RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The review aims to discuss emerging evidence in the field of microbiome-dependent roles in host defense during critical illness with a focus on lung, kidney, and brain inflammation. RECENT FINDINGS: The gut microbiota of critical ill patients is characterized by lower diversity, lower abundances of key commensal genera, and in some cases overgrowth by one bacterial genera, a state otherwise known as dysbiosis. Increasing evidence suggests that microbiota-derived components can reach the circulatory system from the gut and modulate immune homeostasis. Dysbiosis might have greater consequences for the critically ill than previously imagined and could contribute to poor outcome. Preclinical studies suggest that impaired communication across the gut - organ axes is associated with brain, lung - and kidney failure. SUMMARY: In health, a diverse microbiome might enhance host defense, while during critical illness, the dysbiotic microbiome might contribute to comorbidity and organ dysfunction. Future research should be aimed at further establishing the causes and consequences of dysbiosis seen in the critically ill, which will provide perspective for developing new strategies of intervention.
Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Microbiota , Disbiose , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome plays a protective role in the host defense against pneumonia. The composition of the lung microbiota has been shown to be predictive of clinical outcome in critically ill patients. However, the dynamics of the lung and gut microbiota composition over time during severe pneumonia remains ill defined. We used a mouse model of pneumonia-derived sepsis caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae in order to follow the pathogen burden as well as the composition of the lung, tongue and fecal microbiota from local infection towards systemic spread. RESULTS: Already at 6 h post-inoculation with K. pneumoniae, marked changes in the lung microbiota were seen. The alpha diversity of the lung microbiota did not change throughout the infection, whereas the beta diversity did. A shift between the prominent lung microbiota members of Streptococcus and Klebsiella was seen from 12 h onwards and was most pronounced at 18 h post-inoculation (PI) which was also reflected in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines indicating severe pulmonary inflammation. Around 18 h PI, K. pneumoniae bacteremia was observed together with a systemic inflammatory response. The composition of the tongue microbiota was not affected during infection, even at 18-30 h PI when K. pneumoniae had become the dominant bacterium in the lung. Moreover, we observed differences in the gut microbiota during pulmonary infection. The gut microbiota contributed to the lung microbiota at 12 h PI, however, this decreased at a later stage of the infection. CONCLUSIONS: At 18 h PI, K. pneumoniae was the dominant member in the lung microbiota. The lung microbiota profiles were significantly explained by the lung K. pneumoniae bacterial counts and Klebsiella and Streptococcus were correlating with the measured cytokine levels in the lung and/or blood. The oral microbiota in mice, however, was not influenced by the severity of murine pneumonia, whereas the gut microbiota was affected. This study is of significance for future studies investigating the role of the lung microbiota during pneumonia and sepsis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: An increasing body of evidence is indicating that the gut microbiota modulates pulmonary inflammatory responses. This so-called gut-lung axis might be of importance in a whole spectrum of inflammatory pulmonary diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pneumonia. Here, we investigate the effect of antibiotic disruption of gut microbiota on immune responses in the lung after a intranasal challenge with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). METHODS/RESULTS: C57Bl/6 mice were treated for two weeks with broad-spectrum antibiotics supplemented to their drinking water. Afterwards, mice and untreated control mice were inoculated intranasally with LPS. Mice were sacrificed 2 and 6 hours post-challenge, after which bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung tissues were taken. Gut microbiota analysis showed that antibiotic-treated mice had a pronounced reduction in numbers and diversity of bacteria. A modest, but time consistent, significant increase of interleukin (IL)-6 release was seen in BALF of antibiotic treated mice. Release of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), however, was not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic induced microbiota disruption is associated with alterations in host responses during LPS-induced lung inflammation. Further studies are required to determine the clinical relevance of the gut-lung axis in pulmonary infection and inflammation.
Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/etiologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Lipopolissacarídeos/toxicidade , Animais , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/química , Feminino , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Pulmão/patologia , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BLRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The microbiome has emerged as an important player in the pathophysiology of a whole spectrum of diseases that affect the critically ill. We hypothesized that differences in microbiota composition across vendors can influence murine models of pulmonary lipopolysaccharide (LPS) inflammation and Gram-negative pneumonia. METHODS: A multi-vendor approach was used with genetically similar mice derived from three different vendors (Janvier, Envigo, Charles River). This model was employed to study the effect on the host response to a pulmonary LPS challenge (1 µg Klebsiella pneumoniae LPS, intranasal), as well as experimental K. pneumoniae infection (ATCC43816, 1 × 104 CFU, intranasal). RESULTS: Gut microbiota analysis revealed profound intervendor differences in bacterial composition as shown by beta diversity and at various taxonomic levels. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6 release in lung and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were determined 6 and 24 h after intranasal treatment with LPS. No differences were found between the groups, with the exception for Envigo, showing a higher level of TNFα in lung and BALF at 6 h compared to Janvier and Charles River. In another set of experiments, mice from different vendors were subjected to a clinically relevant model of Gram-negative pneumonia (K. pneumoniae). At 12 and 36 h post-infection, no intervendor differences were found in bacterial dissemination, or TNFα and IL-6 levels in the lungs. In line, markers for organ failure did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a marked variation in the gut microbiota composition of mice from different vendors, the hypothesized impact on our models of pulmonary inflammation and severe pneumonia was limited. This is of significance for experimental settings, showing that differences in gut microbiota do not have to lead to differences in outcome.