RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Bipolar patients show social cognitive disorders. The objective of this study is to review facial expression recognition (FER) disorders in bipolar patients (BP) and explore clinical heterogeneity factors that could affect them in the euthymic phase: socio-demographic level, clinical and changing characteristics of the disorder, history of suicide attempt, and abuse. METHOD: Thirty-four euthymic bipolar patients and 29 control subjects completed a computer task of explicit facial expression recognition and were clinically evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with control subjects, BP patients show: a decrease in fear, anger, and disgust recognition; an extended reaction time for disgust, surprise and neutrality recognition; confusion between fear and surprise, anger and disgust, disgust and sadness, sadness and neutrality. In BP patients, age negatively affects anger and neutrality recognition, as opposed to education level which positively affects recognizing these emotions. The history of patient abuse negatively affects surprise and disgust recognition, and the number of suicide attempts negatively affects disgust and anger recognition. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive heterogeneity in euthymic phase BP patients is affected by several factors inherent to bipolar disorder complexity that should be considered in social cognition study.
Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/fisiopatologia , Expressão Facial , Reconhecimento Facial/fisiologia , Percepção Social , Adulto , Transtorno Bipolar/psicologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to describe the frequency and coding of the psychiatric management of short-stay patients admitted to Nice University Hospital in 2013. METHODS: Various parameters were measured : percentage of outpatient psychiatric procedures or psychiatric diagnosis codes ; coding practice differences between the Programme de médicalisation des systèmes d'information (Medical Information System Programme) for medicine, surgery and obstetrics and psychiatric medical data records, and the impact of coding on diagnosis-related groups. RESULTS: Twenty-four per cent of hospitalised patients received psychiatric management (either outpatient care or a psychiatric diagnosis) and 3.9% received both psychiatric management and a psychiatric diagnosis. Liaison psychiatrists more commonly used codes for neurotic and psychosomatic disorders (28% vs 16%), while somatic physicians more commonly used codes for psychoactive substance use-related disorders (26% vs 16%).The presence of psychiatric comorbidity had an impact on the DRG classification or the level of severity for 0.5% of standardized discharge summaries. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates the importance of the active involvement of psychiatry personnel in the management of short-stay patients. The importance of psychosomatic medicine in a short-stay institution could be improved by establishing a clearer definition of coding rules for these diseases and revising and identifying wards or beds devoted to psychosomatic disorders.
Assuntos
Codificação Clínica , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Hospitalização , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence in the literature that brief contact interventions (BCIs) might be reliable suicide prevention strategies. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a decision-making algorithm for suicide prevention (ALGOS) combining existing BCIs in reducing suicide reattempts in patients discharged after a suicide attempt. METHODS: A randomized, multicenter, controlled, parallel trial was conducted in 23 hospitals. The study was conducted from January 26, 2010, to February 28, 2013. People who had made a suicide attempt were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (ALGOS) or the control group. The primary outcome was the rate of participants who reattempted suicide (fatal or not) within the 6-month study period. RESULTS: 1,040 patients were recruited. After 6 months, 58 participants in the intervention group (12.8%) reattempted suicide compared with 77 (17.2%) in the control group. The difference between groups (4.4%; 95% CI, -0.7% to 9.0%) was not significant (complete-case analysis, P = .059). CONCLUSIONS: These results may help researchers better integrate BCIs into routine health care and provide new insights concerning personalized suicide prevention strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01123174.