Strengthening Public Health Through Primary Care and Public Health Collaboration: Innovative State Approaches.

OBJECTIVE: Partnerships are increasingly critical to achieve the mission of public health. We sought to understand the levers and tools that states use to better connect public health and primary care in efforts to strengthen public health. DESIGN: We reviewed literature focused on collaborative or integrative efforts between primary care and public health and examined strategies employed by 4 innovative states: North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington. Using a purposive convenience sample, we conducted semistructured interviews with 17 state experts from January to March 2023. We asked leaders to describe their approaches to data sharing, communication, and systems change that could be adopted or adapted by other states interested in better connecting primary care and public health systems. We recorded and coded interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen state leaders from North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Key experiences, strategies, policy levers, and lessons for integration or collaboration between primary care and public health sectors, both common and divergent, across the states. RESULTS: State activity can be categorized by 3 actions: (1) endeavors to support relationship building, both formal and informal; (2) efforts to employ coordinating bodies and champions to ensure all necessary actors are included in planning and communications with clear roles; and (3) approaches to identifying and elevating essential system elements and the change levers to support them. The integration is built primarily on the well-resourced medical care system rather than the public health system. CONCLUSION: States are engaged in creative approaches to collaboration between public health and primary care. Building blocks include backbone organizations, leadership training programs, payment reform spheres, interoperable data platforms, and intentional efforts to build relationships. Collaboration between primary care, public health, and community-based organizations is an opportunity to strengthen public health systems while staying focused on improving the public's health.

The Potential of Pay-for-Success as a Financing Strategy for Evidence-Based Practices: An Illustration with Multisystemic Therapy.

There is a critical need to identify strategies for financing the implementation of evidence-based practices. We illustrate the potential of pay-for-success financing (PFS)-a strategy in which private investors fund implementation and receive a return on investment from a government payer-using multisystemic therapy as an example. We argue that standard multisystemic therapy (for serious juvenile offenders) and several of its adaptations (for other complex behavioral problems in youth) would be good candidates for PFS in the right contexts. Despite some challenges for policymakers and administrators, PFS has significant potential as a financing strategy for evidence-based practices.

"Pay for Success" Financing and Home-Based Multicomponent Childhood Asthma Interventions: Modeling Results From the Detroit Medicaid Population.

Policy Points: The Pay for Success (PFS) financing approach has potential for scaling the implementation of evidence-based prevention interventions in Medicaid populations, including a range of multicomponent interventions for childhood asthma that combine home environment risk mitigation with medical case management. Even though this type of intervention is efficacious and cost-saving among high-risk children with asthma, the main challenges for implementation in a PFS context include legal and regulatory barriers to capturing federal Medicaid savings and using them as a source of private investor repayment. Federal-level policy change and guidance are needed to support PFS financing of evidence-based interventions that would reduce expensive acute care among Medicaid enrollees. CONTEXT: Pay for Success has emerged as a potential financing mechanism for innovative and cost-effective prevention programs. In the PFS model, interventions that provide value to the public sector are implemented with financing from private investors who receive a payout from the government only if the metrics identified in a performance-based contract are met. In this nascent field, little has been written about the potential for and challenges of PFS initiatives that produce savings and/or value for Medicaid. METHODS: In order to elucidate the basic economics of a PFS intervention in a Medicaid population, we modeled the potential impact of an evidence-based multicomponent childhood asthma intervention among low-income children enrolled in Medicaid in Detroit. We modeled outcomes and a comparative benefit-cost analysis in 3 risk-based target groups: (1) all children with an asthma diagnosis; (2) children with an asthma-related emergency department visit in the past year; and (3) children with an asthma-related hospitalization in the past year. Modeling scenarios for each group produced estimates of potential state and federal Medicaid savings for different types or levels of investment, the time frames for savings, and some overarching challenges. FINDINGS: The PFS economics of a home-based asthma intervention are most viable if it targets children who have already experienced an expensive episode of asthma-related care. In a 7-year demonstration, the overall (undiscounted) modeled potential savings for Group 2 were $1.4 million for the federal Medicaid and $634,000 for the state Medicaid programs, respectively. Targeting children with at least 1 hospitalization in the past year (Group 3) produced estimated potential savings of $2.8 million to federal Medicaid and $1.3 million to state Medicaid. However, current Medicaid rules and regulations pose significant challenges for capturing federal Medicaid savings for PFS payouts. CONCLUSIONS: A multicomponent intervention that provides home remediation and medical case management to high-risk children with asthma has significant potential for PFS financing in urban Medicaid populations. However, there are significant administrative and payment challenges, including the limited ability to capture federal Medicaid savings and to use them as a source of investor repayment. Without some policy reform and clear guidance from the federal government, the financing burden of PFS outcome payments will be on the state Medicaid program or some other state-level funding source.

"Pay for Success" Projects: Financing Interventions That Address Social Determinants of Health in 20 Countries.

Over the past eight years, there has been an increase in the use of pay for success (PFS) as a financing tool whereby private investors provide initial funding for preventive health and human service interventions. If an independent evaluator deems the interventions successful, investors are repaid by the government. To better understand how PFS is used, we created a global landscape surveillance system to track and analyze data on all PFS projects that have launched through 2017. We focus on the potential for PFS to improve population health by funding interventions that target the social determinants of health. Our findings show that all launched projects to date have implemented interventions aimed at improving the structural and intermediary social determinants of health, primarily in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Although there are some challenges associated with PFS, we believe it is a promising tool for financing interventions aimed at social determinants of health in underserved and marginalized populations.

Sexual Health Knowledge, Self-Efficacy and Behavioral Intentions Following a Health Fair for Adolescents.

High rates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) exist among urban African American youth. There is a need to provide HIV information to youth prior to the onset of sexual activity. The Stomping Out HIV intervention combines a health fair and step show to increase awareness and healthy behaviors among this population. Questionnaires were administered to youth and parents before and after Stomping Out, and focused on health knowledge, satisfaction with Stomping Out, intended behavior changes and self-efficacy to make healthier choices related to HIV and STI prevention. Youth and adults reported increased knowledge and self-efficacy after Stomping Out. These findings suggest that health initiatives focusing on sociocultural issues can greatly impact adults and youth.

Health Navigator Perspectives on Implementation of Healthy Michigan Plan Work Requirements.

Importance: In 2020, Michigan Medicaid implemented a new work requirement policy for enrollees in the Healthy Michigan Plan (HMP), the state's expanded Medicaid program. Under the policy, enrollees would be required to report 80 hours of work or other qualifying activities each month or obtain an exemption to maintain health insurance coverage. Objective: To assess the experiences of health navigators (and beneficiaries by proxy) with the implementation of Michigan's Medicaid work requirement. Design Setting and Participants: This qualitative study included health navigators who participated in 11 focus groups from September to December 2020. Focus group questions addressed topics related to implementation and communication of the HMP work requirement policy. A survey was administered to capture background information, assess readiness to assist with navigation, and assess the quality of the state's communication about the policy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were general understanding of policy components, communications about the policy, navigation of the exemption process, navigation of the reporting process, and beneficiaries' ability to comply with the policy. Results: Of 50 health navigators who participated in the focus groups, 44 (88.0%) responded to the survey and 43 provided demographic information (mean [SD] age, 44.0 [10.5] years). All 43 had at least some college or vocational education, with 27 (62.8%) reporting a 4-year degree or higher, and they resided in geographic regions across Michigan. Navigators indicated that they felt prepared to assist HMP enrollees navigate work requirements. Communication to beneficiaries regarding the new policy was viewed as an improvement compared with traditional Medicaid communications. However, the complex policy was potentially difficult for beneficiaries to understand. Limited language options besides English created barriers for some enrollees. Exemptions were confusing for beneficiaries owing to the numerous categories and sometimes vague guidelines. Those who used the online reporting system generally found the platform to be user-friendly. Navigators expressed concern regarding HMP enrollees' ability to report compliance with work requirements owing to barriers with internet access, telephone access, language challenges, and computer literacy. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative analysis of health navigators in Michigan, respondents reported overall positive feedback about many of the implementation and communication strategies, including human-centered design, automatic exemptions, and use of state administrative data to assess whether beneficiaries were in compliance with the policy; however, barriers to reporting remained for enrollees. The findings suggest that state agencies should seek to reduce administrative barriers and apply a human-centered design approach to alleviate risk of unnecessary loss of Medicaid benefits.

Interventions to Decrease Use in Prehospital and Emergency Care Settings Among Super-Utilizers in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Interest in high users of acute care continues to grow as health care organizations look to deliver cost-effective and high-quality care to patients. Since "super-utilizers" of acute care are responsible for disproportionately high health care spending, many programs and interventions have been implemented to reduce medical care use and costs in this population. This article presents a systematic review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature on evaluations of interventions to decrease prehospital and emergency care use among U.S. super-utilizers. Forty-six distinct evaluations were included in the review. The most commonly evaluated intervention was case management. Although a number of interventions reported reductions in prehospital and emergency care utilization and costs, methodological and study design weaknesses-especially regression to the mean-were widespread and call into question reported positive findings. More high-quality research is needed to accurately assess the impact of interventions to reduce prehospital and emergency care use in the super-utilizer population.

Enhancing Prehospital Outcomes for Cardiac Arrest (EPOC) study: sequential mixed-methods study protocol in Michigan, USA.

INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a common, life-threatening event encountered routinely by first responders, including police, fire and emergency medical services (EMS). Current literature suggests that there is significant regional variation in outcomes, some of which may be related to modifiable factors. Yet, there is a persistent knowledge gap regarding strategies to guide quality improvement efforts in OHCA care and, by extension, survival. The Enhancing Prehospital Outcomes for Cardiac Arrest (EPOC) study aims to fill these gaps and to improve outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods study includes three aims. In aim I, we will define variation in OHCA survival to the emergency department (ED) among EMS agencies that participate in the Michigan Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) in order to sample EMS agencies with high-survival and low-survival outcomes. In aim II, we will conduct site visits to emergency medical systems-including 911/dispatch, police, non-transport fire, and EMS agencies-in approximately eight high-survival and low-survival communities identified in aim I. At each site, key informant interviews and a multidisciplinary focus group will identify themes associated with high OHCA survival. Transcripts will be coded using a structured codebook and analysed through thematic analysis. Results from aims I and II will inform the development of a survey instrument in aim III that will be administered to all EMS agencies in Michigan. This survey will test the generalisability of factors associated with increased OHCA survival in the qualitative work to ultimately build an EPOC Toolkit which will be distributed to a broad range of stakeholders as a practical 'how-to' guide to improve outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The EPOC study was deemed exempt by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board. Findings will be compiled in an 'EPOC Toolkit' and disseminated in the USA through partnerships including, but not limited to, policymakers, EMS leadership and health departments.

Access to primary care child weight management programs: Urban parent barriers and facilitators to participation.

The prevalence and comorbidities of childhood obesity among low-income urban children are a significant health issue in the United States. Programs designed to assist families are underutilized. The aim of this study is to describe barriers and facilitators relevant to intervention program participation from the perspective of parents who have children who are overweight or obese. Systematic thematic analysis of focus groups and semi-structured interviews with parents from multiple urban pediatrics and family medicine practices were used to gather data. A framework analysis approach was used and a codebook of themes was developed. Transcripts were coded independently by the research team and consensus among researchers was reached. Forty-eight parents participated in the study. Perceived barriers to participation included (1) varied referral process (lack of follow-up or varying referral experience), (2) costs (time and program fee), (3) logistics (location and program schedule), and (4) child motivation. Perceived facilitators to participation included (1) systematic referral process (in-office referral and timely follow-up), (2) program content and organization, and (3) no cost. Multiple barriers and facilitators affect weight management program participation among families, which should be specifically targeted in future obesity interventions in order to effectively reach urban, minority parents and children.

Pay For Success And Population Health: Early Results From Eleven Projects Reveal Challenges And Promise.

Pay for success (PFS) is a type of social impact investing that uses private capital to finance proven prevention programs that help a government reduce public expenditures or achieve greater value. We conducted an analysis of the first eleven PFS projects in the United States to investigate the potential of PFS as a strategy for financing and disseminating interventions aimed at improving population health and health equity. The PFS approach has significant potential for bringing private-sector resources to interventions regarding social determinants of health. Nonetheless, a number of challenges remain, including structuring PFS initiatives so that optimal prevention benefits can be achieved and ensuring that PFS interventions and evaluation designs are based on rigorous research principles. In addition, increased policy attention regarding key PFS payout issues is needed, including the "wrong pockets" problem and legal barriers to using federal Medicaid funds as an investor payout source.