Early Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Urogenital Function in Morbidly Obese Men.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is an independent risk factor for erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Bariatric surgery has been shown to improve erectile function and urinary symptoms in medium- to long-term studies (3- to 12-month postoperative follow-up). AIM: To investigate the early effect (1 month postoperatively) of bariatric surgery on ED and LUTS, which has not previously been investigated. METHODS: Morbidly obese men (body mass index > 35 kg/m2) undergoing bariatric surgery were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaires before surgery and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The influence of bariatric surgery on urogenital function, body mass index, fasting blood glucose, and glycated hemoglobin were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests for paired samples. RESULTS: Of 30 patients who completed the study, 18 reported ED (IIEF score < 25) and 14 reported moderate or severe LUTS (IPSS ≥ 8) before the operation. Twelve patients had ED and moderate or severe LUTS. IIEF score, IPSS, body mass index, percentage of weight loss, fasting blood glucose, and glycated hemoglobin showed significant and rapid improvement after bariatric surgery starting at the 1-month postoperative time point and improvement continued throughout the study in all patients with ED or moderate to severe LUTS. CONCLUSION: This is the first study showing improvement in erectile and urinary function within 1 month after bariatric surgery, an effect that was parallel to glycemic improvement and weight loss.

Early postoperative weight loss predicts maximal weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies show that 'poor responders' to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) may be identified on the basis of early postoperative weight loss. Early identification of poor responders could allow earlier provision of postoperative behavioural and/or intensive lifestyle interventions and enhance their maximal weight loss. Our aim was to investigate whether early postoperative weight loss predicts the maximal weight loss response after RYGBP and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). METHODS: We undertook a retrospective cross-sectional study of 1,456 adults who underwent either RYGBP (n = 918) or SG (n = 538) as a primary procedure in one of two European centres. Postoperative weight loss was expressed as weight loss velocity (WLV) and percentage weight loss. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association of early postoperative weight loss with maximal %WL, including adjustment for baseline variables. RESULTS: There was marked variability in maximal %WL following both RYGBP (mean 32.9 %, range 4.1-60.9 %) and SG (mean 26.2 %, range 1.1-58.3 %). WLV 3-6 months postoperatively was more strongly associated with maximal %WL (r (2) = 0.32 for RYGBP and r (2) = 0.26 for SG, P < 0.001 for both) than either WLV 0-6 weeks or 6 weeks to 3 months postoperatively (r (2) = 0.14 and 0.10 for RYGBP, respectively; r (2) = 0.18 and 0.21 for SG, respectively; P < 0.001 for all). Multiple linear regression analysis, including baseline variables of age, sex, preoperative BMI, type 2 diabetes, ethnicity, and bariatric centre, revealed that 3-6 month WLV was an independent predictor of maximal %WL in both SG and RYGBP groups (standardised ß-coefficients 0.51 and 0.52, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: There is a marked variability in weight loss response following RYGBP and SG. Early postoperative weight loss can be used to identify patients whose predicted weight loss trajectories are suboptimal. Early targeting of poor responders with more intensive postoperative lifestyle and behavioural support could potentially enhance their weight loss response.

Comparison of ankle-brachial pressure index measurements using an automated oscillometric device with the standard Doppler ultrasound technique.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy of an automated oscillometric device (DINAMAP) in measuring ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) in the clinical setting. Results were then compared to those obtained using the standard Doppler technique. METHODS: A prospective comparative study of 50 healthy volunteers was carried out using a standard ward DINAMAP machine, hand-held Doppler and a 14 cm sphygmomanometer cuff. Three consecutive pressure readings were taken from all four limbs of the volunteers using both Doppler and DINAMAP techniques. The two techniques were carried out by different investigators who were blind to the findings of the other. The ABPI was calculated for each technique and the two techniques were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant agreement between the ABPI readings obtained by DINAMAP and those obtained by the standard Doppler technique. There was also a substantial variation in pressure readings produced by the DINAMAP for a given limb as measured by intraclass correlation of the three readings taken. CONCLUSIONS: There is no role for standard automated oscillometric devices in the calculation of ABPI in the vascular clinic.

Timing of pregnancy in obese women after bariatric surgery.

AIMS: There is an increased risk of preterm and small-for-gestational-age births associated with bariatric surgery, especially if maternal early pregnancy body mass index (BMI) is <30.0kg/m(2). However, the relationship between timing of pregnancy post-bariatric surgery and effects on pregnancy outcome are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the timing of pregnancy post-bariatric surgery and compare early pregnancy BMI between women who became pregnant before or after the recommended 12month postoperative window. METHODS/RESULTS: Women who underwent either sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass and subsequently became pregnant were offered antenatal care in a multidisciplinary high-risk clinic. There were 50 such pregnancies in women who attended our high-risk clinic (n=26 <12months and n=24 >12months postoperatively, mean estimated times to conception 31.9±12.6weeks and 102.8±37.7weeks respectively). There was no significant difference in early pregnancy BMI between groups (33.2±6.8kg/m(2) and 32.5+2.1kg/m(2) respectively, p=0.78). There were 6 miscarriages in each group, however more women in the <12month (n=8) than in the >12months group (n=2) were lost-to-follow-up (likelihood ratio 4.2, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Women who became pregnant <12months post-bariatric surgery were, for unknown reasons, less likely to attend follow-up in a specialist antenatal clinic than those who became pregnant >12months postoperatively. Further research is required to explore the relationship between timing of pregnancy post-bariatric surgery and pregnancy outcome and to identify predictors more clinically useful than early pregnancy BMI, in this high-risk pregnancy group.

Age- and sex-specific effects on weight loss outcomes in a comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures undertaken globally but there are no evidenced-based criteria that inform the selection of one operation over the other. The purpose of this study was thus to compare weight loss outcomes between RYGBP and SG, and to define patient factors affecting weight loss. METHODS: A single-centre two-year follow-up retrospective cohort study of all adults who underwent either RYGBP (n = 422) or SG (n = 432) between 2007 and 2012, at University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, an academic tertiary referral centre, was undertaken. Multilevel linear regression was used to compare weight loss between groups, enabling adjustment for preoperative BMI (body mass index) and evaluation for interaction factors. RESULTS: One- and two-year results showed that unadjusted BMI loss was similar between groups; 13.7 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 12.9, 14.6 kg/m(2)) and 12.8 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 11.8, 13.9 kg/m(2)) for RYGBP patients respectively compared with 13.3 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 12.0, 14.6 kg/m(2)) and 11.5 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 10.1, 13.0 kg/m(2)) for SG patients respectively. Adjusting for preoperative BMI, there was 2.2 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 1.5, 2.8) and 2.3 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 1.3, 3.3) greater BMI loss in the RYGBP group compared to the SG group at one and two years respectively (P < 0.001 for both). The interaction analyses demonstrated that age and sex had important differential impacts on SG and RYGBP weight outcomes. Men under 40 and women over 50 years obtained on average far less benefit from SG compared to RYGBP, whereas men over 40 years and women under 50 years experienced similar weight loss with either procedure (P = 0.001 and 0.022 for interaction effects at one and two years respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that patient sex and age significantly impact on weight loss in a procedure-dependent manner and should be considered when choosing between RYGBP and SG. Optimizing procedure selection could enhance the effectiveness of bariatric surgery, thus further increasing the benefit-to-risk ratio of this highly effective intervention.

Differential effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastric bypass on appetite, circulating acyl-ghrelin, peptide YY3-36 and active GLP-1 levels in non-diabetic humans.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) reduces appetite and induces significant and sustainable weight loss. Circulating gut hormones changes engendered by LRYGBP are implicated in mediating these beneficial effects. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is advocated as an alternative to LRYGBP, with comparable short-term weight loss and metabolic outcomes. LRYGBP and LSG are anatomically distinct procedures causing differential entero-endocrine cell nutrient exposure and thus potentially different gut hormone changes. Studies reporting the comparative effects of LRYGBP and LSG on appetite and circulating gut hormones are controversial, with no data to date on the effects of LSG on circulating peptide YY3-36 (PYY3-36) levels, the specific PYY anorectic isoform. In this study, we prospectively investigated appetite and gut hormone changes in response to LRYGBP and LSG in adiposity-matched non-diabetic patients. Anthropometric indices, leptin, fasted and nutrient-stimulated acyl-ghrelin, active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), PYY3-36 levels and appetite were determined pre-operatively and at 6 and 12 weeks post-operatively in obese, non-diabetic females, with ten undergoing LRYGBP and eight adiposity-matched females undergoing LSG. LRYGBP and LSG comparably reduced adiposity. LSG decreased fasting and post-prandial plasma acyl-ghrelin compared to pre-surgery and to LRYGBP. Nutrient-stimulated PYY3-36 and active GLP-1 concentrations increased post-operatively in both groups. However, LRYGBP induced greater, more sustained PYY3-36 and active GLP-1 increments compared to LSG. LRYGBP suppressed fasting hunger compared to LSG. A similar increase in post-prandial fullness was observed post-surgery following both procedures. LRYGBP and LSG produced comparable enhanced satiety and weight loss. However, LSG and LRYGBP differentially altered gut hormone profiles.