Association of Socioeconomic Status With Postdischarge Pediatric Resource Use and Quality of Life.

OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic factors may impact healthcare resource use and health-related quality of life, but their association with postcritical illness outcomes is unknown. This study examines the associations between socioeconomic status, resource use, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of children recovering from acute respiratory failure. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure clinical trial. SETTING: Thirty-one PICUs. PATIENTS: Children with acute respiratory failure enrolled whose parent/guardians consented for follow-up. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Resource use included in-home care, number of healthcare providers, prescribed medications, home medical equipment, emergency department visits, and hospital readmission. Socioeconomic status was estimated by matching residential address to census tract-based median income. Health-related quality of life was measured using age-based parent-report instruments. Resource use interviews with matched census tract data (n = 958) and health-related quality of life questionnaires (n = 750/958) were assessed. Compared with high-income children, low-income children received care from fewer types of healthcare providers (ß = -0.4; p = 0.004), used less newly prescribed medical equipment (odds ratio = 0.4; p < 0.001), and had more emergency department visits (43% vs 33%; p = 0.04). In the youngest cohort (< 2 yr old), low-income children had lower quality of life scores from physical ability (-8.6 points; p = 0.01) and bodily pain/discomfort (+8.2 points; p < 0.05). In addition, health-related quality of life was lower in those who had more healthcare providers and prescribed medications. In older children, health-related quality of life was lower if they had prescribed medications, emergency department visits, or hospital readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Children recovering from acute respiratory failure have ongoing healthcare resource use. Yet, lower income children use less in-home and outpatient services and use more hospital resources. Continued follow-up care, especially in lower income children, may help identify those in need of ongoing healthcare resources and those at-risk for decreased health-related quality of life.

Income-driven socioeconomic status and presenting illness severity in children with acute respiratory failure.

Children living in low socioeconomic communities are vulnerable to poor health outcomes, especially when critically ill. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and illness severity upon pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission in children with acute respiratory failure. This secondary analysis of the multicenter Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure clinical trial includes children, 2 weeks to 17 years old, mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure; specifically, subjects who had parental consent for follow-up and residential addresses that could be matched with census tracts (n = 2006). Subjects were categorized into quartiles based on income, with a median income of $54,036 for the census tracts represented in the sample. Subjects in the highest income quartile were more likely to be older, non-Hispanic White, and hospitalized for pneumonia. Subjects in the lowest income quartile were more likely to be Black, younger, and hospitalized for asthma or bronchiolitis, to have age-appropriate baseline functional status, and history of prematurity and asthma. After controlling for age group, gender, race, and primary diagnosis, there were no associations between income quartile and either Pediatric Risk of Mortality scores or pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. As measured, income-based SES was not associated with illness severity upon PICU admission in this cohort of patients. More robust and reliable methods for measuring SES may help to better explain the mechanisms by which socioeconomic affect critical illness.

Socioeconomic Status in Pediatric Health Research: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a scoping review of the literature to describe current conceptualization and measurement of socioeconomic status in pediatric health research. STUDY DESIGN: Four databases were used to identify relevant studies, followed by selection and data extraction. Inclusion criteria for studies were the following: enrolled subjects <18 years old, included a health-related outcome, published from 1999 to 2018, and explicitly measured socioeconomic status (SES). RESULTS: Our literature search identified 1768 publications and 1627 unique records. After screening for duplication and relevance, 228 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, with 75% (n = 170) published since 2009. There were 52 unique singular measures and an additional 20 composite measures. Income-related measures were used in 65% of studies (n = 147) and measures of education in 42% (n = 95). The majority of studies using census-derived variables or insurance status were conducted within the previous 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric studies use a variety of SES measures, which limits comparisons between studies. Few studies provide an evidenced-based rationale that connects the SES indicator to the health outcome, but the majority of studies do find a significant impact of SES on outcomes. SES should be comprehensively studied so that meaningful measures can be used to identify specific SES mechanisms that impact child health.

Long-Term Outcomes after Protocolized Sedation versus Usual Care in Ventilated Pediatric Patients.

RATIONALE: Whether a nurse-implemented goal-directed sedation protocol resulting in more awake yet calm intubated children affects postdischarge functional status, health-related quality of life, or risk for post-traumatic stress disorder is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare postdischarge outcomes in children with acute respiratory failure cluster-randomized to a sedation protocol or usual care. METHODS: A stratified random sample of 1,360 patients from 31 centers in the RESTORE (Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure) trial was assessed by mail, electronically, and/or telephone 6 months after ICU discharge. In treatment group comparisons, we controlled for age, baseline functional status, and severity of illness. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used the Pediatric Overall Performance Category and the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category to characterize functional status, the Infant and Toddler Quality of Life Questionnaire (97-item full-length version) (<2 yr old) or Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (≥2 yr old), and the Child Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale (≥8 yr old and developmentally able). Functional status worsened from baseline to follow-up in 20%. Decline in functional status did not differ by treatment arm and was more common among those with baseline impairment than those with baseline normal function (27 vs. 18%; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in health-related quality of life total scores by treatment arm. Scores indicating risk of post-traumatic stress disorder occurred in 30%, with no difference between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: A sedation strategy that allows patients to be more awake and exposes them to fewer sedative and analgesic medications produces no long-term harm. However, postdischarge morbidity after acute respiratory failure is common. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00814099).

A Systematic Review of Risk Factors Associated With Cognitive Impairment After Pediatric Critical Illness.

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors associated with cognitive impairment as assessed by neuropsychologic tests in neurotypical children after critical illness. DATA SOURCES: For this systematic review, we searched the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and CINAHL databases from January 1960 to March 2017. STUDY SELECTION: Included were studies with subjects 3-18 years old at the time of post PICU follow-up evaluation and use of an objective standardized neuropsychologic test with at least one cognitive functioning dimension. Excluded were studies featuring patients with a history of cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury, or genetic anomalies associated with neurocognitive impairment. DATA EXTRACTION: Twelve studies met the sampling criteria and were rated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ten studies reported significantly lower scores in at least one cognitive domain as compared to healthy controls or normed population data; seven of these-four case-control and three prospective cohort studies-reported significant lower scores in more than one cognitive domain. Risk factors associated with post critical illness cognitive impairment included younger age at critical illness and/or older age at follow-up, low socioeconomic status, high oxygen requirements, and use of mechanical ventilation, sedation, and pain medications. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying risk factors for poor cognitive outcomes post critical illness may help healthcare teams modify patient risk and/or provide follow-up services to improve long-term cognitive outcomes in high-risk children.