A qualitative exploration of health care workers' approaches to relational harm reduction in HIV primary care settings.

BACKGROUND: Structural harm reduction is an approach to care for people who use drugs (PWUD) that incorporates services and resources (e.g., naloxone, sterile syringes). As conceptualized in our previous research, harm reduction is also "relational," encompassing a patient-provider relationship that is non-judgmental and respectful of patients' autonomy. Little is known about health care workers' (HCW) knowledge or attitudes towards harm reduction beyond structural strategies, whose availability and legality vary across geographical settings. To operationalize how relational harm reduction is both characterized and employed in HIV care settings, where nearly half of patients have a diagnosed substance use disorder, we qualitatively explored HCWs' knowledge of and use of harm reduction via individual in-depth interviews. METHODS: Our study sample included three HIV clinics, one in Birmingham, Alabama (AL) and two in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (PA). We conducted individual interviews with n = 23 health care workers via Zoom, using a semi-structured interview guide to probe for questions around health care workers' attitudes towards and experiences with providing care to PWH who use drugs and their knowledge of and attitudes towards relational and structural harm reduction. Data was analyzed in Dedoose using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses revealed two primary themes, Continuum of Relational Harm Reduction in Practice and Limited Harm Reduction Training. Nearly all HCWs (n = 19, 83%) described a patient interaction or expressed a sentiment that corresponded with the principles of relational harm reduction. Yet, over half of participants (n = 14, 61%) used language to describe PWH who use drugs that was stigmatizing or described an interaction that was antithetical to the principles of relational harm reduction. Five HCWs, all from Birmingham, were unaware of the term 'harm reduction.' Few HCWs had any harm reduction training, with most learning about harm reduction from webinars/conferences or on the job. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that relational harm reduction in HIV care settings is practiced along a continuum, and that a range of behaviors exist even within individual HCWs (e.g., used stigmatizing terms such as "addict" but also described patient interactions that reflected patients' autonomy). Given that harm reduction is typically described as a structural approach, a broader definition of harm reduction that is not dependent on policy-dependent resources is needed.

Elucidating Harm Reduction Principles in a Client-Centered Representative Payee Program.

Harm Reduction seeks to mitigate harms associated with health behaviors without the expectation that these behaviors be extinguished completely. Client-Centered Representative Payee (CCRP) is an intervention that modifies the US Social Security Administration's (SSA) Representative Payee policy by incorporating relational harm reduction. We used Human-Centered Design (HCD) methods to elucidate ways that harm reduction principles are present in and integral to CCRP and to create a blueprint for replication. Thirteen individuals familiar with CCRP brainstormed 88 statements, which were parsed, consolidated, and then independently assigned by a subgroup of participants to six principles of harm reduction. After refining the data, 29 statements aligning with harm reduction principles remained. Delineating harm reduction within CCRP, which can empower and establish trust with clients, may help other providers identify how to offer representative payee services that are respectful, compassionate, rooted in harm reduction, and ultimately improve client outcomes.

Role of Visit Modality in the HIV-Related No-Shows During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study.

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid expansion of telehealth as part of healthcare delivery. This study compared HIV-related no-shows by visit type (in-person; video; telephone) during the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020-September 2021) from the Data for Care Alabama project. Using all primary care provider visits, each visit's outcome was categorized as no-show or arrived. A logistic regression model using generalized estimating equations accounting for repeat measures in individuals and within sites calculated odds ratios (OR) and their accompanying 95% confidence interval (CI) for no-shows by visit modality. The multivariable models adjusted for sociodemographic factors. In-person versus telephone visits [OR (95% CI) 1.64 (1.48-1.82)] and in-person versus video visits [OR (95% CI) 1.53 (1.25-1.85)] had higher odds of being a no-show. In-person versus telephone and video no-shows were significantly higher. This may suggest success of telehealth visits as a method for HIV care delivery even beyond COVID-19.

Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Retention in HIV Primary Care: A Longitudinal Multisite Analysis.

We compared retention in care outcomes between a pre-COVID-19 (Apr19-Mar20) and an early-COVID-19 (Apr20-Mar21) period to determine whether the pandemic had a significant impact on these outcomes and assessed the role of patient sociodemographics in both periods in individuals enrolled in the Data for Care Alabama project (n = 6461). Using scheduled HIV primary care provider visits, we calculated a kept-visit measure and a missed-visit measure and compared them among the pre-COVID-19 and early-COVID-19 periods. We used logistic regression models to calculated odds ratios (OR) and accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CI). Overall, individuals had lowers odds of high visit constancy [OR (95% CI): 0.85 (0.79, 0.92)] and higher odds of no-shows [OR (95% CI): 1.27 (1.19, 1.35)] during the early-COVID-19 period. Compared to white patients, Black patients were more likely to miss an appointment and transgender people versus cisgender women had lower visit constancy in the early-COVID-19 period.

"If I have to drive 100 miles, I'll drive 100 miles to get it": a qualitative exploration of HIV care travel behavior.

ABSTRACTAlabama depends heavily on Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP) funding, yet patient enrollment at one large, RWHAP-funded, academically-affiliated HIV clinic in Alabama has steadily increased each year, with approximately 20% bypassing more proximal RWHAP clinics. To understand reasons why patients travel long distances and bypass closer clinics to receive care, we conducted eight focus groups over Zoom, each containing between 2-3 participants (n = 18) and applied thematic analysis to code the data. Primary themes included: (1) Reasons for Traveling Long Distances to Receive HIV Medical Care, (2) Experiences with HIV Medical Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and (3) Travel Challenges. Some participants were attracted by the clinic's one-stop-shop model, while others eschewed local clinics to avoid status disclosure. An overarching travel challenge was lack of transportation, yet most participants favored in-person appointments over telehealth despite driving long distances. Future research should explore patient attitudes towards telehealth in greater depth.

A community health worker and mobile health app intervention to improve adherence to HIV medication among persons with HIV: the CHAMPS study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Persons with HIV (PWH) can now achieve a near-normal life expectancy due to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Despite widespread availability of ART in the United States (US), many of the country's approximate 1.1 million PWH are not achieving viral suppression due to poor ART adherence. Viral suppression rates are particularly low in Alabama (AL, 62%) and New York City (NYC, 67%). There is mixed evidence on the efficacy of community health workers (CHW) and mHealth interventions for improving ART adherence and viral suppression in PWH thus, we sought to combine these interventions and test the efficacy for improving health outcomes in PWH. METHODS: The CHAMPS study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial among 300 PWH with suboptimal primary care appointment adherence (n = 150 in AL and 150 in NYC) over the course of 12 months. Participants are randomly assigned to CHAMPS (intervention) or a standard-of-care (control) arm. Participants in the intervention arm are given a CleverCap pill bottle that syncs to the WiseApp to track medication adherence, reminds users to take their medication at a set time, and enables communication with CHW. All participants complete baseline, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up visits where surveys are administered and, CD4 and HIV-1 viral load are obtained through blood draw. DISCUSSION: Maintaining ART adherence has significant implications in HIV management and transmission. mHealth technologies have been shown to optimize the provision of health services, produce positive changes in health behavior, and significantly improve health outcomes. CHW interventions also provide personal support to PWH. The combination of these strategies may provide the necessary intensity to increase ART adherence and clinic attendance among PWH at highest risk for low engagement. Delivering care remotely enables CHW to contact, assess, and support numerous participants throughout the day, reducing burden on CHW and potentially improving intervention durability for PWH. The adoption of the WiseApp coupled with community health worker sessions in the CHAMPS study has the potential to improve HIV health outcomes, and will add to the growing knowledge of mHealth and CHW efforts to improve PWH medication adherence and viral suppression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04562649) on 9/24/20.

Development and implementation of a distributed data network between an academic institution and state health departments to investigate variation in time to HIV viral suppression in the Deep South.

