Factors associated with patient satisfaction with antiretroviral therapy in Japan: A cross-sectional, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Current antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens are highly effective; therefore, to differentiate between various regimens, considering patient-reported outcomes is essential. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction with their current ART regimens and investigate factors associated with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: Status (HIVTSQs) score. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted in Japan between April and December 2021. Patient-reported satisfaction with ART was assessed using the Japanese version of the HIVTSQs. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with a low total HIVTSQs score. RESULTS: A total of 679 patients completed the questionnaire. The median total HIVTSQs score was 58 (interquartile range: 52.5-64). In the multivariable logistic regression analyses, a total HIVTSQs score in the lowest quartile (indicating low satisfaction) was independently associated with twice- or thrice-daily regimens compared with single-tablet, once-daily regimens (adjusted odds ratio: 2.80, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-6.06, p = 0.009) and depression (adjusted odds ratio: 2.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-4.01, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with the current ART regimen was high. Depression and twice- or thrice-daily ART regimen were associated with low HIVTSQ. Switching to a single-tablet, once-daily regimen may improve patient satisfaction in patients receiving twice- or thrice-daily regimens.

Assessment of satisfaction with antiretroviral drugs and the need for long-acting injectable medicines among people living with HIV in Japan and its associated factors: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional observational study.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting injectable formulations for HIV infection have been approved and are now available in Japan. Although not currently recommended as first-line drugs in Japanese or overseas guidelines, use of such formulations may increase, in accordance with patient conditions and preference. We determine the level of satisfaction with current anti-HIV drugs and analyzed the preferences of patients who favor long-acting injectable drugs based on their satisfaction level with the present anti-HIV drugs. METHODS: People living with HIV (PLWH) who had received antiretroviral therapy (ART) for at least one month and consented to the study between 1 April and 31 December 2021 were included in a survey conducted using a self-administered questionnaire. The content of the survey included satisfaction with seven items (tablet size, ease and feeling when taking the medicine, color, taste, portability, daily oral therapy, and co-payment) related to the anti-HIV drugs they were taking and their need for future drugs (dosage form, frequency of dosing, long-acting injectable, etc.). In addition, factors related to the need for long-acting injectable medications were analyzed with regard to the relationship with satisfaction with anti-HIV drugs. RESULTS: Overall, 667 patients available for analysis were included in this study. Satisfaction with anti-HIV drugs was highest with regard to "co-payment" and lowest with "daily oral therapy". Regarding the need for long-acting injectable medications, logistic regression analysis indicated that tablet size and daily oral therapy were significant predictors of patient preference for a once-every-eight-weeks intramuscular formulation in terms of their requirement for long-acting injectable medications (tablet size, OR = 2.14, 95%CI 1.030-4.430, p = 0.042; and daily oral therapy, OR = 1.75, 95%CI 1.010-3.030, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Patients currently receiving anti-HIV drugs who express dissatisfaction with tablet size and daily oral therapy may prefer a long-acting injectable formulation, taking into consideration patient age, employment status, ART history, frequency of daily dosage and concomitant medications other than ART.

Real-world data of the association between quality of life using the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level utility value and adverse events for outpatient cancer chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient cancer chemotherapy may lead to improved quality of life (QOL) by allowing treatment to continue without impairing the social lives of patients compared with hospitalization. However, the occurrence of serious adverse events may cause a decline in QOL. We investigated the relationship between outpatient chemotherapy-induced adverse events and QOL. METHODS: A single-center retrospective descriptive study was conducted in patients who received outpatient chemotherapy at Gifu University Hospital (Gifu, Japan) between September 2017 and December 2018. The utility values of QOL, type and severity of adverse events, type of cancer, chemotherapy regimen, and other patient demographics were analyzed. Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. QOL was evaluated using the Japanese version of the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L). Associations between the EQ-5D-5L utility value and serious adverse events were assessed using adjusted (age and sex) odds ratios obtained with a proportional odds logistic regression model. RESULTS: Data from 1008 patients who received 4695 chemotherapy cycles were analyzed. According to proportional odds logistic regression, the adverse events that significantly correlated with a decreased EQ-5D-5L utility value were malaise, edema of the limbs, peripheral neuropathy, pruritus, and dry skin. Based on the proportional odds logistic analysis, neither cancer type nor anticancer drugs were significantly correlated with the EQ-5D-5L utility value in patients who received chemotherapy. Pharmaceutical care for peripheral neuropathy significantly improved patients' EQ-5D-5L utility value from 0.747 to 0.776 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events (i.e., peripheral neuropathy, malaise, and edema of the limbs) are significantly correlated with a decrease in QOL, regardless of the type of cancer or anticancer drugs used. Pharmaceutical care provided by pharmacists in collaboration with physicians may improve QOL.

