Incidence and risk factors for developing chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain in 500 cancer patients: A file-based observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To define the incidence and risk factors for developing chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (CINP). METHODS: Retrospective, file-based analysis on cancer patients who received any type of conventional chemotherapy and for whom neurological evaluation was asked to reveal the extent of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) with or without CINP. CINP was assessed by means of the PI-NRS and Douleur Neuropathique-4 questionnaire. The total neuropathy score-clinical version graded the severity of CIPN. RESULTS: The medical files of 500 chemotherapy-treated cancer patients were reviewed. Any grade chronic CIPN was disclosed in 343 (68.6%) patients and CINP in 127 (37%) of them, corresponding to an overall percentage of 25.4% among all 500 included patients. The logistic regression analysis identified as independent predictors for CINP development the presence of uncomplicated diabetes (OR: 2.17; p = .039) and grade 2-3 chronic CIPN (OR: 1.61; p < .001) as also the administration of combined paclitaxel plus cisplatin (reference variable), compared to oxaliplatin (OR: 0.18; p = .001) and taxanes (OR: 0.16; p < .001). The increased severity of acute OXAIPN was associated with CINP (OR: 4.51; p < .001). OXA-treated patients with persistent CINP presented a worst likelihood to improve after chemotherapy discontinuation, than patients receiving combined paclitaxel plus cisplatin (OR: 50; p < .001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of CINP in our cohort was comparable to previous reports, with severities fluctuating upwards during chemotherapy and declined post-chemotherapy. Uncomplicated diabetes, the combined paclitaxel plus cisplatin treatment and the increased severity of acute oxaliplatin neurotoxicity mostly increase the risk for developing CINP. OXA-treated patients present less possibilities to recover from CINP after chemotherapy discontinuation, than other chemotherapies.

Expression of CD44 is associated with aggressiveness in seminomas.

BACKGROUND: Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) exhibit diverse biological and pathological features and are divided in two main types, seminomas and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs). CD44 is a cell surface receptor, which is highly expressed in malignancies and is implicated in tumorigenesis affecting cell-matrix interactions and cell signaling. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here, we examined the expression of CD44 in tumor cell lines and in patients' material. We found that CD44 is over-expressed in TGCTs compared to normal tissues. Immunohistochemical staining in 71 tissue specimens demonstrated increased expression of CD44 in some patients, whereas CD44 was absent in normal tissue. In seminomas, a high percentage of tumor and stromal cells showed cytoplasmic and/or cell surface staining for CD44 as well as increased staining for CD44 in the tumor stroma was found in some cases. The increased expression of CD44 either in tumor cells or in stromal components was associated with tumor size, nodal metastasis, vascular/lymphatic invasion, and disease stage only in seminomas. The increased stromal expression of CD44 in TGCTs was positively associated with angiogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: CD44 may exhibit diverse biological functions in seminomas and NSGCTs. The expression of CD44 in tumor cells as well as in tumor stroma fosters an aggressive phenotype in seminomas and should be considered in disease treatment.

Resistance to hormone therapy in breast cancer cells promotes autophagy and EGFR signaling pathway.

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths for women worldwide. Endocrine therapies represent the cornerstone for hormone-dependent breast cancer treatment. However, in many cases, endocrine resistance is induced with poor prognosis for patients. In the current study, we have developed MCF-7 cell lines resistant to fulvestrant (MCF-7Fulv) and tamoxifen (MCF-7Tam) aiming at investigating mechanisms underlying resistance. Both resistant cell lines exerted lower proliferation capacity in two-dimensional (2-D) cultures but retain estrogen receptor α (ERα) expression and proliferate independent of the presence of estrogens. The established cell lines tend to be more aggressive exhibiting advanced capacity to form colonies, increased expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and heterodimerization of ERBB family receptors and activation of EGFR downstream pathways like MEK/ERK1/2 and PI3K/AKT. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors tested against resistant MCF-7Fulv and MCF-7Tam cells showed moderate efficacy to inhibit cell proliferation, except for lapatinib, which concomitantly inhibits both EGFR and HER2 receptors and strongly reduced cell proliferation. Furthermore, increased autophagy was observed in resistant MCF-7Fulv and MCF-7Tam cells as shown by the presence of autophagosomes and increased Beclin-1 levels. The increased autophagy in resistant cells is not associated with increased apoptosis, suggesting a cytoprotective role for autophagy that may favor cells' survival and aggressiveness. Thus, by exploiting those underlying mechanisms, new targets could be established to overcome endocrine resistance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The development of resistance to hormone therapy caused by both fulvestrant and tamoxifen promotes autophagy with concomitant apoptosis evasion, rendering cells capable of surviving and growing. The fact that resistance also triggers ERBB family signaling pathways, which are poorly inhibited by tyrosine kinase inhibitors might attribute to cells' aggressiveness. It is obvious that the development of endocrine therapy resistance involves a complex interplay between deregulated ERBB signaling and autophagy that may be considered in clinical practice.

Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard-of-care first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma. However, progression-free survival and overall survival are limited by chemotherapy resistance. METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who did not have disease progression with first-line chemotherapy (four to six cycles of gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin) to receive best supportive care with or without maintenance avelumab. The primary end point was overall survival, assessed among all patients who underwent randomization (overall population) and among those with tumors positive for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Secondary end points included progression-free survival and safety. RESULTS: Among all 700 patients who underwent randomization, the addition of maintenance avelumab to best supportive care significantly prolonged overall survival as compared with best supportive care alone (control). Overall survival at 1 year was 71.3% in the avelumab group and 58.4% in the control group (median overall survival, 21.4 months vs. 14.3 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.86; P = 0.001). Avelumab also significantly prolonged overall survival in the PD-L1-positive population; overall survival at 1 year was 79.1% in the avelumab group and 60.4% in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.79; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 3.7 months in the avelumab group and 2.0 months in the control group in the overall population (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.75) and 5.7 months and 2.1 months, respectively, in the PD-L1-positive population (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.73). The incidence of adverse events from any cause was 98.0% in the avelumab group and 77.7% in the control group; the incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was 47.4% and 25.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance avelumab plus best supportive care significantly prolonged overall survival, as compared with best supportive care alone, among patients with urothelial cancer who had disease that had not progressed with first-line chemotherapy. (Funded by Pfizer and Merck [Darmstadt, Germany]; JAVELIN Bladder 100 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02603432.).

Prospectively assessing serum neurofilament light chain levels as a biomarker of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in breast cancer patients.

Our aim was to assess the significance of measuring serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels as a biomarker of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (PIPN). We longitudinally measured sNfL in breast cancer patients, scheduled to receive the 12-weekly paclitaxel-based regimen. Patients were clinically examined by means of the Total Neuropathy Score-clinical version (TNSc), while sNfL were quantified, using the highly sensitive Simoa technique, before starting chemotherapy (baseline), after 2 (week 2) and 3 (week 3) weekly courses, and at the end of chemotherapy (week 12). Among 59 included patients (mean age: 53.1 ± 11.5 years), 33 (56%) developed grade 0-1 and 26 (44%) grade 2-3 PIPN at week 12. A significant longitudinal increase of sNfL levels from baseline to week-12 was determined, whereas patients with TNSc grade 2-3 PIPN had significantly increased sNfL levels at week 12, compared to those with grade 0-1. receiver-operated characteristics (ROC) analysis defined a value of NfL of >85 pg/mL at week 3 as the best discriminative determination to predict the development of grade 2-3 PIPN at week 12 (sensitivity 46.2%, specificity 84.8%). The logistic binary regression analysis revealed that age > 50 years and the cutoff of >85 pg/mL of sNfL levels at week 3 independently predicted the development of grade 2-3 PIPN at week 12 with a sensitivity of 46%, a specificity of 91%, and a positive and negative predictive values of 75% and 67%, respectively. sNfL levels seem to be a valuable biomarker of neuro-axonal injury in PIPN. An early increase of this biomarker after a 3-weekly chemotherapy course can be a predictive marker of final PIPN severity.

Plain language summary of results from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 study: avelumab maintenance treatment for advanced urothelial cancer.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a plain language summary of an article originally published in The New England Journal of Medicine. It is about initial results (collected in October 2019) from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 study (a clinical trial), which looked at avelumab maintenance treatment in people with advanced urothelial cancer. Urothelial cancer is the most common type of bladder cancer. People with advanced urothelial cancer often receive chemotherapy. If this is the first treatment people with advanced disease are given, it is called first-line treatment. If the cancer stops growing or shrinks with first-line chemotherapy, people can be given different treatment to try to prevent the cancer from growing again. This is called maintenance treatment. It may help people live longer. WHAT HAPPENED IN THE JAVELIN BLADDER 100 STUDY?: In the JAVELIN Bladder 100 study, researchers wanted to find out if maintenance treatment with avelumab would help people with advanced urothelial cancer live longer. Avelumab is a type of medicine called immunotherapy. Immunotherapy helps the body's immune system fight cancer. 700 people took part in the study. To take part, they must have already been treated with first-line chemotherapy. Also, their cancer must have shrunk or not grown with this treatment. They were then treated with either avelumab maintenance treatment plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone. Best supportive care means treatments that help improve symptoms and quality of life. These treatments do not affect the cancer directly and can include medicines to relieve pain. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Researchers found that people treated with avelumab maintenance treatment plus best supportive care lived, on average, 7 months longer than people who received best supportive care alone. People treated with avelumab had more side effects than those not treated with avelumab, but most were not severe. Common side effects with avelumab included persistent tiredness, itchy skin, urinary tract infection, and diarrhea. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?: Results from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 study support the use of avelumab as maintenance treatment for people with advanced urothelial cancer whose cancer has shrunk or not grown with first-line chemotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT number: NCT02603432.

Prospective assessment of psychopathological symptoms and their relation to demographic factors in primary caregivers of cancer patients throughout chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The present study aims to investigate the course of psychological symptoms through chemotherapy in a sample of primary caregivers of patients with cancer and to examine all possible correlations between psychological distress and demographic characteristics. METHODS: In this prospective study, 112 primary family caregivers of cancer patients were evaluated. Symptom checklist 90 revised (SCL-90-R) was administered to assess their pathological symptoms, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to assess depression and anxiety. There was an evaluation at the beginning of chemotherapy and a second at the end of the patients' intravenous chemotherapy treatment (EOT). RESULTS: A total of 112 primary caregivers were initially enrolled in the study, and 99 (88.4%) completed it. Caregivers' psychopathology was low to moderate at both points of time (baseline and EOT). However, a considerable decrease in the Global Severity Index (GSI) emerged over time. CONCLUSIONS: At EOT, participants reported statistically significant decreases in five aspects of SCL 90, namely Depression, phobic anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, somatization, and psychoticism. A notable finding was that female caregivers were significantly more distressed, especially when providing care to a male recipient.

Serum neurofilament light chain levels as biomarker of paclitaxel-induced cognitive impairment in patients with breast cancer: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the utility of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels in identifying the risk to develop chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI) in cancer patients. We also examined if sNfL can be identified as an early biomarker of CICI development. METHODS: We longitudinally measured sNfL levels in 20 female patients with breast cancer, scheduled to receive the 12 weekly paclitaxel-based regimen. An equal number of age-matched female heathy subjects was incuded as control group. CICI was graded by means of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MOCA); peripheral neurotoxicity (PN) was graded using the neurosensory Common Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)v5.0, while sNfL levels were quantified using a high-sensitive technique (Quanterix, Simoa) before the administration of chemotherapy (T0), after 3 courses (T1), and at the end of chemotherapy (T2). RESULTS: Pre-treatment sNfL levels were comparable in patients and controls (p = 0.103). At T2, 5/20 patients (mean age 61.4 ± 5.0 years) developed CICI. These 5 patients also had clinically-significant PN. Patients with and without CICI had comparable sNfL values at T2 (p = 0.1). In addition, at T2, sNfL levels did not correlate significantly with MOCA score in CICI patients (p = 0.604). The difference of sNfL levels between T1 and T0 failed to predict independently the occurrence of CICI at T2. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support the utility of measuring sNfL levels as a biomarker of CICI. Grade 2-3 PN most strongly confounded our outcomes. Considering the small sample size, which might have prevented the results from being extrapolated, further testing in larger studies is warranted.

Isolated optic neuritis after pembrolizumab administration for non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To report a case of isolated optic neuritis associated with pembrolizumab immunotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old man, with a history of metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma, presented with vision loss in his left eye for the past week. He had been treated with pembrolizumab for the underlying disease for 2 months. On presentation, best corrected visual acuity was 20/30 in the right eye and 20/200 in the left eye. Fundoscopy revealed optic nerve edema in the left eye. Visual fields examination in right eye revealed an enlarged blind spot and an extended defect in the inferior nasal quadrant. In the left eye a partial superior arcuate defect and an extended defect in the inferior hemisphere was observed. The mean deviation was -12.15 dB in the right eye and -13.70 dB in left eye. Pembrolizumab was withheld and corticosteroids were administered for a total of nine weeks, first intravenously and then slowly tapered orally, resulting in resolution of optic neuritis, restoration of visual acuity and in relative improvement in the visual field defects after 3 months. Calculated Naranjo Nomogram score was 7, indicating a 'highly probable' correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Optic neuritis is a relatively rare immune-related adverse event after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors cancer immunotherapy. Prompt discontinuation of the offending agent and early initiation of corticosteroid therapy is the mainstay of the treatment.

