Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Fimasartan, Amlodipine, and Hydrochlorothiazide for the Investigation of Drug-Drug Interaction Potentials.

PURPOSE: To build a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for fimasartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide, and to investigate the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potentials. METHODS: The PBPK model of each drug was developed using Simcyp software (Version 15.0), based on the information obtained from literature sources and in vitro studies. The predictive performance of the model was assessed by comparing the predicted PK profiles and parameters with the observed data collected from healthy subjects after multiple oral doses of fimasartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide. The DDI potentials after co-administration of three drugs were simulated using the final model. RESULTS: The predicted-to-observed ratios of all the pharmacokinetic parameters met the acceptance criterion. The PBPK model predicted no significant DDI when fimasartan was co-administered with amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide, which is consistent with the observed clinical data. In the simulation of DDI at steady-state after co-administration of three drugs, the model predicted that fimasartan exposure would be increased by ~24.5%, while no changes were expected for the exposures of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide. CONCLUSIONS: The developed PBPK model adequately predicted the pharmacokinetics of fimasartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide, suggesting that the model can be used to further investigate the DDI potential of each drug.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between the Fixed-Dose Combination of Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin 10/20 Mg and the Fixed-Dose Combination of Telmisartan/Amlodipine 80/5 Mg in Healthy Subjects.

Background: Management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, which are common comorbid risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, require multiple medications. The development of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) containing ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, telmisartan, and amlodipine aims to enhance patient adherence and persistence, but the potential interactions among the four medications have not been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between the FDC of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg (ER) and the FDC of telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg (TA). Methods: An open-label, single-sequence, three-period, three-treatment crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. All subjects received ER for 7 days, TA for 9 days and ER combined with TA for 7 days during each treatment period. For PK analysis of total/free ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, telmisartan, and amlodipine, serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours at steady state. Safety profiles were assessed throughout the study. Results: Thirty-eight subjects were enrolled, and 34 subjects completed the study. The systemic exposure to each active ingredient after coadministration of the two FDCs was similar to that after each FDC alone. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for the maximum plasma concentration (µg/L) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (h·µg/L) of the combination therapy to monotherapy, assessed at steady state, were as follows: total ezetimibe, 1.0264 (0.8765-1.2017) and 0.9359 (0.7847-1.1163); free ezetimibe, 1.5713 (1.2821-1.9257) and 0.9941 (0.8384-1.1788); rosuvastatin, 2.1673 (1.7807-2.6379) and 1.1714 (0.9992-1.3733); telmisartan, 1.0745 (0.8139-1.4186) and 1.1057 (0.8379-1.4591); and amlodipine, 0.9421 (0.8764-1.0126) and 0.9603 (0.8862-1.0405). Both combination therapy and monotherapy were well tolerated by the subjects. Conclusion: The coadministration of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg and ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg was well tolerated in healthy subjects, and the PK interaction between those two FDCs was not clinically significant.

Endogenous metabolic markers for predicting the activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase.

Five-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapeutic agent that is mainly metabolized by the rate-limiting enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The DPD enzyme activity deficiency involves a wide range of severities. Previous studies have demonstrated the effect of a DPYD single nucleotide polymorphism on 5-FU efficacy and highlighted the importance of studying such genes for cancer treatment. Common polymorphisms of DPYD in European ancestry populations are less frequently present in Koreans. DPD is also responsible for the conversion of endogenous uracil (U) into dihydrouracil (DHU). We quantified U and DHU in plasma samples of healthy male Korean subjects, and samples were classified into two groups based on DHU/U ratio. The calculated DHU/U ratios ranged from 0.52 to 7.12, and the two groups were classified into the 10th percentile and 90th percentile for untargeted metabolomics analysis using liquid chromatography-quantitative time-of-flight-mass spectrometry. A total of 4440 compounds were detected and filtered out based on a coefficient of variation below 30%. Our results revealed that six metabolites differed significantly between the high activity group and low activity group (false discovery rate q-value < 0.05). Uridine was significantly higher in the low DPD activity group and is a precursor of U involved in pyrimidine metabolism; therefore, we speculated that DPD deficiency can influence uridine levels in plasma. Furthermore, the cutoff values for detecting DPD deficient patients from previous studies were unsuitable for Koreans. Our metabolomics approach is the first study that reported the DHU/U ratio distribution in healthy Korean subjects and identified a new biomarker of DPD deficiency.

Pharmacokinetics of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Amlodipine/Losartan and Chlorthalidone Compared to Concurrent Administration of the Separate Components.

Hypertension is more effectively treated with coadministration of 2 or more antihypertensive drugs than with high-dose monotherapy. Therefore, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and thiazides are coadministered to treat hypertension. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of HCP1401, a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine 5 mg, losartan 100 mg, and chlorthalidone 25 mg, with the separate components (loose combination) of amlodipine/losartan 5/100 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-way crossover study was conducted. Blood samples for amlodipine and chlorthalidone were collected for up to 144 hours after dosing, whereas those for losartan were collected up to 48 hours after dosing. The PK parameters of these drugs were calculated using a noncompartmental method. Sixty subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable point for amlodipine, losartan, and chlorthalidone were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.80 to 1.25. There were no clinically significant changes in safety assessments, and the treatments were well tolerated. The PK characteristics and tolerability profiles of a single oral FDC of amlodipine, losartan, and chlorthalidone were equivalent to those of individual tablets in a loose combination.

Effect of CYP3A4 metabolism on sex differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem.

To investigate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences of zolpidem between males and females and their causes, including CYP3A4 activity. A single oral dose of zolpidem (10 mg) was administered to 15 male and 15 female healthy subjects. Blood samples were collected up to 12 h post-dose to determine plasma zolpidem concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained using non-compartmental analysis. Digit symbol substitution test, choice reaction time, and visual analog scale of sleepiness were used to evaluate pharmacodynamics. We measured CYP3A4 activity using 4ß-hydroxycholesterol, an endogenous metabolite. Mean maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve were higher for females than for males (9.9% and 32.5%, respectively); other pharmacokinetic parameters showed no significant differences. Pharmacodynamic scores for females showed delayed recovery compared with that for males. CYP3A4 activity was higher in females than in males (p = 0.030). There was no serious adverse event, and adverse event incidence was not different between the sexes. Zolpidem exposure was about 30% higher in females than in males. Delayed pharmacodynamic score recovery in females could be related to higher zolpidem concentrations. Although apparent clearance was lower in females, systemic clearance might not be the cause of the different exposures to zolpidem.

Influence of CYP2C19 Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics of Omeprazole in Elderly Subjects.

Omeprazole blocks the gastric H+ /K+  adenosine triphosphatase, thus inhibiting gastric acid secretion, and is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19. Due to the physiological changes in the elderly, there are different pharmacokinetic consequences compared to young people. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of omeprazole in 15 elderly participants according to the CYP2C19 genotype. The concentration-time profiles of omeprazole and its metabolites, 5-hydroxy (5-OH) omeprazole and omeprazole sulfone, were similar between the CYP2C19 extensive metabolizer (EM) and intermediate metabolizer groups. In contrast, when comparing the EM group and CYP2C19 poor metabolizer (PM) group, the EM/PM geometric mean ratio (95% confidence interval) of area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time of dosing to the last measurable concentration was 0.52 (0.27-1.01) and that of the IM group was 0.71 (0.32-1.59), indicating that the exposure of omeprazole in the PM group was increased. The exposure of 5-OH omeprazole was significantly decreased in the PM group when compared to the EM group, with an EM/PM geometric mean ratio (95% confidence interval) of 2.20 (1.50-3.22). In conclusion, the tendency of drug exposure according to the CYP2C19 genotype in the elderly and young adults was similar in that the exposure level was highest in the PM group. However, when compared to young adults, the difference between the genotype groups was smaller in the elderly.

Comparison of Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Tolerability Profiles of CKD-11101, Darbepoetin Alfa (NESP®) Biosimilar, to Those of NESP® After a Single Subcutaneous or Intravenous Administration to Healthy Subjects.

INTRODUCTION: Darbepoetin alfa (NESP® and ARANESP®) has a sustained erythropoietic activity with a longer half-life than conventional recombinant human erythropoietin. CKD-11101 is under clinical development as a biosimilar of darbepoetin alfa. The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and tolerability profiles of CKD-11101 with those of reference drug in healthy subjects. METHODS: This study was performed in two parts for healthy subjects. In each period, CKD-11101 and reference, both at 60 µg, were administered via intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) route of administration. RESULTS: After both IV or SC dose, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of CKD-11101 to reference drug and its 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for Cmax, AUC0-last and AUC0-∞ were all within 0.8-1.25. No statistically significant differences were noted in the maximum baseline adjusted reticulocyte count or the area under the baseline adjusted reticulocyte count-time between the CKD-11101 and reference drug after IV or SC dose (all p-value>0.05). Both CKD-11101 and reference drug were generally well tolerated. DISCUSSION: After a single IV or SC dose, the CKD-11101 was well tolerated and showed comparable PK and PD characteristics with reference drug.

Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Rosuvastatin/Metformin Sustained-Release (10/1000 mg) and Separate Tablets in Healthy Male Subjects.

Fixed-dose combination (FDC) drugs with various dose combinations for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia are currently in demand. We compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of the rosuvastatin/metformin sustained-release (10/1000 mg) FDC and separate tablets and evaluated the effect of food by randomized, open-label, 3-period, 6-sequence crossover studies conducted in healthy male subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: separate tablets of 10 mg rosuvastatin and 1000 mg metformin sustained release in the fed state and the FDC in the fasted and fed states. PK samples were collected up to 72 hours postdose for rosuvastatin, N-desmethyl rosuvastatin, and metformin. The PK parameters were determined using a noncompartmental method, and the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the treatments were calculated. A total of 35 subjects completed the study. The GMR and 90%CI of the peak concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUClast ) of the FDC and the separate tablets were within the bioequivalence criteria (0.8-1.25) for both rosuvastatin and metformin. The effect of food was statistically significant for both rosuvastatin and metformin but not expected to be of clinical significance.

The necessary conduct: Exploratory multiregional clinical trials in East Asia.

Various studies have highlighted the importance of ethnic differences. The consideration of ethnic differences in the field of individualized pharmacotherapy is imperative. Therefore, various organizations and networks across countries should aim to conduct multicountry and multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs). If there is solid evidence available to evaluate the existence of ethnic differences between the same regional areas, it will lead to an increase in the efficiency of drug development. The purpose of this paper was to compare the approval dosing regimen among four Asian countries (Korea, Japan, China, and Taiwan) and elucidate the readiness and current status of the implementation of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E17 guidelines on MRCTs. Reducing unnecessary clinical trials via multinational clinical trials in East Asian countries is also suggested. The approved dosing regimens for some drugs in the four Asian countries were similar; however, some differences might be caused by differences in legislation, even though there were no ethnic differences. This indicates that there are several roles to be expected of the Asia Clinical Pharmacology study network for exploratory MRCTs, which would lead to the accumulation of evidence for MRCTs, ultimately accelerating the efficiency of drug development in East Asian countries. The exposure of the new treatment to the necessary patients through collaborative research coordination and simultaneous multinational subject recruitment would serve its role in providing East Asia with specific personalized medicine with a high treatment success rate.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DWP14012 (fexuprazan) in healthy subjects with different ethnicities.

BACKGROUND: DWP14012 (fexuprazan), a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is under development for the treatment of acid-related disorders. AIMS: To compare the pharmacodynamics (PDs), pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of DWP14012 among healthy subjects of Korean, Caucasian and Japanese descent. METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-dose study was conducted. Ten subjects in each dose group (40, 60 or 80 mg for Koreans; 40 or 80 mg for Caucasians; 20, 40 or 80 mg for Japanese) were randomly assigned to DWP14012 or a placebo. Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH measurements and serial blood samples were collected for PK/PD evaluation. The PK/PD parameters were compared between each ethnicity. RESULTS: The extent of gastric acid suppression was similar among the ethnicities; the mean percentages of time that the intragastric pH was above 4 after multiple doses of 40 mg in the Korean, Caucasian and Japanese subjects were 64.3%, 62.8% and 70.3%, respectively, and the corresponding values for the 80 mg dose were 94.8%, 90.6% and 90.6% respectively. The changes in serum gastrin were not clinically significant between all three ethnicities. The systemic exposure of DWP14012 was similar between the three ethnicities after the 40 mg doses but slightly lower in Caucasian and Japanese subjects after the 80 mg doses. Gastric acid suppression by DWP14012 showed a clear exposure-response relationship in the three ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric acid suppression by DWP14012 was similar among the Korean, Caucasian and Japanese subjects in this study, and the PK, PK-PD relationships and safety were also similar among the three ethnicities. DWP14012 could be used without consideration of ethnicity.