Impact of dysplasia at resection margin on oncologic outcome after curative resection of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: significance of high-grade dysplastic resection margin.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes among negative, close, positive, and dysplasia resection margins (RMs) with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and to investigate the impact of dysplastic RMs. METHODS: The 565 patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into four groups according to RM. Dysplasia was classified into mild, moderate, and severe subgroups. RESULTS: RMs consisted of negative (62.1%), close (27.1%), positive (2.1%), and dysplastic (8.7%). In multivariate analysis, advanced T/N stages and positive RM were significant risk factors for overall survival, while dysplasia at the RM was not a significant risk factor for locoregional recurrence or overall survival. In subgroup analysis of patients with dysplastic margin, RM with severe dysplasia showed higher recurrence than mild and moderate dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Dysplastic RM was not a risk factor for recurrence and survival. Severe dysplasia RM should be carefully observed due to higher recurrence compared to other dysplasia RMs.

A Case of Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Neck Lymph Nodes Without Primary Tumor in Thyroid Gland.

Metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma in the lymph nodes without a primary tumor in the thyroid gland is rarely reported. We report the case of a 63-year-old male who had a left neck level II palpable mass. A left cervical mass had previously undergone 2 central needle biopsies, but only atypical cells had been identified. His prior medical history included surgical treatment for prostate cancer 11 years ago. There was no suspicious primary tumor in the endoscopic examination. After the excisional biopsy, the pathologic finding was metastatic papillary carcinoma from the thyroid, and there were no aberrant findings in the thyroid sonography. The patient underwent a complete thyroidectomy, bilateral central neck dissection (CND), and left level IV dissection, along with postoperative radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. No thyroid lesion and no more positive lymph nodes were found in the final pathology report. Three months later, a radioiodine nuclear scan was performed, although it revealed no abnormal iodine uptake.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Tracheostomy between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We compared decannulation-related factors between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent a tracheostomy. The clinical factors were compared between the successful (decannulation within 3 months) and failed decannulation (decannulation over 3 months) groups in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: The successful decannulation rates were 41.1% in COVID-19 and 45.1% in non-COVID-19 patients, with no significant differences in demographic and clinical factors between the two groups. In the non-COVID-19 patients, the failed decannulation group had a higher proportion of cerebrovascular and pulmonary diseases. Ventilator dependency or increased oxygen demand was the primary cause of decannulation failure in both groups, with no significant differences except for a higher prevalence of swallowing problems in the COVID-19 group (42.4% vs. 20.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The predominant cause of decannulation failure was ventilator and oxygen demand in both the non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 patients. In the non-COVID-19 patients, underlying cerebrovascular diseases were considered to have a significant impact on the decannulation process. On the other hand, swallowing problems significantly influenced decannulation among the COVID-19 patients. Therefore, we should consider early and active respiratory and swallowing rehabilitation to facilitate successful decannulation in COVID-19 patients.

Therapeutic Effect of Multilevel Surgery on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: Impact on the Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score.

OBJECTIVES: Our previous study found that multilevel obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) surgery mitigated laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms in terms of the reflux symptom index (RSI), but no studies have investigated the impact of OSA surgery on laryngoscopic parameters. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical outcome of LPR improvement following OSA surgery, with a focus on both the RSI and the reflux finding score (RFS). METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 28 patients who underwent multilevel OSA surgery from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were asked to complete the RSI questionnaire and underwent a laryngoscopic examination to evaluate the RFS before and after surgery. Age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and polysomnography data before and after surgery were also reviewed. RESULTS: After surgery, the total RSI and RFS decreased significantly from 11.96±8.40 to 7.68±6.82 (P=0.003) and from 6.57±3.49 to 3.21±1.87 (P<0.001). The positive rates of RSI and RFS decreased from 28.6% to 17.9% and 32.1% to 0%, respectively. Significant improvements were found in the RSI subdomains of throat clearing, throat mucus, breathing difficulty, troublesome cough, and heartburn sensation, while all RFS subdomains except granuloma improved significantly. In subgroup analyses, no significant differences were found between subgroups based on age, OSA severity, or BMI. CONCLUSION: OSA surgery has the potential to alleviate both LPR symptoms and laryngoscopic. RESULTS: Additional research integrating more objective techniques and novel treatment strategies is required to better comprehend the clinical impact of OSA surgery on LPR.