RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is evidence that the financial crisis has deleteriously affected scientific output. We aimed to assess the dynamics of Greek publications in gastroenterology and hepatology over the last ten years. METHODS: Data were collected from SCImago. The average annual growth rate (AAGR) of total and citable documents published in Greece in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology was compared with that of cardiology, surgery, and radiology. In addition, it was compared with the corresponding rates in Belgium, Ireland and Portugal. RESULTS: The annual number of Greek publications (total and citable documents) remained relatively unchanged in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology from 2006-2011. During the following years, we detected a negative AAGR, with values of -12%, -3.3%, -9.5% and -5.4% for gastroenterology-hepatology, cardiology, surgery and radiology, respectively. During the same period, the AAGR of the citable documents of the respective specialties was -8.6%, -3.7%, -9.8%, and -5.1%. Comparison of the 4 European countries in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology revealed that publications from Portugal rose massively (AAGR +24.6% and +20.6% for total and citable documents, respectively), almost reaching the number of Greek publications in 2015. The number of publications from Belgium and Ireland remained essentially unchanged after 2011, with AAGR values of -0.7%, and -2.1% for total and -1.1% and -1.4% for citable documents, respectively. CONCLUSION: The publication output in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology decreased significantly after the outbreak of the financial crisis in Greece, not only in relation to other medical specialties, but also compared to the output of other European countries with or without fiscal austerity measures.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We monitor colonoscopy service quality biannually, by measuring sedation administration, colonoscopy completion, adenoma detection and early complications rates (CR). We herein present our audit results for the years 2013 and 2015. METHODS: In our endoscopy facility, five rotating senior gastroenterologists perform colonoscopies, on a daily basis. We measured the quality indicators in three cohorts: A, intention for total colonoscopy cases; B, cohort A excluding bowel obstruction cases; C, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening cases. RESULTS: In 2015, overall sedation administration rate (SAR) was 93.0% (91.6-94.4%), achieving our target to give conscious sedation to >90% of patients undergoing colonoscopy in all three cohorts. Colonoscopy completion rate (CCR) increased significantly (P<0.0001) from 94.8% (93.4-96.2%) to 98.1% (97.3-98.9%) in cohort B and numerically from 96.6% (94.4-98.8%) to 98.6% (97.4-99.7%) in cohort C, at the same periods. In cohort C, adenoma detection rates (ADR) were similar-27.1% (21.7-32.5%) and 27% (22.7-31.3%)-in the two periods. There were only two serious early complications: one cardiorespiratory event and one perforation in 2013 and 2015, respectively. While significant variability regarding SAR (ranging from 80% to 100%) was detected among the participating endoscopists, all but one of them constantly achieved [judged by the lower confidence interval (CI) of the quality indicator] CCRs higher than the recommended by international guidelines. On the contrary ADR was variable among endoscopists during the studied periods. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is certain variability in endoscopists' performance, the overall colonoscopy quality indicators meet or exceed the internationally recommended standards, in our endoscopy facility.