Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 88(5): 678-689, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26700212

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study's aim was to describe a hospital-wide system to deliver rapid door-to-balloon time across the entire spectrum of emergency percutaneous intervention. BACKGROUND: Many patients needing emergency PCI are excluded from door-to-balloon public reporting metric; these groups do not achieve door-to-balloon times ≤90 min and have increased mortality rates. METHODS: We prospectively implemented a protocol for patients with STEMI or other emergency indication for catheterization mandating (1) emergency department physician or cardiologist activation of the catheterization lab and (2) immediate patient transfer to an immediately available catheterization lab by an in-house nursing transfer team. RESULTS: From September 1, 2005 to December 31, 2008, 526 consecutive patients underwent emergency PCI. Median door-to-balloon time was 68 min with 85.7% ≤90 min overall. Important subgroups included primary emergency department (62.5 min), cardiorespiratory arrest (71 min), cardiogenic shock (68 min), need for temporary pacemaker or balloon pump (67 min), initial ECG without ST-elevation (66.5 min), transfer from another ED (84 min), in-hospital (70 min), and activation indications other than STEMI (68 min). Patients presenting to primary ED and in transfer were compared to historical controls. Treatment ≤90 min increased (28%-85%, P < 0.0001). Mean infarct size decreased, as did hospital length-of-stay and admission total hospital costs. Acute myocardial infarction all-cause 30-day unadjusted mortality and risk-standardized mortality ratios were substantially lower than national averages. CONCLUSION: A hospital-wide systems approach applied across the entire spectrum of emergency PCI leads to rapid door-to-balloon time, reduced infarct size and hospitals costs, and low myocardial infarction 30-day all-cause mortality. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
2.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 9: 32, 2009 Jul 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19631001

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The impact of reducing door-to-balloon time on hospital revenues, costs, and net income is unknown. METHODS: We prospectively determined the impact on hospital finances of (1) emergency department physician activation of the catheterization lab and (2) immediate transfer of the patient to an immediately available catheterization lab by an in-house transfer team consisting of an emergency department nurse, a critical care unit nurse, and a chest pain unit nurse. We collected financial data for 52 consecutive ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing emergency percutaneous intervention from October 1, 2004-August 31, 2005 and compared this group to 80 consecutive ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients from September 1, 2005-June 26, 2006 after protocol implementation. RESULTS: Per hospital admission, insurance payments (hospital revenue) decreased ($35,043 +/- $36,670 vs. $25,329 +/- $16,185, P = 0.039) along with total hospital costs ($28,082 +/- $31,453 vs. $18,195 +/- $9,242, P = 0.009). Hospital net income per admission was unchanged ($6962 vs. $7134, P = 0.95) as the drop in hospital revenue equaled the drop in costs. For every $1000 reduction in total hospital costs, insurance payments (hospital revenue) dropped $1077 for private payers and $1199 for Medicare/Medicaid. A decrease in hospital charges ($70,430 +/- $74,033 vs. $53,514 +/- $23,378, P = 0.059), diagnosis related group relative weight (3.7479 +/- 2.6731 vs. 2.9729 +/- 0.8545, P = 0.017) and outlier payments with hospital revenue>$100,000 (7.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.022) all contributed to decreasing ST-elevation myocardial infarction hospitalization revenue. One-year post-discharge financial follow-up revealed similar results: Insurance payments: $49,959 +/- $53,741 vs. $35,937 +/- $23,125, P = 0.044; Total hospital costs: $39,974 +/- $37,434 vs. $26,778 +/- $15,561, P = 0.007; Net Income: $9984 vs. $9159, P = 0.855. CONCLUSION: All of the financial benefits of reducing door-to-balloon time in ST-elevation myocardial infarction go to payers both during initial hospitalization and after one-year follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00800163.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Preços Hospitalares , Custos Hospitalares , Infarto do Miocárdio/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Transferência de Pacientes/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Tempo de Internação/economia , Medicaid/economia , Medicare/economia , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA