Outcomes Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraoperative Thoraco-Abdominal Chemotherapy with Diaphragm Resection for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hyperthermic intraoperative thoraco-abdominal chemotherapy (HITAC) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) patients who underwent diaphragm resection. METHODS: PC patients who underwent CRS with diaphragm resection were selected from a prospectively established database and were divided into hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and HITAC groups. The clinicopathological characteristics, treatment-related variables, perioperative adverse events (AEs), and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of 1168 CRS + HIPEC/HITACs, 102 patients were enrolled-61 HITAC patients and 41 HIPEC patients. In the HITAC and HIPEC groups, the incidence of grade III-V AEs was 29.5% versus 34.1% (p = 0.621). The pleural progression rates were 13.2 versus 18.9% (p = 0.462) and the median overall survival (OS) was 50.5 versus 52.7 months (p = 0.958). Median time to progression (TTP) in thoracic disease was not reached. There was no significant difference in perioperative AEs, TTP, and OS for total patients and the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score subgroups (p > 0.05). Age ≥ 60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 4.162, p = 0.026) was an independent risk factor influencing pleural progression, and primary malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM; HR 2.749, p = 0.016) and the presence of two or more serious AEs (SAEs; HR 7.294, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors influencing OS. CONCLUSIONS: HITAC can be performed in carefully selected PC patients who underwent diaphragm resection, with no worsening of the safety profile and a possible benefit for pleural progression. In those patients, age ≥ 60 years is associated with a shorter TTP of thoracic disease, while primary MPM and two or more perioperative SAEs are associated with worse OS.

Intraoperative urinary tract resection and construction in CRS + HIPEC procedures: a single center retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of CRS + HIPEC combined with urinary tract resection and reconstruction are controversial. This study aims to summarize the clinicopathological features and to evaluate the safety and survival prognosis of CRS + HIPEC combined with urinary tract resection and reconstruction. METHODS: The patients who underwent urinary tract resection and reconstruction as part of CRS surgery were retrospectively selected from our disease-specific database for analysis. The clinicopathological characteristics, treatment-related variables, perioperative adverse events (AEs), and survival outcomes were studied using a descriptive approach and the K-M analysis with log-rank comparison. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled. Perioperative serious AEs (SAEs) were observed in 11 patients (22.4%), with urinary SAEs occurring in 3 patients (6.1%). Additionally, there were 23 cases (46.8%) involving urinary adverse events (UAEs). The median overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort was 59.2 (95%CI: 42.1-76.4) months. The median OS of the UAE group and No-UAE group were 59.2 months (95%CI not reached), and 50.5 (95%CI: 11.5 to 89.6) months, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.475). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in OS based on the grade of UAEs or the number of UAEs (P = 0.562 and P = 0.622, respectively). CONCLUSION: The combination of CRS + HIPEC with urinary tract resection and reconstruction is associated with a high incidence of Grade I-II UAEs, which do not have an impact on OS. The safety profile of this combined technique is acceptable. However, this is a retrospective single-center single-arm analysis, with limitations of generalizability and potential selection bias. The findings need high-level validation.

Effect of standardized fluid management on cardiac function after CRS + HIPEC in patients with PMP: a single-center case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of standardized fluid management (SFM) on cardiac function in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHOD: Patients with PMP who underwent CRS + HIPEC at our center were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into control and study groups according to whether SFM was applied after CRS + HIPEC. We compared the preoperative and postoperative cardiac and renal function parameters, daily fluid volume three days after CRS, and cardiovascular-related adverse events. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the indicators affecting clinical prognosis. RESULT: Among the 104 patients, 42 (40.4%) were in the control group and 62 (59.6%) in the study group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the main clinicopathological characteristics, preoperative cardiac and renal function parameters, and CRS + HIPEC-related indicators. The incidences of cardiac troponin I (CTNI) > upper limit of normal (ULN), >2 × ULN, >3 × ULN, serum creatinine > ULN, and blood urea nitrogen > ULN were higher in the control group than in the study group (p < 0.05). The median daily fluid volume of the control group was higher than that of the study group 3 days after CRS (p < 0.05). Postoperative CTNI > 2 × ULN was an independent risk factor for serious circulatory adverse events. Survival analysis revealed pathological grading, completeness of cytoreduction score, and postoperative CTNI > ULN as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: SFM after CRS + HIPEC in patients with PMP may reduce cardiovascular adverse events risk and improve clinical outcomes.

Clinicopathological features of desmoplastic small round cell tumors: clinical series and literature review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a highly malignant sarcoma that occurs in the abdominopelvic cavities of adolescents. The accurate diagnosis of DSRCT is challenging owing to limited literatures. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with DSRCTs. METHODS: Data of 8 patients with DSRCT originating from the abdominal cavity were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical manifestations, pathological characteristics, treatment approaches, and prognosis were analyzed. The histopathological (identified using hematoxylin-eosin staining), immunohistochemical, and molecular diagnostic (using fluorescence in situ hybridization) features were also reviewed. RESULTS: All patients were male aged between 24 and 45 years (median age, 30 years). The main clinical symptoms included abdominal distension, abdominal pain, and constipation. Seven of the 8 patients developed metastases to either distant organs or lymph nodes. Multiple gray nodules with diameters of 1-10 cm and poorly defined boundaries were scattered throughout the omentum and mesentery. Histopathological examination demonstrated well-defined nests composed of small round blue cells separated by markedly desmoplastic stroma. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed positive expressions of desmin, vimentin and C-terminal of Wilm's tumor suppressor (WT-1). The Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 gene fused with WT1 (EWSR1-WT1) gene fusion was detected in all patients. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) was performed in 6 patients. Follow-up period ranged from 7.5 to 28.5 months with a median of 17.2 months. Three patients died during follow-up. CONCLUSION: DSRCT is highly aggressive and presents distinctive morphological features. CRS is the essential therapy for DSRCT. A test for the combined expression of desmin, cytokeratins, and C-terminal of WT-1, as well as the analysis of morphologic features, might be helpful during DSRCT diagnosis, and the EWSR1-WT1 gene fusion is the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Our work will provide new insights into the diagnosis and treatment of DSRCTs.

Current status and future prospects of clinical trials on CRS + HIPEC for gastric cancer peritoneal metastases.

PURPOSE: There is no standard treatment for peritoneal metastases (PM) from gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this review is to evaluate the clinical trials on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for GC PM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The published clinical trials on CRS + HIPEC for GC PM are critically evaluated, and survival and safety are the primary endpoints. In addition, the registered ongoing clinical trials are summarised. RESULTS: The natural course of GC PM is <5 months. CRS + HIPEC could improve the overall survival (OS). In prospective studies, the median OS was 11.0 months in the CRS + HIPEC group vs. 5.4 months in the CRS alone group. In case-control studies, the median OS was 13.3 months in the CRS + HIPEC group vs. 7.9 months in the CRS alone group. In cohort studies, the median OS after CRS + HIPEC was 13.3. The median 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates after CRS + HIPEC were 50.0%, 35.8% and 13.0%, respectively. There is no statistically significant increase in serious adverse events that are directly attributed to CRS + HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CRS and HIPEC is a promising integrated treatment strategy for GC PM that has encouraging initial results, calling for urgent further evaluation of this strategy in randomised control trials (RCTs).

Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of primary peritoneal serous carcinoma: Results of a Chinese retrospective study.

Purpose Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare condition with a poor survival rate, even after treatment with debulking surgery followed by systemic chemotherapy. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of PPSC. Patients and methods This retrospective study included 22 female patients with primary advanced PPSC (group A, n = 12) or recurrent PPSC (group B, n = 10) treated with 25 CRS + HIPEC procedures. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and the secondary end points were safety profiles. Results A total of 25 CRS + HIPEC procedures were performed in these 22 patients. The median OS was 31.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 22.3-39.7), and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 100%, 45.5%, and 27.3%, respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed that the median OS was 31.0 months (95% CI 19.8-42.2) for group A vs. 38.5 months (95% CI 9.6-67.4) for group B (P = 0.832, log rank test); 51.5 months (95% CI 34.9-68.1) for peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≤ 15 vs. 20.3 months (95% CI 12.6-28.0) for PCI > 15 (P = 0.000, log rank test); and 38.5 months (95% CI 22.5-54.5) for completeness of cytoreduction (CC) of 0-1 vs. 23.5 months (95% CI 15.3-31.7) for CC of 2-3 (P = 0.178, log rank test). There were no perioperative deaths. Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in two patients (9.1%). A univariate analysis identified PCI ≤ 15 as the only prognostic predicator (hazard ratio (HR) 13.1, 95% CI 2.7-63.4, P = 0.001). Conclusions CRS + HIPEC could contribute to favourable outcomes for select PPSC patients with acceptable safety profiles.

Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with lobaplatin and docetaxel improves survival for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from abdominal and pelvic malignancies.

BACKGROUND: This work was to evaluate the perioperative safety and efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with lobaplatin and docetaxel in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from gastrointestinal and gynecological cancers. METHODS: Patients were treated by CRS + HIPEC with lobaplatin 50 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) in 6000 mL of normal saline at 43 ± 0.5 °C for 60 min. Vital signs were recorded for 6 days after CRS + HIPEC procedures. Perioperative serious adverse events (SAE), hematological, hepatic, renal, and electrolytes parameters, the changes in serum tumor markers (TM) before and after operation, patient recovery, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred consecutive PC patients underwent 105 CRS + HIPEC procedures and postoperative chemotherapy. The median CRS + HIPEC duration was 463 (range, 245-820) min, and the highest temperature and heart rate during six postoperative days were 38.6 °C (median 37.5 °C) and 124 bpm (median 100 bpm), respectively. The 30-day perioperative SAE occurred in 16 (15.2 %) and mortality occurred in 2 (1.9 %) patients. Most routine blood laboratory tests at 1 week after surgery turned normal. Among 82 cases with increased preoperative TM CEA, CA125, and CA199, 71 cases had TM levels reduced or turned normal. Median time to nasogastric tube removal was 5 (range, 3-23) days, to liquid food intake 6 (range, 4-24) days, and to abdominal suture removal 15 (range, 10-30) days. At the median follow-up of 19.7 (range, 7.5-89.2) months, the median OS was 24.2 (95 % CI, 15.0-33.4) months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 77.5, 32.5, and 19.8 %, respectively. Univariate analysis identified five independent prognostic factors on OS: the origin of PC, peritoneal cancer index, completeness of CRS, cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, and SAE. CONCLUSIONS: CRS + HIPEC with lobaplatin and docetaxel to treat PC is a feasible procedure with acceptable safety and can prolong the survival in selected patients with PC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00454519.

Intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for prevention and treatment of peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer: a narrative review.

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC) has long been regarded as the terminal disease, lacking of effective treatments. In recent 40 years, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, including hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS), and early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC), has been recommended as a preferred treatment option for some selected patients with GCPM. Intraperitoneal free cancer cells were recognized as the pathological cause of PM and the primary target for intraperitoneal chemotherapy. There were a lot of evidence demonstrating that HIPEC could effectively eradiate intraperitoneal free cancer cells and prolong overall survival in GCPM. However, there are still no standard HIPEC protocols. This review summarized the current HIPEC regimens used in GCPM from a literature search, trying to conclude the optimal HIPEC in GCPM, and indicate the future direction of HIPEC study. Moreover, the new data on the exploration of HIPEC in GCPM at Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University was shared. In conclusion, there was not enough evidence from publications and our own experience to conclude a recommended HIPEC regimen for GCPM. There is urgent need for standardizing HIPEC protocols worldwide. Accordingly, more international collaborations focusing on pharmacology and HIPEC-related parameters to generate high level evidence are essential.

Long term survival of cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of conventional debulking surgery and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with the peritoneal metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOCPC). METHODS: In patients with ovarian cancer who underwent surgery-based multidisciplinary treatment at our center from May 2004 to November 2019, 186 EOCPC patients were divided into a control group (conventional debulking surgery, n=115) and a study group (CRS+HIPEC, n=71) and were matched for baseline characteristics by propensity score matching (PSM). The endpoints were median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS). RESULTS: After matching, 133 patients met the selection criteria, including 80 patients in the control group and 53 patients in the study group. The mOS in the study group was significantly longer than that in the control group (87.3 vs. 25.2 months, respectively, P=0.002). For complete cytoreduction, the mPFS in the study group was significantly longer than that in the control group [(19.6 vs. 10.1 months, respectively, P=0.007)]. For complete CRS, the mOS in the study group was significantly longer than that in the control group [103.3 vs. 46.2 months, respectively, P=0.020]. For incomplete CRS, the mOS in the study group was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized CRS+HIPEC can contribute significant survival benefits to patients with EOCPC.

Corrigendum to "Cytoreductive Surgery plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Improves Survival with Acceptable Safety for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Clinical Study of 100 Patients".

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2021/5533134.].

Cytoreductive Surgery plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Improves Survival with Acceptable Safety for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Clinical Study of 100 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The mainstay of treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy that includes carboplatin and paclitaxel, but the prognosis is poor. This study is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS+HIPEC) as first-line surgical treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). METHODS: FIGO stage III/IV AOC patients underwent CRS+HIPEC as first-line surgical treatment at our center from December 2007 to January 2020. The primary endpoint was survival, and the secondary endpoint was safety. RESULTS: Among 100 patients, the median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score was 80 (50-100), median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 19 (1-39), median completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score was 1 (0-3), number of organ regions removed was 4 (3-9), number of peritoneal regions removed was 4 (1-9), and number of anastomoses was 1 (0-4). The median follow-up was 36.8 months; 75 (75.0%) patients were still alive, and 25 (25.0%) had died. The median overall survival (mOS) was 87.6 (95% CI: 72.1-103.0) months, and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates were 94.1%, 77.2%, 68.2%, 64.2%, and 64.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that better mOS correlated with an age ≤, KPS ≥ 80, ascites ≤ 1000 ml, PCI < 19, and CC score 0-1. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that CC was an independent factor for OS; patients who underwent CRS with a CC score 0-1 had a mPFS of 67.8 (95% CI: 48.3-87.4) months. The perioperative serious adverse event and morbidity rates were 4.0% and 2.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CRS+HIPEC improves survival for AOC patients with acceptable safety at experienced high-volume centers. Stringent patient selection and complete CRS are key factors for better survival.

Establishment and histopathological study of patient-derived xenograft models and primary cell lines of epithelioid malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignancy with few experimental models. This study used the human surgical specimen to establish MPM patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and primary cell lines to provide a study platform for MPM in vitro and in vivo, and conducted histopathological analysis. Our study used the experimental peritoneal cancer index (ePCI) score to evaluate gross pathology, and the results showed that the ePCI score of the female and male nude mice were 8.80 ± 1.75 and 9.20 ± 1.81 (P=0.6219), respectively. The Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining of animal models showed that the tumor was epithelioid mesothelioma and invaded multiple organs. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining showed that Calretinin, Cytokeratin 5/6, WT-1 and Ki-67 were all positive. The Swiss-Giemsa and Immunofluorescence (IF) staining of primary cell lines were also consistent with the pathological characteristics of mesothelioma. We also performed the whole-exome sequencing (WES) to identify the mutant genes between models and the patient. And the results showed that 21 mutant genes were shared between the two groups, and the genes related to tumorigenesis and development including BAP1, NF2, MTBP, NECTIN2, CDC23, LRPPRC, TRIM25, and DHRS2. In conclusion, the PDX models and primary cell lines of MPM were successfully established with the epithelioid mesothelioma identity confirmed by histopathological evidence. Moreover, our study has also illustrated the shared genomic profile between models and the patient.

Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) based patient selecting strategy for complete cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: A single-center retrospective analysis of 125 patients.

OBJECTIVE: The role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) is still controversial, mainly due to the limited survival benefit and uncertain patient selection. This study aims to construct a selecting strategy in GCPM for CRS + HIPEC. METHODS: From a prospective established database, 125 patients were enrolled. All these patients were pathologically confirmed as GCPM and treated with CRS + HIPEC with or without preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy. The clinical documents and follow-up results were collected and analyzed with the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoint of perioperative serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: The median OS of 125 GCPM patients treated with CRS + HIPEC was 10.7 months, with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 43.8%, 24.7%, 18.6%, and 15.7%, respectively. The multivariate analysis identified completeness of cytoreduction (CC), SAEs, HIPEC drugs, and adjuvant chemotherapy as independent prognostic factors on OS. The median OS was 30.0 (95%CI: 16.8-43.3) months in CC-0 group, significantly better than 7.3 (95%CI: 5.8-8.8) months in CC1-3 group (P < 0.001). The median OS showed no significant difference among CC-1 (8.5, 95%CI: 6.7-10.2, months), CC-2 (5.6, 95%CI: 3.0-8.2, months) and CC-3 (6.5, 95%CI: 5.2-7.7, months) groups (P > 0.05 for all pairwise comparations). The nomogram based on peritoneal metastasis timing, preoperative tumor marker (TM), and peritoneal cancer index (PCI), with AUC of 0.985, showed a good accuracy and consistency between actual observation and prediction of the probability of complete CRS. The cutoffs of PCI were 16 for synchronous GCPM with normal TM, 12 for synchronous GCPM with abnormal TM, 10 for metachronous GCPM with normal TM, and 5 for metachronous GCPM with abnormal TM, setting the probability to achieve complete CRS as 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Only complete CRS + HIPEC (CC-0) could improve survival for high selected GCPM patients with acceptable safety. An incomplete CRS (CC1-3) should be avoided for GCPM patients. Synchronous GCPM with PCI ≤16 and normal TM, synchronous GCPM with PCI ≤12 and abnormal TM, metachronous GCPM with PCI ≤10 and normal TM, or metachronous GCPM with PCI ≤5 and abnormal TM maybe potential indications for complete CRS + HIPEC treatment.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastasis from breast cancer: a preliminary report of 4 cases.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) has the highest morbidity and the fifth-highest mortality rate among women in China. Peritoneal metastases from BC are rare, and presently, there are no guidelines or international consensus on its treatment. Patients with a prognosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) have poorer survival rates than patients with other regional metastases from BC. METHODS: Four BC PC patients, who had undergone cytoreductive surgery (CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), participated in this study. Clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival (OS) data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Patients' average age when they underwent CRS + HIPEC was 59.8 years. The average time of CRS + HIPEC was 8.8 h. The median number of resected organ areas was 7. Following CRS + HIPEC, each of the 4 patients survived for 31, 28, 16 and 52 months, respectively. There were no serious adverse events during the perioperative period. CONCLUSIONS: The study examined the detailed process of CRS + HIPEC and found that patients with BC PC may benefit from this treatment. The 4 cases provided evidence that the integrated therapy of CRS + HIPEC is a promising strategy that could improve outcomes for BC PC patients. Further, no serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred during the CRS + HIPEC perioperative period.

CRS + HIPEC combined with IP + IV chemotherapy for gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma: Case report of long-term survival.

