Nursing Student's Satisfaction With Virtual Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic in India.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the world in 2020. Every country adopted quarantine measures to prevent the transmission of the coronavirus infection. These measures resulted in dramatic changes in the daily lives of most people. In the academic world, students faced a shift from the traditional classroom-based teaching to virtual distance learning platforms. This shift in nursing education posed challenges both to the instructors and students as they were not fully prepared for this transition. Objective: The study assessed the nursing students' satisfaction with the virtual learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic in selected nursing colleges in India. Methods: The study was conducted in four nursing colleges in India. A total of 1,166 Diploma, Post Basic BSc (N), BSN, and MSN nursing students participated in the study. Ethical approval was obtained from all the nursing colleges included in the study. The Google Forms satisfaction survey included student, teacher, course, technology, environmental, and practical dimensions. Results: The response rate was 86.31% (n = 1,166). The overall satisfaction with virtual theory and practical classes has a mean and SD score of 67.14 + 11 and 16.21 + 3.46, respectively. The results showed that overall 51% of the students had good satisfaction with virtual theory classes while 48% had moderate satisfaction. In terms of overall satisfaction with virtual practical classes, approximately 39% had good satisfaction, 58% had moderate satisfaction and nearly 3% had poor satisfaction. In addition, the students expressed that they had good satisfaction with Teacher dimension (64.3%), Student dimension (63%), and Course dimension (57.2%). On the contrary, they expressed poor satisfaction in the Technical dimension (11.3%) and Environmental dimension (5.6%). The results showed that the courses, the place of attending class, and health issues were significantly associated with the student's level of satisfaction with virtual learning. Conclusion: Although the majority of the students rated their satisfaction level as being "good" in virtual theory classes and "moderate" in virtual practical learning, most of them were dissatisfied with the Technical and Environmental dimensions of virtual learning. This results calls for blended learning strategies to be designed to enhance better learning outcomes and, to ensure deepened level of satisfaction with virtual learning activities.

EWSR1 and ATF1 rearrangements in clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: presentation of a case.

Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) is a rare odontogenic tumor of the jaws that is more common in the mandible than maxilla and has a female preponderance with a peak incidence in the sixth decade. It is characterized by locally aggressive behavior and has the potential to metastasize. This tumor was recently reported to have a rearrangement of the Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 gene (EWS RNA-binding protein 1, EWSR1) in 5 of 8 cases tested and of the activating transcription factor 1 gene (ATF1) in 1 case tested. We report a case of CCOC in the premolar area of the mandible in a 59-year-old woman. This case demonstrated the presence of both EWSR1 and ATF1 gene rearrangements by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Ovotesticular disorder of sexual development (true hermaphroditism).

OBJECTIVES: To determine the mechanism for the 46,XX/46,XY karyotype observed in a patient with an ovotesticular disorder of sexual development (ie, true hermaphroditism). METHODS: Cytogenetic, molecular cytogenetic, and molecular DNA analyses were performed on the blood, skin, and left and right gonadal tissue from 2 surgical procedures. The results of these studies were used to determine whether the ovotesticular disorder of sexual development resulted from mosaicism or tetragametic chimerism. RESULTS: Cytogenetic and molecular analyses revealed a mixture of 46,XX and 46,XY cells in most tissues. DNA analysis from the gonadal tissues from surgeries 1 and 2 was performed. Highly polymorphic loci from 12 different chromosomes were examined for the presence of > or = 1 paternal or maternal alleles. Three loci were highly informative: D14S544 (14q32.2), DS14S583 (14q21.3), and SE33 (6q14). Each demonstrated the presence of 2 paternal and 2 maternal alleles, indicating that the ovotesticular disorder of sexual development resulted from tetragametic chimerism. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of the cytogenetic, molecular cytogenetic, and DNA analyses of the polymorphic markers from several different loci, it was confirmed that the patient had tetragametic chimerism. This case has assisted in increasing our knowledge of the possible mechanisms causing this rare and complex disorder.

Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 3 mosaicism.

OBJECTIVES: To present the clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular cytogenetic findings of prenatally diagnosed trisomy 3 mosaicism. CASE AND METHODS: Trisomy 3 mosaicism is rare, and only two cases of prenatally diagnosed trisomy 3 mosaicism have been reported. Amniocentesis, performed for AMA, revealed a karyotype of 47,XX, + 3[8]/46,XX[27]. Periumbilical blood sampling (PUBS) showed 46,XX in 100 cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using an alpha satellite chromosome 3 probe confirmed the cytogenetic findings. A repeat amniocentesis confirmed mosaicism for trisomy 3 (47,XX, + 3[1]/46,XX[18]). The infant was delivered by elective C-section because of the presence of IUGR and oligohydramnios. The baby had normal physical findings at birth except for symmetric IUGR, apparently resulting from the placental trisomic cell lines. At delivery, chromosome analysis of 50 cells each from blood, placenta, and umbilical cord revealed 46,XX in all cells. FISH analysis of amniotic fluid cells (54 nuclei), peripheral blood (50 nuclei), umbilical cord fibroblasts (57 nuclei), and placental tissue (52 nuclei) demonstrated two signals in 200 nuclei (i.e., 46,XX) and three signals in 13 nuclei (i.e., 47,XX, + 3). At 11 months of age, the baby was progressing normally. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of trisomy 3 mosaicism is problematic for patients and clinicians. This is only the third case of trisomy 3 mosaicism identified at amniocentesis. Ultrasound, PUBS, and evaluation of placental tissues and postnatal peripheral blood, were useful in providing information regarding the fetal involvement of trisomy 3. Additional cases of prenatally diagnosed mosaicism for rare trisomies are necessary to more accurately assess the significance of these findings.

Prenatal diagnosis of a rare inherited heterochromatic variant chromosome 4.

Heterochromatic chromosome polymorphisms have been extensively reported. Most are associated with C-band positive regions located on chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y. We report a prenatal case of a rare heterochromatic variant on chromosome 4. Amniocentesis was performed on a 35-year-old white female for AMA. The karyotype was 46,XY,add(4)(q35)?. One chromosome 4 homolog had an additional dark band at the terminus of the long arm. Parental chromosome analyses revealed that the chromosome 4 was maternally inherited. The mother and fetus were both Q and C-band positive and NOR and DAPI Distamycin staining negative. FISH using Y, 4, and 9 whole chromosome paint (WCP), centromere probes for all chromosomes (Cytocell, Chromoprobe Multiprobe-I System, Rainbow Scientific, Inc., Windsor, CT), alpha-satellite probes for 13/21, 14/22 (D13Z1/D21Z1; D14Z1/D22Z1, Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD), and the 15 PWS/Angelman probe (LSI SNRPN, D15Z1, PML, Vysis, Inc., Downers Grove, IL) were negative. The TelVysion 4q telomere probe (D4S2930, Vysis, Inc.) was positive. A phenotypically normal male was born at 37 weeks. Follow up studies on placenta, cord, cord blood, and foreskin confirmed the prenatal results. Based on these findings, it appears that this chromosome 4 was a rare heterochromatic variant. Heterochromatic variants have been demonstrated to have no phenotypic effect on carriers. This case illustrates the importance of reporting unusual variant chromosomes for genetic counseling purposes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a heterochromatic variant involving part of the long arm of chromosome 4 in a phenotypically normal mother and child.