Oxaliplatin rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with clinically significant oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity.

We investigated whether rechallenge with oxaliplatin (OXA) can worsen the pre-existing oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OXAIPN) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Patients previously treated with OXA, having clinically significant grade 1 or 2 OXAIPN were assessed, after receiving rechallenge with OXA, using the clinical version of the Total Neuropathy Score (TNSc). Peripheral neuropathy was assessed at the end of first OXA exposure and at completion of OXA rechallenge. The first line OXA-based chemotherapy was completed at least 9 months earlier (OXA-free interval). We studied 25 mCRC patients, 14 males and 11 females, with a median age of 63 (35-77) years. After their first exposure to OXA-based chemotherapy, 9 (36%) patients developed grade 1 OXAIPN and 16 patients grade 2 (64%) neurotoxicity. OXA reintroduction with a median of 10 (8-14) cycles led to grade 1 OXAIPN in two patients (8%), grade 2 in 19 patients (76%), and grade 3 neuropathy in 4 (16%) patients Worsening of pre-existing OXAIPN was documented in seven (28%) patients and was significantly associated with higher OXA delivered cumulative dose (P < .001). Median TNSc scores following treatment (10; range 4-18) were significantly increased (P < .001), when compared to the scores recorded at the end of first line treatment (8; range 2-12). Rechallenging OXA appears to relatively worsen the severity of existing OXAIPN. However, the majority of rechallenged patients developed a clinically significant (grade 2) OXAIPN, rather than treatment-emergent grade 3. As such, OXA rechallenge might be a feasible option in patients previously having OXAIPN.

Phase 2 study of cabazitaxel as second-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes-a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel is a novel taxane that might be active in breast cancer resistant to first-generation taxanes. METHODS: The purpose of the current multicentre phase II trial was to evaluate the activity and safety of cabazitaxel, as second-line treatment, in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with taxanes. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled between October 2012 and November 2016. Taxane resistance to previous treatment was detected in 43 cases. The ORR was 22.6% in the intent-to-treat population, 23.3% in taxane-resistant and 20.5% in taxane-non-resistant cases. At a median follow-up of 39.6 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.7 months (95% CI 2.2-4.4) and 15.2 months (95% CI 11.3-19.4), respectively. Regarding toxicity, grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 22.6% and febrile neutropenia in 6% of the patients, respectively. Two fatal events (one febrile neutropenia and one sepsis) were reported as being related to study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II trial suggests that cabazitaxel is active as second-line treatment in taxane-pretreated patients with HER2-negative MBC, with manageable toxicity.

Correlation Between Bevacizumab Exposure and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab treatment is subject to large interpatient variability in efficacy, which may partly be explained by differences in complex bevacizumab pharmacokinetic characteristics that influence bevacizumab exposure. Exposure-response relationships have been identified for other monoclonal antibodies. We aimed to identify possible exposure-survival relationships in bevacizumab-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mCRC who started first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy between July 2012 and July 2014, and from whom serial blood samples and survival were prospectively collected, were included. Follow-up was carried out until July 2018. Total bevacizumab trough concentrations were measured from cycle 2 to cycle 30 of treatment. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Cox analysis were used to identify the relationship between concentrations and overall survival (OS). In addition, OS was compared between different trough concentration groups. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven blood samples from 46 patients were evaluable for analyses. ROC analysis showed a clear separation in survival based on trough levels (area under the curve = 0.739, p = .009). Cox regression also showed a strong positive correlation between trough levels and survival (p = .0004). Three distinct groups of exposure were identified: low (median trough concentration [Ctm ] ≤41.9 mg/L); medium (Ctm 43-87.2 mg/L) with median OS of 12.8 and 36 months, respectively (p = .0003); and high (Ctm ≥7.9 mg/L), where the majority of patients were still alive 60 months after the initiation of treatment. CONCLUSION: This study shows that survival was proportional to the magnitude of exposure in patients with mCRC. Further clinical research should focus on clarifying these exposure-outcome relationships in order to optimize dosing. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Bevacizumab-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. Moreover, bevacizumab presents complicated pharmacokinetics, and in many cases, clinical outcomes can be highly variable, with some patients responding remarkably well and others not. This study's results show that patients who experienced longer overall survival also had significantly higher exposure to bevacizumab. Therefore, bevacizumab trough concentrations could be used both as a predictive biomarker and as a tool for treatment monitoring and optimization. Finally, the development of validated, rapid, and sensitive assays for bevacizumab concentration measurements in combination with these results may lead to a therapeutic drug monitoring-guided approach in bevacizumab treatment with better clinical outcomes.

An MRI study of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal manifestations myofasciitis is the prominent imaging finding.

OBJECTIVE: To assess: (i) the prevalence, and clinical and imaging characteristics of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced musculoskeletal immune-related adverse events (ir-AEs) in a prospective manner and (ii) whether serum levels of cytokines associated with the Th1/Th2/Th17 response are differentially expressed in patients with and without musculoskeletal Ir-AEs. METHODS: All patients treated with ICI who developed musculoskeletal manifestations were referred to the Rheumatology Department, and an MRI of the involved area(s) was performed. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 130 patients were treated with ICIs. Of these, 10 (7.7%) developed ICI-induced Ir-AEs. The median time from ICI treatment since development of symptoms was 2.5 months. Three different patterns of musculoskeletal manifestations were found: (i) prominent joint involvement (n = 3); (ii) prominent 'periarticular' involvement (n = 4). These patients had diffuse swelling of the hands, feet or knees. MRI depicted mild synovitis with more prominent myositis and/or fasciitis in the surrounding tissues in all cases; (iii) myofasciitis (n = 3). Clinically, these patients presented with pain in the knee(s)/thigh(s), whereas MRI depicted myofasciitis of the surrounding muscles. Patients with musculoskeletal ir-AEs had significantly higher oncologic response rates compared with patients not exhibiting musculoskeletal ir-AEs (50% vs 12.5%, respectively, P = 0.0016). Cytokine levels associated with a Th1/Th2/Th17 response were similar between patients with and without musculoskeletal ir-AEs. Overall, symptoms were mild/moderate and responded well to treatment, with no need for ICI discontinuation. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, ICI-induced musculoskeletal manifestations developed in 7.7% of patients. Imaging evidence of myofasciitis was found in most patients, indicating that the muscle/fascia is more frequently involved than the synovium.

Real world, open label experience with lacosamide against acute painful oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity.

We report the outcome of a pilot, open-label study that tested the potential of lacosamide (200 mg/bi.d) as an effective and safe symptomatic treatment against acute painful oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OXAIPN). Lacosamide was introduced in 18 colorectal cancer patients with evidence of clinically significant acute, painful OXAIPN after infusion of the third course (T1) of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX4) and was maintained until completion of all 12 courses (T4). The OXA-Neuropathy Questionnaire (OXA-NQ) was used to record the severity of acute OXAIPN; the PI-NRS estimated the severity of neuropathic pain, while the chronic OXAIPN was graded with TNSc. The EuroQOL (EQ-5D) instrument was also applied. The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale measured the lacosamide-attributed perception of change. LCM-responders were considered those with ≥50% reduction in PI-NRS and OXA-NQ scores at T4, compared to T1. Patients experienced on T1 a median number of acute OXAIPN symptoms of 4 and had a median neuropathic pain severity score of 6, which was strongly related to lower quality of life, according to EQ-VAS (P < .001). At T4, 12 patients (66.7%) were classified as responders. A significant clinical improvement was documented in the severity of acute OXAIPN and neuropathic pain in relation to lacosamide (P < .001) at T4 compared to T1, which was associated with improved EQ-VAS scores (P < .001). Twelve patients scored PGIC ≥5 (lacosamide-attributed) at T4. There were no incidences of early drop-outs for safety reasons. Lacosamide appears to be an effective and well-tolerated symptomatic treatment against acute, painful OXAIPN.

Incidence and characteristics of neurotoxicity in immune checkpoint inhibitors with focus on neuromuscular events: Experience beyond the clinical trials.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with various neurological adverse events (NAEs). We herein explored the incidence and clinical phenotype of immune-related NAEs in cancer patients. Medical records of ICI-treated cancer patients were reviewed between the years 2010 and 2018, with an aim to characterize immuno-related NAEs. A total of 1185 ICIs-treated patients were identified, 63.7% of which were males and 36.3% were females, with a mean age of 63.4 ± 7.3 years. Twenty-four from the overall ICIs-treated patients (2%) developed NAEs. No differences were identified in terms of age, sex, tumor type and class of ICIs between the patients who developed NAEs and those who did not. The median number of cycles of ICI treatment before NAEs onset were 4.5 (1-10), and the median time was 102 days. Peripheral nervous system (PNS) involvement was present in 14 patients (58.4%) and central nervous system (CNS) involvement in 10 (33.3%), including 2 patients with aseptic meningitis and polyradicular involvement. Amongst PNS complications, there were five (20.8%) with axonal sensory neuropathies, four (16.7%) with Guillain-Barre-like syndromes, and four (16.7%) with myositis and/or myasthenic syndromes. The majority of patients with PNS-related NAEs (n = 11; 78.6%) improved after ICIs discontinuation and treatment with immune-modulating therapies. The time to neuromuscular toxicities onset was significantly shorter, compared to CNS NAEs (median 70 vs 119 days, P = .037). Immune-related NAEs mostly present with neuromuscular complications. Discontinuation of ICIs and appropriate treatment should be commenced early throughout the process, in order to maximize a favorable outcome.

Assessing risk factors of falls in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity.

AIM: To identify the risk factors of falls in a well-characterized cohort of cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 122 cancer patients experiencing any grade of CIPN, following completion of different chemotherapeutic regimens for various non-hematological malignancies. The results of the clinical examination were summarized by means of the Total Neuropathy Score-clinical version (TNSc®). A neurophysiological examination was also carried out. RESULTS: Among 122 patients, 21 (17.2%) of them reported falls. These were 7 males and 14 females with a mean age of 57.3 ± 8.1 years. All of them (21; 100%) had grade 3 CIPN, according to TNSc® with a median value of 15. Univariate analysis showed that the following variables were strongly associated with falls: TNSc® score of > 14 corresponding to grade 3 CIPN, evidence of motor impairment, evidence of sensory ataxia with positive Romberg sign, and decrease of sural a-SAP > 50% from the baseline value. Multivariate regression analysis failed to define independent predictors of falls. However, ROC analysis demonstrated that a discriminative TNSc® cutoff value of > 14 predicted falls with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 87%, whereas sensory ataxia predicted falls with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 83%. CONCLUSION: Grade 3 CIPN, as assessed with TNSc®, and evidence of sensory ataxia with a positive Romberg sign were strongly associated with an increased risk of falls. Although our results need further validation, the TNSc® scale appears to be a practical and easy tool for identifying patients at higher risk of falling.

Rheumatic Manifestations in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that activate the immune system, aiming at enhancing antitumor immunity. Their clinical efficacy is well-documented, but the side effects associated with their use are still under investigation. These drugs cause several immune-related adverse events (ir-AEs), some of which stand within the field of rheumatology. Herein, we present a literature review performed in an effort to evaluate all publicly available clinical data regarding rheumatic manifestations associated with ICIs. The most common musculoskeletal ir-AEs are inflammatory arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica and myositis. Non-musculoskeletal rheumatic manifestations are less frequent, with the most prominent being sicca, vasculitides and sarcoidosis. Cases of systemic lupus erythematosus or scleroderma are extremely rare. The majority of musculoskeletal ir-AEs are of mild/moderate severity and can be managed with steroids with no need for ICI discontinuation. In severe cases, more intense immunosuppressive therapy and permanent ICI discontinuation may be employed. Oncologists should periodically screen patients receiving ICIs for new-onset inflammatory musculoskeletal complaints and seek a rheumatology consultation in cases of persisting symptoms.

Pharmacogenetics in Model-Based Optimization of Bevacizumab Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) are significant regulators of angiogenesis, an important biological process involved in carcinogenesis. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (MAB), is approved for the treatment of metastatic Colorectal cancer (mCRC), however clinical outcomes are highly variable. In the present study, we developed a pharmacokinetic (PK), a simplified quasi-steady state (QSS) and a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to identify potential sources of variability. A total of 46 mCRC patients, who received bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy were studied. VEGF-A (rs2010963, rs1570360, rs699947) and ICAM-1 (rs5498, rs1799969) genes' polymorphisms, age, gender, weight, and dosing scheme were investigated as possible co-variates of the model's parameters. Polymorphisms, trough, and peak levels of bevacizumab, and free VEGF-A were determined in whole blood and serum. Data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The two-compartment PK model showed that clearance (CL) was significantly lower in patients with mutant ICAM-1 rs1799969 (p < 0.0001), inter-compartmental clearance (Q) was significantly higher with mutant VEGF-A rs1570360 (p < 0.0001), and lower in patients with mutant VEGF-A rs699947 (p < 0.0001). The binding QSS model also showed that mutant ICAM-1 rs1799969 was associated with a lower CL (p = 0.0177). Mutant VEGF-A rs699947 was associated with a lower free VEGF-A levels, prior to the next dose (p = 0.000445). The above results were confirmed by the PK/PD model. Findings of the present study indicated that variants of the genes regulating angiogenesis might affect PK and PD characteristics of bevacizumab, possibly influencing the clinical outcomes.

Prospective Observational Study of Pazopanib in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (PRINCIPAL Study).

BACKGROUND: Real-world data are essential to accurately assessing efficacy and toxicity of approved agents in everyday practice. PRINCIPAL, a prospective, observational study, was designed to confirm the real-world safety and efficacy of pazopanib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: Patients with clear cell advanced/metastatic RCC and a clinical decision to initiate pazopanib treatment within 30 days of enrollment were eligible. Primary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), relative dose intensity (RDI) and its effect on treatment outcomes, change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety. We also compared characteristics and outcomes of clinical-trial-eligible (CTE) patients, defined using COMPARZ trial eligibility criteria, with those of non-clinical-trial-eligible (NCTE) patients. Secondary study objectives were to evaluate clinical efficacy, safety, and RDI in patient subgroups. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-seven patients were enrolled and received ≥1 dose of pazopanib. Median PFS and OS were 10.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-12.0) and 29.9 months (95% CI, 24.7 to not reached), respectively, and the ORR was 30.3%. HRQoL showed no or little deterioration over time. Treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) and AEs of special interest occurred in 64 (9.7%), and 399 (60.7%) patients, respectively. More patients were classified NCTE than CTE (85.2% vs. 14.8%). Efficacy of pazopanib was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: PRINCIPAL confirms the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with advanced/metastatic RCC in a real-world clinical setting. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: PRINCIPAL is the largest (n = 657) prospective, observational study of pazopanib in patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma, to the authors' knowledge. Consistent with clinical trial results that often contain specific patient types, the PRINCIPAL study demonstrated that the effectiveness and safety of pazopanib is similarly safe and effective in patients with advanced kidney cancer in a real-world clinical setting. The PRINCIPAL study showed that patients with advanced kidney cancer who are treated with first-line pazopanib generally do not show disease progression for approximately 10 months and generally survive for nearly 30 months.

Liability of the voltage-gated potassium channel KCNN3 repeat polymorphism to acute oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity.

Thus far, there are conflicting results on the causal role of K+ channels in the pathogenesis of acute oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OXAIPN). As such, we tested the hypothesis that the voltage-gated K+ channel KCNN3 repeat polymorphism confers liability to acute OXAIPN. DNA from 151 oxaliplatin-treated patients for colorectal cancer was extracted and genotyped. The incidence of acute OXIPN was measured by the OXA-neuropathy questionnaire, while the severity of acute OXAIPN was scored basing on the number of symptoms reported by the patients at each clinical assessment. The increased number of acute symptoms was considered as being suggestive of an increased severity of acute OXAIPN. A total of 130/151 (86.1%) patients developed any grade of acute OXAIPN. Grade I acute neurotoxicity was revealed in 43 (28.5%) patients; grade II in 34 (22.5%); and grade III in 53 (53.1%) patients. Genotyping revealed alleles carrying 11 to 20 CAG repeats. The majority of patients were heterozygous (131; 89.4%). The most common numbers of CAG repeats were 15 (n = 46), 16 (n = 53), and 17 (n = 95). Patients carrying alleles with either 15 to 17 CAG repeats (P = .601) did not experience a higher incidence of grade III (treatment-emergent) acute OXAIPN. Likewise, no increased incidence of acute treatment-emergent OXAIPN was noted in heterozygous patients carrying either two short alleles (<19 CAG repeats) or one short and one long (≥19 CAG repeats) allele (P = .701). Our results do not support a causal relationship between the KCNN3CAG repeat polymorphism and acute OXΑIPN.