The influence of the coadministration of the p-glycoprotein modulator elacridar on the pharmacokinetics of lapatinib and its distribution in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid.

Background Lapatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2) and EGFR that has currently been approved for the treatment of HER2-positive advanced and metastatic breast cancer (BC). The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family of transporters includes P-glycoprotein (P-gp; ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP; ABCG2), which substantially restrict the penetration of drugs, including chemotherapeutics, through the blood-brain barrier and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of elacridar, an ABCB1 and ABCG2 inhibitor, on the brain and cerebrospinal fluid uptake of lapatinib. Methods Rats were divided into two groups: one group received 5 mg/kg elacridar and 100 mg/kg lapatinib (an experimental group), and the other group received 100 mg/kg lapatinib (a control group). Lapatinib concentrations in the blood plasma (BP), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and brain tissue (BT) were measured by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Results Elacridar significantly increased lapatinib penetration into the CSF and BT (Cmax increase of 136.4% and 54.7% and AUC0-∞ increase of 53.7% and 86.5%, respectively). The Cmax of lapatinib in BP was similar in both experimental groups (3057.5 vs. 3257.5 ng/mL, respectively). Conclusion This study showed that elacridar influenced the pharmacokinetics of lapatinib. The inhibition of ABCB1 and ABCG2 transporters by elacridar substantially enhanced the penetration of lapatinib into the CSF and BT. The blocking of protein transporters could become indispensable in the treatment of patients with breast cancer and brain metastases.

The concomitant use of lapatinib and paracetamol - the risk of interaction.

Lapatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for the treatment of breast cancer. Paracetamol is an analgesic commonly applied to patients with mild or moderate pain and fever. Cancer patients are polymedicated, which involves high risk of drug interactions during therapy. The aim of the study was to assess the interaction between lapatinib and paracetamol in rats. The rats were divided into three groups of eight animals in each. One group received lapatinib + paracetamol (IL + PA), another group received lapatinib (IIL), whereas the last group received paracetamol (IIIPA). A single dose of lapatinib (100 mg/kg b.w.) and paracetamol (100 mg/kg b.w.) was administered orally. Plasma concentrations of lapatinib, paracetamol and its metabolites - glucuronide and sulphate, were measured with the validated HPLC-MS/MS method and HPLC-UV method, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters of both drugs were calculated using non-compartmental methods. The co-administration of lapatinib and paracetamol increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) of lapatinib by 239.6% (p = 0.0030) and 184% (p = 0.0011), respectively. Lapatinib decreased the paracetamol AUC0-∞ by 48.8% and Cmax by 55.7%. In the IL + PA group the Cmax of paracetamol glucuronide was reduced, whereas the Cmax of paracetamol sulphate was higher than in the IIIPA group. Paracetamol significantly affected the enhanced plasma exposure of lapatinib. Additionally, lapatinib reduced the concentrations of paracetamol. The co-administration of lapatinib decreased the paracetamol glucuronidation but increased the sulphation. The findings of this study may be of clinical relevance to patients requiring analgesic therapy.

THE EFFECT OF TOTAL AND PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF INTRAVENOUS PARACETAMOL IN HUMANS.

Paracetamol is one of the most common analgesic and antipyretic drugs. Recently intravenous paracetamol has been widely used to treat moderate postoperative pain. Surgery is the main method of treatment of renal cancer. Total or partial nephrectomy can be performed, depending on the size and location of the tumor. Pharmacokinetics of drugs may depend on the type of surgery. The aim of the study was to compare the postinfusion pharmacokinetics of paracetamol in patients after total nephrectomy (TN) and nephron sparing surgery (NSS).The research was carried out on two groups of patients after nephrectomy: total (TN n = 37; mean [SD], age, 60.4 [10.9] years; BMI, 26.5 [3.8] kg/m2; creatinine clearance, Cl, 80.9 [37.1] mL/min) and nephron sparing surgery (NSS n = 17; 57.9 [16.5] years; BMI, 29.5 [5.3] kg/m2; Cl, 97.6 [27.8] mL/min). The patients were treated with paracetamol (PerfalganO Bristol-Myers Squibb) at an intravenous dose of 1.000 mg, which was infused for 15 minutes after surgery. The concentrations of paracetamol in the patients' plasma were determined by the HPLC method with UV detection (X = 261 run). The main pharmacokinetic parameters of paracetamol in the TN vs. NSS group were as follows: C.. 29.08 [17.39] vs. 27.54 [15.70] pg/mL (p = 0.6692); AUC5, 29.24 [13.86] vs. 34.85 [14.28] pg.h/mL (p = 0.2896); AUMC5,,,, 47.58 [26.08] vs. 62.02 [27.64] pg-h/mL (p = 0.1345); to. 2.34 [0.96] vs. 1.93 [0.50] h (p = 0.1415), respectively. In both groups the exposure to paracetamol was comparable. The t1/2 after nephron sparing surgery was shorter than after total nephrectomy. Therefore, these patients may demand more frequent drug administration. In the NSS group the C. of the analgesic was considerably reduced in men.

The effect of sunitinib on the plasma exposure of intravenous paracetamol and its major metabolite: paracetamol glucuronide.

The study aimed to examine the effect of sunitinib on the plasma exposure of intravenous paracetamol and its major metabolite, paracetamol glucuronide. Both drugs share metabolic pathways in the liver, and the drug interactions between sunitinib and paracetamol administered in higher doses were reported. These interactions resulted in hepatotoxicity. The adult New Zealand male rabbits were divided into three groups (6 animals each): rabbits receiving sunitinib and paracetamol (SUN + PC), rabbits receiving sunitinib (SUN), and a control group receiving paracetamol (PC). Sunitinib was administered orally (25 mg) and paracetamol was administrated intravenously (35 mg/kg). Blood samples for sunitinib and SU12662 assays were collected up to 96 h after drug administration and for paracetamol and paracetamol glucuronide up to 300 min after drug administration. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and bilirubin were analysed before and after drug administration. A number of pharmacokinetic parameters were analysed. There were no differences in the levels of AST, ALT, and bilirubin among the groups at either time point. Significantly higher values of AUC0-t , AUC0-∞ , and C max and lower clearance and volume of distribution of paracetamol were observed in group PC vs. group SUN + PC (p < 0.01). The maximum plasma concentration of paracetamol glucuronide tended to be higher in group PC 213.27 µg/mL (90 % CI 1.06, 1.25; p = 0.0267). Statistically significant differences were revealed for paracetamol glucuronide mean residence time (MRT); MRT was higher in group SUN + PC than in group PC (p = 0.0375). The mean t max of paracetamol glucuronide was similar in both groups: SUN + PC and group PC (15 and 20 min, respectively). The mean t max of sunitinib was different in groups SUN + PC and SUN (10.0 and 7.0, respectively; p = 0.0134). At the studied doses, neither of the drugs, whether administered alone or together, had hepatotoxic effects. The present study was not able to confirm that sunitinib, administered at low doses in conjunction with paracetamol, displays a hepatoprotective effect. Significant differences were observed in some pharmacokinetic parameters of paracetamol.

Bidirectional pharmacokinetic drug interactions between olaparib and metformin.

OBJECTIVE: Olaparib is a PARP (poly-ADP-ribose polymerase) inhibitor used for maintenance therapy in BRCA-mutated cancers. Metformin is a first-choice drug used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Both drugs are commonly co-administered to oncologic patients with add-on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Olaparib is metabolized by the CYP3A4 enzyme, which may be inhibited by metformin through the Pregnane X Receptor. In vitro studies have shown that olaparib inhibits the following metformin transporters: OCT1, MATE1, and MATE2K. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of 'the perpetrator drug' on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of 'the victim drug' after a single dose. To evaluate the effect, the AUC0→∞ (area under the curve) ratio was determined (the ratio between AUC0→∞ in the presence of the perpetrator and AUC0→∞ without the presence of the perpetrator). METHODS: Male Wistar rats were assigned to three groups (eight animals in each group), which were orally administered: metformin and olaparib (IMET+OLA), vehiculum with metformin (IIMET), and vehiculum with olaparib (IIIOLA). Blood samples were collected after 24 h. HPLC was applied to measure the concentrations of olaparib and metformin. The PK parameters were calculated in a non-compartmental model. RESULTS: Metformin did not affect the olaparib PK parameters. The AUC0→∞ IMET+OLA/IIIOLA ratio was 0.99. Olaparib significantly increased the metformin Cmax (by 177.8%), AUC0→t (by 159.8%), and AUC0→∞ (by 74.1%). The AUC0→∞ IMET+OLA/IIMET ratio was 1.74. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of metformin did not affect the PK parameters of olaparib, nor did it inhibit the olaparib metabolism, but olaparib significantly changed the metformin pharmacokinetics, which may be of clinical importance.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between regorafenib and atorvastatin in rats.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib is used in the treatment of colorectal cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. Due to the co-morbidity of hyperlipidemia in these conditions, statins, including atorvastatin, are used as potential adjuvant therapy agents. Both regorafenib and atorvastatin are metabolized by CYP3A4. In addition, atorvastatin is a P-gp and BCRP substrate, whereas regorafenib and its active metabolites M-2 and M-5 are inhibitors of these transporters. Hence, the concomitant use of both drugs may increase the risk of a clinically significant drug-drug interaction. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic interactions of atorvastatin and regorafenib and their active metabolites. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were assigned to three groups (eight animals in each) and were orally administered: regorafenib and atorvastatin (IREG+ATO), a carrier with regorafenib (IIREG), and atorvastatin with a carrier (IIIATO). Blood samples were collected for 72 h. UPLC-MS/MS was the method of measurement of regorafenib and atorvastatin concentrations. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with a non-compartmental model. RESULTS: A single administration of atorvastatin increased the exposure to regorafenib and its active metabolites. In the IREG+ATO group, the Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ of regorafenib increased 2.7, 3.2, and 3.2-fold, respectively. Atorvastatin also significantly increased the Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ of both regorafenib metabolites. Regorafenib, in turn, decreased the AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ of 2-OH atorvastatin by 86.9% and 67.3%, and the same parameters of 4-OH atorvastatin by 45.0% and 46.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This animal model study showed a significant pharmacokinetic interaction between regorafenib and atorvastatin. While this interaction may be clinically significant, this needs to be confirmed in clinical trials involving cancer patients.

Stability of calcium folinate (Teva) in concentrate after re-use and in dilute infusions in 0.9% NaCl in polyethylene bags.

The study concerned the stability of calcium folinate in concentrate in glass vials and diluted in polyethylene (PE) bags stored at 15-25 degrees C and 2-8 degrees C for up to 34 days. Original vials of calcium folinate injection (10 mg/mL, Teva) were stored at room and refrigerator temperatures and subjected to re-piercing at 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 22, 28, 30 and 34 days following the initial piercing. Calcium folinate infusions at nominal concentrations of 0.12 mg/mL were prepared in 0.9% sodium chloride (250 mL) in PE bags. Chemical stability was measured with a stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. Physical stability was assessed by visual inspection in normal light. The concentration of calcium folinate at each sampling time in the analyzed solutions remained > 90% of the initial concentration, regardless of the container. No changes in color or turbidity were observed in any of the vials or in the prepared solutions. Calcium folinate, both undiluted in glass containers and diluted with NaCl 0.9% in PE bags, remains stable (< 10% degradation) for at least 30 days at room and refrigerator temperatures when protected from light.

The physical and chemical stability of cisplatin (Teva) in concentrate and diluted in sodium chloride 0.9%.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The subject of study was the stability of cisplatin in concentrate in glass vials and diluted in polyethylene (PE) bags stored at 15-25°C for up to 30 days. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Original vials of cisplatin injection (1 mg/ml, Teva) were stored at room temperature and subjected to re-piercing after 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 30 days following the initial piercing. Cisplatin infusions at nominal concentrations of 0.1 mg/ml were prepared in 0.9% sodium chloride (1000 ml) in PE bags. Chemical stability was measured by means of a stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. Physical stability was assessed by visual inspection in normal light. RESULTS: The concentration of cisplatin at each sampling time in the analysed solutions remained within 92.0-100.7% of initial concentration, regardless of the container. No changes in colour or turbidity were observed in any of the vials or prepared solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin, both undiluted in glass containers and diluted with NaCl 0.9% in PE bags, remains stable (< 10% degradation) for at least 30 days at room temperature when protected from light.

Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Study of Sorafenib and Morphine in Rats.

A combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sorafenib-and the opioid analgesic-morphine-can be found in the treatment of cancer patients. Since both are substrates of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and sorafenib is also an inhibitor of P-gp, their co-administration may affect their pharmacokinetics, and thus the safety and efficacy of cancer therapy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between sorafenib and morphine using an animal model. The rats were divided into three groups that Received: sorafenib and morphine (ISOR+MF), sorafenib (IISOR), and morphine (IIIMF). Morphine caused a significant increase in maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞) of sorafenib by 108.3 (p = 0.003), 55.9 (p = 0.0115), and 62.7% (p = 0.0115), respectively. Also, the Cmax and AUC0-t of its active metabolite-sorafenib N-oxide-was significantly increased in the presence of morphine (p = 0.0022 and p = 0.0268, respectively). Sorafenib, in turn, caused a significant increase in the Cmax of morphine (by 0.5-fold, p = 0.0018). Moreover, in the presence of sorafenib the Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ of the morphine metabolite M3G increased by 112.62 (p < 0.0001), 46.82 (p = 0.0124), and 46.78% (p = 0.0121), respectively. Observed changes in sorafenib and morphine may be of clinical significance. The increased exposure to both drugs may improve the response to therapy in cancer patients, but on the other hand, increase the risk of adverse effects.

The Influence of Paracetamol on the Penetration of Sorafenib and Sorafenib N-Oxide Through the Blood-Brain Barrier in Rats.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sorafenib is an oral, multikinase inhibitor with established single-agent activity in several tumor types. Sorafenib was moderately transported by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and more efficiently by breast cancer resistance protein. The constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor involved in P-gp regulation in the brain microvasculature. Paracetamol is a CAR activator. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of paracetamol on the brain uptake of sorafenib and sorafenib N-oxide. METHODS: The rats were assigned to two groups-rats receiving oral paracetamol 100 mg/kg and sorafenib 100 mg/kg (n = 42, ISR+PA) and rats receiving oral vehicle and sorafenib 100 mg/kg (n = 42, IISR). The sorafenib and sorafenib N-oxide concentrations in blood plasma and brain tissue were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection. Brain-to-plasma partition coefficient (Kp) was calculated as a ratio of the area under the curve from zero to 24 h (AUC) in the brain and plasma. A drug targeting index (DTI) was estimated as the group ISR+PA Kp to group IISR Kp ratio. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed increased brain exposure to sorafenib and sorafenib N-oxide after co-administration of paracetamol. The brain maximum concentration (Cmax) and the AUC of the parent drug in the ISR+PA group compared with the IISR group were greater by 49.5 and 77.8%, respectively, and the same parameters for the metabolite were higher by 51.4 and 50.9%. However, the Kp values of sorafenib and sorafenib N-oxide did not differ significantly between the two animal groups and the DTI values were close to 1. CONCLUSION: Paracetamol increases exposure to sorafenib and sorafenib N-oxide in the brain, likely due to increased exposure in plasma.

In vivo assessment of potential for UGT-inhibition-based drug-drug interaction between sorafenib and tapentadol.

Sorafenib (SR) is one of the most potent UGT (1A1, 1A9) inhibitors (in in vitro tests). The inhibition of UGT1A1 may cause hyperbilirubinaemia, whereas the inhibition of UGT1A9 and 1A1 may result in drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Tapentadol (TAP) is a synthetic µ-opioid agonist and is used to treat moderate to severe acute pain. Tapentadol is highly glucuronidated by the UGT1A9 and UGT2B7 isoenzymes. The aim of the study was to assess the DDI between SR and TAP. Wistar rats were divided into three groups, with eight animals in each. The rats were orally treated with SR (100 mg/kg) or TAP (4.64 mg/kg) or in combination with 100 mg/kg SOR and 4.64 TAP mg/kg. The concentrations of SR and sorafenib N-oxide, TAP and tapentadol glucuronide were respectively measured by means of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet detection and by means of ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The co-administration of TAP with SR caused TAP maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) to increase 5.3-fold whereas its area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) increased 1.5-fold. The tapentadol glucuronide Cmax increased 5.3-fold and whereas its AUC0-∞ increased 2.0-fold. The tapentadol glucuronide/TAP AUC0-∞ ratio increased 1.4-fold (p = 0.0118). TAP also increased SR Cmax 1.9-fold, whereas its AUC0-∞ increased 1.3-fold. The sorafenib N-oxide Cmax increased 1.9-fold whereas its AUC0-∞ increased 1.3-fold. The sorafenib N-oxide/SR AUC0-t ratio increased 1.4-fold (p = 0.0127). The results show that the co-administration of sorafenib and tapentadol increases the exposure to both drugs and changes their metabolism. In consequence, the pharmacological effect may be intensified, but the toxicity may increases, too.

In vivo assessment of the drug interaction between sorafenib and paracetamol in rats.

PURPOSE: Sorafenib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and radioactive iodine resistant thyroid carcinoma. Neoplastic diseases are the cause of pain, which may occur regardless of the stage of the disease. Paracetamol is a non-opioid analgesic used alone or in combination with opioids for the treatment of cancer pain. Numerous studies have pointed out changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of TKIs when co-administered with paracetamol. The aim of the study was to assess drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between sorafenib and paracetamol. METHODS: Rats were divided into three groups, each consisting of eight animals. The first group received sorafenib (IIS), the second group received sorafenib + paracetamol (IS+PA), whereas the third group received only paracetamol (IIIPA). A single dose of sorafenib (100 mg/kg b.w.) and paracetamol (100 mg/kg b.w.) was administered orally. The plasma concentrations of sorafenib and its metabolite-N-oxide as well as paracetamol and its glucuronide and sulphate metabolites were measured using validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with ultraviolet detection. RESULTS: The co-administration of sorafenib and paracetamol increased the maximum concentration (Cmax) of paracetamol by 33% (p = 0.0372). In the IS+ PA group the Cmax of paracetamol glucuronide was reduced by 48% (p = < 0.0001), whereas the Cmax of paracetamol sulphate was higher by 153% (p = 0.0012) than in the IIIPA group. Paracetamol increased sorafenib and sorafenib N-oxide Cmax by 60% (p = 0.0068) and 83% (p = 0.0023), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A greater knowledge of DDI between sorafenib and paracetamol may help adjust dose properly and avoid toxicity effects in individual patients.

The oxidation and hypoglycaemic effect of sorafenib in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes reduces the activity of CYP3A4 and may increase the exposure for the drugs metabolized by the isoenzyme. Sorafenib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), used for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and radioactive iodine resistant thyroid carcinoma. The TKI undergoes CYP3A4-dependent oxidative transformation, which may be influenced by hyperglycaemia. The aim of the study was to compare the oxidation for sorafenib between healthy and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Additionally, the effect of sorafenib on glucose levels was investigated. METHODS: The rats were assigned to the groups: streptozotocin-induced diabetic (DG, n = 8) or healthy (HG, n = 8). The rats received sorafenib orally as a single dose of 100 mg/kg. The plasma concentrations of sorafenib and its metabolite N-oxide were measured with the validated high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. RESULTS: The difference between groups in Cmax and AUC0-t values for sorafenib were significant (p = 0.0004, p = 0.0104), and similarly for the metabolite (p = 0.0008, p = 0.0011). Greater exposure for the parent drug and analysed metabolite was achieved in diabetic group. However, the Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ ratios between the metabolite and sorafenib were similar in both groups. The significant reduction of glycaemia was observed only in the diabetic animals. CONCLUSION: The findings of the study provide evidence that diabetes significantly influence on the exposition for sorafenib and its metabolite, but similar ratios N-oxide/sorafenib for AUC and Cmax in healthy and diabetic animals suggest that oxidation of the TKI is rather unchanged. Additionally, sorafenib-associated hypoglycaemia was confirmed in diabetic animals.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Sorafenib and Atorvastatin, and Sorafenib and Metformin in Rats.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib is the first-line treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in which hyperlipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may often coexist. Protein transporters like organic cation (OCT) and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) are involved in the response to sorafenib, as well as in that to the anti-diabetic drug metformin or atorvastatin, used in hyperlipidemia. Changes in the activity of these transporters may lead to pharmacokinetic interactions, which are of clinical significance. The study aimed to assess the sorafenib-metformin and sorafenib-atorvastatin interactions in rats. The rats were divided into five groups (eight animals in each) that received sorafenib and atorvastatin (ISOR+AT), sorafenib and metformin (IISOR+MET), sorafenib (IIISOR), atorvastatin (IVAT), and metformin (VMET). Atorvastatin significantly increased the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of sorafenib by 134.4% (p < 0.0001) and 66.6% (p < 0.0001), respectively. Sorafenib, in turn, caused a significant increase in the AUC of atorvastatin by 94.0% (p = 0.0038) and its metabolites 2-hydroxy atorvastatin (p = 0.0239) and 4-hydroxy atorvastatin (p = 0.0002) by 55.3% and 209.4%, respectively. Metformin significantly decreased the AUC of sorafenib (p = 0.0065). The AUC ratio (IISOR+MET group/IIISOR group) for sorafenib was equal to 0.6. Sorafenib did not statistically significantly influence the exposure to metformin. The pharmacokinetic interactions observed in this study may be of clinical relevance in HCC patients with coexistent hyperlipidemia or T2DM.

The Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Glucuronidation and Sulphation of Paracetamol in Patients with Febrile Neutropenia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Numerous studies have confirmed the influence of diabetes mellitus on the pharmacokinetics of drugs. Paracetamol (APAP) is an antipyretic that is commonly used in febrile neutropenia (FN) therapy. APAP is chiefly metabolised by glucuronidation and sulphation. This study assessed the influence of diabetes on the pharmacokinetics of paracetamol and its metabolites: glucuronide (APAP-glu) and sulfate (APAP-sulfate) in FN patients. METHODS: Patients with FN received single intravenous dose 1000 mg of APAP. The FN patients were allocated to one of two groups: diabetics (DG, n = 7) or non-diabetics (NDG, n = 11). The plasma concentrations of paracetamol and its metabolites were measured with the validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) detection. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters (mean [SD]) of APAP in the DG and NDG groups were as follows: Cmax (maximum comcentration) = 21.50 [11.23] vs. 23.42 [9.79] mg/L, AUC0-t (area under the concentration-time curve) = 44.23 [17.93] vs. 41.43 [14.57] mg·h/L, t1/2kel (elimination half-life) = 2.28 [0.80] vs. 2.11 [0.80] h. In both groups the exposure to APAP was comparable. The study did not reveal differences between the two groups in the pharmacokinetics of APAP-glu and APAP-sulfate. The Cmax and AUC0-t ratio between the metabolites and APAP were similar. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in the pharmacokinetics of APAP, APAP-glu and APAP-sulfate in patients with FN indicates that diabetes does not influence glucuronidation and sulfatation of paracetamol.

A pharmacokinetic study on lapatinib in type 2 diabetic rats.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex metabolic disorder which affects the function of numerous tissues and alters the pharmacokinetic parameters of many drugs. As many oncological patients are diabetics, it is important to determine the influence of this chronic disease on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of anticancer drugs. Lapatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. The aim of the study was to compare the PK of lapatinib in normal and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) model rats. Additionally, the effect of lapatinib on blood glucose concentrations was examined. METHODS: The PK of lapatinib was studied in healthy rats (n=6, the healthy group) and T2DM model rats (n=6, the diabetic group). The rats received lapatinib orally as a single dose of 50mg. Plasma concentrations of lapatinib were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography method coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The plasma concentrations of lapatinib were increased in the T2DM model rats. There were statistically significant differences between the groups in Cmax (p=0.0104) and AUC0-t (p=0.0265). The reduction of glycaemia in the range of 1.2-41.5% and in the range of 4.1-36.8% was observed in the diabetic and healthy animals, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Higher concentrations of lapatinib in the diabetic rats may suggest the need for application of lower doses of this TKI in patients with DM.

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between erlotinib and paracetamol: A potential risk for clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Erlotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor available for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Paracetamol is an analgesic agent, commonly used in cancer patients. Because these drugs are often co-administered, there is an increasing issue of interaction between them. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of paracetamol on the pharmacokinetic parameters of erlotinib, as well as the influence of erlotinib on the pharmacokinetics of paracetamol. METHODS: The rabbits were divided into three groups: the rabbits receiving erlotinib (IER), the group receiving paracetamol (IIPR), and the rabbits receiving erlotinib+paracetamol (IIIER+PR). A single dose of erlotinib was administered orally (25mg) and was administered intravenously (35mg/kg). Plasma concentrations of erlotinib, its metabolite (OSI420), paracetamol and its metabolites - glucuronide and sulphate were measured with the validated method. RESULTS: During paracetamol co-administration we observed increased erlotinib maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) by 87.7% and 31.1%, respectively. In turn, erlotinib lead to decreased paracetamol AUC0-∞ by 35.5% and Cmax by 18.9%. The mean values of paracetamol glucuronide/paracetamol ratios for Cmax were 32.2% higher, whereas paracetamol sulphate/paracetamol ratios for Cmax and AUC0-∞ were 37.1% and 57.1% lower in the IIPR group, when compared to the IIIER+PR group. CONCLUSIONS: Paracetamol had significant effect on the enhanced plasma exposure of erlotinib. Additionally, erlotinib contributed to the lower concentrations of paracetamol. Decreased glucuronidation and increased sulphation of paracetamol after co-administration of erlotinib were also observed.

Influence of the Time of Intravenous Administration of Paracetamol on its Pharmacokinetics and Ocular Disposition in Rabbits.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Paracetamol is one of the most common analgesics and antipyretics applied in health care. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of the time-of-day administration on the paracetamol pharmacokinetics and its penetration into aqueous humour (AH). METHODS: Rabbits were divided into three groups: I-receiving paracetamol at 08.00 h, II-receiving paracetamol at 16.00 h, and III-receiving paracetamol at 24.00 h. Paracetamol was administered intravenously at a single dose of 35 mg/kg. The concentrations of paracetamol and its metabolite (paracetamol glucuronide) in the plasma, as well as in AH were measured with the validated HPLC-UV method. RESULTS: No significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of paracetamol was observed. When the drug was administered at 24.00 h,  elimination half-life (t 1/2kel) of paracetamol glucuronide was longer than when the drug was administered 08.00 h (P = 0.0193). In addition, a statistically significant increase in the paracetamol glucuronide/paracetamol ratio was observed when the drug was administered at 08.00 vs. 16.00 h (P ≤ 0.0001) and 24.00 h (P ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There was no chronobiological effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of paracetamol.

The pharmacokinetics of oral ketoprofen in patients after gastric resection.

BACKGROUND: Total and partial gastric resection may affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs, especially orally administered a few days after surgery. Ketoprofen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) broadly used to treat postoperative pain, including patients after gastric resection. The aim of the research was to analyse the pharmacokinetics (PK) of orally administered ketoprofen in patients after gastrectomy. METHODS: The research was carried out on two groups of patients after total (TG; Roux-Y procedure) and partial (PG; Billroth II procedure) gastrectomy. The patients in group TG (n=15; mean [SD] age 61.86 [14.15] years; and BMI 24.20 [3.73] kg/m2) and group PG (n=5; mean [SD] age 62.40 [16.80] years; and BMI 23.98 [3.45] kg/m2) received ketoprofen in a single oral dose of 100mg. The measurement of ketoprofen plasma concentrations was made by means of the HPLC (high performance liquid chromatography) method. RESULTS: The PK parameters in group TG and PG were as follows: maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), 3.42 [0.99] and 4.66 [0.81] mg/l (p=0.0220); area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), 9.12 [2.78] and 9.17 [2.87] mg×h/ml (p=0.9734); area under the first moment curve from zero to the time of infinity (AUMC0-∞), 25.95 [8.52] and 26.53 [11.43] mg×h2/l (p=0.9056); time to reach maximum concentration (tmax), 0.47 [0.25] and 0.55 [0.27] h (p=0.5327), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lower concentrations of ketoprofen in patients after gastrectomy suggest that it might be necessary to apply higher dose of the analgesic.