Brain metastases in gastroesophageal cancers-an underestimated complication.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases represent a severe complication in many gastrointestinal malignancies especially those arising from the upper gastrointestinal tract, including cancer of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and stomach (GEC). However, there is little knowledge about the onset or potential risk factors for brain metastases (BRMs) in upper gastrointestinal cancers resulting in a lack of screening guidelines for BRMs. METHODS: We analyzed 827 patients from our cancer registry suffering from gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) and treated at the University Medical Center Göttingen between January 2013 and December 2019 for the presence of BRMs. RESULTS: From 827 patients with GEC we found 54 patients with BRMs, resulting in an incidence of 6.5%. BRMs are more frequent in male patients (90.74% vs 9.26%, p = 0.0051) and in adenocarcinomas (90.74% vs 9.26%, p = 0.0117). Mean duration for the onset of BRMs from initial cancer diagnoses was 20.9 months in limited disease (curative approach) and 9.3 months in advanced disease (palliative approach) (p = 0.0026). However, early detection of BRMs is a prognostic factor since patients with successful resection of BRMs have a better prognosis compared to those with unresectable BRMs (5.93 vs 2.07 months, p = 0.0091). CONCLUSION: In this single-center retrospective study, brain metastases (BRMs) occur with a high frequency (6.5%) in gastroesophageal cancer (GEC), significantly more often in male patients and adenocarcinomas. Since survival of these patients considerably correlates with successful BRMs resection, our observations propose further prospective trails to validate our hypothesis and ultimately the implementation of routine screening procedures to detect asymptomatic brain metastases.

Questions and Controversies in the Clinical Application of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Treat Patients with Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Expert Perspectives.

Notwithstanding regulatory approval of lenvatinib and sorafenib to treat radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (RAI-R DTC), important questions and controversies persist regarding this use of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). RAI-R DTC experts from German tertiary referral centers convened to identify and explore such issues; this paper summarizes their discussions. One challenge is determining when to start TKI therapy. Decision-making should be shared between patients and multidisciplinary caregivers, and should consider tumor size/burden, growth rate, and site(s), the key drivers of RAI-R DTC morbidity and mortality, along with current and projected tumor-related symptomatology, co-morbidities, and performance status. Another question involves choice of first-line TKIs. Currently, lenvatinib is generally preferred, due to greater increase in progression-free survival versus placebo treatment and higher response rate in its pivotal trial versus that of sorafenib; additionally, in those studies, lenvatinib but not sorafenib showed overall survival benefit in subgroup analysis. Whether recommended maximum or lower TKI starting doses better balance anti-tumor effects versus tolerability is also unresolved. Exploratory analyses of lenvatinib pivotal study data suggest dose-response effects, possibly favoring higher dosing; however, results are awaited of a prospective comparison of lenvatinib starting regimens. Some controversy surrounds determination of net therapeutic benefit, the key criterion for continuing TKI therapy: if tolerability is acceptable, overall disease control may justify further treatment despite limited but manageable progression. Future research should assess potential guideposts for starting TKIs; fine-tune dosing strategies and further characterize antitumor efficacy; and evaluate interventions to prevent and/or treat TKI toxicity, particularly palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and fatigue.

Time to Deliver on Promises: The Role of ERBB2 Alterations as Treatment Options for Colorectal Cancer Patients in the Era of Precision Oncology.

Receptor tyrosine kinase erythroblastic oncogene B2 (ERBB2), also known as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), represents an oncogenic driver and has been effectively targeted in breast and gastric cancer. Recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) discovered ERBB2 as a promising therapeutic target in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), where it is altered in 3-5% of patients, but no therapies are currently approved for this use. Herein, we present the experience of a single center in diagnosing actionable genetic ERBB2 alterations using NGS and utilizing the latest therapeutic options. Between October 2019 and December 2022, a total of 107 patients with advanced CRC underwent molecular analysis, revealing actionable ERBB2 mutations in two patients and ERBB2 amplifications in two other patients. These findings correlated with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Of these four patients, two were treated with trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd). We present two exemplary cases of patients with actionable ERBB2 alterations to demonstrate the effectiveness of T-DXd in heavily pretreated ERBB2-positive mCRC patients and the need for early molecular profiling. To fully exploit the potential of this promising treatment, earlier molecular profiling and the initiation of targeted therapies are essential.