BACKGROUND: Achieving early and sustained viral suppression (VS) following diagnosis of HIV infection is critical to improving outcomes for persons with HIV (PWH). The Deep South of the United States (US) is a region that is disproportionately impacted by the domestic HIV epidemic. Time to VS, defined as time from diagnosis to initial VS, is substantially longer in the South than other regions of the US. We describe the development and implementation of a distributed data network between an academic institution and state health departments to investigate variation in time to VS in the Deep South. METHODS: Representatives of state health departments, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the academic partner met to establish core objectives and procedures at the beginning of the project. Importantly, this project used the CDC-developed Enhanced HIV/AIDS Reporting System (eHARS) through a distributed data network model that maintained the confidentiality and integrity of the data. Software programs to build datasets and calculate time to VS were written by the academic partner and shared with each public health partner. To develop spatial elements of the eHARS data, health departments geocoded residential addresses of each newly diagnosed individual in eHARS between 2012-2019, supported by the academic partner. Health departments conducted all analyses within their own systems. Aggregate results were combined across states using meta-analysis techniques. Additionally, we created a synthetic eHARS data set for code development and testing. RESULTS: The collaborative structure and distributed data network have allowed us to refine the study questions and analytic plans to conduct investigations into variation in time to VS for both research and public health practice. Additionally, a synthetic eHARS data set has been created and is publicly available for researchers and public health practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: These efforts have leveraged the practice expertise and surveillance data within state health departments and the analytic and methodologic expertise of the academic partner. This study could serve as an illustrative example of effective collaboration between academic institutions and public health agencies and provides resources to facilitate future use of the US HIV surveillance system for research and public health practice.

Patient and Provider Perspectives on HIV Stigma in Healthcare Settings in Underserved Areas of the US South: A Mixed Methods Study.

Stigma experienced in healthcare settings is a barrier to ending the HIV epidemic. Using a convergent parallel mixed methods approach, we collected qualitative data from 14 focus groups with People with HIV (PWH) and Healthcare workers (HCW) and quantitative survey data (N = 762 PWH and N = 192 HCW) from seven HIV healthcare clinics outside of major urban areas in the southeastern US. Four key themes emerged: (1) HIV-related stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings; (2) experiences of intersectional stigma; (3) disclosure concerns in healthcare settings; and (4) impact of stigma on HIV-related health behavior. Implications for future stigma interventions in healthcare settings include the importance of engaging PWH in the development of interventions, the need for interventions in settings that do not specialize in HIV care, and the importance of engaging all staff when addressing HIV-related stigma.

RESUMEN: El estigma experimentado en los entornos de atención médica es una barrera para poner fin a la epidemia del VIH. Utilizando un enfoque convergente de métodos mixtosparalelos, recopilamos datos cualitativos de 14 grupos focales con personas con VIH y trabajadores de la salud y datos de encuestas cuantitativas (N = 762 personas con VIH y N = 192 trabajadores de la salud) de siete clínicas de atención médica de VIH fuera de las principales áreas urbanas en el sureste de los Estados Unidos. Surgieron cuatro temas clave: (1) el estigma y la discriminación relacionados con el VIH en los entornos de atención médica; (2) experiencias de estigma interseccional; (3) preocupaciones de divulgación en entornos de atención médica; y (4) el impacto del estigma en el comportamiento de salud relacionado con el VIH. Las implicaciones para futuras intervenciones de estigma en entornos de atención médica incluyen la importancia de involucrar a las personas con VIH en el desarrollo de intervenciones, la necesidad de intervenciones en entornos que no se especializan en la atención del VIH y la importancia de involucrar a todo el personal al abordar el estigma relacionado con el VIH.

Addressing HIV and Homelessness During COVID-19: A Community-Based Demonstration Project.

People experiencing homelessness are at increased risk for HIV, and people with HIV (PWH) experiencing homelessness are more likely to experience suboptimal HIV health outcomes than PWH with stable housing. Within Alabama, a state prioritized in the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative, Jefferson County consistently has the highest number of new HIV diagnoses as well as a high percentage of the state's homeless population. To address the twin epidemics of both HIV and homelessness within the high-priority setting of Jefferson County, Alabama, this 1-year community-based project, Ending the HIV Epidemic: Addressing HIV Health and Homelessness (AH3), sought to increase HIV testing and linkage to care among this population by placing a full-time case manager trained in HIV testing and case management at a homeless shelter. Results demonstrated that HIV testing was highly acceptable: 733 individuals were offered a test, and only 2.7% (n = 20) declined. Nine previously diagnosed, out of care PWH and one newly diagnosed PWH were identified through AH3 testing efforts. Of these, five (50%) were linked to care at a local HIV clinic. The remaining five PWH left the shelter before they could be linked to care. Just 10 shelter guests expressed interest in taking PrEP (just 1.4% of guests who tested negative for HIV), and only one of these linked to PrEP care. Future health promotion programs are needed to address mental health and other ancillary needs among this population, as well as programs that provide access to PrEP and other HIV prevention services.

Mental health among transgender women living with HIV in Canada: findings from a national community-based research study.

Antiretroviral therapy adherence among transgender (trans) women living with HIV (WLWH) is negatively impacted by depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Yet, little is known about factors associated with depression or PTSD among trans WLWH. Using cross-sectional data from a national community-based study of 1422 WLWH (n = 53 trans women), we characterized the prevalence of depressive and PTSD symptoms among trans WLWH and examined associations between factors (e.g., Trans stigma) and depressive and PTSD symptoms. Nearly half of participants reported clinically significant PTSD (45.3%) and depressive symptoms (45.3%) [mean Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Civilian Checklist Version-C score 13.8 (SD = 5.8); mean Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression score 9.4 (SD = 8.0)]. Univariate linear regression analyses showed that <95% adherence, higher internalized HIV-related stigma, frequency of past-month hazardous alcohol use, and current injection drug use were significantly associated with both higher PTSD and depressive symptom scores, and higher resilience and social support with lower scores. A history of violence in adulthood was associated with higher depressive symptoms scores, whereas sexual relationship power and less difficulty meeting housing costs were associated with lower scores. Findings suggest a need for multi-level interventions to reduce barriers to mental wellbeing while fostering resilience and social support.

Health insurance and AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) increases retention in care among women living with HIV in the United States.

Our objective was to examine the association between healthcare payer type and missed HIV care visits among 1,366 US women living with HIV (WLWH) enrolled in the prospective Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS). We collected secondary patient-level data (October 1, 2017-September 30, 2018) from WLWH at nine WIHS sites. We used bivariate and multivariable binary logistic regression to examine the relationship between healthcare payer type (cross-classification of patients' ADAP and health insurance enrollment) and missed visits-based retention in care, defined as no-show appointments for which patients did not reschedule. Our sample included all WLWH who self-reported having received HIV care at least once during the two consecutive biannual WIHS visits a year prior to October 1, 2017-September 30, 2018. In the bivariate model, compared to uninsured WLWH without ADAP, WLWH with private insurance + ADAP were more likely to be retained in care, as were WLWH with Medicaid only and private insurance only. In the adjusted model, WLWH with private insurance only were more likely to be retained in care compared to uninsured WLWH without ADAP. Private health insurance and ADAP are associated with increased odds of retention in care among WLWH.

Interprofessional Collaboration Improves the Odds of Educating Patients About PrEP over Time.

BACKGROUND: Low levels of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake continue among the most vulnerable (e.g., men who have sex with men) for HIV exposure in the USA. Providers of social and public health services ("psychosocial providers") can help improve this situation by educating patients about PrEP before linking them to primary care providers (PCPs). OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of psychosocial providers offering PrEP education to patients vulnerable to HIV infection by determining the frequency with which psychosocial providers offer PrEP education to patients. DESIGN: Longitudinal overview of PrEP implementation in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Psychosocial providers of HIV prevention and adjunct treatment services, such as medication adherence counseling in 34 community settings. MAIN MEASURES: Longitudinal survey data collected in 2014-2016 (baseline) and 2015-2017 (1-year follow-up) from a 5-year longitudinal repeated measures study. Logistic regression modeling tested associations between baseline psychosocial provider-level and organization-level characteristics and frequency of PrEP education at baseline and 1-year follow-up. KEY RESULTS: Out of 245 participants, the number of psychosocial providers offering PrEP education at least once in the past 6 months increased significantly from baseline (n = 127, 51.8%) to 1-year follow-up (n = 161, 65.7%). Participants with higher odds of offering PrEP education at baseline and at one1-year follow-up were more likely to have reported high levels of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and were also more likely to have received formal HIV prevention training. CONCLUSIONS: Both IPC and HIV training are predictive of PrEP education, and this association was maintained over time. We recommend expanding educational outreach efforts to psychosocial providers to further improve PrEP education and also training in interprofessional collaboration. This is an important first step toward linking patients to PCPs who prescribe PrEP and may help improve PrEP uptake.

Is Insurance a Barrier to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis? Clarifying the Issue.

Clinical trials have demonstrated that preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) protects against HIV infection; yet, even with its approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2012, less than 10% of eligible users in the United States are currently taking PrEP.While there are multiple factors that influence PrEP uptake and pose barriers to PrEP implementation, here we focus on PrEP's cost in the United States, which, at the current list price of $2000 per month and with high levels of cost sharing, can leave insured users with more than $1000 in out-of-pocket costs every year. We discuss how patient deductibles, monthly premiums, copayments, and coinsurance vary widely and may increase the financial burden. Although drug payment-assistance programs have made PrEP more affordable to uninsured and underinsured users, lack of insurance is a barrier to PrEP accessibility. The FDA approved a generic version in 2017; however, that version has not been distributed to US consumers and may not be more affordable.As other countries begin implementing PrEP programs, the extent of PrEP's availability as a tool in the global fight against HIV remains to be seen.

Ryan White HIV/AIDS program recipients more likely than non-recipients to be retained in care using six different retention measures.

Retention in care (RiC) is crucial for maintaining HIV health. We examined the relationship between receipt of Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP) supplementary services and six different measures of RiC among 2,288 adults living with HIV who received HIV primary care services at a large, academically-affiliated HIV/AIDS clinic in the southeastern United States in 2016. The independent variable of interest was RWHAP supplementary services, which referred to whether patients received documented non-medical wraparound supplementary services. The outcome was six different measures of RiC: the Institute of Medicine (IOM) indicator, 6-month gap, 4-month constancy, missed visits dichotomous, missed visits count, and visit adherence. Separate multivariable models were fit for each RiC outcome. Receipt of supplementary RWHAP services was significantly (p < .05) and positively associated with RiC across all six measures (test statistic, 95% confidence interval): IOM (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.88, 2.16-3.83), 6-month gap (aOR = 1.76, 1.48-2.09), 4-month visit constancy (aOR = 2.03, 1.72-2.39), missed visits dichotomous (aOR = 1.40, 1.16-1.68), missed visit count (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) = 0.77, 0.67-0.88), and visit adherence (adjusted beta coefficient (adjß) = 0.05, 0.02-0.06). Our findings suggest that receipt of RWHAP services is important for retention in care, regardless of the measure employed.

Interprofessional collaboration improves linkages to primary care: a longitudinal analysis.

The first steps of the HIV care continuum include patients finding access to HIV testing and primary care. Psychosocial providers ("providers"), such as social workers, health educators, and outreach workers comprise a workforce tasked with linking patients to HIV testing and primary care. This study examines longitudinal associations between provider- and organization-level factors and linkage to HIV testing and primary care. The sample included 245 providers in 36 agencies in New York City. We used longitudinal data (baseline and 12- and 24-months follow-ups) and multilevel ordinal logistic regression to examine associations between factors distributed in three theoretical socioecological domains: individual (demographic and HIV training characteristics); relationship (interprofessional collaboration); and agency (size and capacity), and frequency of HIV testing and primary care linkages. Approximately 30% of providers linked 20 or more patients to HIV testing or HIV primary care in the previous six months. Providers' higher endorsement of interprofessional collaboration at 12 months, formal HIV training, younger age, and Latinx ethnicity had higher odds of making more linkages to HIV testing and HIV primary care at 24 months. Training providers in interprofessional collaboration principles and practice and basic HIV knowledge may improve the frequency of linkages to HIV care continuum services.

