Amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide predicts ventricular arrhythmogenesis in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Even in high-risk population groups, not all patients have the same risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Given the emerging data about the amino-terminal fragment of the brain natriuretic peptide prohormone (NT-proBNP) value in heart failure, we planned to evaluate the importance of NT-proBNP levels in predicting the occurrence of malignant arrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty five ambulatory patients with previous myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%, and ICDs for primary prevention of SCD according to Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial I criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Venous blood samples for plasma NT-proBNP measurement were obtained after 30 min of supine rest from all patients at the beginning of the study. Patients were evaluated every 2 months, or sooner in cases of device discharges, during a 1-year follow-up period. Data concerning arrhythmias and device therapy were stored at the time of device interrogation on each follow-up visit. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: During 1-year follow-up, 11 of 35 patients (31.4%) received 18 antiarrhythmic device therapies for ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT). Patients who experienced such arrhythmias had NT-proBNP levels of 997.27 +/- 335.14 pmol/L (mean +/- SD), whereas those without VT had NT-proBNP levels of 654.87 +/- 237.87 pmol/L (p = 0.001). An NT-proBNP cutoff value of 880 pmol/L had a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 88%, a positive predictive value of 80%, and a negative predictive value of 88% for the prediction of occurrence-sustained VT events. CONCLUSION: To achieve the maximum benefit by ICD therapy, more precise risk stratification is required, even in high-risk, post-myocardial infarction patients. Plasma NT-proBNP levels comprise a promising method that could help in the better identification of a patient group with an even higher risk of sudden death.

Effects of amiodarone and diltiazem on persistent atrial fibrillation conversion and recurrence rates: a randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of amiodarone and diltiazem on atrial fibrillation (AF) induced atrial electrical remodeling and their clinical implications. METHODS: Persistent AF patients were randomly assigned to three treatment groups over a period from 6 weeks before to 6 weeks after internal cardioversion: group A (35 patients, oral diltiazem), group B (34 patients, oral amiodarone) and group C (37 patients, no antiarrhythmic drugs). Several electrophysiological parameters were assessed 5 min and 24 h after cardioversion. RESULTS: Compared with controls, group B patients had significantly higher conversion rates (83% vs. 100%, p = 0.041) and a higher probability to maintain sinus rhythm (p = 0.037). Patients of group B had longer fibrillatory cycle length intervals than patients of group A and C (180 +/- 18 ms vs. 161 +/- 17 ms vs. 164 +/- 19 ms, p = 0.001) and longer atrial effective refractory periods (211 +/- 22 ms vs. 198 +/- 16 ms vs. 194 +/- 17 ms, p = 0.003) as assessed 5 min after conversion. Post-conversion density of supraventricular ectopics was significantly lower in group B compared to groups A and C (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Oral amiodarone increases conversion rates, prolongs fibrillatory cycle length and atrial effective refractory period and preserves sinus rhythm after cardioversion in persistent AF patients by suppressing the atrial ectopics that trigger AF.