Interosseous-lumbrical adhesions - a rare condition? A series of five cases.

Adhesions between the interosseous and lumbrical muscles involving the deep transverse metacarpal ligament (dTML) can be a cause of chronic pain and reduced range of motion. New reports on this condition are rare. We identified five patients experiencing pain, swelling and decreased range of motion in the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints during manual load. The condition was caused by a direct trauma. After not responding to conservative treatment, patients underwent surgery. Time between trauma and surgery was on average 16 months and the mean postoperative follow-up was 8 months. The lumbrical-interosseus junction was exposed by volar or dorsal incision, adhesions were widely released and the distal third of the dTML was resected. This resulted in normal passive excursion of the muscles and the tendon junction. At the mean follow-up time 8.2 months (3-18) after surgery, all patients were pain-free and had gained near normal range of motion in the MCP joints. Interosseous-lumbrical adhesions may be more common than reflected by the literature. Hand surgeons should keep this condition in mind in cases with chronic inter-metacarpal pain after trauma or infection. Surgical exploration is relatively straight forward and tends to lead to gratifying results. Level of Evidence: IV (therapeutic).

[Anatomical landmarks for peripheral neural blocks of the forearm and the wrist: A cadaveric study]. / Anatomische Landmarken für periphere Nervenblöcke an Unterarm und Handgelenk: Eine Untersuchung an Leichenpräparaten.

BACKGROUND: There are no data ensuring a standardized landmark-based-technique for blocking sensitive nerves of the forearm. PURPOSE: To identify locations were with use of good palpable bony landmarks and lines between them sensitive nerve blocks on the forearm can be done with great success. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dissection of the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN), the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve (DBUN), the lateral, medial and dorsal antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN, MACN, and DACN) as well as the palmar branch of the median nerve (PBMN) was performed on five upper limbs of five different Caucasian cadavers. With respect to radius and ulnar styloid, Lister's tubercle, and the medial and lateral epicondyle of the humerus as well as connecting lines between these bony landmarks locations were defined, where the mentioned nerves can be found and blocked. RESULTS: The six nerves can be safely blocked at the following sites: the SBRN 85 mm proximal to Lister's tubercle on a line drawn between the latter and the medial humeral epicondyle; the LACN 38 mm and the dorsal one 32 mm ulnar from the lateral epicondyle; the MACN 14 mm radial to the medial epicondyle; the DBUN 27 mm proximal to the ulnar styloid in direction to the lateral epicondyle; the PBMN 45 mm proximal to the radial styloid following a line between the latter and the medial epicondyle and 21 mm ulnarwards perpendicular to this line. CONCLUSION: Using superficial good palpable landmarks at the wrist and elbow as well as connecting lines between them the SBRN, DBUN, PBMN, LACN, MACN, and DACN can easily be located.

Management of posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) palsies after distal biceps tendon repair using a single incision technique- a conclusive approach to diagnostics and therapy.

Complete distal ruptures of the biceps brachii tendon are rather rare and surgical reinsertion is the gold standard. Recently, one incision approaches for the refixation of the distal biceps tendon have been popularized with the introduction of a single-incision approach employing a trans-radial cortical button fixation. Since the introduction of this fixation technique we have seen more iatrogenic lesions to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) after not having seen any PIN lesions with 2 incision biceps refixation techniques over the last 5 years. Several patients with iatrogenic PIN affections after one incision refixation techniques of the distal biceps tendon were referred to our level 1 department of Plastic surgery and hand surgery from different orthopedic surgeons. Over the course of 6 months we saw 5 patients with a similar history. We decided to analyze this problem and propose a course of action to regain function of the PIN innervated muscles as good and fast as possible. If there is a loss of function in the PIN innervated muscles after distal biceps refixation a neurological evaluation including electrophysiology needs to be conducted. An ultrasound assessment of the nerve itself should guide the clinician in the decision between a conservative and a surgical treatment in the early postoperative phase. If surgical exploration is warranted intraoperative neurography should be the basis on which ground (partial) grafting or solely neurolysis is performed. Postoperatively all patients need to follow a rehabilitation protocol to help with nerve regeneration and regaining of motor function.

Intramedullary screw fixation for metacarpal shaft fractures: a biomechanical human cadaver study.

Intramedullary cannulated compression screws have been introduced for the fixation of unstable metacarpal fractures. In the present study, this technique was compared with dorsal compression plating to evaluate its biomechanical performance in stabilizing metacarpal shaft fractures. In a first set of experiments, the biomechanical characteristics of the screws were analysed in an artificial bone model. In subsequent experiments, midshaft osteotomies were performed in human cadaver metacarpals, followed by plating or intramedullary screw osteosynthesis. The metacarpals were tested to failure in cantilever bending, following a stepwise increasing cyclic loading protocol. We found a significantly lower load at failure and a significantly lower number of cycles to failure in the intramedullary screw group, but both methods offered sufficient stability under these loads. With reference to published loads on the metacarpals during use of the hand, we conclude that intramedullary osteosynthesis yields sufficient strength and stiffness for early active motion. A difference in its fixation stability is noted compared with plate fixation, which may not be clinically relevant.

Adjuvant simultaneous integrated boost IMRT for patients with intermediate- and high-risk head and neck cancer: outcome, toxicities and patterns of failure.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate loco-regional control, survival, toxicities and patterns of failure of adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients according to risk features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 129 HNC patients who were treated between January 2001 and June 2010 at our institute with adjuvant SIB-IMRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy (CTX-SIB-IMRT) were included. High-risk (HR) patients with extracapsular tumor extension (ECE) and/or close resection margins had CTX-SIB-IMRT to 54/63.9 Gy and intermediate-risk (IR) patients had SIB-IMRT to 50/56 Gy. The primary endpoints were local (LC) and regional control (RC). Secondary endpoints included distant control rate (DC), overall survival (OS), acute and late toxicities and patterns of failure. RESULTS: 79/129 Patients were HR. 50/129 patients IR. 5-year LC was 87% and 89%, RC was 97% and 86%, DC was 95% and 77% and the OS 73% and 67% for IR and HR respectively. 43 deaths occurred. Acute toxicity CTCAE⩾grade 3 was observed in 55% and 56% and late toxicities in 10% and 15% of the IR and HR-group respectively. Fifteen patients developed loco-regional failure. CONCLUSION: We observed significantly more patients with distant metastases in the HR group and no difference in LC, RC or OS between the two groups. The majority of the analyzed recurrences were in-field, in the high dose volume. Acute and late toxicity was moderate.