RATIONALE: Signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is prone to relapse and metastasis after traditional surgical treatment, and the prognosis is also poor. We improved the concept of treatment and conducted cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with intraperitoneal (IP) and intravenous (IV) chemotherapy for a gastric signet-cell carcinoma patient. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 65-year-old male patient with complaint of intermittent hematemesis for over 10 days was referred to our hospital for treatment. The patient developed hematemesis of 800 mL without obvious causes on May 27, 2015, accompanied by dizziness and amaurosis fugax. After the bleeding was stopped with medicinal treatment, diagnostic gastroscopy revealed an ulcer at the less curvature of the stomach, with biopsy pathology diagnosis as severe atypical hyperplasia, which was confirmed to be poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma by a second biopsy. In past medical history, the patient had 5 coronary stents implanted because of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease 3 years ago. DIAGNOSIS: Gastric cancer (cT4NxMx) according to the patient's history and biopsy pathology. INTERVENTIONS: the patient was treated surgery-based multidisciplinary treatments integrating CRS + HIPEC and IP + IV adjuvant chemotherapy. The CRS was curative distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, and HIPEC was cisplatin 120 mg plus mitomycin C 30 mg at 43 °C, for 60 minutes. Final pathological diagnosis of after surgery was: poorly differentiate adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cells, with invasion beyond the serosal layer and into the duodenum, 10/23 lymph nodes positive, nerve invasion, vascular tumor thrombi, Borrmann type IV, Lauren type diffuse. TNM stage was pT4aN3M0, IIIC. After operation, the patient received 6 courses of IV chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium capsules, and IP chemotherapy with docetaxel and carboplatin. OUTCOMES: Regular follow-up till July 20, 2020, revealed that the patient has a disease-free survival of over 61+ months. LESSONS: CRS + HIPEC combined with IP + IV chemotherapy achieved long-term disease-free survival for this patient with gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma and deserve further study. This new treatment modality deserves appropriate consideration in routine clinical practice for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Perioperative safety after cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei from appendiceal origin: Experience on 254 patients from a single center.

OBJECTIVE: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a standard treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) recommended by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). The study is to analyze the incidence of perioperative serious adverse events (SAEs) of CRS + HIPEC to treat PMP patients, and identify the risk factors, for guiding the prevention of SAEs. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on the PMP database established at our center. The clinicopathological features, treatment details and SAEs information on the PMP patients are systematically established in this database. The incidence, organ system distribution and severity of perioperative SAEs are analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses are performed to identify the independent risk factors. RESULTS: Among the 272 CRS + HIPEC procedures for 254 PMP patients, there are 93 (34.2%) SAEs. Six systems are involved in the SAEs, including infections (9.6%), digestive system (8.1%), respiratory system (6.3%), cardiovascular system (5.5%), hematological system (2.9%), and urinary system (1.5%), in terms of frequency. In terms of severity, the majority is grade III SAEs (27.9%), followed by grade IV SAEs (4.8%) and grade V SAEs (1.5%). Univariate analysis reveals 4 risk factors for perioperative SAEs: HIPEC regimens (P = 0.020), PCI (P = 0.025), intraoperative red blood cell transfusion volume (P = 0.004), and intraoperative blood loss volume (P = 0.002). Multivariate and logistic regression model analysis identifies only one independent risk factor for perioperative SAEs: intraoperative blood loss volume (P = 0.001, OR = 0.344, 95%CI: 0.182-0.649). CONCLUSIONS: PMP patients treated by CRS + HIPEC at experienced centers could have acceptable safety. Improving the surgical techniques and developing the integrated hemostasis techniques are essential to reduce intraoperative blood loss and decrease SAEs rate.

