RESUMO
BACKGROUND: One of the most prevalent causes of emergency room visits is acute dyspnea. Several etiologies, including cardiac, pulmonary, metabolic, psychogenic etc may be involved. Acute heart failure (AHF) is among the most common causes. This study aims to evaluate, in patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the emergency departement (ED), the accuracy of a diagnostic approach combining Lung ultrasonography (LUS) and clinical assessment as compared to the traditional AHF diagnostic work-up. METHODS: This is a bi-centric cross-sectional observational study, conducted at the Emergency and Cardiology Department of both the Hedi Chaker Hospital in Sfax and the Habib Thameur Hospital in Tunis for the period extending from 01/07/2022 to 30/09/2023. The diagnostic performance of pulmonary ultrasonography was studied and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were compared with those of clinical examination, chest X-Ray, NT-pro -BNP and the Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) which was the reference exam. RESULTS: The most common cause of acute dyspnea is acute heart failure (79.3 %). LUS had a sensitivity of 94,2 % in diagnosing AHF and a specificity of 77,5 %. Its PPV and NPV were respectively 92 % and 81 %. The area under curbe (AUC) of B-Lines required for the diagnosis of interstitial pulmonary syndrome was excellent (92 %). There was a moderate significant positive correlation between the number of B-Lines and NT-Pro-BNP levels r = 0.51, P < 0.001. Also, there was a very strong significant positive relationship between the pulmonary congestion assessed by LUS and Left atrium - pressure r = 0.788, P < 0.001 CONCLUSION: LUS is an excellent test both to confirm and exclude the diagnosis of AHF in patients consulting the emergency room for acute dyspnea and therefore deserves to be performed systematically.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In Tunisia, the number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing, owing to the increase in patient life expectancy and expanding indications. Despite their life-saving potential and a significant reduction in population morbidity and mortality, their increased numbers have been associated with the development of multiple early and late complications related to vascular access, pockets, leads, or patient characteristics. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to identify the rate, type, and predictors of complications occurring within the first year after CIED implantation. It also aims to describe the demographic and epidemiological characteristics of a nationwide sample of patients with CIED in Tunisia. Additionally, the study will evaluate the extent to which Tunisian electrophysiologists follow international guidelines for cardiac pacing and sudden cardiac death prevention. METHODS: The Tunisian National Study of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (NATURE-CIED) is a national, multicenter, prospectively monitored study that includes consecutive patients who underwent primary CIED implantation, generator replacement, and upgrade procedure. Patients were enrolled between January 18, 2021, and February 18, 2022, at all Tunisian public and private CIED implantation centers that agreed to participate in the study. All enrolled patients entered a 1-year follow-up period, with 4 consecutive visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after CIED implantation. The collected data are recorded electronically on the clinical suite platform (DACIMA Clinical Suite). RESULTS: The study started on January 18, 2021, and concluded on February 18, 2023. In total, 27 cardiologists actively participated in data collection. Over this period, 1500 patients were enrolled in the study consecutively. The mean age of the patients was 70.1 (SD 15.2) years, with a sex ratio of 1:15. Nine hundred (60%) patients were from the public sector, while 600 (40%) patients were from the private sector. A total of 1298 (86.3%) patients received a conventional pacemaker and 75 (5%) patients received a biventricular pacemaker (CRT-P). Implantable cardioverter defibrillators were implanted in 127 (8.5%) patients. Of these patients, 45 (3%) underwent CRT-D implantation. CONCLUSIONS: This study will establish the most extensive contemporary longitudinal cohort of patients undergoing CIED implantation in Tunisia, presenting a significant opportunity for real-world clinical epidemiology. It will address a crucial gap in the management of patients during the perioperative phase and follow-up, enabling the identification of individuals at particularly high risk of complications for optimal care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05361759; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05361759. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/47525.