A randomized controlled trial of motavizumab versus palivizumab for the prophylaxis of serious respiratory syncytial virus disease in children with hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease.

Children with hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk for serious respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease. This study was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of motavizumab versus palivizumab in children with CHD and was not powered for efficacy. Patients (n = 1236) aged ≤24 mo were randomized to receive five monthly doses (15 mg/kg) of motavizumab or palivizumab during the RSV season. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded through 30 d after the last dose. RSV hospitalizations and RSV outpatient medically attended lower respiratory tract infections (MALRI; season 2) were summarized. Approximately 93 and 50% of patients reported an AE or SAE, respectively. Skin events occurred in 19.3% of motavizumab recipients and 16.2% of palivizumab recipients. Rates of hospitalizations and RSV MALRI were similar between treatment groups [relative risk (RR): 0.75; 95% CI, 0.34-1.59 and RR: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.10-1.99, respectively; both p > 0.05]. Motavizumab and palivizumab had similar safety profiles in children with hemodynamically significantly CHD; with the exception of skin events which were increased in motavizumab recipients. Safety and efficacy were consistent with another study comparing motavizumab with palivizumab in premature infants without CHD.

Efficacy of motavizumab for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus disease in healthy Native American infants: a phase 3 randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute lower respiratory tract infections in children. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of an anti-RSV monoclonal antibody (motavizumab) in healthy term (≥36 weeks' gestational age) infants for the prevention of medically attended RSV acute lower respiratory tract infections. METHODS: This phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial enrolled healthy Native American infants aged 6 months or younger who were born at 36 weeks' gestational age in southwestern USA, on the Navajo Nation, the White Mountain Apache reservation, and the San Carlos Apache Indian reservation. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either five monthly intramuscular doses of motavizumab (15 mg/kg) or placebo. They were followed up for 150 days after the first dose, and the primary endpoints were respiratory admission to hospital with a positive result for RSV by RT-PCR and death caused by RSV. Participants were followed up for medically attended wheezing until they reached age 3 years. Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00121108. FINDINGS: During the autumn seasons (October to December) between 2004 and 2007, 2127 infants of the 2596 infants enrolled were randomly assigned to receive either motavizumab (1417) or placebo (710). After ITT analysis, motavizumab resulted in an 87% relative reduction (relative risk [RR] 0·13, 95% CI 0·08-0·21) in the proportion of infants admitted to hospital with RSV (21 [2%] of 1417 participants who received motavizumab; 80 [11%] of 710 participants who received placebo, p<0·0001). Serious adverse events were less common in particpants taking motavizumab (212 [15%]) than particpants on placebo (148 [21%]). Six deaths occurred in study participants (motavizumab, n=4 [0·3%]; placebo, n=2 [0·3%]); none were deemed to be related to the study product. Hypersensitivity events were more common in patients given motavizumab (208 [14·7%]) than in placebo recipients (87 [12·3%]; p=0·14). There was no effect on rates of medically attended wheezing in children aged 1-3 years (190 [14·9%] of participants randomly assigned to receive motavizumab vs 90 [14·0%] participants randomly assigned to receive placebo). INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the only trial of an anti-RSV antibody to prevent serious RSV disease in healthy term infants. Motavizumab significantly reduced the RSV-associated inpatient and outpatient burden and set a benchmark for the efficacy of RSV prevention strategies. The findings do not support a direct, generalisable, causal association between RSV lower respiratory tract infection and subsequent long-term wheezing in term infants. FUNDING: MedImmune.

Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Safety of the Liquid Versus Lyophilized Formulation of Palivizumab in Premature Infants and Children with Chronic Lung Disease of Prematurity.

INTRODUCTION: To avoid the need for reconstitution required by lyophilized palivizumab, a liquid formulation was developed. This study assessed the safety and antidrug antibodies (ADA) of the liquid formulation of palivizumab compared with the lyophilized formulation. METHODS: This phase 4, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study included children with chronic lung disease of prematurity who were ≤24 months of age and children born prematurely with a gestational age of ≤35 weeks who were ≤6 months of age at randomization. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to 15 mg/kg of either liquid or lyophilized palivizumab administered via intramuscular injection every 30 days for a total of 5 injections. Safety was assessed based on serious adverse events (SAEs). ADA to palivizumab was assessed using blood collected at baseline and at a time point between study days 240 and 300. RESULTS: A total of 413 subjects were included in the analyses. The incidence of SAEs reported was 8.5% with liquid palivizumab and 5.9% with lyophilized palivizumab; none were deemed drug-related. The reported SAEs were consistent with expected conditions in this pediatric age group; there was no increase in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease with liquid palivizumab. At study days 240-300, antipalivizumab antibodies were detected in none of the subjects in the liquid palivizumab group and in 1 subject in the lyophilized group. The true ADA percent positive, based on the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI), was <1.5% for both treatments combined. CONCLUSION: The frequency of detection of ADAs was low. The true ADA percent positive for both treatment groups combined based on the upper limit of the 95% CI was <1.5%. The type and frequency of SAEs reported were as expected, and there was no evidence of an increase in RSV disease with liquid palivizumab.

Motavizumab treatment of infants hospitalized with respiratory syncytial virus infection does not decrease viral load or severity of illness.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine whether treatment with motavizumab, an anti-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) monoclonal antibody, would decrease viral load and improve clinical outcomes in previously healthy term infants hospitalized with RSV lower respiratory tract infection. METHODS: Infants hospitalized with lower respiratory tract infection and a positive RSV test performed locally were randomized to receive 1 intravenous dose of motavizumab (30 or 100 mg/kg) or placebo. Nasal wash samples were tested by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction at a central laboratory to determine viral load. Clinical data were collected during RSV hospitalization and at 12-month follow up. RESULTS: Of 118 infants, 112 were confirmed RSV positive by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. In each study group, median (range) RSV load (log10 copies/mL) decreased at a similar rate from baseline to study day 7 [motavizumab 30 mg/kg: 8.35 (2.5-9.5) to 5.03 (2.5-6.8); motavizumab 100 mg/kg: 8.22 (5.5-9.7) to 4.25 (2.5-8.0); placebo: 8.02 (6.7-9.8) to 5.17 (2.5-7.3)]. Median (range) duration of hospitalization was 3.05 (0.8-16.0), 2.99 (1.0-25.0) and 2.88 (0.8-11.7) days for the motavizumab 30 mg/kg, motavizumab 100 mg/kg and placebo groups, respectively. Six (8%) motavizumab and 0 placebo recipients were admitted to the intensive care unit and 4 required mechanical ventilation. The incidence of wheezing episodes during the 12-month follow up was comparable for all 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Motavizumab had no appreciable effect on RSV viral load measured in the upper respiratory tract of children hospitalized for RSV lower respiratory tract infection. No differences were observed for duration of hospitalization, severity of illness measures or wheezing episodes during 12-month follow up in children treated with motavizumab or placebo.