Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 6(3): 504-12, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23588627

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We considered the role of programmed ventricular stimulation in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in an idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy population. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty-eight patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent programmed ventricular stimulation. Ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation was triggered in 44 patients (group I, 27.8%) versus 114 patients (group II), where ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation was not induced. Sixty-nine patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation: 41/44 in group I and 28/114 in group II. The major end points of the study were overall mortality and appropriate ICD activation. Overall mortality during the 46.9 months of mean follow-up was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% (n=119) demonstrated a higher overall mortality rate compared with the patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >35% (n=39; 16.8% versus 10.3%, log-rank P=0.025). Advanced New York Heart Association class (III and IV versus I and II) was the single independent and strongest prognostic factor of overall mortality (hazard ratio, 11.909; P<0.001; confidence interval, 3.106-45.65), as well as of cardiac mortality (hazard ratio, 14.787; P=0.001; confidence interval, 2.958-73.922). Among ICD recipients, ICD activation rate was significantly higher in group I compared with group II (30 of 41 patients-73.2% versus 5 of 28 patients-17.9%; log-rank P=0.001), either in the form of antitachycardia pacing (68.3% versus 17.9%; log-rank P=0.001) or in the shock delivery form (51.2% versus 17.9%; log-rank P=0.05). Induction of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation during programmed ventricular stimulation in contrast to left ventricular ejection fraction was the single independent prognostic factor for future ICD activation (hazard ratio, 4.195; P=0.007; confidence interval, 1.467-11.994). CONCLUSIONS: Inducibility of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation was associated with an increased likelihood of subsequent ICD activation and sudden cardiac death surrogate.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/complicações , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/terapia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Taquicardia Ventricular/complicações , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento , Fibrilação Ventricular/complicações , Fibrilação Ventricular/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA