Perinatal exposure to the immune-suppressant di-n-octyltin dichloride affects brain development in rats.

Disruption of the immune system during embryonic brain development by environmental chemicals was proposed as a possible cause of neurodevelopmental disorders. We previously found adverse effects of di-n-octyltin dichloride (DOTC) on maternal and developing immune systems of rats in an extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study according to the OECD 443 test guideline. We hypothesize that the DOTC-induced changes in the immune system can affect neurodevelopment. Therefore, we used in-vivo MRI and PET imaging and genomics, in addition to behavioral testing and neuropathology as proposed in OECD test guideline 443, to investigate the effect of DOTC on structural and functional brain development. Male rats were exposed to DOTC (0, 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg of diet) from 2 weeks prior to mating of the F0-generation until sacrifice of F1-animals. The brains of rats, exposed to DOTC showed a transiently enlarged volume of specific brain regions (MRI), altered specific gravity, and transient hyper-metabolism ([18F]FDG PET). The alterations in brain development concurred with hyper-responsiveness in auditory startle response and slight hyperactivity in young adult animals. Genomics identified altered transcription of key regulators involved in neurodevelopment and neural function (e.g. Nrgrn, Shank3, Igf1r, Cck, Apba2, Foxp2); and regulators involved in cell size, cell proliferation, and organ development, especially immune system development and functioning (e.g. LOC679869, Itga11, Arhgap5, Cd47, Dlg1, Gas6, Cml5, Mef2c). The results suggest the involvement of immunotoxicity in the impairment of the nervous system by DOTC and support the hypothesis of a close connection between the immune and nervous systems in brain development.

Neural progenitor cells as models for high-throughput screens of developmental neurotoxicity: state of the science.

In vitro, high-throughput methods have been widely recommended as an approach to screen chemicals for the potential to cause developmental neurotoxicity and prioritize them for additional testing. The choice of cellular models for such an approach will have important ramifications for the accuracy, predictivity and sensitivity of the screening assays. In recent years neuroprogenitor cells from rodents and humans have become more widely available and may offer useful models having advantages over primary neuronal cultures and/or transformed cell lines. To date, these models have been utilized in only a limited number of toxicity studies. This review summarizes the state of the science regarding stem and neuroprogenitor models that could be used for screening assays, provides researchers in this field with examples of how these cells have been utilized to date, and discusses the advantages, limitations and knowledge gaps regarding these models. Data are available from both rodent and human stem and neuroprogenitor cell models that indicate that these models will be a valid and useful tool for developmental neurotoxicity testing. Full potential of these models will only be achieved following advances in neurobiology that elucidate differentiation pathways more clearly, and following further evaluation of larger sets of developmentally neurotoxic and non-toxic chemicals to define the sensitivity and predictivity of assays based on stem or progenitor cell models.