Long-term progression-free survival of hepatocellular carcinoma with synchronous diffuse peritoneal metastasis treated by CRS+HIPEC: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with peritoneal metastasis (PM) is rare. There has been no standard treatment for this severe disease, and the conventional palliative therapy could only reach an overall survival of 6 to 14 months PATIENT CONCERNS:: A 38-year-old male with a chief complain of "abdominal distension and diagnosis of HCCPM for 3 months", was suffering from severe diarrhea and moderate anemia. DIAGNOSIS: Diagnostic laparoscopic exploration with biopsy and the following pathology confirmed the diagnosis of HCC with PM. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) followed by 6 cycles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. OUTCOMES: Till January 15, 2019, the patient has progression-free survival for over 22 months. LESSONS: CRS plus HIPEC combined adjuvant intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy may improve progression-free survival for some HCC with PM patients and should be considered as an option for such patients.

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Development of a Physiotherapy Program.

BACKGROUND: This study was to assess the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and to evaluate the safety and feasibility of physiotherapy program to prevent VTE during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: For VTE prevention, we developed a systematic physiotherapy program consisting of active exercises of both arms and legs, and intermittent pneumatic compression device to massage both legs. This physiotherapy was applied to all patients, and the VTE-related events were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Cytoreductive surgery + HIPEC was performed on 466 patients with PC. All patients had highest VTE risk, with the median Caprini risk factor score being 11. During the 3-month observation period, 8 patients had 9 (1.9%) clinically symptomatic VTE events, including 8 (1.7%) deep vein thrombosis and 1 (0.2%) pulmonary embolism. Among those, 5 patients received pharmacological treatments with low-molecular-weight heparin, and the other 3 received physical exercises only. All these patients recovered well, and there was no mortality about VTE perioperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PC treated by CRS + HIPEC are at highest risk for VTE. The systematic physiotherapy program is safe and feasible to prevent VTE post CRS + HIPEC.

Treatment of hypermyoglobinemia after CRS + HIPEC for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: A retrospective comparative study.

This retrospective comparative study aims to explore the time courses of serum myoglobin (Mb) changes, and summarize our experience in treating patients with hypermyoglobinemia after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).This study covered 60 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with CRS + HIPEC as the study group, and another 25 cancer patients treated with conventional extensive surgery without HIPEC as the control group from February to October 2016. In the study group, patients with postoperative hypermyoglobinemia were on a comprehensive treatment regimen consisting intravenous injection of sodium bicarbonate solution according to the Mb level. In the control group, patients were recorded and treated with the same regimen except for special sodium bicarbonate solution. The preoperative and postoperative serum Mb, blood urine nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine (Cr) levels were evaluated.There were no significantly difference between the 2 groups in serum Mb, BUN, and Cr levels before surgery. Postoperative serum Mb levels were elevated in both groups and significantly higher on postoperative 0 to 2 days (P < .05) in the study group than the control group. The peak value of serum Mb levels (426.65 ±â€Š108.386 µg/L) occurred on the surgery day. The serum Mb change rate was much bigger in the study group than the control group. Serum BUN levels in both groups revealed a slow increase during the early postoperative period and were significantly lower in the study group than the control group on days 1 and 2. The serum Cr levels were similar and stable between the 2 groups after surgery. The serum Cr change rates changed synchronously with same tendency in both groups, and on postoperative day 1 the increase rate was bigger in the control group than the study group.Hypermyoglobinemia is a common and prominent lab abnormality after CRS + HIPEC, and serum Mb levels could be an early and sensitive indicator for dramatic disturbances in the internal milieu after CRS + HIPEC. Adequate treatment with sodium bicarbonate could accelerate the reduction in serum Mb levels and reduce the risk for major organ damages.

Intraperitoneal free cancer cells in gastric cancer: pathology of peritoneal carcinomatosis and rationale for intraperitoneal chemotherapy/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is one of the most common causes of death in gastric cancer patients. Intraperitoneal free cancer cells (IFCCs) play a very important role in forming PC, but the administration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) and/or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) could be an effective treatment for IFCCs. This review focuses on the origin of IFCCs, the mechanism of PC formatting, the rationale of IPC/HIPEC, and the current clinical trials on IPC/HIPEC to treat advanced gastric cancer patients.