Racial and ethnic disparities in major adverse limb events persist for chronic limb threatening ischemia despite presenting limb threat severity after peripheral vascular intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Racial and ethnic disparities have been well-documented in the outcomes for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). One purported explanation has been the disease severity at presentation. We hypothesized that the disparities in major adverse limb events (MALE) after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for CLTI would persist despite controlling for disease severity at presentation using the WIfI (Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection) stage. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI dataset (2016-2021) was queried for CLTI. Patients were excluded if they were missing the WIfI stage. The primary end point was the incidence of 1-year MALE, defined as major amputation (through the tibia or fibula or more proximally) or reintervention (endovascular or surgical) of the initial treatment limb. A multivariate hierarchical Fine-Gray analysis was performed, controlling for hospital variation, competing risk of death, and presenting WIfI stage, to assess the independent association of Black/African American race and Latinx/Hispanic ethnicity with MALE. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for the 1-year survival analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 47,830 patients (60%) had had WIfI scores reported (73% White, 20% Black, and 7% Latinx). The 1-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of MALE was 13.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.6%-13.5%) for White, 14.3% (95% CI, 13.5%-15.3%) for Black, and 17.0% (95% CI, 15.3%-18.9%) for Latinx patients. On bivariate analysis, the occurrence of MALE was significantly associated with younger age, Black race, Latinx ethnicity, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, dialysis, intervention level, any prior minor or major amputation, and WIfI stage (P < .001). The cumulative incidence of 1-year MALE increased by increasing WIfI stage: stage 1, 11.7% (95% CI, 10.9%-12.4%); stage 2, 12.4% (95% CI, 11.8%-13.0%); stage 3, 14.8% (95% CI, 13.8%-15.8%); and stage 4, 15.4% (95% CI, 14.3%-16.6%). The cumulative incidence also increased by intervention level: inflow, 10.7% (95% CI, 9.8%-11.7%), femoropopliteal, 12.3% (95% CI, 11.7%-12.9%); and infrapopliteal, 14.1% (95% CI, 13.5%-14.8%). After adjustment for WIfI stage only, Black race (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.17-1.44; P < .001) and Latinx ethnicity (SHR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.37-1.81; P < .001) were associated with an increased 1-year hazard of MALE compared with White race. On adjusted multivariable analysis, MALE disparities persisted for Black/African American race (SHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.25; P = .028) and Latinx/Hispanic ethnicity (SHR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16-1.54; P < .001) compared with White race. CONCLUSIONS: Black/African American and Latinx/Hispanic patients had a higher associated hazard of MALE after PVI for CLTI compared with White patients despite an adjustment for WIfI stage at presentation. These results suggest that disease severity at presentation does not account for disparities in outcomes. Further work should focus on better understanding the underlying mechanisms for disparities in historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups presenting with CLTI.

Structured discharge documentation reduces sex-based disparities in statin prescription in vascular surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative statin use has been shown to improve survival in vascular surgery patients. In 2018, the Northern California Vascular Study Group implemented a quality initiative focused on the use of a SmartText in the discharge summary. We hypothesized that structured discharge documentation would decrease sex-based disparities in evidence-based medical therapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using Vascular Quality Initiative eligible cases at a single institution. Open or endovascular procedures in the abdominal aorta or lower extremity arteries from 2016 to 2021 were included. Bivariate analysis identified factors associated with statin use and sex. Multivariate logistic regression was performed with the end point of statin prescription at discharge and aspirin prescription at discharge. An interaction term assessed the differential impact of the initiative on both sexes. Analysis was then stratified by prior aspirin or statin prescription. An interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate the trend in statin prescription over time. RESULTS: Overall, 866 patients were included, including 292 (34%) female and 574 (66%) male patients. Before implementation, statins were prescribed in 77% of male and 62% of female patients (P < .01). After implementation, there was no statistically significant difference in statin prescription (91% in male vs 92% in female patients, P = .68). Female patients saw a larger improvement in the adjusted odds of statin prescription compared with male patients (odds ratio: 3.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-8.6, P = .04). For patients not prescribed a statin preoperatively, female patients again saw an even larger improvement in the odds of being prescribed a statin at discharge (odds ratio: 6.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.8-22.7, P < .01). Interrupted time series analysis demonstrated a sustained improvement in the frequency of prescription for both sexes over time. The unadjusted frequency of aspirin prescription also improved by 3.5% in male patients vs 5.5% in female patients. For patients not prescribed an aspirin preoperatively, we found that the frequency of aspirin prescription significantly improved for both male (19% increase, P = .006) and female (31% increase, P = .001) patients. There was no significant difference in the perioperative outcomes between male and female patients before and after standardized discharge documentation. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, low-cost regional quality improvement initiative eliminated sex-based disparities in statin prescription at a single institution. These findings highlight the meaningful impact of regional quality improvement projects. Future studies should examine the potential for structured discharge documentation to improve patient outcomes and reduce disparities.