Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are convenient tools for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinics, and testing using saliva samples could decrease the risk of infection during sample collection. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD for testing of nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with the RT-PCR tests and viral culture for detecting viable virus. METHODS: One hundred seventeen nasopharyngeal swab specimens and 73 saliva samples with positive results on RT-PCR were used. Residual samples were assayed using a commercially available RAD test immediately, and its positivity was determined at various time points during the clinical course. The concordance between 54 nasopharyngeal swab samples and saliva samples that were collected simultaneously was determined. Viral culture was performed on 117 samples and compared with the results of the RAD test. RESULTS: The positive rate of RAD test using saliva samples was low throughout the clinical course. Poor concordance was observed between nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples (75.9%, kappa coefficient 0.310). However, a substantially high concordance between the RAD test and viral culture was observed in both nasopharyngeal swab specimens (86.8%, kappa coefficient 0.680) and saliva samples (95.1%, kappa coefficient 0.643). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RAD test was insufficient, particularly for saliva samples. However, a substantially high concordance with viral culture suggests its potential utility as an auxiliary test for estimating SARS-CoV-2 viability.

Seasonal changes in indoor airborne fungal concentration in a hematology ward.

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is an important infectious complication of hematological disorders, especially in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. Evidences suggest seasonal and/or geographical variations in the airborne fungal counts and a relationship between those counts and the incidence of IFD. We evaluated the concentrations of indoor airborne fungi quantitated over the course of one year in a hematology ward in Japan. In January, April, July, and October, fixed volumes of air samples were obtained by an air sampler in a hematology ward not equipped with a high-efficiency particulate air filter and incubated in fugal cultures. Samples were also obtained from a protective environment in the same ward and were evaluated. The number of fungal colonies per 50 L of sampled air was highest in October (median 2.25 (range, 0.2-7.0)), which was significantly higher than those in the other three months (0.1 (range, 0-1.0) in January; 0 (0-0) in April; 0.55 (0-2.5) in July; P < 0.01)). Commonly identified pathogens included Penicillium and Cladosrporium species, but Aspergillus species was detected only in July and October samples. These results suggest a seasonal variation in indoor airborne fungal concentrations in Japan, which could affect the epidemiology of IFD.

Nationwide surveillance of bacterial respiratory pathogens conducted by the surveillance committee of Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and the Japanese Society for clinical microbiology in 2014: General view of the pathogens' antibacterial susceptibility.

The nationwide surveillance on antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial respiratory pathogens from the patients in Japan was conducted by Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and the Japanese Society for Clinical Microbiology in 2014. The isolates were collected from clinical specimens obtained from well-diagnosed adult patients with respiratory tract infections during the period between January 2014 and April 2015 by three societies. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted at the central reference laboratory according to the method recommended by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Susceptibility testing was evaluated in 1534 strains (335 Staphylococcus aureus, 264 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 29 Streptococcus pyogenes, 281 Haemophilus influenzae, 164 Moraxella catarrhalis, 207 Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 254 Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Ratio of methicillin-resistant S. aureus was 43.6%, and those of penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae was 100%. Among H. influenzae, 8.2% of them were found to be ß-lactamase-producing ampicillin-resistant strains, and 49.1% to be ß-lactamase-non-producing ampicillin-resistant strains. Extended spectrum ß-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae and multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa with metallo ß-lactamase were 9.2% and 0.4%, respectively.

Nationwide surveillance of bacterial respiratory pathogens conducted by the surveillance committee of Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and the Japanese Society for Clinical Microbiology in 2012: General view of the pathogens' antibacterial susceptibility.

The nationwide surveillance on antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial respiratory pathogens from the patients in Japan was conducted by Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese association for infectious diseases and Japanese society for Clinical Microbiology in 2012. The isolates were collected from clinical specimens obtained from well-diagnosed adult patients with respiratory tract infections during the period between January and December in 2012 by three societies. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted at the central reference laboratory according to the method recommended by Clinical Laboratory Standard Institutes. Susceptibility testing was evaluated in 1236 strains (232 Staphylococcus aureus, 225 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 16 Streptococcus pyogenes, 231 Haemophilus influenzae, 147 Moraxella catarrhalis, 167 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 218 Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Ratio of methicillin-resistant S. aureus was 51.3%, and those of penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae was 0.4%. Among H. influenzae, 5.6% of them were found to be ß-lactamase-producing ampicillin-resistant strains, and 37.2% to be ß-lactamase-non-producing ampicillin-resistant strains. Extended spectrum ß-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae and multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa with metallo ß-lactamase were 4.2% and 3.2%, respectively. Continuous national surveillance is important to determine the actual situation of the resistance shown by bacterial respiratory pathogens to antimicrobial agents.

Minimum inhibitory concentrations of azithromycin in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium complex in Japan.

The latest guidelines include azithromycin as a preferred regimen for treating Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease. However, serially collected susceptibility data on clinical MAC isolates are limited, and no breakpoints have been determined. We investigated the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of azithromycin and clarithromycin for all MAC strains isolated in 2021 from a single center in Japan, excluding duplicates. The MICs were determined using a panel based on the microbroth dilution method, according to the latest Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations. The MICs were determined for 318 MAC strains. Although there was a significant positive correlation between the MICs of azithromycin and clarithromycin, the MICs of azithromycin tended to be higher than those of clarithromycin. Among the cases in which the strains were isolated, 18 patients initiated treatment, including azithromycin treatment, after sample collection. Some patients infected with stains with relatively high azithromycin MICs achieved a microbiological cure with azithromycin-containing regimens. This study revealed a higher MIC distribution for azithromycin than clarithromycin, raising questions about the current practice of estimating azithromycin susceptibility based on the clarithromycin susceptibility test result. However, this was a single-center study that included only a limited number of cases treated with azithromycin. Therefore, further multicenter studies that include a greater number of cases treated with azithromycin are warranted to verify the distribution of azithromycin MICs and examine the correlation between azithromycin MICs and treatment effectiveness.IMPORTANCEThe macrolides serve as key drugs in the treatment of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex infection, and the administration of macrolide should be guided by susceptibility test results. Azithromycin is recommended as a preferred choice among macrolides, surpassing clarithromycin; however, drug susceptibility testing is often not conducted, and clarithromycin susceptibility is used as a surrogate. This study represents the first investigation into the minimum inhibitory concentration of azithromycin on a scale of several hundred clinical isolates, revealing an overall tendency for higher minimum inhibitory concentrations compared with clarithromycin. The results raise questions about the appropriateness of using clarithromycin susceptibility test outcomes for determining the administration of azithromycin. This study highlights the need for future discussions on the clinical breakpoints of azithromycin, based on large-scale clinical research correlating azithromycin susceptibility with treatment outcomes.

Efficient automated semi-quantitative urine culture analysis via BD Urine Culture App.

We aimed to assess the clinical utility of BD KiestraTM Urine Culture App (UCA). High concordance rates were observed between the urine culture colony counts obtained by medical technologists and those produced using UCA. This application may increase the efficiency of obtaining semi-quantitative urine culture results.

[Antimicrobial activity of meropenem against main bacterial species isolated from patient blood in 2010].

We investigated antimicrobial activities of meropenem and other antibiotics against 164 isolates (41 Escherichia coli, 16 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 7 Enterobacter cloacae, 21 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 14 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), 18 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 47 Staphylococcus epidermidis) from blood of the patients admitted to Keio University Hospital between January and October in 2010. Meropenem showed the potent antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria especially and it maintained good broad spectrum antimicrobial activity including resistant strains through 13 years since when we started the investigation. These results indicated the validity of choosing meropenem as a first line antimicrobial agent for serious infectious diseases.

Evaluation of the usability of various rapid antibody tests in the diagnostic application for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The usability of laboratory tests related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is critically important for the world undergoing the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study aimed to assess the diagnostic usability of rapid tests for the detection of antibody against SARS-CoV-2 through comparison of their results with the results of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA and with the results of a quantitative test for antibody detection. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 18 patients undergoing RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2. Twelve patients were RT-PCR positive while six were negative. A quantitative test based on chemiluminescent immunoassay and three rapid tests based on immunochromatography were performed to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM. RESULTS: All the antibody tests exhibited poor sensitivity at the timing of initial RT-PCR diagnosis. IgG responses occurring prior to or simultaneously with IgM responses were observed through not only the quantitative test but also the three rapid tests. Based on concordance with the quantitative test results, the large variance among the three rapid tests was revealed. CONCLUSIONS: All antibody tests were unsatisfactory to replace RT-PCR for the early diagnosis of COVID-19. Rapid antibody tests as well as a quantitative antibody test were useful in the assessment of immune responses in COVID-19. The obvious variance among the three rapid tests suggested limited accuracy and difficult standardization. Diagnostic usability of rapid antibody tests for COVID-19 should be investigated rigorously.