Control of Constipation in Patients Receiving CHOP or CHOP-Like Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Management of constipation in patients receiving cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) or CHOP-like chemotherapy regimens is important for prevention of paralytic ileus. We reported earlier that the laxative action of magnesium oxide is reversed by the concomitant use of antacids in cancer patients receiving opioid analgesics. Here, we assessed the prevalence of prophylactic laxative medication for the control of constipation in patients receiving CHOP or CHOP-like regimens for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Data obtained from 211 eligible patients were retrospectively analyzed. Almost all patients (99%) received anti-ulcer agents such as proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor antagonists for the prophylaxis of gastric disorders associated with prednisolone. Prophylactic laxatives were prescribed in 86 patients (40.8%), in which magnesium oxide was used most predominantly (88.4%). However, magnesium oxide at doses of ≦2000 mg/d was not effective for prevention of constipation, although the compound totally inhibited the incidence of constipation at doses higher than 2000 mg/d. Therefore, it is important to avoid negative drug interaction between magnesium oxide and antacids in patients receiving CHOP chemotherapy.

Diagnosis of imported Ugandan typhoid fever based on local outbreak information: A case report.

Re-emerging multidrug-resistant typhoid fever is becoming a worldwide threat, especially in East Africa. At the beginning of 2015, an outbreak of typhoid fever started in the capital city of Uganda, and 1940 suspected cases were reported by 5 March 2015. In this report, we describe a case of typhoid fever caused by a MDR strain with HIV infection and hemoglobin S-syndrome thalassemia in an Ugandan from Kampala City. It is essential to consider MDR strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi infections, including fluoroquinolone-resistant strains, in patients from Africa and Southeast Asia.

[Relationship between the Incidence of Hypomagnesemia and Acneiform Rash and the Therapeutic Effect of Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibody in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer].

PURPOSE: Although anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, including cetuximab and panitumumab, are highly effective in KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer, these drugs frequently cause several adverse events. These events include hypomagnesemia and acneiform rash, which may lead to the dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy. In the present study, we retrospectively investigated the incidence of hypomagnesemia and acneiform rash in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We examined the relationship between the incidence of such adverse events and the therapeutic effect. METHODS: Thirty-four mCRC patients receiving anti -EGFR monoclonal antibody as a first-line therapy during April 2012 to March 2015 were the subjects of the present study. The symptoms of hypomagnesemia and acneiform rash were graded in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v4.0. RESULTS: The incidence rates of hypomagnesemia (all grades) and the acneiform rash (≥grade 2) were 29%and 50%, respectively. Eight patients (24%) exhibited both of these adverse events. The tumor response rate was notable, as it was significantly higher in patients who experienced both of these adverse events compared to those who did not(88% vs 38% for complete response plus partial response, p=0.039). However, the tumor response rate tended to be higher, although not significantly, in patients with either of these adverse events compared to those without it. CONCLUSION: Concurrent onset of hypomagnesemia and acneiform rash may become a reliable factor capable of predicting the therapeutic effect of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody.

Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for cancer cachexia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia affects more than half of all cancer patients, reducing survival rates. Evidence-based approaches are urgently needed to optimize treatment. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of different pharmacotherapies for cancer cachexia. Three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched for the period from January 1, 2000, to March 20, 2024. The netmeta package in R software was used to calculate the pooled effect, employing a random effects model. RESULTS: Seven placebo-controlled randomized trials involving 1421 patients were analyzed. Pairwise analysis showed that body weight increases were 4.6 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-8.37 kg) for olanzapine, 3.82 kg (95% CI 0.73-6.91 kg) for espindolol (20 mg), 2.36 kg (95% CI 1.84-2.89 kg) for anamorelin (100 mg), and 1.31 kg (95% CI 0.42-2.19 kg) for anamorelin (50 mg). In terms of safety profiles, olanzapine demonstrated the lowest odds ratio when compared to placebo, at 0.26 (95% CI 0.07-0.94), followed by anamorelin (50 mg) at 0.86 (95% CI 0.30-2.48), and anamorelin (100 mg) at 0.89 (95% CI 0.42-1.88). However, network meta-analysis could not confirm the superiority of olanzapine over anamorelin in terms of efficacy and safety. CONCLUSION: Both olanzapine and anamorelin are useful in improving body weight in patients with cancer cachexia. Personalization may be helpful for different patients.

Factors associated with incomplete adherence to integrase strand transfer inhibitor-containing single-tablet regimen among Japanese people living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: People living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) require high rates of medication adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) for a successful treatment outcome. Understanding the factors associated with incomplete adherence among those receiving integrase strand transfer inhibitor-containing single-tablet regimens (INSTI-STRs) is crucial for improving treatment outcomes. This study aimed to identify the factors contributing to incomplete ART adherence among Japanese PLWH receiving INSTI-STRs. METHODS: This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at 11 Japanese institutions as an anonymous survey. ART adherence was assessed using a self-reported questionnaire. We defined incomplete ART adherence as missing ≥ 1 dose of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) over the past month. The factors associated with incomplete ART adherence were assessed using logistic regression analysis. Additionally, we investigated the associations between patients' satisfaction score with and need for ARVs and their adherence to ART. RESULTS: The final analysis included data of 387 patients who were treated with INSTI-STRs. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated significant association of younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.79; 95%confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.99 for each 10-year increment) with incomplete ART adherence. Additionally, female sex (aOR, 3.98; 95%CI: 1.36-11.60); depressive symptoms (mild depression: aOR, 1.68; 95%CI: 1.001-2.82, moderate depression: aOR, 2.98; 95%CI: 1.35-6.53, and severe depression: aOR, 8.73; 95%CI: 1.38-55.00 vs. minimal depression); were also significantly associated with incomplete ART adherence when compared with the reference categories. Concomitant medication usage was significantly associated with a lower rate of incomplete ART adherence (1-4 medications: aOR, 0.53; 95%CI: 0.31-0.89 and ≥ 5 medications: aOR, 0.30; 95%CI: 0.13-0.70 vs. no concomitant medication usage). In the incomplete ART adherence group, satisfaction scores for various aspects were significantly lower. Furthermore, a lower proportion of patients in the incomplete ART adherence group preferred the option of "taking tablets daily and visiting the hospital every 3 months," compared to those in the complete ART adherence group (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that factors associated with incomplete ART adherence include younger age, female sex, no concomitant medication, and depressive symptoms. Despite ART simplification, incomplete adherence among PLWH receiving INSTI-STRs, remains a challenge, requiring additional actions.

A Phase â ¡ Study of Ubenimex Combined With Pembrolizumab, Nab-Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin for Previously Untreated Advanced Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: TORG2241 (UBE-Q).

BACKGROUND: According to the results of the KEYNOTE-407 trial, pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with previously untreated advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ubenimex, a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor, is an oral drug with immunostimulatory and antitumor activities. We aim to assess the safety and efficacy of ubenimex in combination with pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial is conducted to confirm the tolerability and efficacy of the tested drugs. Patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC will receive a predetermined daily dose of ubenimex orally plus 4 cycles of pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin, followed by continuous administration of ubenimex and pembrolizumab for a maximum of 2 years. To confirm tolerability, the daily dose of ubenimex will begin at level 1 (30 mg), which will be increased to levels 2 (60 mg) and 3 (120 mg) according to the escalation criteria, with a standard 3 + 3 design for achieving the target dose-limiting toxicity rate of 33%. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ubenimex at the determined dose level will be analyzed. The primary endpoint of the efficacy evaluation will be the objective response rate assessed by an independent review committee. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ubenimex combined with pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC. The results will help devise future treatment strategies.

Real-World Data on Subsequent Therapy for First-Line Osimertinib-Induced Pneumonitis: Safety of EGFR-TKI Rechallenge (Osi-risk Study TORG-TG2101).

BACKGROUND: Although osimertinib is a promising therapeutic agent for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer, the incidence of pneumonitis is particularly high among Japanese patients receiving the drug. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of subsequent anticancer treatments, including EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) rechallenge, which are to be administered after pneumonitis recovery, remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge in patients who experienced first-line osimertinib-induced pneumonitis, with a primary focus on recurrent pneumonitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who developed initial pneumonitis following first-line osimertinib treatment across 34 institutions in Japan between August 2018 and September 2020. RESULTS: Among the 124 patients included, 68 (54.8%) patients underwent EGFR-TKI rechallenge. The recurrence rate of pneumonitis following EGFR-TKI rechallenge was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-39) at 12 months. The cumulative incidence of recurrent pneumonitis was significantly higher in the osimertinib group than in the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI (conventional EGFR-TKI) groups (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.5; p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between EGFR-TKI type (osimertinib or conventional EGFR-TKI) and pneumonitis recurrence, regardless of severity or status of initial pneumonitis (HR 3.29; 95% CI 1.12-9.68; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib rechallenge after initial pneumonitis was associated with significantly higher recurrence rates than conventional EGFR-TKI rechallenge.

Controlling nutritional status score during hospitalization as a predictor of clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a serious condition with high mortality and a high permanent disability rate. In this study, we examined the association of clinical outcome with the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score during hospitalization in aSAH patients. A single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted at Gifu University Hospital. Patients transported to the emergency room for aSAH and diagnosed with World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade III and IV aSAH between April 2004 and March 2021 were enrolled. A logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate the association of the CONUT score with a modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≥ 3 and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). 127 patients diagnosed with WFNS grade III and IV aSAH were analyzed. CONUT score was significantly associated with mRS ≥ 3 during hospitalization. The score obtained by subtracting the CONUT score at admission from the maximum CONUT score was significantly associated with mRS ≥ 3 at discharge. Moreover, the score obtained by subtracting the CONUT score at admission from the maximum CONUT score during the first 14 days was significantly associated with DCI within 14 days from admission. These findings indicate that CONUT score during hospitalization may be a useful daily marker for predicting poor outcomes in aSAH patients.

Predictors of central line-associated bloodstream infections in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy through implanted venous access ports: a retrospective, observational study.

Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are sometimes superior to peripheral vascular access for chemotherapy. Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are an important complication of CVCs in chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted to investigate patients with implanted venous access ports (PORTs) from July 2010 to June 2021 in a teaching hospital. General conditions of the PORTs, backgrounds, and characteristics of patients were compared between CLABSI cases and uninfected cases to identify predictors of CLABSI. Results: A total of 566 patients with PORTs who underwent chemotherapy were enrolled in this study, with CLABSI identified in 41 patients, for a total of 436,597 catheter-days. The median duration of PORT use was 26 vs. 494 days (P<0.001) in the CLABSI and uninfected groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in tumor classification, staging, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil proportion, lymphocyte proportion, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and performance status between the CLABSI and uninfected groups. Multivariable analysis showed that antibiotic usage within the previous week, total protein (TP), and immediate PORT use were independently associated with CLABSI, and their odds ratios (ORs) were 4.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67, 14.35], 1.95 (95% CI: 1.14, 3.53), and 3.13 (95% CI: 1.18, 8.30), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic curve for TP was 0.63, and the cutoff value was 5.9 g/dL. Conclusions: PORT implantation should be avoided in patients who had antibiotic treatment episodes within 1 week, especially for those with low serum TP levels.

Adherence to anti-retroviral therapy, decisional conflicts, and health-related quality of life among treatment-naïve individuals living with HIV: a DEARS-J observational study.

BACKGROUND: Supporting people living with HIV using anti-retroviral therapy (ART) is important due to the requirement for strict medication adherence. To date, no data from longitudinal studies evaluating adherence by treatment-naïve people living with HIV are currently available. We investigated the adherence of treatment-naïve people living with HIV over time and examined the relationships among decisional conflicts, adherence, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). METHODS: The survey items included adherence (visual analogue scale [VAS]), decisional conflict (decisional conflict scale [DCS]), and HRQL (Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey [MOS-HIV]). The DCS and MOS-HIV scores and the VAS and MOS scores were collected electronically at the ART initiation time point and at 4-, 24-, and 48-week post-treatment time points. RESULTS: A total of 215 participants were enrolled. The mean DCS score was 27.3 (SD, 0.9); 23.3% of participants were in the high-score and 36.7% in the low-score groups. The mean adherence rates at 4, 24, and 48 weeks were 99.2% (standard error [SE], 0.2), 98.4% (SE, 0.4), and 96.0% (SE, 1.2), respectively. The least-square means of the MOS-HIV for the DCS (high vs. low scores) were 64.4 vs. 69.2 for general health perceptions and 57.7 vs. 64.0 for HRQL, respectively. CONCLUSION: Adherence among treatment-naïve people living with HIV was maintained at a higher level, and HRQL tended to improve with ART. People with high levels of decisional conflict tended to have lower HRQL scores. Support for people living with HIV during ART initiation may be related to HRQL.

Prospective exosome-focused translational research for afatinib (EXTRA) study of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation: an observational clinical study.

Background: The exosome-focused translational research for afatinib (EXTRA) study is the first trial to identify novel predictive biomarkers for longer treatment efficacy of afatinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) via a comprehensive association study using genomic, proteomic, epigenomic, and metabolomic analyses. Objectives: We report details of the clinical portion prior to omics analyses. Design: A prospective, single-arm, observational study was conducted using afatinib 40 mg/day as an initial dose in untreated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Dose reduction to 20 mg every other day was allowed. Methods: Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Results: A total of 103 patients (median age 70 years, range 42-88 years) were enrolled from 21 institutions in Japan between February 2017 and March 2018. After a median follow-up of 35.0 months, 21% remained on afatinib treatment, whereas 9% had discontinued treatment because of AEs. The median PFS was 18.4 months, with a 3-year PFS rate of 23.3%. The median afatinib treatment duration in patients with final doses of 40 (n = 27), 30 (n = 23), and 20 mg/day (n = 35), and 20 mg every other day (n = 18) were 13.4, 15.4, 18.8, and 18.3 months, respectively. The median OS was not reached, with a 3-year OS rate of 58.5%. The median OS in patients who did (n = 25) and did not (n = 78) receive osimertinib during the entire course of treatment were 42.4 months and not reached, respectively (p = 0.654). Conclusions: As the largest prospective study in Japan, this study confirmed favorable OS following first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in a real-world setting. Further analysis of the EXTRA study is expected to identify novel predictive biomarkers for afatinib. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR identifier (UMIN000024935, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_his_list.cgi?recptno=R000028688.

Effectiveness of Cell-Free and Concentrated Ascites Reinfusion Therapy in the Treatment of Malignancy-Related Ascites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Malignancy-related ascites (MRA) is one of the symptoms causing discomfort in advanced cancer patients. Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) is one of the palliative treatments widely conducted in Japan only. METHODS: A systematic review following a meta-analysis of CART was performed. The efficiency and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 2567 patients and 6013 procedures of CART were identified in this study. The mean volume of MRA collected was 4.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.47-5.11) L, and the volume reinfused after concentrating was 0.49 (95% CI 0.39-0.60) L. A total of 86.1 (95% CI 77.1-95.2) g protein and 42.9 (95% CI 36.0-50.0) g albumin was reinfused. The mean time to the next paracentesis was 20.7 (95% CI 15.6-25.8) days. The body weight was reduced by 3.38 (95% CI 1.90-4.86; p < 0.01) kg, and abdominal circumference was reduced by 7.86 (95% CI 6.58-9.14; p < 0.001) cm. Serum albumin increased an average of 0.14 (95% CI -0.01-0.28; p = 0.07) mg/dL the day after CART. Abdominal distension, dyspnea, and fatigue were alleviated by 6.0 (95% CI 5.59-6.51), 2.66 (95% CI 2.05-3.28), and 2.64 (95% CI 1.86-3.42) points using a numerical rating scale system ranging from 0 to 10. Overall, 17% (95% CI 0.03-0.31%) of patients had improved performance status after CART. Significant body temperature elevation was observed, at an average of 0.4 °C (95% CI 0.18-0.62 °C). CONCLUSIONS: CART might be a safe and effective palliative therapy in MRA and further clinical trials are necessary.

Effect of Adjuvant and Palliative Chemotherapy in Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subset of lung carcinoma with poor overall survival. METHODS: A systematic review following a meta-analysis of studies was performed to identify the effect of different selections of chemotherapy in LCNEC. Articles providing overall survival data for adjuvant chemotherapy or palliative chemotherapy for LCNEC were eligible. The odds ratio (OR) of mortality at one or two years after chemotherapy was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 16 reports were finally included in the quantitative synthesis, involving a total of 5916 LCNEC patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 1303 patients, and palliative chemotherapy was administered to 313 patients using either a small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regimen. The OR for adjuvant chemotherapy was 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 to 0.89, p = 0.002). The SCLC regimen showed an OR of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.11 to 2.38, p = 0.40) after one year, and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.11 to 0.89, p = 0.03) after two years, compared with the NSCLC regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy for pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma improved the outcome after surgery. The SCLC regimen showed better survival than the NSCLC regimen as palliative chemotherapy.

Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts treatment efficacy and prognosis of cytotoxic anticancer drugs, molecular targeted drugs, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has recently attracted attention as a prognostic predictor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the utility of NLR in relation to cytotoxic anticancer drugs or molecular targeted drugs remains unclear. We determined if NLR could predict the treatment efficacy and prognosis in NSCLC patients who receive cytotoxic anticancer drugs or molecular targeted drugs, as well as ICIs, in a cross-sectional manner. METHODS: Of 658 patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line systemic treatment in our hospital between 2008 and 2019, 312 who met the analytical criteria were included in the study. We retrospectively analyzed the ability of NLR with a cut-off value of 5 to predict time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients who received the following treatments: first-line treatment with molecular targeted drugs (mt group, n=100); first-line treatment with cytotoxic anticancer drugs (wt group, n=212); and first-line treatment with cytotoxic anticancer drugs followed by ICIs (ICI group, n=58). RESULTS: In the high- and low-NLR mt subgroups, median TTFs were 6.7 and 14.9 months (P<0.01), respectively, and median survival times (MSTs) were 17.8 and 39.1 months (P<0.01), respectively. In the high- and low-NLR wt subgroups, median TTFs were 1.5 and 5.8 months (P<0.01), and MSTs were 6.3 and 20.7 months (P<0.01), respectively. In the high- and low-NLR ICI subgroups, median TTFs were 1.3 and 6.8 months (P<0.01), and MSTs were 9.2 and 25.8 months (P<0.01), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified NLR as a significant independent predictor of TTF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.89, P=0.01; HR 2.51, P<0.01; and HR 5.06, P<0.01 in the mt, wt, and ICI groups, respectively) and OS (HR 3.81, P<0.01; HR 2.59, P<0.01; and HR 2.48, P<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that NLR might be a predictor of treatment efficacy and prognosis in advanced NSCLC patients who receive various systemic treatments. This finding of consistent applicability of NLR to a wide variety of systemic treatments is of great significance.

Polaprezinc prevents oral mucositis associated with radiochemotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer.

Oral mucositis is frequent but serious adverse event associated with radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy in head and neck cancer severely impairs health-related quality of life, leading to poor prognosis due to discontinuation of the therapy. Although a number of compounds have been tested for prophylaxis of oral mucositis, few of them are satisfactory. We investigated the effect of polaprezinc (zinc L-carnosine), a gastric mucosal protective drug, on radiochemotherapy-induced oral mucositis, pain, xerostomia and taste disturbance in patients with head and neck cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive polaprezinc (n = 16) or azulene oral rinse as the control (n = 15). The incidence rates of mucositis, pain, xerostomia and taste disturbance were all markedly lower in polaprezinc group than in control. Moreover, the use of analgesics was significantly (p = 0.003) less frequent and the amount of food intake was significantly (p = 0.002) higher in polaprezinc group than in control. On the other hand, tumor response rate in patients with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was not significantly affected by polaprezinc, in which the response rate (complete plus partial response) was 88% for polaprezinc and 92% for control (p = 1.000). Therefore, it is highly assumable that polaprezinc is potentially useful for prevention of oral mucositis and improvement of quality of life without reducing the tumor response.

Pharmaceutical interventions facilitate premedication and prevent opioid-induced constipation and emesis in cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Opioid analgesics possess a number of side effects, among which constipation and nausea/vomiting occur most frequently. Although pretreatment with laxatives and antiemetics for the prophylaxis of opioid-induced constipation and nausea/vomiting, respectively, is recommended, such side effects are still a matter of concern in clinical setting. METHODS: We first surveyed the prevalence of premedication in 83 cancer patients who took opioid analgesics and the incidence of such side effects. Subsequently, intervention was carried out to promote premedication, and the effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated in 107 patients. RESULTS: Prophylactic treatment with laxatives and antiemetics were conducted in 57% and 52%, respectively. The most frequently prescribed laxatives and antiemetics were magnesium oxide in combination with pantethine, a mild stimulant laxative, and prochlorperazine, respectively. The lack of premedication increased the risk of constipation (odds ratio, 5.25; 95% confidence intervals, 1.93-14.31; p = 0.001) and vomiting (4.67, 1.04-21.04; p = 0.045). Intervention such as provision of drug information to physicians, verification of prescription orders, and instructions to patients increased the rates of prophylactic medications to 93% (p < 0.001) for laxatives and 81% (p < 0.001) for antiemetics. The incidence of side effects was lowered from 36% to 9% (p < 0.001) for constipation, from 28% to 17% for nausea (p = 0.077), and from 16% to 4% for vomiting (p = 0.0085). CONCLUSION: Intervention to promote prophylactic medication was highly effective in reducing the risk of opioid-induced constipation and nausea/vomiting.

Importance and Difficulty of Differentiating BMA-induced AFF Prodromal Symptoms from Hormonal Therapy-related Femoral Pain.

We herein report a case of breast cancer in a 74-year-old woman treated with exemestane as fourth-line hormonal therapy and bone-modifying agents for long time. She suddenly developed a right femoral shaft fracture during treatment. Her femoral fracture had a beaking sign on radiogram. Given this finding, her fracture was ultimately diagnosed as atypical femoral fracture (AFF). In this case, it was difficult to recognize the difference between groin pain as a prodromal symptom of AFF and that due to an adverse reaction to hormonal therapy. Therefore, clinicians should recognize the difficulty of this differentiation and consider the situation with caution.