Evaluation of a Novel Prefilled Syringe Concept for Ophthalmic Applications: A Formative Human Factors Study.

Intravitreal injection (IVI) is the most commonly performed intraocular procedure worldwide. Several manufacturers have developed glass prefilled syringe (PFS) devices to increase the ease of performing IVIs and reduce the complications associated with medication preparation. This formative human factors study assessed a novel, polymer PFS alternative to glass syringes to support development of a usable, silicone-free delivery platform for IVI. Thirteen retina specialists (RSs) with experience preparing a minimum of ≥10 IVIs per week completed the study. RSs were presented with the concept device and prototype instructions for use and completed hands-on tasks to simulate IVI. They then evaluated the concept device for ease of use, comfort, safety, and overall preference versus the IVI devices they are accustomed to using. The primary objectives were to assess the ease of use and acceptability of the proposed syringe design, evaluate the corresponding instructions for use (IFU), and identify any potential usability issues. The secondary objectives were to evaluate a new tamper-evident cap design and compare several externally printed dose marking designs. There were 130 total opportunities for use errors that deviated from the IFU. Of these 130 steps, 110 were a Success, 17 were Incomplete or Incorrect, 2 were Resolved, and 1 was the result of a Study Artifact. All 13 participants completed 3 Essential Tasks successfully and at least 10 participants completed each of the 4 Safety-Critical Tasks successfully. A total of 20 errors were made throughout the test simulation, most of which were rooted in unfamiliar use steps or transference behaviors. Overall, the concept device was found to be usable, acceptable, and safe for IVI by experienced RSs. RSs preferred the concept device to IVI products supplied in vials, but there was no notable preference for the concept device design compared to current glass PFSs used for IVI. The unique features of the concept device, including absence of silicone oil and break-resistance, were mostly recognized by participants and may offer an improvement to currently available systems for IVI.

The burden of at-home preparation of lyophilized parenteral medications: an analysis of contributing factors and implications for chronic disease patients and caregivers.

BACKGROUND: In the acute care setting, parenteral medication errors are well-studied. However, there is comparatively little research on how these issues translate to patient- or caregiver-prepared medications in the home, particularly with reconstituted medications. METHODS: This was an ethnographic study designed to identify issues associated with four reconstitution use scenarios. Preparation burden was determined by measuring the time and manipulations required to prepare reconstituted medications across three preparation phases (assembly, reconstitution, and transfer). Deviations from product instructions for use, sterility breaches, self-reported preparation complications, and supply storage conditions were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 14 participants completed the study. Overall, preparation burden was markedly higher when purpose-built reconstitution devices were not available. The majority of participants reported experiencing at least one complication associated with their medication preparation process; the reconstitution phase was the most significant source of both instructions for use deviations and breaches in sterility. Participants reported that the volume and variety of medication preparation supplies were a significant source of burden. CONCLUSIONS: At-home preparation of reconstituted medications poses several challenges for patients and caregivers. As parenteral medications continue to shift towards self-administration, manufacturers should carefully consider the usability of such products and employ purpose-built reconstitution devices whenever possible.