Development of a national medical leadership competency framework: the Dutch approach.

BACKGROUND: The concept of medical leadership (ML) can enhance physicians' inclusion in efforts for higher quality healthcare. Despite ML's spiking popularity, only a few countries have built a national taxonomy to facilitate ML competency education and training. In this paper we discuss the development of the Dutch ML competency framework with two objectives: to account for the framework's making and to complement to known approaches of developing such frameworks. METHODS: We designed a research approach and analyzed data from multiple sources based on Grounded Theory. Facilitated by the Royal Dutch Medical Association, a group of 14 volunteer researchers met over a period of 2.5 years to perform: 1) literature review; 2) individual interviews; 3) focus groups; 4) online surveys; 5) international framework comparison; and 6) comprehensive data synthesis. RESULTS: The developmental processes that led to the framework provided a taxonomic depiction of ML in Dutch perspective. It can be seen as a canonical 'knowledge artefact' created by a community of practice and comprises of a contemporary definition of ML and 12 domains, each entailing four distinct ML competencies. CONCLUSIONS: This paper demonstrates how a new language for ML can be created in a healthcare system. The success of our approach to capture insights, expectations and demands relating leadership by Dutch physicians depended on close involvement of the Dutch national medical associations and a nationally active community of practice; voluntary work of diverse researchers and medical practitioners and an appropriate research design that used multiple methods and strategies to circumvent reverberation of established opinions and conventionalisms. IMPLICATIONS: The experiences reported here may provide inspiration and guidance for those anticipating similar work in other countries to develop a tailored approach to create a ML framework.

Rapid Systematic Review of the Epley Maneuver for Treating Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare watchful waiting to the Epley maneuver as a management option for patients with posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (p-BPPV) regarding symptom relief. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted. Studies reporting original study data were included. Relevance and risk of bias (RoB) of the selected articles were assessed. Studies with low relevance, high RoB, or both were excluded. Absolute risk differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted for the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 1448 unique studies were retrieved. Eight of these satisfied the eligibility criteria. At 1-week follow-up, all included studies reported a clinically relevant effect in favor of the Epley maneuver regarding symptom relief (absolute risk differences ranging from 20% [95% CI, 5%-37%] to 59% [95% CI, 32%-76%]) or conversion to a negative Dix-Hallpike (absolute risk differences ranging from 17% [95% CI, -5%-37%] to 64% [95% CI, 29%-79%]). At 1-month follow-up, the results of the included studies diverged further. Absolute risk differences ranged from 6% (95% CI, -24%-35%) more symptom relief in favor of watchful waiting to 79% (95% CI, 56%-88%) in favor of the Epley maneuver. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: All data of the selected studies show a benefit in favor of the Epley maneuver at 1-week follow-up in the management of p-BPPV. The Epley maneuver should be considered in all patients with p-BPPV.