Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 88(5): 2213-2222, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34878686

RESUMO

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, nature, preventability and severity of adverse drug events (ADEs) across three paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in England. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted across three PICUs over a three-month period during 2019. Included patients were aged ≤18 years and stayed in PICU for a minimum of 24 hours. Identification of suspected ADEs was performed by trained PICU pharmacists. A multidisciplinary expert panel assessed causality, preventability and severity of events. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients were included and 62 ADEs were confirmed (definite/probable causality). One in six patients experienced one or more ADEs. The estimated incidence of ADEs were 20.5 per 100 patients (95% CI 15.3-27.5) and 16.7 per 1000 patient-days (95% CI 9.3-29.9). The majority of ADEs were judged preventable by the expert panel (36/62, 58.1%). ADEs were commonly involved with medicines prescribing (29/62, 46.8%) and caused temporary patient harm (42/62, 67.7%). Medications for the central nervous system (14/62, 22.6%), infections (13/62, 20.9%) and cardiovascular system (12/62, 19.4%) were commonly implicated with ADEs. Multivariable analysis revealed that patients who stayed in PICU for ≥7 days (OR 6.29, 95% CI 2.42-16.32) were more likely to experience an ADE compared to patients with a stay of 1-6 days. CONCLUSION: ADEs are common in English PICUs and most of them may be preventable. There is a strong association between ADE occurrence and duration of PICU stay, which represents a target for remedial interventions. Exploring contributory factors of preventable ADEs is now necessary to inform preventive policies.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Incidência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 4(5): e206, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31745509

RESUMO

We hypothesized that antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) could be enhanced through positive feedback for the behaviors of healthcare professionals. This project aimed to reduce antimicrobial consumption in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) by >5%, with secondary aims to reduce broad-spectrum antimicrobial consumption, and processes related to AMS. Learning from Excellence is a positive feedback initiative conceptualized at our institution. METHODS: This project took place over 12 months (April 2017-March 2018) in a 31-bedded PICU. We identified and measured processes about AMS daily. Healthcare professionals, achieving success in these processes, received positive feedback via Learning from Excellence, during a 6 months intervention period. Selected reports were followed with appreciative inquiry interviews to reinforce positive feedback. We calculated antimicrobial consumption data from existing databases (antimicrobial doses dispensed divided by PICU bed-days). Health Care-Associated Infection (HCAI) rates were included as a balancing measure. RESULTS: Antimicrobial consumption was 6.5% lower during the intervention period compared with the matching period from the previous year. We reduced broad-spectrum antimicrobial (meropenem) consumption by 17.6%. Improvements in processes were mixed: a daily review of antimicrobials and documentation of antimicrobial prescription and administration significantly improved. Other processes failed to improve. HCAI rates did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Positive feedback can be used as a QI intervention to improve processes around AMS. This intervention may contribute to a reduction in antimicrobial consumption. Not all processes are impacted equally, and there may be a "dose-response" effect. Further evaluation would benefit from a trial study design in other settings.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA