Racial and ethnic differences in type II endometrial cancer mortality outcomes: The contribution of sociodemographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment factors.

OBJECTIVE: The burden of type II endometrial cancer (EC) is rising dramatically in the U.S. Although type II EC disproportionately affects Black women, the magnitude of racial/ethnic differences in type II EC mortality outcomes and factors underlying these differences remain understudied. We examined racial/ethnic differences in cancer-specific and overall mortality in women with type II EC and quantified the extent to which mortality differences are mediated by sociodemographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment factors. METHODS: 14,710 women ≥18 years with type II EC from 2007 to 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The association between race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White [NHW], non-Hispanic Black [NHB], Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander [NHAPI]) and cancer-specific and overall mortality was examined. Mediation analysis was used to identify factors underlying differences in mortality outcomes. RESULTS: NHB women had a higher risk of cancer-specific mortality than NHW women (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.12-1.33), whereas NHAPI (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.99) and Hispanic women (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.81-1.01) had a lower risk of cancer-specific mortality than NHW women. Differences in clinicopathologic (stage, grade, histologic subtype), sociodemographic (insurance type, geographic region and location, neighborhood socioeconomic status), and treatment factors (treatment type, lymphadenectomy) explained 43.5%, 8.1%, and 7.3% of the difference in cancer-specific mortality between NHB and NHW women, respectively. Similar results were noted for overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary and multilevel approaches that integrate and address social and biological factors are needed to reduce the disproportionate burden of type II EC mortality in NHB women.

Racial and ethnic differences in the adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians in the United States have rapidly adopted opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. However, little is known about racial and ethnic differences in opportunistic salpingectomy adoption. Surgical innovations in gynecology may be adopted differentially across racial and ethnic groups, exacerbating current disparities in quality of care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate racial and ethnic differences in opportunistic salpingectomy adoption across inpatient and outpatient settings and assess the effect of national guidelines supporting opportunistic salpingectomy use on these differences. STUDY DESIGN: A sample of 650,905 women aged 18 to 50 years undergoing hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or surgical sterilization from 2011 to 2018 was identified using the Premier Healthcare Database, an all-payer hospital administrative database, including more than 700 hospitals across the United States. The association between race and ethnicity and opportunistic salpingectomy use was examined using multivariable-adjusted mixed-effects log-binomial regression models accounting for hospital-level clustering. Models included race and ethnicity by year of surgery (2011-2013 [before guideline] and 2014-2018 [after guideline]) interaction term to test whether racial and ethnic differences in opportunistic salpingectomy adoption changed with the release of national guidelines supporting opportunistic salpingectomy use. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 82,792 women underwent hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy (non-Hispanic White, 60.3%; non-Hispanic Black, 18.8%; Hispanic, 12.2%; non-Hispanic other race, 8.7%) and 23,398 women underwent opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization (non-Hispanic White, 64.7%; non-Hispanic Black, 10.8%; Hispanic, 16.7%; non-Hispanic other race, 7.8%). The proportion of hysterectomy procedures involving an opportunistic salpingectomy increased from 6.3% in 2011 to 59.7% in 2018 (9.5-fold increase), and the proportion of sterilization procedures involving an opportunistic salpingectomy increased from 0.7% in 2011 to 19.4% in 2018 (27.7-fold increase). In multivariable-adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black (risk ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.97), Hispanic (risk ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.00), and non-Hispanic other race women (risk ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.96) were less likely to undergo hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy than non-Hispanic White women. A significant interaction between race and ethnicity and year of surgery was noted in non-Hispanic Black compared with non-Hispanic White women (P<.001), with a reduction in differences in hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy use after national guideline release (risk ratio2011-2013, 0.80 [95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.88]; risk ratio2014-2018, 0.98 [95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.01]). Moreover, non-Hispanic Black women were less likely to undergo an opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization than non-Hispanic White women (risk ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.95), with no difference by year of surgery (P=.62). Stratified analyses by hysterectomy route and age at surgery revealed similar results. CONCLUSION: Although opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention has been rapidly adopted in the United States, our findings suggested that its adoption has not been equitable across racial and ethnic groups. Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic other race women were less likely to undergo opportunistic salpingectomy than non-Hispanic White women even after adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, procedural, hospital, and provider characteristics. These differences persisted after the release of national guidelines supporting opportunistic salpingectomy use. Future research should focus on understanding the reasons for these differences to inform interventions that promote equity in opportunistic salpingectomy use.

Brigham and Women's Hospital tumor classification system for basal cell carcinoma identifies patients with risk of metastasis and death.

BACKGROUND: Despite approximately 4400 locally advanced US cases annually, high-stage basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is ill-defined. OBJECTIVE: To develop a tumor (T) staging system for BCC that will predict metastasis/death and compare its performance with that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition (AJCC8) T-staging system. METHODS: Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) T staging was developed from a previously published nested cohort of 488 primary BCCs. Tumors were staged via BWH and AJCC8 T-staging systems, and predictions of metastasis and/or death were compared. RESULTS: The BWH and AJCC8 T-staging systems both captured all metastases/deaths in high T stages (BWH, T2; AJCC8, T3/T4). BWH T2 included 54% fewer cases ≥2 cm than AJCC8 T3/T4. BWH had a higher specificity (0.92 vs 0.80; P < .001) and positive predictive value (24% vs 11%, P < .001) for identifying cases at risk for metastasis/death, and the C-statistic was superior for BWH (P < .001). The BWH T2 10-year cumulative incidence of metastasis/death was 37% (95% confidence interval, 21%-60%). LIMITATIONS: Two-center cohort. CONCLUSIONS: BWH and AJCC 8 BCC staging both capture all metastases and deaths in the upper stages. However, BWH staging does so in half the number of cases, thus minimizing inappropriate up-staging. The risk of metastasis or death in BWH T2 BCC is sufficient to warrant surveillance for recurrence and clinical trials of adjuvant therapy.

Detection of subclinical disease with baseline and surveillance imaging in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: There are limited studies on imaging for management of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HRCSSC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of baseline (ie, at diagnosis) and surveillance (ie, subsequent time points after diagnosis) imaging on management of HRCSCCs. METHODS: All primary CSSCs treated at Brigham and Women's Hospital Mohs Surgery Clinic and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute High-Risk Skin Cancer Clinic from January 1, 2017 through June 1, 2019, were reviewed to identify tumors that underwent baseline or surveillance imaging. Tumors that underwent imaging were reviewed to determine the impact of imaging on management and ability of imaging to identify subclinical disease. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients underwent imaging for 87 primary HRCSCCs, of which 48 (58%) underwent surveillance imaging. A total of 146 (59%) abnormal results were obtained from 248 imaging studies. Management was altered by 42 (24%) studies. Imaging detected subclinical disease in 21% of cases studied. A majority (56%) of detections were not seen initially but rather during surveillance imaging in the 2 years after treatment. LIMITATIONS: Single institution retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging identifies subclinical disease in HRCSCC. Prospective studies are needed to determine best practices for screening and surveillance in HRCSCC.

Factors predictive of recurrence, metastasis, and death from primary basal cell carcinoma 2 cm or larger in diameter.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) recurrence and metastatic rates are known to be very low. The risk factors for these rare outcomes are subsequently not well studied. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors independently associated with local recurrence (LR) and metastasis and/or death (M/D) in large (≥2 cm) BCC. METHODS: BCCs histologically confirmed between 2000 and 2009 were retrospectively screened for tumor diameter at 2 academic centers. Medical records of all large BCCs and an equal number of randomly selected small BCCs were reviewed for LR and M/D. RESULTS: Included were 248 large BCC and 248 small BCC tumors. Large BCCs had a significantly higher risk of LR and M/D than small BCCs (LR: 8.9% vs 0.8%, P < .001; M/D: 6.5% vs. 0%, P < .001). Because the risks were so low in small BCCs, they were excluded from further analysis. On multivariable logistic regression, head/neck location (odds ratio [OR], 9.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-31.3) and depth beyond fat (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.0-9.6) were associated with LR in large BCCs. Risk of LR was lower with Mohs micrographic surgery (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.5). Head/neck location (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.2-23.2), tumor diameter ≥4 cm (OR, 11.9; 95% CI, 2.4-59.4), and depth beyond fat (OR, 28.6; 95% CI, 6.7-121) were significant predictors of M/D in large BCCs. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective cohort design. CONCLUSIONS: Large BCCs, particularly those with additional risk factors, have a high enough risk of recurrence and metastasis to warrant further investigation to optimize management.

Evaluation of AJCC and an Alternative Tumor Classification System for Primary Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Background: Currently, no studies have attempted to validate the AJCC tumor (T) class for vulvar cancer or examine its performance via clinical data. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors associated with poor outcomes in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (vSCC) and compare prognostic discrimination of these outcomes between the AJCC T-classification system and the newly developed Brigham and Women's Vulvar Tumor Classification system (BWVTC). Methods: A 15-year, 2-center retrospective cohort study of primary vSCCs (N=226) was undertaken. Risk factors for poor outcomes, including local recurrence (LR), nodal and distant metastasis (NM and DM, respectively), disease-specific death (DSD), and overall death (OD) were determined using competing risks models. Poor outcomes were analyzed by T stage with regard to each classification system's distinctiveness, homogeneity, and monotonicity. Results: AJCC T stages were indistinct, with overlapping 95% confidence intervals for 10-year cumulative incidences of poor outcomes. Most poor outcomes occurred in low AJCC T stages: T1a/T1b contained 77% of LR, 79% of NM, 66% of DM/DSD, and 78% of OD, indicating poor homogeneity and monotonicity. Five risk factors were independent predictors of poor outcomes: history of lichen sclerosus, tumor diameter ≥2.0 cm, tumor depth ≥3.0 mm, poor differentiation, and mucosal involvement, and these were used to develop the BWVTC (BWVTC BWT1 = 0 risk factors; BWT2 = 1 risk factor; BWT3 = 2 risk factors; and BWT4 = ≥3 risk factors). The BWVTC displayed superior homogeneity and monotonicity, with most poor outcomes occurring in high T stages: T3/T4 contained 87% of LR, 92% of NM, 91% of DM/DSD, and 78% of OD (P<.001), although not all T stages were statistically distinct in this small cohort. Conclusions: The BWVTC offers improved prognostic discrimination over the AJCC T-classification system. Validation in population-based cohorts and in vulvar cancers other than SCC is needed.

A comparison of skin cancer screening and treatment costs at a Massachusetts cancer center, 2008 versus 2013.

BACKGROUND: Temporal analyses of skin cancer costs are needed to examine how expenditure differences between diagnoses are changing. OBJECTIVE: To tabulate the costs of skin cancer-related care (SCRC), including both screening and treatment, at an academic cancer center at 2 time points. METHODS: Cost data (insurance and patient payments) at an academic cancer center from 2008 and 2013 were queried for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes pertaining to skin cancer. Screening costs were separated from treatment costs through associated Current Procedural Terminology codes. RESULTS: The total annual cost of SCRC increased by 64%, the number of patients receiving SCRC increased by 45%, and the mean cost per patient treated increased by 13%. Screening accounted for 17% and 16% of total annual costs in 2008 and 2013, respectively. The mean cost per patient with melanoma increased by 84%, which was the largest increase among skin cancer diagnoses. In 2013, the few patients with melanoma who were treated with ipilimumab (n = 48 [4% of patients with melanoma]) accounted for 42% of melanoma treatment costs and 20% of SCRC costs. LIMITATIONS: Prescription costs were unavailable. CONCLUSIONS: Melanoma costs have increased as a result of the introduction of ipilimumab. Ongoing studies are needed to monitor the cost-effectiveness of SCRC at a national level.

Impact of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines on Case Selection and Outcomes for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommended sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for thin melanomas ≤1 mm with mitotic rate (MR) ≥1. In 2016, the criteria were changed to Breslow depth >0.75 mm and MR ≥1. OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of 2010 and 2016 NCCN guidelines on SLNB case selection and thin melanoma outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten-year retrospective cohort of primary thin melanomas at an academic hospital was retroactively stratified for SLNB eligibility using the 2010 and 2016 NCCN guidelines. Nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared. RESULTS: Eight hundred two patients with 859 tumors and median follow-up of 79 months were included. Eleven percent fewer tumors qualified for SLNB under 2016 versus 2010 NCCN guidelines (19% vs 8%, p < .001). The 2016-qualifying cases also had lower 10-year NRFS (70.7% vs 95.2%, p < .001) and DFS (64.7% vs 91.4%, p < .001). Among 2016-qualifying cases, those that received SLNB had improved NRFS (85.6% vs 35.3%, p = .001) and DFS (80.2% vs 30.5%, p < .001) as compared to those that did not receive SLNB. CONCLUSION: The 2016 NCCN guidelines reduced the number of thin melanomas qualifying for SLNB and more accurately selected cases with higher risks of nodal recurrence and death.

The positive impact of radiologic imaging on high-stage cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma management.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on the utility of radiologic imaging for prognostic staging of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). OBJECTIVE: Review utilization of radiologic imaging of high-stage CSCCs to evaluate whether imaging impacted management and outcomes. METHODS: Tumors classified as Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) tumor (T) stage T2B or T3 over a 13-year period were reviewed to identify whether imaging was performed and whether results affected treatment. Disease-related outcomes (DRO: local recurrence, nodal metastasis, death from disease) were compared between patients by type of imaging used. RESULTS: 108 high-stage CSCCs in 98 patients were included. Imaging (mostly computed tomography, 79%) was utilized in 45 (46%) patients and management was altered in 16 (33%) patients who underwent imaging. Patients that received no imaging were at higher risk of developing nodal metastases (nonimaging, 30%; imaging, 13%; P = .041) and any DRO (nonimaging, 42%; imaging, 20%; P = .028) compared to the imaging group. Imaging was associated with a lower risk for DRO (subhazard ratio, 0.5; 95% CI 0.2-0.9; P = .046) adjusted for BWH T stage, sex, and location. LIMITATIONS: Single institution retrospective design and changes in technology overtime. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologic imaging of high-stage CSCC may influence management and appears to positively impact outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to establish which patients benefit from imaging.

Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction of Primary Epidermally Limited Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epidermally limited nonmelanoma skin cancer (ELNMSC) (superficial basal cell carcinoma [SBCC] and squamous cell carcinoma in situ [SCCIS]) is common. Data on outcomes and patient satisfaction are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To examine treatment efficacy and satisfaction in ELNMSC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adults with primary SBCC or SCCIS. A 25% random subset completed a satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Five hundred and fifty patients with 227 SBCC and 451 SCCIS were included; 329 tumors (49%) were treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and 349 (51%) with non-MMS (imiquimod [n = 26], 5% 5-fluorouracil [n = 234], ingenol mebutate [n = 32], or cryotherapy [n = 57]). Five-year recurrence-free survival was high in both groups, with MMS having a small but statistically significant advantage (99% vs 95%, p = .004). More MMS patients were willing to undergo treatment again (97% vs 86%, p = .024). Dissatisfaction was mostly due to prolonged treatment course and pain associated with non-MMS treatments. CONCLUSION: Surgical and nonsurgical treatments for primary ELNMSC have low recurrence rates, though cure rate and patient satisfaction are higher with MMS. Treatment choice for epidermal NMSC may be guided through patient preferences regarding ability to comply with topical treatment, out-of-pocket costs, desire to treat surrounding field disease, and desire to avoid a surgical scar.

A quantitative systematic review of the efficacy of imiquimod monotherapy for lentigo maligna and an analysis of factors that affect tumor clearance.

BACKGROUND: The reported efficacy of imiquimod for lentigo maligna varies widely, without consensus on tumor or treatment factors that can impact tumor clearance. OBJECTIVE: We sought to provide a more precise estimate of clearance rates in patients with lentigo maligna who are treated with imiquimod and to analyze factors that can impact tumor clearance. METHODS: We performed a literature search for biopsy-proven lentigo maligna treated with imiquimod monotherapy, linked treatment and outcome data to individual tumors, calculated histologic and clinical clearance rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and analyzed the impact of tumor and treatment factors on tumor clearance using logistic regression. RESULTS: Based on 347 tumors from 45 studies, histologic and clinical clearance rates were 76.2% (95% CI, 71.4-81.0%) and 78.3% (95% CI, 73.6-82.9%), respectively. The incidence of clinical recurrence was 2.3% (95% CI, 0.5-4.2%), with a mean follow-up of 34.2 ± 11.8 months. Treatment with >60 total applications, or with >5 applications per week was associated with a higher likelihood of histologic clearance (odds ratio, 8.4 [95% CI, 2.9-24.1] and odds ratio, 6.0 [95% CI, 2.4-14.7], respectively). LIMITATIONS: Our limitations included the accuracy and scope of published data, variable follow-up times, potential patient selection, and publication bias related to case series/cohort designs of previous studies. CONCLUSION: Imiquimod offers a 76% histologic and 78% clinical clearance rate for lentigo maligna. Both cumulative dose and treatment intensity affect tumor clearance.

A systematic review of outcome data for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with and without fibrosarcomatous change.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no systematic review of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) outcomes based on the presence or absence of fibrosarcomatous (FS) change has been performed. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare available outcome data for DFSP versus DFSP-FS. METHODS: The literature was searched for DFSP and DFSP-FS reports with outcome data (local recurrence, metastasis, or death from disease). Chi-square tests were calculated to determine whether DFSP and DFSP-FS significantly differed in risk of local recurrence, metastasis, and death from disease. RESULTS: In all, 24 reports containing 1422 patients with DFSP and 225 with DFSP-FS are summarized. Risk of local recurrence, metastasis, and death from disease in DFSP-FS was significantly higher as compared with DFSP (local recurrence 29.8% vs 13.7%, risk ratio 2.2 [95% confidence interval 1.7-2.9]; metastasis 14.4% vs 1.1%, risk ratio 5.5 [95% confidence interval 4.3-7.0]; and death from disease 14.7% vs 0.8%, risk ratio 6.2 [95% confidence interval 5.0-7.8]). There was no significant difference in DFSP-FS outcomes based on proportion of FS change within tumors. LIMITATIONS: This study is based on previously reported data from different hospitals with no uniform process for reporting FS change. The impact of confounders (age, immune status, tumor location, treatment) could not be evaluated because of limited data. CONCLUSION: Based on available retrospective data, risk of metastasis and death is elevated in DFSP-FS as compared with DFSP. Even a low degree of FS involvement portends worse outcomes.

The Z-advancement flap for reconstruction of lateral nasal tip and medial alar defects.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of lateral nasal tip and medial alar defects is challenging. Contour, symmetry, and skin texture of the nose, along with adequate nasal airway patency, should be preserved. The Z-advancement flap is a novel reconstruction technique designed for optimal cosmesis and function. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the aesthetic and functional outcomes of Z-advancement flap nasal reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients with defects 1 cm or less in diameter on the lateral nasal tip or medial ala underwent Z-advancement flap repair. Patients completed a survey assessing cosmesis and airway patency. Three physicians evaluated standardized photographs on visibility of scar lines, erythema and telangiectasia, and contour and symmetry of the ala and nostril opening. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (96%) patients completed survey questionnaires. All patients were satisfied with the look and feel of their reconstructed nose. Twenty-four (86%) saw no visible scar or abnormality. Postoperative photographs were available for review in 19 (66%) patients. In 95% to 96% of physician ratings, scars were invisible or visible only on close inspection, and alar symmetry was unchanged or only slightly altered. In 88%, nostril opening symmetry was unchanged or slightly altered. CONCLUSIONS: The Z-advancement flap preserves aesthetic subunits of the nose to produce excellent cosmesis and patient satisfaction for defects of the lateral nasal tip or medial ala 1 cm or less in diameter.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: estimated incidence of disease, nodal metastasis, and deaths from disease in the United States, 2012.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that over 700,000 new cases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) are diagnosed annually in the United States. However, CSCC has been excluded from national cancer registries. Thus the precise incidence of CSCC, along with metastases and deaths resulting from it, is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the 2012 incidence of invasive (non-in situ) CSCC and the number of nodal metastases and deaths arising from it in the US white population. METHODS: US studies reporting incidence of CSCC, or the number of nodal metastases or deaths arising from it, were reviewed. Linear regression was used to estimate current CSCC incidence based on available incidence data adjusting for higher reported incidences in southern versus northern/central United States. Reported risks of nodal metastases and death from CSCC were averaged. Averages were used to estimate current metastasis and death rates based on incidence estimates. The number of estimated CSCC deaths was compared against deaths from other cancers. RESULTS: It is estimated that 186,157 to 419,543 whites were given a diagnosis of CSCC, 5604 to 12,572 developed nodal metastasis, and 3932 to 8791 died from CSCC in the United States in 2012. LIMITATIONS: The estimates of the 2012 incidence, nodal metastasis, and death from invasive CSCC are based on previous estimates of incidence and outcomes of CSCC. CONCLUSION: CSCC is an underrecognized health issue. In the central and southern United States, deaths from CSCC may be as common as deaths from renal and oropharyngeal carcinomas, and melanoma. Population-based studies reporting CSCC incidence and outcomes are required to verify these estimates.

Cancer-Specific Mortality in Asian American Women Diagnosed with Gynecologic Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is the leading cause of death in Asian Americans (AA), the fastest-growing U.S. population group. Despite heterogeneity in socioeconomic status and health behaviors by ethnicity, few studies have assessed cancer outcomes across AA ethnic groups. We examined differences in gynecologic cancer mortality between AA ethnic groups and non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified ovarian (n = 69,113), uterine (n = 157,340), and cervical cancer cases (n = 41,460) diagnosed from 1991-2016. Competing risk regression was used to compare cancer-specific mortality for AAs by ethnicity, using NHW as the reference population. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, AAs had a lower risk of ovarian [HR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-0.94] and cervical cancer death (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.87) than NHWs, with stronger associations among those ≥50 years at diagnosis [(HRovary, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.92); (HRcervix, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67-0.81)]. No overall difference was noted for uterine cancer death (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.10); however, AAs <50 years at diagnosis had a higher risk of uterine cancer death than NHWs (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.46). Patterns of cancer mortality were heterogeneous, with Filipino and Chinese women at the highest risk of uterine cancer death and Indian/Pakistani women at the lowest risk of ovarian and cervical cancer death. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in gynecologic cancer mortality between AAs and NHWs, with heterogeneity by AA ethnicity. IMPACT: Disaggregated analysis of AA is needed to better understand the burden of gynecologic cancer and identify high-risk groups for cancer prevention efforts.