement was reflected in significant improvement in ejection fraction from 21.8 ±â€¯7.8% to 36.2 ±â€¯14.3% (p < 0.001). Increases in sodium and chloride were statistically small but significant. There a significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations in comparison to a year prior to after the initial encounter in the clinic (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed that a nurse directed GDMT titration program successfully increased the number of GDMT that patients were able to tolerate in a timely fashion, all the while enhancing ejection fraction, sodium and chloride levels, with a reduction in rehospitalization rates.

12.
J Clin Med ; 7(9)2018 Aug 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30134627

RESUMO

There has been increased awareness in the understanding and recognition of spontaneous coronary artery disease. Diagnosing this condition is of paramount importance as the treatment strategy differs greatly from traditional acute coronary syndrome patient. We review here the current state of management of spontaneous coronary artery disease.

13.
Am J Med ; 126(11): 989-994.e1, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24054174

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were to quantify the change in 7-day follow-up visits and 30-day readmissions as part of a hospital quality improvement initiative and to characterize events at 7-day follow-up visits. Some data suggest that outpatient assessments of patients with heart failure within 7 days of hospital discharge may prevent readmissions, although little is known about patient needs at 7-day follow-up visits. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective chart review of all heart failure discharges at the University of Connecticut Health Center (398 patients) the year before (2008) and the year after (2011) a quality improvement initiative that included mandatory 7-day follow-up visits. We quantified the change in 30-day readmission rate after the initiative, frequency of 7-day follow-up visits, and events at follow-up visits. RESULTS: The average age of patients with heart failure was 79.9 years in 2011, with 45.9% having systolic heart failure. Thirty-day all-cause readmissions decreased from 27.5% to 19.1% after our quality improvement initiative (P = .024). Frequency of 7-day follow-up visits increased from 19.6% to 46.9% (P < .01). Eighty-one percent of 7-day visits occurred in the University of Connecticut Heart Failure Center with a cardiologist or heart failure nurse practitioner. Fifty-one percent of patients had blood work drawn, and 26% had a medication dose changed. Only 13% of patients had no discrepancy between the discharge and follow-up medication lists. CONCLUSIONS: Our hospital's 30-day readmission rate for patients with heart failure decreased in parallel with an increase in 7-day follow-up visits. Patients with heart failure were complex and often had diagnostic testing and medication changes at follow-up visits.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/normas , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA