Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of conventional saline-assisted piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to underwater EMR (UEMR) without submucosal lifting of colorectal polyps are lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of EMR to UEMR of large colorectal polyps. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-nine colorectal polyps were removed by a single endoscopist from 7/2007 to 2/2015 using EMR or UEMR. 135 polyps (EMR: 62, UEMR: 73) that measured ≥15 mm and had not undergone prior attempted polypectomy were evaluated for rates of complete macroscopic resection and adverse events. 101 of these polyps (EMR: 46, UEMR: 55) had at least 1 follow-up colonoscopy and were studied for rates of recurrence and the number of procedures required to achieve curative resection. RESULTS: The rate of complete macroscopic resection was higher following UEMR compared to EMR (98.6 vs. 87.1%, p = 0.012). UEMR had a lower recurrence rate at the first follow-up colonoscopy compared to EMR (7.3 vs. 28.3%, OR 5.0 for post-EMR recurrence, 95% CI: [1.5, 16.5], p = 0.008). UEMR required fewer procedures to reach curative resection than EMR (mean of 1.0 vs. 1.3, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in rates of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: UEMR appears superior to EMR for the removal of large colorectal polyps in terms of rates of complete macroscopic resection and recurrent (or residual) abnormal tissue. Compared to conventional EMR, UEMR may offer increased procedural effectiveness without compromising safety in the removal of large colorectal polyps without prior attempted resection.

Pancreatic Myeloid Sarcoma Causing Obstructive Jaundice: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is an extramedullary manifestation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and commonly occurs in sites such as the lymph nodes, skin, soft tissues, and bone. It more rarely manifests in the pancreas, with less than 20 cases reported in the literature since 1987. Despite its rarity, MS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a soft tissue mass causing obstructive jaundice, especially if the patient has a known hematologic disease. Isolated cases of pancreatic MS have been known to progress to AML; therefore, it is crucial to differentiate MS from more common diagnoses, such as pancreatic cancer or pancreatitis. This is a case of a 70-year-old male with symptomatic obstructive jaundice secondary to pancreatic MS, ultimately requiring endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and management. Also included is a comprehensive review of previous case reports with similar clinical presentations, management, and treatment of pancreatic MS.

Phenotypic manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease differ between Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites: results of a large cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Hispanics are the fastest growing minority in the United States, yet few studies have examined the phenotypes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in this population. No studies compare IBD presentation between foreign and US-born Hispanics. Our aim was to compare phenotypic characteristics of IBD between Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), as well as between US-born and foreign-born Hispanics. METHODS: We retrospectively identified cohorts of adult IBD patients from 1998 to 2009 and compared ethnic variation in phenotype, including disease type (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (UC)), extra-intestinal manifestations (EIMs), Montreal classification, surgeries, hospitalizations, and medication prescription. RESULTS: A total of 325 patients were included; 208 were Hispanics. Foreign-born Hispanics, accounting for 68% of the total, were diagnosed at an older age than US-born Hispanics and NHWs (45 vs. 25 and 27, respectively, P<0.05). Foreign-born Hispanics manifested more UC than US-born Hispanics or NHWs (59.9% vs. 41% and 28.2%, respectively, P<0.05). No difference was noted in the prevalence of EIMs between Hispanics and NHWs. More upper gastrointestinal tract Crohn's was observed in NHWs (12.5% vs. 3.9%, P<0.05). The incidence density rate of IBD-related surgeries in NHWs was higher than in Hispanics (22.9 vs. 7.3 surgeries/100 person-years, P<0.01, hazard ratio: 0.3, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.5). Hispanic patients had fewer prescriptions for biologics and immunomodulators than NHWs (22.2% vs. 55.6%, P<0.01 and 35.7% vs. 53.8%, P<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates differences in IBD presentation among NHW, US-born Hispanic, and foreign-born Hispanic groups. Further investigation to identify environmental and genetic differences between ethnic groups affected by IBD is warranted.

Meals ready to eat: a brief history and clinical vignette with discussion on civilian applications.

Meals ready to eat (MRE) have undergone many revisions of their origins in the trench ration from World War I. The MRE was implemented in 1980. Its design allows extended storage and easy, safe meal preparation. MRE sodium content varies by meal and may range from 1.6 g/meal to 2.3 g/meal. The average MRE contains 1,200 kcal. When consumed as intended, MREs are adequate for maintaining a soldier's physical parameters without undesirable consequences. The average soldier has a healthy cardiovascular system, has the ability to excrete high sodium loads, and has high insensible losses. The American Heart Association recommends limiting sodium to 2.3 g/day for the general population. Additionally, those with heart failure should limit sodium to 2 g/day. Excess intake of calories and electrolytes may lead to adverse outcomes in certain populations. We describe a case of heart failure exacerbated by regular MRE consumption and the "perfect storm" of risk factors encountered with postdisaster distribution of MREs to a civilian population.