Are missed- and kept-visit measures capturing different aspects of retention in HIV primary care?

The literature recognizes six measures of retention in care, an integral component of the HIV Continuum of Care. Given prior research showing that different retention measures are differentially associated with HIV health outcomes (e.g., CD4 count and viral suppression), we hypothesized that different groups of people living with HIV (PLWH) would also have differential retention outcomes based on the retention measure applied. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of multisite patient-level medical record data (n = 10,053) from six academically-affiliated HIV clinics using six different measures of retention. Principal component analysis indicated two distinct retention constructs: kept-visit-measures and missed-visit measures. Although black (compared to white) PLWH had significantly poorer retention on the three missed-visit measures, race was not significantly associated with any of the three kept-visit measures. Males performed significantly worse than females on all kept-visit measures, but sex differences were not observed for any missed-visit retention measures. IDU risk transmission group and younger age were associated with poorer retention on both missed- and kept-visit retention measures. Missed- and kept-visit measures may capture different aspects of retention, as indicated in the observed differential associations among race, sex, age, and risk transmission group. Multiple measures are needed to effectively assess retention across patient subgroups.

Predicting Retention in HIV Primary Care: Is There a Missed Visits Continuum Based on Patient Characteristics?

Missing 3 + scheduled HIV primary care visits over a 1-year period increases mortality risk for people living with HIV (PLWH). We used electronic health data from PLWH (≥ 18 years old) at a southeastern US HIV clinic in 2016 to examine differences across patient-level characteristics and number of missed visits (1-2 vs. 0, 3 + vs. 0, 3 + vs. 1-2). In multivariable multinomial logistic regression analyses, poverty, lack of Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program support services, being uninsured, not having a high school degree, and being younger were significantly associated with 1-2 or 3 + missed visits (vs. 0 missed). Only poverty remained predictive of missing 3 + versus 1-2 visits (RR = 2.70, 95% CI 1.49-4.88). Patients at risk for missing 3 + visits present similar characteristics to patients who miss 1-2 visits. Interventions aimed at poverty reduction and increased access to education, health insurance, and support services may improve retention and, therefore, decrease mortality risk.

Expanding Knowledge About Implementation of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): A Methodological Review.

Methodological limitations in PrEP implementation studies may explain why PrEP implementation is lagging. This methodological review provides a description and critique of the methods used to identify barriers to PrEP implementation in the United States (2007-18). For each selected article, we provide: (1) research questions; (2) measures; (3) design; (4) sample (size and type); and (5) theoretical orientation. Among 79 articles which identified knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral and social/structural barriers to PrEP implementation, 51 (65%) were quantitative; 25 (32%) qualitative; and 3 (4%) were mixed-methods; overall, just one-half described a conceptual approach. About two-thirds of articles were conducted with patients and one-third with healthcare providers. Our review reveals a paucity of longitudinal, mixed-methods, and ethnographic/observational research and guiding theoretical frameworks; thus, the applicability of results are limited. We recommend that interventions aimed at PrEP implementation address barriers situated at multiple ecological domains, and thus improve PrEP access, uptake, and adherence.

Suboptimal Retention in Care Among Recently Released Prisoners: Implications for Social Workers in HIV Primary Care.

Certain populations of people living with HIV (PLWH) are at greater risk for falling out of care, including PLWH with a history of incarceration. This is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. In the current retrospective cohort study, we examined patient-level information for 340 PLWH who had transferred HIV care services from prison or from other community-based or private HIV primary care providers to a large urban HIV clinic in the southeastern United States. Results indicated that, compared to those transferring care from another community-based or private medical provider, PLWH transferring care from prison were significantly less likely to be retained in care than PLWH transferring care from other providers, even after controlling for other factors. HIV primary care social workers, who are trained to provide case management services, can help provide PLWH with a coordinated continuum of care that addresses the complex issues faced post-release.