Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dig Dis Sci ; 66(6): 1829-1835, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32691381

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly affects women of reproductive age. Many patients lacking knowledge about IBD and reproduction make uninformed decisions, such as voluntary childlessness and medication cessation. Education should be individualized to the patient's knowledge base and include topics of most importance to the patient. Our study aimed to describe the priority rankings of topics selected by patients seeking preconception and pregnancy counseling. METHODS: As part of an ongoing prospective study, patients with IBD were asked to rank, in order of importance, nine a priori preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum topics they would like addressed by our specialized care team, which includes an IBD physician and a high-risk obstetrician. χ2 and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess associations between clinical and demographic characteristics and priority rankings, and a p value cutoff for significance was set as .05. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight women with IBD (mean (IQR) age; 32 (28-37) years) were seen in consultation, and 116 (70 (60%) CD, 43 (37%) UC, and 3 (3%) IBD-U) completed intake forms were analyzed. There were 78 (68%) women seen in the preconception stage, median age 31 (IQR 28-34), and 38 women (32%) were pregnant, median age 32 (IQR 28-33). Safety of IBD medications during pregnancy was most commonly ranked as top priority (40%) for all patients regardless of pregnancy status, followed by control of IBD disease activity and impact on pregnancy (31%), impact of IBD and surgery on fertility (19%), pregnancy outcomes for the baby (18%), mode of delivery (6%), inheritance of IBD (4%), breastfeeding (2%), nutritional health (2%), and vaccines and newborn care (1%). The impact of IBD and surgery on fertility was ranked as the number one priority more often in the preconception group (p value < 0.01) and mode of delivery in the pregnancy group (p value 0.04). CONCLUSION: Safety of IBD medications remains a priority topic for patients seeking preconception and pregnancy counseling.


Assuntos
Aconselhamento/métodos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/psicologia , Preferência do Paciente/psicologia , Cuidado Pré-Concepcional/métodos , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/diagnóstico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 28(6): 843-849, 2022 06 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34272560

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly affects women during childbearing years and often requires antepartum therapy. Data regarding effects of biologic exposure on delivery outcomes are limited. We explored whether peripartum biologic exposure impacts wound healing following cesarean section (C-section) and vaginal delivery (VD) in IBD patients. METHODS: Pregnancy and IBD data from the IBD Preconception and Pregnancy Planning (I-PrePP) Clinic database were collected and analyzed. Primary outcome was frequency of postpartum wound infection in women receiving peripartum biologics, defined as exposure in the third trimester and up to 2 weeks postdelivery relative to nonexposed patients. Secondary outcomes included effect of peripartum biologic timing and IBD phenotype on wound healing. Descriptive statistics summarized data using frequency for categorical variables and median for continuous variables. Univariate analyses tested associations when appropriate. RESULTS: Of 100 deliveries (interquartile range, 30-35; median, 33 years old), 58 were C-sections and 42 VDs. Peripartum biologic exposure occurred in 72% (42 of 58) and 57% (24 of 42), respectively. Median time from last dose to delivery was 6 (interquartile range, 4-8) weeks; 21 (32%) received biologics within 72 hours following delivery. Seven infections occurred following C-section among 5 unique CD patients. Peripartum biologic exposure was not associated with infection (4 of 66 [6%] exposed vs 3 of 34 [8.8%] nonexposed; P = .68), nor was disease activity (P = 1.0). Crohn's disease (P = 0.02), internal penetrating phenotype (P < .001), prior IBD surgery (P = .03), and prior postpartum infection (P = .04) were associated with infection. CONCLUSIONS: Peripartum biologic exposure does not impair postpartum wound healing; however, patients with more complicated disease phenotypes require close monitoring.


No prior studies have explored risk of postpartum wound infection in women receiving biologics in the peripartum period. We found no significant increase in risk of postpartum wound infection; however, internal penetrating Crohn's phenotype may be an important risk factor.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Terapia Biológica/efeitos adversos , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/etiologia , Período Periparto , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Cicatrização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA