Quadriceps and hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction differ only marginally in function after the rehabilitation: a propensity score-matched case-control study.

PURPOSE: To determine potential quadriceps versus hamstring tendon autograft differences in neuromuscular function and return to sport (RTS)-success in participants after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Case-control study on 25 participants operated on with an arthroscopically assisted, anatomic ipsilateral quadriceps femoris tendon graft and two control groups of 25 participants each, operated on with a semitendinosus tendon or semitendinosus-gracilis (hamstring) tendon graft ACL reconstruction. Participants of the two control groups were propensity score matched to the case group based on sex, age, Tegner activity scale and either the total volume of rehabilitation since reconstruction (n = 25) or the time since reconstruction (n = 25). At the end of the rehabilitation (averagely 8 months post-reconstruction), self-reported knee function (KOOS sum scores), fear of loading the reconstructed knee during a sporting activity (RSI-ACL questionnaire), and fear of movement (Tampa scale of kinesiophobia) were followed by hop and jump tests. Front hops for distance (jumping distance as the outcome) were followed by Drop jumps (normalised knee joint separation distance), and concluded by qualitative ratings of the Balanced front and side hops. Between-group comparisons were undertaken using 95% confidence intervals comparisons, effect sizes were calculated. RESULTS: The quadriceps case group (always compared with the rehabilitation-matched hamstring graft controls first and versus time-matched hamstring graft controls second) had non-significant and only marginal higher self-reported issues during sporting activities: Cohen's d = 0.42, d = 0.44, lower confidence for RTS (d = - 0.30, d = - 0.16), and less kinesiophobia (d = - 0.25, d = 0.32). Small and once more non-significant effect sizes point towards lower values in the quadriceps graft groups in the Front hop for distance limb symmetry values in comparison to the two hamstring control groups (d = - 0.24, d = - 0.35). The normalised knee joint separation distance were non-significantly and small effect sized higher in the quadriceps than in the hamstring groups (d = 0.31, d = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Only non-significant and marginal between-graft differences in the functional outcomes at the end of the rehabilitation occurred. The selection of either a hamstring or a quadriceps graft type cannot be recommended based on the results. The decision must be undertaken individually. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Prehospital Electrocardiogram Transmission and Prehospital Scene Time: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Telemedical transmission of prehospital electrocardiograms (ECGs) to a target clinic may improve clinical workflows and speed of intervention. However, whether ECG transmission delays prehospital workflows remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to clarify whether ECG transmission prolongs prehospital scene time in patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: We retrospectively included all patients diagnosed with ACS by prehospital emergency physicians from July 2016 to June 2019 at a single academic center. The primary endpoint was the effect of ECG transmission on prehospital scene time. The secondary endpoints were the effects of ECG diagnosis on prehospital scene time and quality of care. Multivariable regression was used to account for patients' age, physician specialty, completion of specialty training, and whether emergencies occurred throughout the day or night shifts as potential confounders. Results: A total of 1,106 cases were included, of which 154 ECG transmissions were performed. ECG transmission prolonged prehospital scene time by an average of 3 min: adjusted regression coefficient [95% confidence interval (95% CI)]: 3.24 (1.7-4.8), p < 0.001. Prehospital treatment time was not influenced by prehospital ECG-based diagnosis (ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] vs. non-ST-elevation ACS [NSTE-ACS]): adjusted regression coefficient (95% CI): 0.7 (-1.3 to 2.7), p = 0.490. Emergency physicians adhered to local standard operating procedures in 739 of 1,007 (73%) patients diagnosed with NSTE-ACS and 93 of 99 (94%) patients diagnosed with STEMI. A STEMI diagnosis compared with NSTE-ACS was associated with five times higher odds of adhering to standard operating procedures (odds ratio [95% CI]: 5.6 [2.7-14.6], p < 0.001). Conclusion: The observed delay of ∼3 min in the prehospital scene time by ECG transmission is clinically irrelevant. For patients prehospitally diagnosed with NSTE-ACS who do not meet STEMI criteria, adherence to standard operating procedures seems unjustifiably low and should be improved.

Late-stage rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A multicentre randomised controlled trial (PReP).

BACKGROUND: At the completion of formal rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, functional capacity is only restored in a small proportion of affected individuals. Therefore, the end of formal rehabilitation is not the end of functional rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To compare adherence to and effectiveness of a late-stage rehabilitation programme with usual care after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: This prospective, double-blind, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial, included people aged 18 to 35 years after formal rehabilitation completion (mean [SD] 241 [92] days post-reconstruction). Participants were block-randomised to a 5-month neuromuscular performance intervention (Stop-X group) or usual care (medically prescribed standard physiotherapy, individual formal rehabilitation, home-exercises). All outcomes were measured once/month. Primary outcome was the normalised knee separation distance on landing after drop jump. Baseline-adjusted linear mixed models were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 112 participants (Stop-X: 57; Usual care: 55,) were analysed. Initially, mean (SD) intervention frequency (units/week) was higher in the Stop-X than the Usual care group: 2.65 (0.96) versus 2.48 (1.14) units/week in the first and 2.28 (1.02) versus 2.14 (1.31) units/week in the second month. No between-group*time(*baseline)-differences were found for the primary outcome. Between-group*time-effects favoured the Stop-X-group at 2 months (fewer self-reported knee problems during sport, KOOS-SPORT) (estimate = 64.3, 95 % CI 24.4-104.3 for the Stop-X), more confidence to return to sport (ACL-RSI) (62.4, 10.7-114.2), fewer pain-associated knee problems (KOOS-PAIN) (82.8, 36.0-129.6), improved everyday activity abilities (KOOS-ADL) (71.1, 6.4-135.7), and improved limb symmetry index in the front hop for distance at 3 and 4 months (0.34, 0.10-0.57; 0.31, 0.08-0.54). No between-group*time-effects occurred for kinesiophobia, symptom-associated knee problems or balance hops performance. At the end of the intervention, 79 % of the Stop-X and 70 % of the Usual care participants (p < 0.05) had successfully returned to their pre-injury sport type and level. CONCLUSIONS: The Stop-X intervention was slightly superior to usual care as part of late-stage rehabilitation after ACL-reconstruction. The small benefit might justify its use after formal rehabilitation completion.